Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2022

20.10.2021 | Original Research

Vaccine Hesitancy and Exposure to Misinformation: a Survey Analysis

verfasst von: Stephen R. Neely, PhD, Christina Eldredge, MD, PhD, Robin Ersing, PhD, Christa Remington, PhD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 1/2022

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Despite the widespread availability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the USA, vaccine hesitancy continues to represent a significant impediment to the attainment of herd immunity and the end of the COVID-19 pandemic. This survey analysis provides an update for clinical healthcare providers and public health officials regarding current trends in misinformation exposure, as well as common objections to COVID-19 vaccination.

Methods

We conducted a web-based survey of 600 adults in the state of Florida between June 3 and June 14, 2021. Access to the sample was purchased through an industry-leading market research provider (Prodege MR), and survey respondents were selected using a stratified, quota sampling approach to ensure representativeness. Balanced quotas were determined (by region of the state) for gender, age, race, education, and ethnicity. The survey responses were analyzed using basic descriptive statistics, as well as chi-square testing and a logit regression model.

Findings

High levels of misinformation exposure were observed among participants, with 73% reporting some exposure to misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines in the past 6 months. Exposure to misinformation was directly correlated with vaccine hesitancy. Among those who did not report any exposure to misinformation, 73.8% of respondents were vaccinated. That number fell to 62.9% with exposure to just one misinformation theme and 52.2% for six or more (χ2 = 11.349; φ = 0.138; p ≤ 0.05). Politicization was also found to be a major factor in vaccine hesitancy, with 73.4% of self-identified Democrats being vaccinated, compared to only 58.5% of Republicans and 56.5% of Independents (χ2 = 16.334; φ = 0.165; p ≤ 0.001). Both misinformation exposure and political affiliation were strong predictors of vaccination even after accounting for other demographic predictors.

Discussion

The survey results add to previous research on misinformation and vaccine hesitancy by quantifying exposure to specific misinformation themes and identifying its relationship to vaccine hesitancy. Overcoming these impediments to vaccination will require strategic and targeted messaging on the part of public health professionals, which may be aided by collaboration with political thought leaders. Understanding the volume and nature of misinformation themes the public is exposed to regarding COVID-19 vaccines may aid public health officials in targeting this vaccine messaging to more directly address reasons for vaccine hesitancy.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Daly M, Jones A, Robinson E. Public trust and willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 in the US from October 14, 2020 to March 29, 2021. JAMA 2021; 325(23): 2397-2399.CrossRef Daly M, Jones A, Robinson E. Public trust and willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 in the US from October 14, 2020 to March 29, 2021. JAMA 2021; 325(23): 2397-2399.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Rief W. Fear of adverse effects and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Recommendations of the treatment expectation expert group. JAMA Health Forum 2021; 2(4): e210804.CrossRef Rief W. Fear of adverse effects and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy: Recommendations of the treatment expectation expert group. JAMA Health Forum 2021; 2(4): e210804.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Troiano G, Nardi A. Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19. Public Health 194: 245-251.. Troiano G, Nardi A. Vaccine hesitancy in the era of COVID-19. Public Health 194: 245-251..
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Wood S, Schulman K. Beyond politics – promoting COVID-19 vaccination in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 2021; 384(7): e23(1)-e23(8).CrossRef Wood S, Schulman K. Beyond politics – promoting COVID-19 vaccination in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 2021; 384(7): e23(1)-e23(8).CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Charron J, Gautier A, Jestin C. Influence of information sources on vaccine hesitancy and practices. Medecine et maladies infectieuses 2020; 50: 727-733.CrossRef Charron J, Gautier A, Jestin C. Influence of information sources on vaccine hesitancy and practices. Medecine et maladies infectieuses 2020; 50: 727-733.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek SJ, de Graaf K, Larson HJ. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nature Human Behavior 2020; 5(3): 337-348.CrossRef Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek SJ, de Graaf K, Larson HJ. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nature Human Behavior 2020; 5(3): 337-348.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Neely S, Eldredge C, Sanders R. Health Information Seeking Behaviors on Social Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among American Social Networking Site Users: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(6):e29802.CrossRef Neely S, Eldredge C, Sanders R. Health Information Seeking Behaviors on Social Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic Among American Social Networking Site Users: Survey Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 2021;23(6):e29802.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Hotez P, Batista C, Ergonul O,… Bottazzi ME. Correcting COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. EClinical Medicine 2021; 33:100780.CrossRef Hotez P, Batista C, Ergonul O,… Bottazzi ME. Correcting COVID-19 vaccine misinformation. EClinical Medicine 2021; 33:100780.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Islam MS, Kamal AHM, Kabir A, … Seale H. COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence. PLoS One 2021; 16(5): 1-17. PMID: 33718854 Islam MS, Kamal AHM, Kabir A, … Seale H. COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence. PLoS One 2021; 16(5): 1-17. PMID: 33718854
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Geoghegan S, O’Callaghan KP, Offit PA. Vaccine safety: Myths and misinformation. Frontiers in Microbiology 2020; 11: 372.CrossRef Geoghegan S, O’Callaghan KP, Offit PA. Vaccine safety: Myths and misinformation. Frontiers in Microbiology 2020; 11: 372.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Davidson M. Vaccination as a cause of autism – myths and controversies. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 2017; 19(4): 403-407.CrossRef Davidson M. Vaccination as a cause of autism – myths and controversies. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 2017; 19(4): 403-407.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn KS, Ryu, S. Park S. Fragmentation in the Twitter Following of News Outlets: The Representation of South Korean Users “Ideological and Generational Cleavage”. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2015; 92(1): 56-76.CrossRef Hahn KS, Ryu, S. Park S. Fragmentation in the Twitter Following of News Outlets: The Representation of South Korean Users “Ideological and Generational Cleavage”. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 2015; 92(1): 56-76.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Iyengar S. and Hahn KS. “Red Media, Blue Media”: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. Journal of Communication 2009; 59(1): 19-39.CrossRef Iyengar S. and Hahn KS. “Red Media, Blue Media”: Evidence of Ideological Selectivity in Media Use. Journal of Communication 2009; 59(1): 19-39.CrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sunstein CR. 2017. Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ. Sunstein CR. 2017. Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Solnick RE, Chao G, Ross RD, Kraft-Todd GT, Kocher KE. Emergency physicians and personal narratives improve the perceived effectiveness of COVID-19 public health recommendations on social media: A randomized experiment. Acad Emerg Med 2021 Feb;28(2):172-183CrossRef Solnick RE, Chao G, Ross RD, Kraft-Todd GT, Kocher KE. Emergency physicians and personal narratives improve the perceived effectiveness of COVID-19 public health recommendations on social media: A randomized experiment. Acad Emerg Med 2021 Feb;28(2):172-183CrossRef
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Stjernswärd S, Ivert AK, Glasdam S. Perceptions and effects of COVID-19 related information in Denmark and Sweden - a web-based survey about COVID-19 and social media. Z Gesundh Wiss 2021 26:1-15. Stjernswärd S, Ivert AK, Glasdam S. Perceptions and effects of COVID-19 related information in Denmark and Sweden - a web-based survey about COVID-19 and social media. Z Gesundh Wiss 2021 26:1-15.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Kouzy R, Jaoude JA, Kraitem A, El Alam MB, Karam B, Adib E, et al. Coronavirus goes viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on Twitter. Cureus 2020;12(3):e7255.PubMedPubMedCentral Kouzy R, Jaoude JA, Kraitem A, El Alam MB, Karam B, Adib E, et al. Coronavirus goes viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on Twitter. Cureus 2020;12(3):e7255.PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation. World Health Organization. 2020 Sep 23. URL: https://tinyurl.com/k4zrca9e Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation. World Health Organization. 2020 Sep 23. URL: https://​tinyurl.​com/​k4zrca9e
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Vraga EK, Bode L. Addressing COVID-19 misinformation on social media preemptively and responsively. Emerg Infect Dis 2021;27(2):396-403.CrossRef Vraga EK, Bode L. Addressing COVID-19 misinformation on social media preemptively and responsively. Emerg Infect Dis 2021;27(2):396-403.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Vaccine Hesitancy and Exposure to Misinformation: a Survey Analysis
verfasst von
Stephen R. Neely, PhD
Christina Eldredge, MD, PhD
Robin Ersing, PhD
Christa Remington, PhD
Publikationsdatum
20.10.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 1/2022
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-07171-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2022

Journal of General Internal Medicine 1/2022 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Die „Zehn Gebote“ des Endokarditis-Managements

30.04.2024 Endokarditis Leitlinie kompakt

Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.