The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-65) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
KAP conceived the study, participated in the design, data analysis, and interpretation of the data, and drafted the manuscript. SJG conceived the study, participated in the design and coordination, and helped draft the manuscript. JT participated in the coordination, analysis, and interpretation of data and helped draft the manuscript. MWG participated in the design, data analysis, and interpretation of the data and critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Randomized controlled trials that test the effectiveness of mobile health-based weight loss programs are attractive to participants, funders, and researchers because of the low implementation cost, minimal participant burden, and the ability to recruit participants from longer distances. Collecting weight data from geographically dispersed participants is a challenge. Relying on participant self-report is one approach to data collection, but epidemiologic studies indicate that self-reported anthropometric data may be inaccurate.
We provided women enrolled in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of postpartum weight loss after gestational diabetes with a digital scale and training to collect and report weight via a web-based survey. To validate self-reported weights and heights, we visited 30 randomly selected women in their homes, with a reference scale and stadiometer, a mean of 34 days after the self-report. We ran linear regression models to identify characteristics that were associated with underreporting or overreporting of anthropometric measures.
Of the 30 women we visited, 11 women (37%) were assigned to the weight loss intervention group and 19 women (63%) were in the control group. Mean age was 38.5 years (SD 4.5). The overall mean difference between participants’ self-reported weights and the weights obtained at their home visit was 0.70 kg (+1.92). Women assigned to the intervention group underreported their weight in comparison with the control group by 1.29 kg (95% CI −2.52, −0.06). The overall difference in collected to self-reported height was −0.56 cm (±1.91). No characteristics were associated with underreporting or overreporting of height.
Our research suggests that by providing a digital scale and developing a weight collection protocol, researchers can train women to collect and record their own study weights with reasonable validity. To achieve the level of validity required for clinical trials, researchers should consider additional strategies to assure the validity of the data.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Obesity: Halting the Epidemic by Making Health Easier. At a Glance. 2011, Atlanta, GA: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, http://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/resources/publications/aag/pdf/2011/Obesity_AAG_WEB_508.pdf,
Bonn SE, Lagerros YT, Balter K: How valid are web-based self-reports of weight?. J Med Internet Res. 2013, 15 (4): http://www.jmir.org/2013/4/e52/,
Bowring AL, Peeters A, Freak-Poli R, Lim MS, Gouillou M, Hellard M: Measuring the accuracy of self-reported height and weight in a community-based sample of young people. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012, 12: 175-10.1186/1471-2288-12-175. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3561081/, CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Spencer EA, Appleby PN, Davey GK, Key TJ: Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC-Oxford participants. Publ Health Nutr. 5 (4): 561-565. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12186665,
Yoong SL, Carey ML, D’Este C, Sanson-Fisher RW: Agreement between self-reported and measured weight and height collected in general practice patients: a prospective study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013, 13: 38-10.1186/1471-2288-13-38. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3599990/, CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Brunner Huber LR: Validity of self-reported height and weight in women of reproductive age. Matern Child Health J. 2007, 11 (2): 137-144. 10.1007/s10995-006-0157-0. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17066316, CrossRefPubMed
Griebeler ML, Levis S, Beringer LM, Chacra W, Gómez-Marín O: Self-reported versus measured height and weight in Hispanic and non-Hispanic menopausal women. J Women's Health. 2011, 20 (4): 599-604. 10.1089/jwh.2009.1850. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3115416/, CrossRef
Lin CJ, DeRoo LA, Jacobs SR, Sandler DP: Accuracy and reliability of self-reported weight and height in the Sister Study. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 15 (6): 989-999. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3511620/, CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Cairns BJ, Liu B, Clennell S, Cooper R, Reeves G, Beral V, Kuh D: Lifetime body size and reproductive factors: comparison of data recorded prospectively with self reports in middle age. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011, 11 (7): http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3034712/pdf/1471-2288-11-7.pdf,
Eggleston EM, Griffey SJ, Paez KA, Mohamoud S, McCowen K, Rifas-Shiman S, Smith J, Thompson J, Oken E, Nahill C, Foley P, Bennett G, Gillman MW: The Avoiding Diabetes after Pregnancy Trial (ADAPT). 2014, Unpublished manuscript
Bennett GG, Warner ET, Glasgow RE, Askew S, Goldman J, Ritzwoller D, Emmons KM, Rosner BA, Colditz GA, for the Be Fit, Be Well Study Investigators: Obesity treatment for socioeconomically disadvantaged patients in primary care practice. Arch Intern Med. 2012, 172 (7): 565-574. 10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) Anthropometry Procedure Manual. 2007, Atlanta, GA: , http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_07_08/manual_an.pdf,
- Validation of self-reported weights and heights in the avoiding diabetes after pregnancy trial (ADAPT)
Kathryn A Paez
Susan J Griffey
Matthew W Gillman
- BioMed Central
Neu im Fachgebiet AINS
Meistgelesene Bücher aus dem Fachgebiet AINS
Mail Icon II