Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2020

03.06.2020 | Original Research

Variation in Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations by Primary Care Providers Surveyed in Wisconsin

verfasst von: Emily Nachtigal, MD, Noelle K. LoConte, MD, Sarah Kerch, MPH, Xiao Zhang, PhD, Amanda Parkes, MD

Erschienen in: Journal of General Internal Medicine | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Cancer screening is chiefly performed by primary care providers (PCPs) who rely on organizational screening guidelines. These guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations; however, they are often without unanimity leading to divergent screening recommendations.

Objective

Due to the high incidence of breast cancer, the availability of screening methods, and the presence of multiple incongruent guideline recommendations, we sought to understand breast cancer screening practices in Wisconsin to identify patterns that would allow us to improve evidence-based screening adherence.

Methods

A 46-question survey on breast cancer screening beliefs and practices for average-risk women was sent to healthcare providers in Wisconsin in 2018, who provided cancer screening services to women. Providers included physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and midwives.

Results

A total of 295 people responded to the survey, for a response rate of 28.6%. Most respondents were physicians (64.1%), followed by NPs (25.7%), PAs (5.3%), and midwives (1.5%). Of physicians, most practiced family medicine (65.3%), followed by internal medicine (25.3%) and gynecology (9.4%). The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) was reported as being “very influential” for 60.5% of providers, followed by the American Cancer Society at 46.8%. For patients 40–49 years old, 75.6% of providers performed clinical breast exams and 58.5% recommended self-breast exams; these numbers increased for women 50+ years old to 78.7% and 61.2%, respectively. Mammography was more likely to be recommended annually for women aged 40–49 rather than biennially by non-physician clinicians compared to physicians (p < .001).

Conclusions

PCPs in Wisconsin continue to overestimate the efficacy of clinical and self-breast exams as well as overuse these in clinical practice. Providers find multiple screening guidelines influential but favor the USPSTF; however, these guidelines are frequently not being followed. Further research needs to be done to investigate the lack of national guideline adherence by providers to improve compliance with evidence-based screening recommendations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2018. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2018. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2018.
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):244–55. Epub 2016/01/12. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-0969.CrossRefPubMed Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):244–55. Epub 2016/01/12. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​7326/​M15-0969.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mandelblatt JS, Stout NK, Schechter CB, van den Broek JJ, Miglioretti DL, Krapcho M, et al. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):215–25. Epub 2016/01/12. doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M15-1536. PubMed PMID: 26756606; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5079106. Mandelblatt JS, Stout NK, Schechter CB, van den Broek JJ, Miglioretti DL, Krapcho M, et al. Collaborative Modeling of the Benefits and Harms Associated With Different U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Strategies. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(4):215–25. Epub 2016/01/12. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​7326/​M15-1536. PubMed PMID: 26756606; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5079106.
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Hall IJ, Tangka FKL, Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, Graubard BI, Breen N. Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E97. Epub 2018/07/26. doi: https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd15.170465. PubMed PMID: 30048233; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6093265. Hall IJ, Tangka FKL, Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, Graubard BI, Breen N. Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018;15:E97. Epub 2018/07/26. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​5888/​pcd15.​170465. PubMed PMID: 30048233; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6093265.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2018: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(4):297–316. Epub 2018/05/30. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21446.CrossRefPubMed Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2018: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(4):297–316. Epub 2018/05/30. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​3322/​caac.​21446.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones N, Weeth-Feinstein L, Mroz S. Breast Cancer Task Force Provider Survey. Report of Findings: Dane County 2012. Jones N, Weeth-Feinstein L, Mroz S. Breast Cancer Task Force Provider Survey. Report of Findings: Dane County 2012.
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin K, Vogel RI, Nagler RH, Wyman JF, Raymond N, Teoh D, et al. Mammography Screening Practices in Average-Risk Women Aged 40-49 Years in Primary Care: A Comparison of Physician and Nonphysician Providers in Minnesota. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020;29(1):91–9. Epub 2019/07/16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7436.CrossRef Martin K, Vogel RI, Nagler RH, Wyman JF, Raymond N, Teoh D, et al. Mammography Screening Practices in Average-Risk Women Aged 40-49 Years in Primary Care: A Comparison of Physician and Nonphysician Providers in Minnesota. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020;29(1):91–9. Epub 2019/07/16. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1089/​jwh.​2018.​7436.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Mehta JM, MacLaughlin KL, Millstine DM, Faubion SS, Wallace MR, Shah AA, et al. Breast Cancer Screening: Women’s Attitudes and Beliefs in Light of Updated United States Preventive Services Task Force and American Cancer Society Guidelines. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018. Epub 2018/09/11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2017.6885. Mehta JM, MacLaughlin KL, Millstine DM, Faubion SS, Wallace MR, Shah AA, et al. Breast Cancer Screening: Women’s Attitudes and Beliefs in Light of Updated United States Preventive Services Task Force and American Cancer Society Guidelines. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018. Epub 2018/09/11. doi: https://​doi.​org/​10.​1089/​jwh.​2017.​6885.
22.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Haas JS, Barlow WE, Schapira MM, MacLean CD, Klabunde CN, Sprague BL, et al. Primary Care Providers’ Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(4):449–57. Epub 2017/01/09. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-016-3973-y. PubMed PMID: 28070772; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5377895. Haas JS, Barlow WE, Schapira MM, MacLean CD, Klabunde CN, Sprague BL, et al. Primary Care Providers’ Beliefs and Recommendations and Use of Screening Mammography by their Patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2017;32(4):449–57. Epub 2017/01/09. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s11606-016-3973-y. PubMed PMID: 28070772; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5377895.
Metadaten
Titel
Variation in Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations by Primary Care Providers Surveyed in Wisconsin
verfasst von
Emily Nachtigal, MD
Noelle K. LoConte, MD
Sarah Kerch, MPH
Xiao Zhang, PhD
Amanda Parkes, MD
Publikationsdatum
03.06.2020
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Journal of General Internal Medicine / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 0884-8734
Elektronische ISSN: 1525-1497
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05922-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

Journal of General Internal Medicine 9/2020 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.