nach oben

Maternal and Child Health Journal

Erschienen in:

02.07.2020

Variation in Postpartum Use of Most and Moderately Effective Contraceptive Methods Among Louisiana Women

verfasst von: Katharine Bruce, Jia Benno, Lyn Kieltyka

Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal | Ausgabe 9/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Women experiencing unintended and short-interval pregnancies are at increased risk for adverse outcomes. Nationally, researchers report disparities in women’s use of effective contraceptive methods based on demographic, cultural, financial and system-level factors. Despite 58% of Louisiana births being unplanned, researchers have not reported on these relationships in Louisiana.

Methods

We used Louisiana Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System data from 2015 to 2018. Among postpartum women who were not abstinent, pregnant, or trying to become pregnant, we estimated use of five categories of effective contraception versus no effective method. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression to investigate the association between effective contraceptive use and race/ethnicity, postpartum insurance and education.

Results

Among Louisiana postpartum women who were not abstinent, pregnant, or trying to become pregnant, 35.4% were not using effective contraception. Women with public insurance had greater odds of using long-acting reversible contraception than women with private insurance (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.55; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–2.16). Compared to women with a bachelor’s or higher, women with less than high school (AOR 2.09; CI 1.22–3.56), high school (AOR 3.11; CI 2.01–4.82) or some college education (AOR 2.48; CI 1.64–3.75) had greater odds of using permanent contraception. Black (AOR 3.83; CI 2.66–5.54) and Hispanic (AOR 3.85; CI 2.09–7.11) women, women with less than high school (AOR 6.79; CI 2.72–16.94), high school (AOR 7.26; CI 3.06–17.21) and some college (AOR 7.22; CI 3.14–16.60), and women with public insurance (AOR 1.91; CI 1.28–2.87) had greater odds of using injectable contraception.

Discussion

Results showed variation in effective contraceptive method use by race/ethnicity, insurance and education. These findings highlight the need for state-level research into the individual, provider, and policy-level factors that influence women’s contraceptive choices.

American Psychological Association. (2019). Education and socioeconomic status. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Byrd, J. E., Hyde, J. S., DeLamater, J. D., & Plant, A. E. (1998). Sexuality during pregnancy and the year postpartum. Journal of Family Practice, 47(4), 305–309.PubMed

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2019). PRAMS—for researchers, October 23. PRAMS. Retrieved March 30, 2020, from https://www.cdc.gov/prams/prams-data/researchers.htm.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Effectiveness of family planning methods. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved March 30, 2020, from https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/contraception/unintendedpregnancy/pdf/Contraceptive_methods_508.pdf.

Colman, G. J., & Joyce, T. (2003). Trends in smoking before, during, and after pregnancy in ten states. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 24(1), 29–35.CrossRef

Conde-Agudelo, A., & Belizán, J. M. (2000). Maternal morbidity and mortality associated with interpregnancy interval: Cross sectional study. BMJ, 321(7271), 1255–1259.CrossRef

Conde-Agudelo, A., Rosas-Bermúdez, A., & Kafury-Goeta, A. C. (2006). Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. JAMA, 295(15), 1809–1823.CrossRef

Crutzen, R., & Göritz, A. S. (2010). Social desirability and self-reported health risk behaviors in web-based research: Three longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health, 10, 720.CrossRef

Daniels, K., Daugherty, J., Jones, J., & Mosher, W. (2015). Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. Hyattsville, MD: National Health Statistics Reports.

Dehlendorf, C., Ruskin, R., Grumbach, K., Vittinghoff, E., Bibbins-Domingo, K., Schillinger, D., et al. (2010). Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: A randomized trial of the effects of patients’ race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 203(4), 319.e1–319.e8.CrossRef

Dozier, A. M., Nelson, A., Brownell, E. A., Howard, C. R., & Lawrence, R. A. (2014). Patterns of postpartum depot medroxyprogesterone administration among low-income mothers. Journal of Women's Health, 23(3), 224–230.CrossRef

Fiscella, K., Goodwin, M. A., & Kurt, S. (2002). Does patient educational level affect office visits to family physicians? Journal of the National Medical Association, 94(3), 157–165.PubMedPubMedCentral

Gomez, A. M., Arteaga, S., Ingraham, N., Arcara, J., & Villaseñor, E. (2018). It’s not planned, but is it okay? The acceptability of unplanned pregnancy among young people. Womens Health Issues, 28(5), 408–414.CrossRef

Hoff, G. L., Okah, F. A., Cai, J., & Liu, Y. (2012). Smoking during pregnancy rates trends in a high smoking prevalence state, 1990–2009. Europe PMC, 105(12), 636–644.

Largent, M. A. (2011). Breeding contempt: The history of coerced sterilization in the United States. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.CrossRef

Louisiana Department of Health. (2019a). Louisiana PRAMS data report 2018. New Orleans, LA: Louisiana Department of Health. Retrieved March 30, 2020, from https://partnersforfamilyhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/2018PRAMSDataReport_9.4.2019_Final.pdf.

Louisiana Department of Health. (2019b). Region 1 Parish, Louisiana 2015–2017 maternal and child health profile. New Orleans, LA: Louisiana Department of Health. Retrieved March 30, 2020, from https://ldh.la.gov/assets/oph/Center-PHCH/Center-PH/maternal/IndicatorProfiles/Region1Parishes_15-17/Region1_2015-2017.pdf.

Louisiana Bureau of Family Health. (n.d.). Louisiana pregnancy risk assessment monitoring system (Louisiana PRAMS). New Orleans, LA: Louisiana Department of Health. Retrieved March 30, 2020, from https://ldh.la.gov/index.cfm/page/1344.

Mauldon, J. G. (2003). Providing subsidies and incentives for norplant, sterilization and other contraception: Allowing economic theory to inform ethical analysis. The Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 31, 351–364.CrossRef

McKinney, D., House, M., Chen, A., Muglia, L., & Defranco, E. (2017). The influence of interpregnancy interval on infant mortality. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 216(3), 316.e1–316.e9.CrossRef

Okoroh, E. M., Kane, D. J., Gee, R. E., Kieltyka, L., Frederiksen, B. N., Baca, K. M., et al. (2018). Policy change is not enough: engaging provider champions on immediate postpartum contraception. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 218(6), 590.e1–590.e7.CrossRef

Orr, A. J. (2003). Black-White differences in achievement: The importance of wealth. Sociology of Education, 76(4), 281–304.CrossRef

Reilly, P. R. (1987). Involuntary sterilization in the United States: A surgical solution. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 62, 153–170.CrossRef

Robbins, C., Boulet, S. L., Morgan, I., D'Angelo, D., Zapata, L., Morrow, B., et al. (2018). Disparities in preconception health indicators—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2013–2015, and Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, 2013–2014. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 67(1), 1–16.CrossRef

Schmidt, M. D., Pekow, P., Freedson, P. S., Markenson, G., & Chasan-Taber, L. (2006). Physical activity patterns during pregnancy in a diverse population of women. Journal of Women's Health, 15(8), 909–918.CrossRef

Terplan, M., Hand, D., Hutchinson, M., Salisbury-Afshar, E., & Heil, S. (2015). Contraceptive use and method choice among women with opioid and other substance use disorders: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 80, 23–31.CrossRef

Trussell, J. (2011). Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception, 83, 397–404.CrossRef

Volscho, T. (2011). Racism and disparities in women’s use of the depo-provera injection in the contemporary USA. Critical Sociology, 35(5), 673–688.CrossRef

Wachino, V. (2016). State medicaid payment approaches to improve access to long-acting reversible contraception. Baltimore, MD: Department of Health and Human Services.

White, K., Potter, J. E., Hopkins, K., & Grossman, D. (2014). Variation in postpartum contraceptive method use: Results from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Contraception, 89(1), 57–62.CrossRef

Willems, S., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., Derese, A., & De Maeseneer, J. (2005). Socio-economic status of the patient and doctor–patient communication: Does it make a difference? Patient Education and Counseling, 56(2), 139–146.CrossRef

Titel: Variation in Postpartum Use of Most and Moderately Effective Contraceptive Methods Among Louisiana Women
verfasst von: Katharine Bruce
Jia Benno
Lyn Kieltyka
Publikationsdatum: 02.07.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Maternal and Child Health Journal / Ausgabe 9/2020
Print ISSN: 1092-7875
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6628
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-020-02971-x

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Discussion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 9/2020

A Cross-Section Study of Relationship Characteristics and Smoking Cessation During Pregnancy in a Sample of Romanian Pregnant Women

Determinants of Women’s Drug Use During Pregnancy: Perspectives from a Qualitative Study

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of an Interconception Intervention Provided by Public Health Nurses

The Effect of Continuous Versus Pregnancy-Only Medicaid Eligibility on Routine Postpartum Care in Wisconsin, 2011–2015

Mobilizing a Public Health Response: Supporting the Perinatal Needs of New Yorkers During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Antenatal Admissions Among Women with Opioid-Affected and Non-Opioid-Affected Deliveries