Introduction
Systemic infections are known to be associated with the exacerbation of central nervous system (CNS) pathologies such as multiple sclerosis (MS) [
1], stroke [
2], Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases [
3]-[
5]. Experimentally, there is also evidence to suggest that the combination of an infection model with, for example, murine prion disease [
6], or with the middle cerebral artery occlusion model of ischemia [
7], will exacerbate the CNS pathology. We have shown that bidirectional communication between the brain and the peripheral immune system revolves around the hepatic production of cytokines and chemokines. Moreover, that concomitant pathologies which are capable of eliciting an acute phase response (APR) have the potential to interfere with the immune response to acute brain injury [
8],[
9]. An increased hepatic APR to brain injury and disease would suggest that any factors that exacerbate the systemic inflammatory response are likely to adversely affect disease outcome [
1],[
10]-[
12].
We have shown that the administration of individual exogenous APRs, such as CCL-2, will exacerbate a brain injury model. However, it is clear that the situation is considerably more complicated. Pre- and post-conditioning studies suggest that stimulating the immune system can confer a degree of tolerance to CNS injury. In animal models of stroke, a number of different strategies, including brief periods of ischemia, afford a degree of neuroprotection against a subsequent insult [
13]-[
15]. Surprisingly, the systemic administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) has been reported to confer neuroprotection from a subsequent ischemic challenge [
16],[
17]. While the mechanism of protective pre-conditioning strategies might include the activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, or a form of tachyphylaxis, it is harder to explain how protective post-conditioning is achieved. We have shown that pre-conditioning and post-conditioning using LPS in models of both brain and spinal cord injury using intracranial IL-1Β and spinal cord compression, shows reduced CNS immune activation and improved outcome [
18]. In the latter we found it was possible to inhibit the recruitment of leukocytes into the spinal cord after injury using an intravenous injection of LPS before, and, importantly, after, the compression injury. The peripheral administration of IL-1 [
18] did not have the same effect, suggesting an important role for toll-like receptor (TLR) signalling pathways. However, hitherto, it remains unclear whether or not other TLR pathway activating pathogens, such as viruses, might have similar LPS-like pre-conditioning effects. Currently, approximately one third of MS relapses are preceded by a viral infection, and the rate of relapse appears to be two to three fold higher following viral infection [
19]-[
23]. Thus, it might be predicted that viral infections should cause exacerbation of CNS lesions. However, the same association is true for bacterial infections where respiratory and urinary tracts caused by bacteria also appear to trigger relapse in 20 to 30% of MS patients [
22],[
24]. Activation of innate immunity by adenoviruses has been reported to occur through both TLR-dependent and TLR-independent pathways, but adenoviruses seem to activate the innate immune system principally via TLR signalling pathways [
25]. Given how widespread adenovirus use has become, here we sought to investigate how pre-challenge with a dsDNA (double stranded DNA) virus might affect the pathogenesis of an acute sterile CNS inflammatory lesion.
Discussion
In contrast to our previous pre-conditioning studies using LPS [
18], pre-challenge with the
AdLuc adenovirus caused an extended CNS inflammatory response that was characterised by increased leukocyte recruitment lasting until 7 days post-injection, and this response was accompanied by an increase in adhesion molecule, cytokine, and chemokine expression within the ipsilateral hemisphere. These data suggest that the anti-inflammatory effect of the conditioning stimulus seen previously appears to be restricted to endotoxin-specific pathways and suggests that the systemic administration of
AdLuc is likely to have an adverse effect on the outcome of co-morbid CNS inflammatory disease.
The ability of pre-conditioning stimuli to abrogate the deleterious effects of a systemic inflammatory response on the outcome of CNS injury is well documented. However, there are obvious shortcomings in terms of implementing protective pre-conditioning strategies, and, not least, among these there is the absence of a complete mechanistic understanding. Here, we have shown that the outcome of pre-conditioning strategy is highly dependent on the nature of the pre-conditioning challenge. As in previously studies [
33], we found that
AdLuc administered iv is not detectable in the brain (Additional file
4: Figure S3). It was considered important to show that the injection of virus did not result in any infection of CNS cell populations, which might provoke a local immune response and confound results. The peripheral iv injection of a replication deficient adenovirus expressing the NF-κB super-repressor or luciferase does not result in the expression of transcript in the brain [
33] and here we show that the luciferase protein is only expressed in the liver. Others have shown that adenoviruses administered intravenously preferentially target the liver [
34],[
35]. We found that this targeting of the liver resulted in a marked elevation in the production of mRNA for the related macrophage chemokines CCL-3 and CCL-4 in the liver (Additional file
5: Figure S4), irrespective of the challenge to the CNS. It should be noted that at 24 hours the luciferase reporter gene expression would not be expected to generate an immunological response
per se and it is reasonable to assume that the chemokine response can be attributed to the vector. The host response to infection with adenoviral vectors (
AdLuc) is known to result in the rapid activation of innate immunity, which stimulates inflammatory antiviral host defenses [
36]. CCL-3 and CCL-4 are known to be involved in responses to certain viral infections [
37], but, in addition to macrophage activation, they can drive cell proliferation and may encourage viral propagation such as in Epstein-Barr B-cell infection [
38].
In the brain, the microinjection of IL-1Β resulted in the recruitment of neutrophils and ED-1-positive macrophages to the ipsilateral hemisphere. Based on observations from our earlier LPS studies [
18], this result was initially surprising. However, systemic infection is known to exacerbate inflammatory responses in the brain in many contexts [
39],[
40] and the result with endotoxin was the more surprising. This provides a potentially useful tool to discover the mechanisms that lead to the viral exacerbation of CNS lesions, such as those occurring in MS, where epidemiological evidence has long suggested a role for virus infection in the initiation and/or exacerbation of the disease [
41],[
42]. Theiler's murine encephalomyelitis virus (TMEV)-induced demyelinating disease has been used as a model for MS. TMEV-infected mice develop a demyelinating disease, which, eventually, is associated with development of myelin-specific T-cell responses. Viruses have been suggested to initiate autoimmune disease through bystander activation of immune cells or through bystander damage to tissue during infection. In this model, administration of antiserum to IFN-beta or poly(I:C), a TLR3 agonist mimicking a dsRNA viral infection, leads to more severe demyelinating disease by promoting `virus-like’ activity, specifically the recruitment and activation of `bystander’ immune cells within the tissue such as microglia and astrocytes [
43]. It is interesting to note that this TLR3 pathway, activated by poly(I:C), also exacerbates CNS inflammation in a similar manner to our
AdLuc TLR9 (and likely others) agonist. Others have also used poly(I:C) to investigate how systemic infection might contribute to the later development of Alzheimer disease and have shown the development of Alzheimer’s-like pathology following poly(I:C) exposure prenatally [
44].
The observation that
AdLuc pre-challenge increased the numbers of neutrophils present in the IL-1Β-challenged brain for as long as 3 days following surgery is striking. Whilst limited infiltration of neutrophils may have a protective role following traumatic injury, elevated neutrophil numbers are also known to have damaging implications upon ischemic lesions in the brain, and furthermore, recent studies have implied a causative role for neutrophils in cortical injury [
45]. Whilst the current study does not examine ischemic lesions, the implications for increased neutrophil recruitment over time are similar. With this in mind, we were interested to discover if there were any ongoing mechanisms in the brain, which could account for the increased cellular recruitment observed following
AdLuc challenge. Elevated expression of ICAM-1 was found in animals microinjected with IL-1Β, and further increased by the presence of
AdLuc. Constitutive expression of ICAM-1 in the brain is known to be low, and the administration of
AdLuc in conjunction with the microinjection of vehicle did not up-regulate expression in the brain. This suggests that the virus does not increase adhesion molecule expression
per se, but it appears that the effects of virus and the microinjection of IL-1Β act synergistically to enhance endothelial signals for recruitment of leukocytes. We have previously shown that blocking adhesion molecule expression significantly reduces neutrophil infiltration into the brain after an IL-1Β injection [
46] and suggest a similar mechanism may be tested in this system in order to determine the degree to which these molecules influence neutrophil trafficking across the endothelium.
Finally, the elevated ED-1-positive macrophage numbers in the brain following the microinjection of IL-1Β was also an unusual observation. These effects were still evident 7 days following the IL-1Β microinjection and the numbers were larger than we would ordinarily have expected considering that we understand leukocyte recruitment to be restricted primarily to neutrophils following the microinjection of IL-1Β [
47]. When the profile of chemokine expression in the brain was examined following IL-1Β challenge, it was evident that the presence of
AdLuc caused an up-regulation in the local production of not just CXCL-1, which we would expect to account for the elevated neutrophil numbers. Indeed, elevations in CCL-2 are known to mobilise monocytes to the injured CNS [
31], but we also observed elevations in the production of CCL-3, CCL-4 and CXCL-10. CCL-3 and CCL-4 are known to be produced by glial cells within the CNS and have been shown to mobilise leukocytes to sites of injury within the CNS [
48]. It seems feasible that the elevation in beta-chemokine production is responsible for the increased numbers of ED-1-positive cells observed. However, while astrocytes do produce chemokine it is important to note that macrophages/microglia also produce beta-chemokine and the increased levels of expression may reflect a downstream consequence of the increased number of ED-1 cells present following the viral challenge. For example, IL-1Β induces CXCL-10 in astrocytes in culture [
49], but it is also expressed by macrophages and has been shown to exacerbate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis [
50]. CXCL-10 is reported to have a diverse set of effects in the CNS; it seems to be important for the clearance of virus within the CNS [
51] but also induces significant free radical production and apoptosis [
52].
In summary, we have shown that a systemic viral challenge causes increased recruitment of leukocytes to the site of IL-1Β microinjection in the brain, and also to the liver. In comparison to our previous work with LPS [
18], these data suggest that viral pre-challenge has deleterious effects on the outcome of CNS injury. When considered in context, viral infection should be considered a significant risk factor for worsened outcome following injuries to the CNS, and may also contribute to multi-organ dysfunction.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.