Background
The ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene (
APOE-ε4) is the strongest genetic factor for late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Compared with those individuals with an
APOE ε3/ε3 genotype, white individuals with one copy of the ε4 allele show an increased lifetime risk of developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) (ε2/ε4, OR 2.6; ε3/ε4, OR 3.2). The risk is much higher for carriers of two copies (ε4/ε4, OR 14.9) [
1]. The main roles of the ApoE protein, encoded by the
APOE gene, include lipid transport and clearance of amyloid deposition. However, the ε4 isoform of the ApoE protein shows an impaired capacity to perform these functions compared with the other isoforms [
2]. Such impaired function may underlie the observed effects of
APOE-ε4 on the brain throughout the lifespan. In particular,
APOE-ε4 has been related to earlier and increased amyloid-β deposition, one of the neuropathological hallmarks of AD [
3,
4]. However, the effects on brain morphology have been reported to be subtler [
5]. Most of the studies so far have stratified individuals in only two levels of risk (
APOE-ε4 carriers vs noncarriers). However,
APOE-ε4 homozygotes, who completely lack expression of the most efficient isoform of the ApoE protein, are an interesting population to study to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms through which
APOE genotype modulates the risk of AD. Given the essential implication of ApoE in the transport of cholesterol, the main component of the myelin sheath, it is conceivable that alterations in white matter (WM) microstructure may be one of these mechanisms.
The last decade has seen increasing interest in the study of brain microstructure measured using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI). Water molecules are locally influenced by existing axon fibers [
6], and their movements properties can be described by a set of measures generally including fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AxD), and radial diffusivity (RD). Variations in these parameters can capture microstructural changes such as axonal loss, inflammation, Wallerian degeneration [
7], demyelination, or fiber damage [
8], and their alteration is likely to hinder transfer of information across networks, eventually leading to cognitive impairment [
9‐
13].
There is a growing body of evidence supporting the association between
APOE-ε4 status and WM integrity in cognitively normal subjects as measured using diffusion (or relaxation) parameters. The nature of this association, however, is still under debate. WM alterations have been detected in individuals at genetic risk of AD [
14‐
18]. Persson et al. and Honea et al. [
15,
17] reported decreased anisotropy in ε4 carriers compared with noncarriers. Heise et al. [
14] compared two groups comprising young (aged 20–35 years) and old (aged 50–78 years) participants (
N = 73) and found a general reduction of FA and a general increase in MD in ε4 carriers. Westlye et al. [
18] observed widespread increases in MD and RD in carriers of the ε4/ε3 alleles compared with ε3/ε3 in 203 volunteers aged 21.1–69.9 years. Recently, Cavedo et al. [
19] studied 74 participants (mean age 67.85 years) and found a significant reduction of FA and increase in RD in ε4 carriers vs noncarriers.
Some researchers have described a genotypic effect that remains stable throughout life, with ε4 carriers showing local increased diffusivity and lower FA in an age-independent manner [
14‐
18]. In contrast, other studies have suggested that
APOE instead impacts the trajectory of age-related changes [
12,
20], with ε4 carriers showing accelerated diffusion changes across the older adult age range. Assessing interaction between age and genotype is challenging without a longitudinal design, as reflected by the inconsistency in the findings from these cross-sectional datasets [
21]. Regarding these previous studies, it is worth noting the large existing variability in the age range of the participants, the ROIs, the sample size, the number of ε4 carriers, or the employed methodology.
WM alterations have also been found in patients with AD [
22] and patients with mild cognitive impairment [
23,
24]. Interestingly, it has been proposed that APOE may play a role in modulating the focality of these alterations [
25]. Such microstructural effects on WM add to the well-known effect of APOE on gray matter (GM) morphology across the AD continuum [
26,
27], driving the neuroanatomical expression of the most common variant AD phenotypes [
28], or even in cognitively healthy middle-aged individuals [
29]. However, only a few studies have described WM differences in the preclinical state of the disease (i.e., cognitively healthy individuals with altered amyloid biomarkers) by addressing the hypothesis that the preclinical state of AD is distinct from normal aging [
30‐
32]. Their final conclusions unanimously identified dMRI metrics as promising markers of early degeneration, potentially predating changes at a macrostructural level. A summary of the studies examining the APOE polymorphisms ε2/ε3/ε4 and WM integrity using dMRI are listed in Table
1 [
33].
Table 1
Studies examining the apolipoprotein E polymorphisms ε2/ε3/ε4 and white matter integrity using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
Nierenberg et al. (2005) [ 16] | ROI | FA, AxD, RD | 29 | 67.1 (6.5) | 14 ε4 carriers 15 ε4 noncarriers | 2 | ε4 carriers: ↓ FA and ↑ RD in L parahippocampal gyrus (p = 0.015) |
Persson et al. (2006) [ 17] | ROI, SPM-VBM | FA | 60 | 66.3 (7.7) | Two analyses: 10 ε4/ε4–10 ε3/ε4–10 ε3/ε3 30 ε4 carriers, 30 ε3/ε3 | 10 | ↓ FA in ε4 carriers: Posterior corpus callosum and fronto-occipital fasciculus No evidence of dose-dependent effect, but not enough data |
| TBSS | FA | 53 | 73.4 (6.3) > 60 | 39 ε3/ε3 12 ε3/ε4 2 ε4/ε4 | 2 | ↓ FA in ε4 carriers: L parahippocampal gyrus (p < 0.001 uncorrected) |
| TBSS | FA | 65 | 62.9 (1.3) | 42 ε4 carriers 23 ε4 noncarriers | n/a | ↓ FA in LOAD risk group in many regions (e.g., bilateral inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, cingulum bundle, splenium) (p < 0.01) |
| TBSS | MD, FA, RD, AxD | 57 | 58.9 (5.8) | 37 ε4 carriers with FH 20 ε4 noncarriers without FH | n/a | Significant for LOAD risk group only: ↓ FA ↑ RD: inferior longitudinal fasciculus, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus/uncinate fasciculus (p < 0.001) ↓ FA: Fornix, ↑ MD: Genu and R inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus/inferior longitudinal fasciculus, ↓ AD: Cingulum |
Bendlin et al. (2010) [ 30] | SPM-VBM | FA, MD | 136 | 69.2 (10.2) | 56 ε4 carriers 80 ε4 noncarriers | n/a | No significant interactions between genotype and age were observed ε4 allele: not significant Family history LOAD + ε4: ↓ FA in multiple brain regions |
| TBSS | MD, FA, RD, AxD | 73 | (1) Young 28.6 (4.2) (2) Older: 64.9 (7.19) | 17 ε4 carriers, 17 ε4 noncarriers (younger) 16 ε4 carriers, 21 ε4 noncarriers (older) | n/a | ε4 carriers: ↑ MD (older) and ↓ FA (younger) in many regions (e.g., cingulum, corpus callosum) (p < 0.05) |
| ROI | FA, ADC | 126 | CN (52–92) | 88 ε4 noncarriers 32 ε4 heterozygotes 6 ε4/ε4 | 6 | ε4 carriers: ↑ ADC with ↑ age in all regions (p < 0.0001) ↓ FA with ↑ age: Frontal, and temporal WM, genu (p < 0.05) |
Westlye et al. (2012) [ 18] | TBSS | MD, FA, RD, AxD | 203 | 47.6 (14.9) 21.1–69.9 | 30 ε2/ε3 113 ε3/ε3 60 ε3/ε4 | 0 | ε4 carriers: widespread increases in MD and RD no interaction between age and genotype no significant differences between ε2/ε3 and ε3/ε4 |
Adluru et al. (2014) [ 20] | ROI | MD, FA, RD, AxD | 343 | 61.03 (6.72) 47–76 | 14 ε4/ε4 109 ε4 heterozygotes 220 ε4 noncarriers | 14 | Subjects with FH: higher AxD in ε4 carriers, lower AxD in ε4 non-carriers, both in the uncinate fasciculus ε4 carriers: higher MD in the SLF (older) and in the portion of the cingulum bundle running adjacent to the cingulate cortex, also higher RD in the genu |
Kljajevic et al. (2014) [ 62] | ROI | FA, MD | 56 | 67.7 (5.9) | 28 ε4 carriers, 28 ε4 noncarriers | n/a | ε4 carriers: higher MD in healthy controls but not in AD (p < 0.001, uncorrected) |
| ROI | FA | 645 | 72.70 (0.74) | 2 ε2/ε2 77 ε2/ε3 14 ε2/ε4 376 ε3/ε3 160 ε3/ε4 13 ε4/ε4 | 13 | ε4 carriers: lower FA in right ventral cingulum and left inferior longitudinal fasciculus |
Laukka et al. (2015) [ 64] | TBSS | FA, MD | 89 | 81.41 (3.01) | 23 ε4 carriers, 66 ε4 noncarriers | n/a | ε4 carriers: lower FA in forceps major and higher MD in corticospinal tract |
Cavedo et al. (2017) [ 19] | TBSS | MD, FA, RD, AxD | 74 | 68.95 (6.85) | 31 ε4 carriers, 43 ε4 noncarriers | n/a | ε4 carriers: lower FA and higher RD in the cingulum, corpus callosum, inferior fronto-occipital and in the inferior longitudinal fasciculi, also higher MD in the genu, right internal capsule, superior longitudinal fasciculus and corona radiata. |
The purpose of the present study was to add to the existing literature by evaluating genotype-related differences in WM integrity as captured by diffusion parameters in a cohort of cognitively normal middle-aged individuals at three levels of AD risk (noncarriers, ε4 heterozygotes, and ε4 homozygotes). We hypothesized that subjects at higher risk of developing AD would show more pronounced age-related changes and therefore more negatively affected microstructure. Such changes would manifest mainly as higher diffusivity in APOE-ε4 carriers, especially among homozygotes. FA is not expected to be significantly altered in this population comprising middle-aged cognitively healthy participants. We hypothesized that these changes may appear in regions involved in AD pathogenesis, in particular along bilateral long associative tracts. The present cohort also allowed us to recruit an unprecedented number of individuals homozygous for the ε4 risk allele for a single-site cohort to better understand this allele’s neurobiological impact on brain microstructure. We analyzed DW parametric maps—namely FA, MD, RD, and AxD—using a skeleton-based approach focused on WM tracts. We assessed effects of APOE-ε4 load, status, age, and sex. Age by genotype interaction was also tested. Given some previous reports in the literature showing associations between cognitive functions and the integrity of the WM, the effect of educational attainment was also assessed on every parameter.
Discussion
The present study points to the existence of WM microstructural changes in cognitively normal adults carrying the ε4 allele. This effect was significant when we tested both the recessive and additive models. These results suggest that the ε4 allele adds extra burden to known age-related changes, especially for those individuals carrying two copies of the risk allele. In the brain, the
APOE protein mediates neuronal delivery of cholesterol, which is an essential component for axonal growth, synaptic formation, and remodeling [
2]. Because the ApoE-ε4 isoform of the protein is less efficient than ApoE-ε3 and ApoE-ε2 in transporting brain cholesterol [
41], our findings could be interpreted as the result of a dysregulation in cholesterol homeostasis, which might contribute to the increased risk of AD observed in the ε4-homozygous group.
In support of this interpretation, it is worth noting that findings in RD and AxD show distinct patterns. Differences in RD but not in AxD are quite typically reported in AD risk studies [
14,
16,
18,
42]. Considering that changes in AxD (in addition to RD increases and FA decreases) are observed in symptomatic AD, this would strengthen the idea that both correspond to distinct stages of WM degeneration. The smaller effects in AxD than in RD in healthy at-risk participants would suggest a disruption of the myelin sheath rather than pure axonal damage [
42,
43]. A plausible explanation of this finding is that
APOE-ε4 homozygotes, who lack expression of the more functional isoforms of the protein, have thinner myelin sheaths that what would correspond to their age. A thinner myelin sheath would decrease the electrical isolation of the axons, thus negatively influencing transmission speed [
44] and demanding a higher metabolic consumption to sustain neurotransmission [
45]. Such an effect would be in addition to the metabolic deficits associated to
APOE-ε4 even in cognitively healthy populations [
46,
47]. Therefore, increased metabolic demand coupled with an impaired neuroenergetic capability might explain the observed WM microstructural changes accelerating the effects of aging of WM microstructure in the
APOE-ε4 homozygous group and would render this group more vulnerable to brain insults associated with AD. For instance, impaired cerebral metabolism could compromise the ability of microglia to remove amyloid deposition and might underlie the observed earlier and faster rate of amyloid accumulation in
APOE-ε4 homozygotes [
3].
The effects of
APOE are essentially observed in regions known to be targets of AD pathology. Among them, SLF fibers showed the largest effect and are indeed known to be affected in AD [
20,
24,
48‐
50] and in mild cognitive impairment [
2,
22]. Effects appear stronger in posterior regions including the temporal and parietal lobes, whereas a number of studies demonstrated widespread effects, including frontal regions [
12,
51]. Ryan et al. interpreted such widespread effects as a combination between ε4-related effects, which affect more posterior regions, and normal aging-related effects, which involve more frontal regions. On one hand, the younger age of the participants in the present study may partially explain the predominance of posterior changes because genotypic effects would predominate over age-related changes. On the other hand, the fact that posterior WM corresponds mainly to late-myelinating fiber pathways is in line with the retrogenesis model proposed by some authors [
50,
52]. This model proposes that brain regions that are myelinated later in development tend to be more vulnerable to age-related damage. These regions include cortical association areas that recapitulate the spatial spread of AD lesions in reverse [
53] and which support the cognitive functions that decline earlier in AD [
54].
The differences partition into recessive and additive components. Recessive contrasts show larger clusters, but all significant voxels from recessive contrast maps include the ones from additive maps. Hence, the strongest differences that emerged in our dataset discriminate the homozygotes against other subjects. This stands out from a number of reported results about carriers differing from noncarriers [
14,
18,
19], which would consequently suggest the existence of a rather dominant effect (with one or two copies of the risk allele). This difference may find explanation in the specific age ranges and distributions of the studied samples, most of which are older than in the present study. In such way, younger ε4 homozygotes in our study might be showing a behavior similar to older heterozygotes in other studies. In this regard, even though the genotypic effect observed in the present study does not interact with age, this same effect may become apparent in heterozygotes of older age. It is also worth noting that these studies opt for pooling ε4 carriers together, generally by lack of sufficient ε4 homozygotes, to be able to keep them as a distinct group. In the present study, the high number of homozygotes allowed us to study them as an individual group and to differentiate additive from recessive effects.
No significant differences in FA emerged between genotypic groups in our dataset. In contrast, researchers in a number of studies [
12,
14‐
17,
19] have reported decreased anisotropy in cognitively healthy ε4 carriers. A possible explanation for this may again derive from the age ranges represented in these studies. Participants in our dataset, especially those at risk of developing AD, are at an early stage where FA is still not sensitive enough to measure WM alteration. Moreover, Acosta-Cabronero et al. [
55] pointed out a possible scenario where absolute diffusivities increase with FA remaining stable because these parameters are mathematically related. Our results may be a plausible example of this scenario, and we hypothesize that when moving toward later stages, differences in FA, only emerging as stable trends in our data, will become significant. Interestingly, we observed possible evidence of this difference in FA when performing the same analysis on a smaller subsample using age-matched genotype groups, where homozygotes ε4 carriers revealed decreased anisotropy compared with other subjects.
Some groups of subjects revealed significant demographic differences in our dataset. In particular, homozygotes appeared to be significantly younger than others. Given the usual known direction of age-related changes on diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters, the young age of these participants may give them an advantage by adding a “protective effect” (though assuming the absence of any pleiotropic expression of
APOE) and may therefore hinder findings related to genotypic influence. Despite such heterogeneity in the dataset, these subjects still showed significant changes as compared with others. Previous researchers also investigated a potential protective effect attributed to the ε2 allele. To account for the potential influence of these two factors (age difference and ε2 allele), the same analytical protocol was run on a subsample consisting of three age-matched groups excluding ε2 carriers. As described in Additional file
1: Appendix A, results from this supplementary analysis were rigorously in line with those obtained with the original dataset. This confirms the earliness of the burden associated with
APOE-ε4 homozygotes while discarding any influence from the ε2 allele. The number of ε2 carriers in our dataset remains far from being sufficient to allow us to assess the specific advantage attributed to this allele. Other modifiable risk factors may contribute to the changes measured in the WM microstructure. In particular, in this work, we evaluated the effect of educational attainment and found no significant voxel. Because pathological hyperintensities may also affect WM under the influence of cardiovascular and genotypic risk factors, associations between diffusion parameters and Fazekas scores or volumes of WM lesions were assessed and no association emerged. The explanation for this lack of influence may lie in the low burden of WM hyperintensities found in our sample.
Although having been studied in the WM for the most part, diffusion changes also take place in the GM and have been described in recent papers [
56,
57]. Although there is some evidence that microstructural changes come early in the pathological cascade, whether the earliest changes occur in cortical regions or in WM fiber fascicles is still under debate. This present study describes differences observed using a tract-based analysis technique. Although some methodological warnings have been raised in relation to using this technique, as described previously [
58,
59], and although the technique may not be used for areas other than WM, it generally provides increased sensitivity in the detection of changes along the most stable fiber tracks and has been widely used as such in many previous works reported in the literature. Nevertheless, we performed a complementary whole-brain voxel-based (SPM) analysis using the same statistical models, contrasts, and dataset (–Additional file
1: Appendix B). The resulting significant clusters were exclusively located in the WM without using any prior anatomical assumptions in the detection. This would support the hypothesis that microstructural changes occur exclusively in the WM. However, because previous studies have shown a nonmonotonous behavior of cortical water diffusivity with progressive preclinical AD stages [
56], we cannot rule out the presence of significant effects on GM. Unfortunately, the lack of core AD biomarkers in this study prevented us from testing this hypothesis. Besides, it could be argued that voxel-based analyses may suffer from the inclusion of signal from cerebrospinal fluid in GM voxels, which would reduce sensitivity within cortical regions. To overcome this, one could then consider opting for different methods, such as using surface-based schemes [
56], which would avoid smoothing using a 3D kernel.
Samples of “healthy” participants are of high interest because they allow study of structural markers at an early stage before deviating from the course of normal aging. However, such studies are often limited by the lack of additional markers that would discriminate preclinical subjects at the earliest stages of AD, such as cerebrospinal fluid markers and brain amyloid burden. Thus, such studies, including this present one, face the risk of having individuals with preclinical AD overrepresented within their
APOE-ε4 groups. To mitigate this, we will have access to follow-up information that will allow us to better stratify our sample with respect to preclinical AD research criteria [
60] and to minimize the risk of including persons with subtle cognitive decline in the healthy group. In particular, a fraction of this cohort will undergo complementary examination including positron emission tomographic imaging and lumbar puncture. (
See [
34] for a detailed description of the various arms of the study.) To date, very few studies have included both structural metrics (e.g., DTI and indices of AD pathology such as cerebrospinal fluid and brain amyloid markers at the preclinical stage). The screening of these individuals will then allow the link between microstructure and cognition to be investigated and compared between healthy and preclinical subjects. A further reason for including study subjects prior to development of disease would be to assess how baseline diffusivity parameters may predict the time before clinical onset, considering especially that
APOE-ε4 is known to have a lower age at onset, in a gene-dose-dependent manner.
The major strength of our study lies in having recruited a relatively young, cognitively healthy sample, with a very large number of
APOE-ε4 homozygotes. This allowed us to study individuals at three levels of risk, thus building on most published studies that compared carriers vs noncarriers. Our findings are robust, as confirmed by several methodological approaches, and are not driven by cerebrovascular disease, as confirmed by ruling out any impact of WMH. However, there are some limitations to our work. The most notable one is that we do not know the amyloid status of the studied participants. Cognitively healthy
APOE-ε4 homozygotes have been reported to show a significantly higher prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology. At the mean age of our homozygote group (55 years), approximately 50% of these individuals display abnormal levels of amyloid biomarkers, as compared with only 10% of noncarriers and about 20% of carriers of a single ε4 allele [
61]. However, the lack of interaction with age in our findings, in agreement with some previous reports [
14,
18], is supportive of our findings not being driven by amyloid status. The fact that no inflection point in the association between RD was found around this age supports the hypothesis that the thinning of the myelin sheath is a genetically determined trait in these subjects rather than a downstream effect of amyloid deposition. dMRI studies in
APOE-ε4 homozygote children and adolescents are needed to confirm this hypothesis. In middle-aged populations, amyloid biomarkers and longitudinal data would obviously be necessary to discern the influence of amyloid deposition in dMRI scalars, and actually, some previous works suggest that microstructural properties in the WM are subject to the combined influence of age and genotype [
12,
20].
Acknowledgements
This publication is part of the ALFA study (ALzheimer and FAmilies). The authors express their most sincere gratitude to the ALFA project participants, without whom this research would not have been possible. We are indebted to colleagues at the Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center for fruitful discussions. The following are collaborators of the ALFA study: Jordi Camí, Gemma Salvadó, Stavros Skouras, Gonzalo Sánchez, Carolina Minguillón, Karine Fauria, Nina Gramunt, Marc Suárez-Calvet, Albina Polo, Cristina Mustata, Laia Tenas, Paula Marne, Xavi Gotsens, Tania Menchón, Anna Soteras, Laura Hernandez, Ruth Dominguez, Sandra Prades, Gema Huesa, Marc Vilanova, Sabrina Segundo, and Jordi Huguet.