Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2017

04.05.2017 | Review Article

Women’s expectations of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review

verfasst von: Kathy Flitcroft, Meagan Brennan, Andrew Spillane

Erschienen in: Supportive Care in Cancer | Ausgabe 8/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Breast reconstruction (BR) makes an important positive contribution to the quality of life of many women who have undergone mastectomy for breast cancer. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the evidence for possible relationships between women’s expectations of BR and their satisfaction with outcomes to inform and facilitate improved communication about BR options prior to initial surgery.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature reporting expectations of BR published between 1 January 1994 and 6 March 2017 identified 2107 initial search results. Twenty-one publications, reporting 20 studies (2288 participants), satisfied the selection criteria. Information on study aim and time frame, participation rate, design/methods, limitations/bias, results and conclusions, as well as participant clinical and demographic information, was reported. An overall quality score was generated for each study.

Results

Four of five studies that quantified expectations and satisfaction found a positive relationship between the two. This may indicate a possible trend, but as 16 of the 21 included publications did not provide quantifiable data, no firm conclusions are possible.

Conclusion

Our findings have important implications for policy and practice which are applicable to medical decision-making more broadly. There is a clear need to utilise accurate and consistent measures of patient-reported expectations and to educate both patients and health practitioners about the importance of informed discussion about treatment options. This is particularly salient for women facing a choice about BR, a major breast cancer survivorship decision. Routine use of an expectations checklist in pre-operative consultations may be useful.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Howes BHL, Watson DI, Xu C, Fosh B, Canepa M, Dean NR (2016) Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 69:1184–1191CrossRef Howes BHL, Watson DI, Xu C, Fosh B, Canepa M, Dean NR (2016) Quality of life following total mastectomy with and without reconstruction versus breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer: a case-controlled cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 69:1184–1191CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat National Clinical Audit Support Programme (NCASP) (2009) National mastectomy and breast reconstruction audit (report 2). The Information Centre (NHS), London National Clinical Audit Support Programme (NCASP) (2009) National mastectomy and breast reconstruction audit (report 2). The Information Centre (NHS), London
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Musgrave KJ, Bochner M, Kollias J (2010) Surgical decision-making in immediate breast reconstruction. World J Surg 34:3029–3035CrossRefPubMed Musgrave KJ, Bochner M, Kollias J (2010) Surgical decision-making in immediate breast reconstruction. World J Surg 34:3029–3035CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Cordeiro PG (2008) Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. New Eng J Med 359:1590–1601CrossRefPubMed Cordeiro PG (2008) Breast reconstruction after surgery for breast cancer. New Eng J Med 359:1590–1601CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR (2005) Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg 75:940–947CrossRefPubMed Nano MT, Gill PG, Kollias J, Bochner MA, Malycha P, Winefield HR (2005) Psychological impact and cosmetic outcome of surgical breast cancer strategies. ANZ J Surg 75:940–947CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Rowland JH, Holland JC, Chaglassian T, Kinne D (1993) Psychological response to breast reconstruction: expectations for and impact on postmastectomy functioning. Psychosomatics 34(3):241–250CrossRefPubMed Rowland JH, Holland JC, Chaglassian T, Kinne D (1993) Psychological response to breast reconstruction: expectations for and impact on postmastectomy functioning. Psychosomatics 34(3):241–250CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, Cawthorn SJ, Reid CD, Maddox PR, Kenealy JM, Rainsbury RM, Umpleby HC (2003) The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1060–1068CrossRefPubMed Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, Cawthorn SJ, Reid CD, Maddox PR, Kenealy JM, Rainsbury RM, Umpleby HC (2003) The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1060–1068CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L (2000) A prospective randomised study, “SVEA”, comparing effects of three methods of delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:66–74CrossRefPubMed Brandberg Y, Malm M, Blomqvist L (2000) A prospective randomised study, “SVEA”, comparing effects of three methods of delayed breast reconstruction on quality of life, patient-defined problem areas of life, and cosmetic result. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:66–74CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Hart AM, Pinell-White X, Egro FM, Losken A (2015) The psychosexual impact of partial and total breast reconstruction. A prospective one-year longitudinal study. Ann Plast Surg 75(3):281–286CrossRefPubMed Hart AM, Pinell-White X, Egro FM, Losken A (2015) The psychosexual impact of partial and total breast reconstruction. A prospective one-year longitudinal study. Ann Plast Surg 75(3):281–286CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, Davis JA, Kim HM, Roth RS, Goldfarb S, Izenberg PH, Houin HP, Shaheen KW (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1014–1025CrossRefPubMed Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, Davis JA, Kim HM, Roth RS, Goldfarb S, Izenberg PH, Houin HP, Shaheen KW (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1014–1025CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Temple-Oberle C, Ayeni O, Webb C, Bettger-Hahn M, Ayeni O, Mychailyshyn N (2014) Shared decision-making: applying a person-centred approach to tailored breast reconstruction information provides high satisfaction across a variety of breast reconstruction options. J Surg Oncol 110:796–800CrossRefPubMed Temple-Oberle C, Ayeni O, Webb C, Bettger-Hahn M, Ayeni O, Mychailyshyn N (2014) Shared decision-making: applying a person-centred approach to tailored breast reconstruction information provides high satisfaction across a variety of breast reconstruction options. J Surg Oncol 110:796–800CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Roth RS, Lowery JC, Davis J, Wilkins EG (2007) Psychological factors predict patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:2008–2017CrossRefPubMed Roth RS, Lowery JC, Davis J, Wilkins EG (2007) Psychological factors predict patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 119:2008–2017CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim MK, Kim T, Moon HG, Jin US, Kim K, Kim J, Lee JW, Kim J, Lee E, Yoo TK, Noh D-Y, Minn KW, Han W (2015) Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:426–432CrossRefPubMed Kim MK, Kim T, Moon HG, Jin US, Kim K, Kim J, Lee JW, Kim J, Lee E, Yoo TK, Noh D-Y, Minn KW, Han W (2015) Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 41:426–432CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Snell L, Cano SJ, McCarthy C, Scott A, Cemal Y, Rubin LR, Cordeiro PG (2012) Measuring and managing patient expectations for breast reconstruction: impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 12(2):149–158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Snell L, Cano SJ, McCarthy C, Scott A, Cemal Y, Rubin LR, Cordeiro PG (2012) Measuring and managing patient expectations for breast reconstruction: impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 12(2):149–158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyomard V, Leinster S, Wilkinson M, Servant J-M, Pereira J (2009) A Franco-British patients’ and partners’ satisfaction audit of breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr, Aesth Surg 62:782–789CrossRef Guyomard V, Leinster S, Wilkinson M, Servant J-M, Pereira J (2009) A Franco-British patients’ and partners’ satisfaction audit of breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr, Aesth Surg 62:782–789CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Schain WS, Jacobs E, Wellisch DK (1984) Psychosocial issues in breast reconstruction: intrapsychic, interpersonal, and practical concerns. Clin Plast Surg 2:237–251 Schain WS, Jacobs E, Wellisch DK (1984) Psychosocial issues in breast reconstruction: intrapsychic, interpersonal, and practical concerns. Clin Plast Surg 2:237–251
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Thompson AGH, Suńol R (1995) Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Quality in Health Care 7(2):127–141CrossRef Thompson AGH, Suńol R (1995) Expectations as determinants of patient satisfaction: concepts, theory and evidence. Int J Quality in Health Care 7(2):127–141CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Moher D, Liberati A, Tezlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e97CrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tezlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6(7):e97CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook Linda S. (2004) Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Health Technology Assessment Initiative No. 13. Alberta, Canada Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook Linda S. (2004) Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research. Health Technology Assessment Initiative No. 13. Alberta, Canada
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Daly J, Willis K, Small R, Green J, Welch N, Kealy M, Hughes E (2007) A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiol 60:43–49CrossRefPubMed Daly J, Willis K, Small R, Green J, Welch N, Kealy M, Hughes E (2007) A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiol 60:43–49CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Brandberg Y, Malm M, Rutqvist E, Jonsson E, Blomqvist L (1999) A prospective randomised study (named SVEA) of three methods of delayed breast reconstruction. Study design, patients’ preoperative problems and expectations. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 33(2):209–216. doi:10.1080/02844319950159479 CrossRef Brandberg Y, Malm M, Rutqvist E, Jonsson E, Blomqvist L (1999) A prospective randomised study (named SVEA) of three methods of delayed breast reconstruction. Study design, patients’ preoperative problems and expectations. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 33(2):209–216. doi:10.​1080/​0284431995015947​9 CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Snell L, McCarthy C, Klassen A, Cano S, Rubin L, Hurley K, Montgomery GH, Cordeiro PG, Pusic A (2010) Clarifying the expectations of patients undergoing implant breast reconstruction: a qualitative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1825–1830CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Snell L, McCarthy C, Klassen A, Cano S, Rubin L, Hurley K, Montgomery GH, Cordeiro PG, Pusic A (2010) Clarifying the expectations of patients undergoing implant breast reconstruction: a qualitative study. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:1825–1830CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Abu-Nab Z, Grunfeld EA (2007) Satisfaction with outcome and attitudes towards scarring among women undergoing breast reconstructive surgery. Pat Educ Counsel 66:243–249CrossRef Abu-Nab Z, Grunfeld EA (2007) Satisfaction with outcome and attitudes towards scarring among women undergoing breast reconstructive surgery. Pat Educ Counsel 66:243–249CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Clifford E (1979) The reconstruction experience: the search for restitution. In: Georgiade NG (ed) Breast reconstruction following mastectomy. CV Mosby, St Louis, pp 22–34 Clifford E (1979) The reconstruction experience: the search for restitution. In: Georgiade NG (ed) Breast reconstruction following mastectomy. CV Mosby, St Louis, pp 22–34
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Contant CME, van Wersch AMEA, Wiggers T, Wai RTJ, van Geel AN (2000) Motivations, satisfaction and information of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Patient Educ Counsel 40:201–208CrossRef Contant CME, van Wersch AMEA, Wiggers T, Wai RTJ, van Geel AN (2000) Motivations, satisfaction and information of immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy. Patient Educ Counsel 40:201–208CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Björklund T, Rylander R, Lagergren J, Jurell G, Wickman M, Sandelin K (2005) Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 14:201–208CrossRefPubMed Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Björklund T, Rylander R, Lagergren J, Jurell G, Wickman M, Sandelin K (2005) Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 14:201–208CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Fang S-Y, Balneaves LG, Shu B-C (2010) “A struggle between vanity and life”. The experience of receiving breast reconstruction in women in Taiwan. Cancer Nurs 33(5):E1–E11CrossRefPubMed Fang S-Y, Balneaves LG, Shu B-C (2010) “A struggle between vanity and life”. The experience of receiving breast reconstruction in women in Taiwan. Cancer Nurs 33(5):E1–E11CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Fee-Fulkerson K, Conaway MR, Winer EP, Fulkerson CC, Rimer BK, Georgiade G (1996) Factors contributing to patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction using silicone gel implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:1420–1426CrossRefPubMed Fee-Fulkerson K, Conaway MR, Winer EP, Fulkerson CC, Rimer BK, Georgiade G (1996) Factors contributing to patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction using silicone gel implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 97:1420–1426CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Flitcroft K, Brennan M, Costa D, Wong A, Snook K, Spillane A (2016) An evaluation of factors affecting preference for immediate, delayed or no breast reconstruction in women with high-risk breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 25(12):1463–1469. doi:10.1002/pon.4087 CrossRefPubMed Flitcroft K, Brennan M, Costa D, Wong A, Snook K, Spillane A (2016) An evaluation of factors affecting preference for immediate, delayed or no breast reconstruction in women with high-risk breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 25(12):1463–1469. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​4087 CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Harcourt D, Rumsey N (2004) Mastectomy patients’ decision-making for or against immediate breast reconstruction. Psycho-Oncology 13:106–115CrossRefPubMed Harcourt D, Rumsey N (2004) Mastectomy patients’ decision-making for or against immediate breast reconstruction. Psycho-Oncology 13:106–115CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Kraemer O, Andersen M, Siim E (1996) Breast reconstruction and tissue expansion in irradiated versus not irradiated women after mastectomy. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 30(3):201–206. doi:10.3109/02844319609062815 CrossRef Kraemer O, Andersen M, Siim E (1996) Breast reconstruction and tissue expansion in irradiated versus not irradiated women after mastectomy. Scand J Plast Reconstr Hand Surg 30(3):201–206. doi:10.​3109/​0284431960906281​5 CrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee CN, Hultman CS, Sepucha K (2010) What are patients’ goals and concerns about breast reconstruction after mastectomy? Ann Plast Surg 64(5):567–569PubMed Lee CN, Hultman CS, Sepucha K (2010) What are patients’ goals and concerns about breast reconstruction after mastectomy? Ann Plast Surg 64(5):567–569PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Nissen MJ, Swensen KK, Kind EA (2002) Quality of life after postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Oncol Nurs Forum 29(3):547–553CrossRefPubMed Nissen MJ, Swensen KK, Kind EA (2002) Quality of life after postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Oncol Nurs Forum 29(3):547–553CrossRefPubMed
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Ringberg A, Tengrup I, Aspegren K, Palmer B (1999) Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 25:470–476CrossRefPubMed Ringberg A, Tengrup I, Aspegren K, Palmer B (1999) Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 25:470–476CrossRefPubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenqvist S, Sandelin K, Wickman M (1996) Patients’ psychological and cosmetic experience after immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 22:262–266CrossRefPubMed Rosenqvist S, Sandelin K, Wickman M (1996) Patients’ psychological and cosmetic experience after immediate breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 22:262–266CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Spector D, Mayer DK, Knafl K, Pusic A (2010) Not what I expected: informational needs of women undergoing breast surgery. Plast Surg Nurs 30(2):70–74CrossRefPubMed Spector D, Mayer DK, Knafl K, Pusic A (2010) Not what I expected: informational needs of women undergoing breast surgery. Plast Surg Nurs 30(2):70–74CrossRefPubMed
37.
Zurück zum Zitat Waljee JF, Ubel PA, Atisha DM, Hu ES, Alderman AK (2011) The choice of breast cancer surgery: can women accurately predict postoperative quality of life and disease-related stigma? Ann Surg Oncol 18:2477–2482CrossRefPubMed Waljee JF, Ubel PA, Atisha DM, Hu ES, Alderman AK (2011) The choice of breast cancer surgery: can women accurately predict postoperative quality of life and disease-related stigma? Ann Surg Oncol 18:2477–2482CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat BREAST-Q™ Expectations Module (Pre Operative) 1.0. (2006) Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre and The University of British Columbia BREAST-Q™ Expectations Module (Pre Operative) 1.0. (2006) Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Centre and The University of British Columbia
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Winters ZE, Afzal M, Rutherford C et al (2017) International validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) for women undergoing breast reconstruction: the QLQ-BRECON23. Br J Surg (in press) Winters ZE, Afzal M, Rutherford C et al (2017) International validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) for women undergoing breast reconstruction: the QLQ-BRECON23. Br J Surg (in press)
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosson GD, Shridharani SM, Magarakis M, Manahan MA, Basdag B, Gilson MM, Pusic AL (2013) Quality of life before reconstructive breast surgery: a preoperative comparison of patients with immediate, delayed, and major revision reconstruction. Microsurgery 33:253–258CrossRefPubMed Rosson GD, Shridharani SM, Magarakis M, Manahan MA, Basdag B, Gilson MM, Pusic AL (2013) Quality of life before reconstructive breast surgery: a preoperative comparison of patients with immediate, delayed, and major revision reconstruction. Microsurgery 33:253–258CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Flitcroft K, Brennan M, Spillane A (2017) Making decisions about breast reconstruction: a systematic review of patient-reported factors influencing choice. Qual Life Res. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1555-z Flitcroft K, Brennan M, Spillane A (2017) Making decisions about breast reconstruction: a systematic review of patient-reported factors influencing choice. Qual Life Res. doi:10.​1007/​s11136-017-1555-z
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP, Caddy CM, Pereira J, Sheppard C, Greenaway K, van der Meulen JHP (2014) Findings of a national comparative audit of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England. J Plast Reconstr, Aesth Surg 67:1333–1344CrossRef Jeevan R, Cromwell DA, Browne JP, Caddy CM, Pereira J, Sheppard C, Greenaway K, van der Meulen JHP (2014) Findings of a national comparative audit of mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery in England. J Plast Reconstr, Aesth Surg 67:1333–1344CrossRef
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Harper and Row, New York Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Harper and Row, New York
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Davis Sears E, Chung KC (2014) Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 155:799–808CrossRefPubMed Waljee J, McGlinn EP, Davis Sears E, Chung KC (2014) Patient expectations and patient-reported outcomes in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery 155:799–808CrossRefPubMed
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Reaby LL (1998) Reasons why women who have mastectomy decide to have or not to have breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:1810–1818CrossRefPubMed Reaby LL (1998) Reasons why women who have mastectomy decide to have or not to have breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 101:1810–1818CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Women’s expectations of breast reconstruction following mastectomy for breast cancer: a systematic review
verfasst von
Kathy Flitcroft
Meagan Brennan
Andrew Spillane
Publikationsdatum
04.05.2017
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Supportive Care in Cancer / Ausgabe 8/2017
Print ISSN: 0941-4355
Elektronische ISSN: 1433-7339
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3712-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2017

Supportive Care in Cancer 8/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.