Background
Globally, workplace musculoskeletal disorders are the primary cause of morbidity and disability in any workforce [
1], and impact on the individual’s quality of life, everyday function and working ability [
2]. In Australia, 3,60,180 serious workplace musculoskeletal disorder claims were lodged between years 2009 to 2014 [
1]. Healthcare and social assistance occupations reported the highest prevalence (18%) and frequency rate (7.1 claims per million hours worked) of workplace musculoskeletal disorder claims during this period [
1]. Subsequent loss of function, poor job satisfaction, reduced productivity and inability to participate in work activities can lead to workforce shortages in healthcare through absenteeism [
3]. Overall musculoskeletal claims were estimated to cost 61.8 billion in year 2012–13 in Australia [
4].
Research about workplace musculoskeletal disorders in health professionals has focused heavily on nurses and physiotherapists [
5‐
7]. However, other health professionals including occupational therapists are also at risk [
8]. Workplace musculoskeletal disorders experienced by occupational therapists have been investigated in several studies [
9‐
16]. Prevalence of disorders varied from 23% [
9] to 63% [
15] in American and Australian studies with sample sizes between 46 and 192. Higher prevalence in the Australian study maybe in part explained by using a survey based on the Standardised Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (SNMQ), and identifying musculoskeletal problems based on symptoms (i.e. aches and pains) in contrast to the American study reporting more substantive but less prevalent disorders. Similarly, body areas affected by workplace musculoskeletal disorders in occupational therapists varied between studies including the neck (11.1–32.8%), lower back (27.2–50%), shoulders (23.3–26.9%), hand/wrist/fingers (10.5–24.5%) and upper back (18.4–22%) [
13,
14].
Risk factors have primarily focused on ergonomic or biomechanical factors including load handling, forceful exertions, poorly designed work environments, static and awkward postures and high task repetition [
17]. However, personal risk factors including female gender, poor work practices, co-morbidities, reduced rest, poor nutrition and decreased fitness level may also contribute [
18]. Inherent differences in body size and physical capacity place females at greater risk of workplace musculoskeletal problems in physically demanding health professions [
19]. The high prevalence of disorders in females may further be explained by the predominantly female healthcare workforce [
20].
Emerging evidence links psychosocial risk factors to the prevalence of workplace musculoskeletal problems [
10]. Psychosocial risk factors may include lack of job control/autonomy, high job demands, lack of social/emotional support and role conflict or ambiguity [
10]. In healthcare professions, time constraints and productivity pressures of caring for people may heighten the risk of workplace musculoskeletal disorders [
21]. Further to this, health professionals are routinely exposed to emotionally and psychologically challenging and confronting situations such as recounts of trauma, tragedy, illness and disease [
10]. Dealing with stressful situations heightens emotional and psychological workplace demands, increasing vulnerability to burnout [
22] and resultant sick leave [
23]. While supportive line managers, and/or co-workers, and self-efficacy help address disproportionate workplace stress [
24], without adequate social supports, self-care and strategies for emotional well-being, susceptibility to injury may increase. Although links between psychosocial risk factors and musculoskeletal health are emerging, the full impact is not yet known.
Evidence indicates 23 to 63% of occupational therapists experience workplace musculoskeletal disorders or problems [
9‐
16]. Prevalence of similar problems in occupational therapy students is scarce. A study conducted in the last decade investigated upper body musculoskeletal problems in Australian occupational therapy students [
25]. Three quarters of students reported a musculoskeletal problem in at least one upper body region in 12 months [
25]. However lower body problems, and problems related to work-based training remain unknown. Evidence suggests students and early career practitioners (≤5 years practice) are at greater risk of workplace musculoskeletal disorders [
6,
26,
27]. This is consistent with student studies in nursing (80%) [
28], medial science (35%) [
2] and dentistry (61%) [
29], as well as, disorders reported in early career occupational therapists (63%) [
15] and podiatrists (45%) [
26]. The aim of this study was to 1) describe prevalence of workplace musculoskeletal problems in occupational therapy students over a 12 month and 7 day recall period, and 2) explore factors influencing reporting of these workplace musculoskeletal problems.
Discussion
Workplace musculoskeletal disorders are a concern for individuals, the workforce, and the community due to inherent health, activity and economic impacts [
1]. Health professionals are often at high risk of musculoskeletal problems, jeopardising the sustainability of the healthcare workforce [
3]. This study revealed occupational therapy students were already at risk of musculoskeletal problems during their work-based undergraduate training. One in three occupational therapy students reported workplace musculoskeletal problems within a 12 month period. Almost half of the students reporting a musculoskeletal problem in 12 months, also reported a problem in 7 days.
While occupational therapy students only participate in work-based training for part of the year (up to a maximum of 10-week full-time blocks, with a maximum of 16 weeks, over two 8-week blocks in year 4), the prevalence of reported problems is around half of that reported by full-time practicing occupational therapists (63%) in the study by Passier and McPhail (2011) [
15].
Early musculoskeletal problems may not necessarily be serious or on-going. However problems can be precursors to future, more serious disorders and often need to be addressed [
1,
39]. Workplace musculoskeletal problems reported by occupational therapy students in this study were already impacting their daily activities, with many seeking medical attention. Students reported concurrent problems at multiple sites with 294 problems reported in 12 months and 99 problems in 7 days. Approximately one third of problems prevented daily activities. These findings are comparable with results from a study with practicing occupational therapists, indicating workplace musculoskeletal problems limit leisure (22.3%) and everyday activities (10.5%) [
15].
Students sought treatment for around half of the reported problems in 12 months and a quarter of problems in 7 days. The proportion of practicing occupational therapists with workplace musculoskeletal problems who sought assistance/treatment (15%) was less than students in our study and may be in part due to the culture of self-treating in health professionals [
15]. If students are more likely to seek treatment, this may be an opportunity for educational strategies to address workplace musculoskeletal risks and their management.
Differences in survey tools and definitions of workplace musculoskeletal disorders/problems between studies makes direct comparison difficult. Our study defined musculoskeletal problems as an ache, pain, numbness and discomfort, which are more prevalent than disorders or injuries to muscles, tendons, intervertebral discs and nerves [
1,
39]. Considering this, the results of our study have primarily been compared with studies sharing similarity in data collection, design and reporting of workplace musculoskeletal problems in occupational therapists and students [
13,
14,
25].
Similar to previous research with occupational therapists, the most common body areas for workplace musculoskeletal problems in occupational therapy students were the neck, lower back, shoulders, wrists/hands and the upper back [
13‐
15]. The high prevalence of musculoskeletal problems in the upper extremities in occupational therapy students are consistent with previous studies and possibly related to caseload [
13]. We found the prevalence of problems reported in the 7 day period to be more consistent with existing data in occupational therapists. This consistency in 7 day recall data with previous research may be related to a more accurate recall within a 7 day recall period rather than over 12 months. Students in first and fourth year, in particular, were participating in similar full-time hours to working therapists in the 7 day recall period.
Knee and ankle/foot problems were less commonly reported. The combined prevalence was 18.1% of total problems reported in 12 months and 12.1% in 7 days. However, lower limb problems in students were approximately double of those experienced by practicing occupational therapists in 12 months and overall throughout their career [
15]. While some problems like knee problems were not as common as other areas, they were reported by almost half of students reporting a problem. In this study, among students with knee problems 32% sought treatment and 21% reported restrictions in their daily activities. Students indicated at least 34% of their work-based training involved standing or walking with around half of the students reporting participating in heavy physical caseloads (46.5%). Physically demanding caseloads [
13] requiring prolonged weight-bearing may account for the nature, prevalence and severity of lower limb problems reported.
Occupational therapy students are exposed to the same workplace risks as occupational therapists while learning in real-world work settings with clients. In our study, 33.6% already report experiencing musculoskeletal problems. Students reporting problems is consistent with studies in nursing, dentistry, and medical science students reporting the prevalence of workplace musculoskeletal problems before graduation of 80% [
28], 61% [
29] and 38% [
2] respectively. While there is higher prevalence in nursing and dentistry, this may, in part, be explained by ergonomically challenging and repetitive work practice in nursing and prolonged static positioning in dentistry. Medical science involves many desk-based tasks [
2]. Desk or table top tasks in occupational therapy may contribute to the similarity in reported musculoskeletal problems (around a third of students) between disciplines.
Our data affirms that occupational therapy students are vulnerable to workplace musculoskeletal problems during their training. Smith et al. (2006) also found occupational therapy students to be at risk, reporting prevalence of upper body problems (75.5%) to be over double the prevalence of musculoskeletal problems in our students (33.6%). While Smith et al. (2006) had a higher prevalence of general upper body problems reported, our study was specific to reporting only workplace related musculoskeletal problems, which may explain this difference. The proportion of neck (71.8% vs 67.4%), shoulder (67.6% vs 46.3%) and upper back (50.7% vs 39.5%) problems between studies were more closely matched than overall prevalence [
25]. However, the prevalence of musculoskeletal problems ranging from 33.6–77.5% in student therapists is a concern.
The proportion of occupational therapy students reporting workplace musculoskeletal problems in our study was at least half the proportion of early career practitioners reporting problems in occupational therapy (63%) [
15] and podiatry (45%) [
26]. Novice clinicians (≤5 years practice experience) have greater risk of workplace musculoskeletal problems [
26], making this rate in students of greater concern. The lack of conditioning for full-time work and condensed time-limited placement blocks may exacerbate vulnerability to injury.
Risk factors associated with reported musculoskeletal problems were female gender, previous musculoskeletal problems, non-standard joint mobility and working in psychosocially focused caseloads. Female gender was associated with a 3 and 5 times greater odds of reporting a problem in the 12 month and 7 day recall periods respectively. This is consistent with other health workforce literature, and may be accounted for, in part, by inherent sex differences in physical capacity and size [
19]. In a recent study of 95 practicing occupational therapists, 61% of females reported a workplace musculoskeletal disorder in comparison to 26% of males [
13].
Having a previous musculoskeletal problem was associated with a 3 and 5 times greater odds of reporting a workplace problem in the 7 day and 12 month recall period respectively. Similar to our finding, previous studies have identified previous pain episodes as a risk factor for future musculoskeletal problems [
40,
41]. Other personal risk factors previously identified in the literature may explain a person’s risk to both non-workplace and workplace musculoskeletal problems. These risk factors include co-morbidities, reduced rest, poor injury recovery, poor nutrition and fitness levels [
18]. Another personal risk factor may be non-standard joint mobility which was found to be associated with reported problems (3 times greater odds in the 7 day recall).
Interestingly, working in psychosocially focused caseloads were associated with 3 times greater odds of reporting problems in the 7 day recall period. While traditional risk factors for workplace musculoskeletal disorders include ergonomic and physical demands, our results support emerging research about the psychological risk factors to musculoskeletal health [
27]. Psychosocially focused caseloads can have greater psychological demands than physical caseloads [
42]. Students working in psychosocially focused caseloads may experience a lack of social/emotional support, high job demands and reduced job control/autonomy [
43]. Psychological demands place stress on the body, which may accumulate over time, leading to workplace musculoskeletal disorders [
10,
44]. Psychosocial demands of monotonous work, low job control and high workload have been found to have long-term, cumulative effects on the developmental of musculoskeletal problems [
45,
46]. Some occupational therapy students and practicing occupational therapists hold negative perceptions of psychosocial practice resulting in staff shortages that lead to increased pressure on staff [
43]. This is a known risk factor for workplace musculoskeletal disorders [
43]. Alternatively, higher likelihood of problems associated with psychosocial caseloads may be explained by occupational therapy students being more aware of biomechanical and ergonomic injury risk factors, with less focus on psychological risk factors, such as their own mental health, and personal resilience.
Data in Australia shows a marked decline by approximately 20% in occupational therapy registrations starting between ages 25–29 years, and continuing to decline thereafter [
47]. While many reasons for this decline might exist, workplace musculoskeletal problems may limit the career-span of therapists, and the profession risks losing its experienced workforce. The healthy worker effect, whereby workers leave the profession early in their career due to injury or illness, leaving a cohort of healthy older workers [
48], may explain some variance in prevalence of musculoskeletal problems between practicing therapists (23–63%) [
9‐
16] and students (33.6%) in this study. Ergonomic education and resilience training as a part of the university curriculum, alongside practical on-site training, are possible strategies to mitigate musculoskeletal risks and impact on students.
Future work
Investigating educational and practical interventions to reduce ergonomic risk factors and increase mental health resilience in occupational therapy students is important. Possible interventions for evaluation may include ergonomic assessment and intervention for tasks commonly completed by occupational therapists, musculoskeletal health education in university curricula and workplaces, and on-going mental health resilience training.
Limitations
Several limitations are noted. Direct contact in practicum classes was only made with first and fourth-year students with class lists used to email all students in second and third-year. While the response rate is reasonable (53%) and higher than previous studies (33%) [
11,
15] this may affect the accuracy and validity of the results. However, given the sample size calculation of 202, including 211 participants fits within the requirements to estimate the prevalence of musculoskeletal problems in approximately one third of the population (± 6.5%). It is possible that students with musculoskeletal problems are more likely to respond to the survey [
15] and/or reach the screener question, introducting a potiential bias. However, 66% of students who completed the survey did not report any workplace musculoskeletal problems.
The findings are consistent with other studies on prevalence of musculoskeletal problems in health professionals, but a background rate of problems in the sample, consistent with the general population, is likely. This was addressed by collecting data specific to work-related musculoskeletal problems and previous non work-related musculoskeletal problems. As non work-related musculoskeletal problems increased the odds of reporting work-related musculoskeletal problems, it is possible some people in the population were more susceptible to these issues.
Previous literature has indicated that the prevalence of workplace musculoskeletal problems may differ between contexts [
14]. This study was limited by only surveying students from one learning context, whereby the results may not be generalisable to other universities or geographical locations.
The recall periods of 12 months and 7 days are possible limitations as some students were not contacted immediately post work-based training due to the availability of students and the timing of work-based training. Previous studies demonstrate that the 12 month recall period is likely to result in recall bias [
49] and may also have been negatively impacted upon by occupational therapy students not participating in work-based training year-round, however, the results would likely be conservative.
All data including musculoskeletal problems and arthrometric data were self-reported which may have resulted in reporting bias or inaccuracies [
14]. Students may have reported problems that were not related to work-based training or problems that did not match the definition. Qualitative studies to understand the impact of workplace musculoskeletal problems on occupational therapy students is warranted. Finally, causation of musculoskeletal problems could not be determined due to the cross-sectional study design [
50].
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.