Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Radiology 4/2024

16.10.2023 | Breast

A bimodal nomogram as an adjunct tool to reduce unnecessary breast biopsy following discordant ultrasonic and mammographic BI-RADS assessment

verfasst von: Ziting Xu, Yue Lin, Jiekun Huo, Yang Gao, Jiayin Lu, Yu Liang, Lian Li, Zhouyue Jiang, Lingli Du, Ting Lang, Ge Wen, Yingjia Li

Erschienen in: European Radiology | Ausgabe 4/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

To develop a bimodal nomogram to reduce unnecessary biopsies in breast lesions with discordant ultrasound (US) and mammography (MG) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessments.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 706 women following opportunistic screening or diagnosis with discordant US and MG BI-RADS assessments (where one assessed a lesion as BI-RADS 4 or 5, while the other assessed the same lesion as BI-RADS 0, 2, or 3) from two medical centres between June 2019 and June 2021. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to develop the nomogram. DeLong’s and McNemar’s tests were used to assess the model’s performance.

Results

Age, MG features (margin, shape, and density in masses, suspicious calcifications, and architectural distortion), and US features (margin and shape in masses as well as calcifications) were independent risk factors for breast cancer. The nomogram obtained an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83–0.91), 0.91 (95% CI, 0.87 – 0.96), and 0.92 (95% CI, 0.86–0.98) in the training, internal validation, and external testing samples, respectively, and demonstrated consistency in calibration curves. Coupling the nomogram with US reduced unnecessary biopsies from 74 to 44% and the missed malignancies rate from 13 to 2%. Similarly, coupling with MG reduced missed malignancies from 20 to 6%, and 63% of patients avoided unnecessary biopsies. Interobserver agreement between US and MG increased from – 0.708 (poor agreement) to 0.700 (substantial agreement) with the nomogram.

Conclusion

When US and MG BI-RADS assessments are discordant, incorporating the nomogram may improve the diagnostic accuracy, avoid unnecessary breast biopsies, and minimise missed diagnoses.

Clinical relevance statement

The nomogram developed in this study could be used as a computer program to assist radiologists with detecting breast cancer and ensuring more precise management and improved treatment decisions for breast lesions with discordant assessments in clinical practice.

Key Points

Coupling the nomogram with US and mammography improves the detection of breast cancers without the risk of unnecessary biopsy or missed malignancies.
The nomogram increases mammography and US interobserver agreement and enhances the consistency of decision-making.
The nomogram has the potential to be a computer program to assist radiologists in identifying breast cancer and making optimal decisions.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Lawson MB, Bissell M, Miglioretti DL et al (2022) Multilevel factors associated with time to biopsy after abnormal screening mammography results by race and ethnicity. JAMA Oncol 8:1115–1126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lawson MB, Bissell M, Miglioretti DL et al (2022) Multilevel factors associated with time to biopsy after abnormal screening mammography results by race and ethnicity. JAMA Oncol 8:1115–1126CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T et al (2016) Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387:341–348CrossRefPubMed Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T et al (2016) Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387:341–348CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Rebolj M, Assi V, Brentnall A, Parmar D, Duffy SW (2018) Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 118:1559–1570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rebolj M, Assi V, Brentnall A, Parmar D, Duffy SW (2018) Addition of ultrasound to mammography in the case of dense breast tissue: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 118:1559–1570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Mann RM, Athanasiou A, Baltzer PA et al (2022) Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI). Eur Radiol 32:4036–4045CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mann RM, Athanasiou A, Baltzer PA et al (2022) Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI). Eur Radiol 32:4036–4045CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Goh JHL, Tan TL, Aziz S, Rizuana IH (2022) Comparative study of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without ultrasound versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting breast lesion. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:759CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Goh JHL, Tan TL, Aziz S, Rizuana IH (2022) Comparative study of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without ultrasound versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting breast lesion. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19:759CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299:2151–2163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB et al (2008) Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 299:2151–2163CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Shen Y, Shamout FE, Oliver JR et al (2021) Artificial intelligence system reduces false-positive findings in the interpretation of breast ultrasound exams. Nat Commun 12(1):5645ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Shen Y, Shamout FE, Oliver JR et al (2021) Artificial intelligence system reduces false-positive findings in the interpretation of breast ultrasound exams. Nat Commun 12(1):5645ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu H, Zhan H, Sun D (2020) Comparison of 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy, ultrasound, and mammography for the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 category lesions. BMC Cancer 20(1):1–8ADSCrossRef Liu H, Zhan H, Sun D (2020) Comparison of 99mTc-MIBI scintigraphy, ultrasound, and mammography for the diagnosis of BI-RADS 4 category lesions. BMC Cancer 20(1):1–8ADSCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Barba D, Leon-Sosa A, Lugo P et al (2021) Breast cancer, screening and diagnostic tools: all you need to know. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 157:103174CrossRefPubMed Barba D, Leon-Sosa A, Lugo P et al (2021) Breast cancer, screening and diagnostic tools: all you need to know. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 157:103174CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307(13):1394–1404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D et al (2012) Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 307(13):1394–1404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Qian X, Pei J, Zheng H et al (2021) Prospective assessment of breast cancer risk from multimodal multiview ultrasound images via clinically applicable deep learning. Nat Biomed Eng 5(6):522–532CrossRefPubMed Qian X, Pei J, Zheng H et al (2021) Prospective assessment of breast cancer risk from multimodal multiview ultrasound images via clinically applicable deep learning. Nat Biomed Eng 5(6):522–532CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Shao SH, Li CX, Yao MH, Li G, Li X, Wu R (2020) Incorporation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis for breast lesions with inconsistent results on mammography and conventional ultrasound. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 74:463–473CrossRefPubMed Shao SH, Li CX, Yao MH, Li G, Li X, Wu R (2020) Incorporation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the differential diagnosis for breast lesions with inconsistent results on mammography and conventional ultrasound. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 74:463–473CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Pu H, Zhang XL, Xiang LH et al (2019) The efficacy of added shear wave elastography (SWE) in breast screening for women with inconsistent mammography and conventional ultrasounds (US). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 71:83–94CrossRefPubMed Pu H, Zhang XL, Xiang LH et al (2019) The efficacy of added shear wave elastography (SWE) in breast screening for women with inconsistent mammography and conventional ultrasounds (US). Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 71:83–94CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Luo S, Yao G, Hong Z et al (2019) Qualitative classification of shear wave elastography for differential diagnosis between benign and metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. Front Oncol 9:533CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luo S, Yao G, Hong Z et al (2019) Qualitative classification of shear wave elastography for differential diagnosis between benign and metastatic axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. Front Oncol 9:533CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Wang XY, Cui LG, Feng J, Chen W (2021) Artificial intelligence for breast ultrasound: an adjunct tool to reduce excessive lesion biopsy. Eur J Radiol 138:109624CrossRefPubMed Wang XY, Cui LG, Feng J, Chen W (2021) Artificial intelligence for breast ultrasound: an adjunct tool to reduce excessive lesion biopsy. Eur J Radiol 138:109624CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Raza S, Goldkamp AL, Chikarmane SA, Birdwell RL (2010) US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management. Radiographics 30:1199–1213CrossRefPubMed Raza S, Goldkamp AL, Chikarmane SA, Birdwell RL (2010) US of breast masses categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: pictorial review of factors influencing clinical management. Radiographics 30:1199–1213CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Xie Y, Zhu Y, Chai W et al (2022) Downgrade BI-RADS 4A patients using nomogram based on breast magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and mammography. Front Oncol 12:807402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xie Y, Zhu Y, Chai W et al (2022) Downgrade BI-RADS 4A patients using nomogram based on breast magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, and mammography. Front Oncol 12:807402CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cai Y, Zhu C, Chen Q, Zhao F, Guo S (2021) Application of a second opinion ultrasound in breast imaging reporting and data system 4A cases: can immediate biopsy be avoided? J Int Med Res 49:675881916CrossRef Cai Y, Zhu C, Chen Q, Zhao F, Guo S (2021) Application of a second opinion ultrasound in breast imaging reporting and data system 4A cases: can immediate biopsy be avoided? J Int Med Res 49:675881916CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Niu S, Huang J, Li J et al (2020) Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A. BMC Cancer 20:1–7CrossRef Niu S, Huang J, Li J et al (2020) Application of ultrasound artificial intelligence in the differential diagnosis between benign and malignant breast lesions of BI-RADS 4A. BMC Cancer 20:1–7CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA (2005) BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1260–1265CrossRefPubMed Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA (2005) BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1260–1265CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan PS, Ali MA, Eriksson M, Hall P, Humphreys K, Czene K (2021) Mammography features for early markers of aggressive breast cancer subtypes and tumor characteristics: a population-based cohort study. Int J Cancer 148:1351–1359CrossRefPubMed Tan PS, Ali MA, Eriksson M, Hall P, Humphreys K, Czene K (2021) Mammography features for early markers of aggressive breast cancer subtypes and tumor characteristics: a population-based cohort study. Int J Cancer 148:1351–1359CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi WJ, Han K, Shin HJ, Lee J, Kim E, Yoon JH (2021) Calcifications with suspicious morphology at mammography: should they all be considered with the same clinical significance? Eur Radiol 31:2529–2538CrossRefPubMed Choi WJ, Han K, Shin HJ, Lee J, Kim E, Yoon JH (2021) Calcifications with suspicious morphology at mammography: should they all be considered with the same clinical significance? Eur Radiol 31:2529–2538CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Rauch GM, Hobbs BP, Kuerer HM et al (2016) Microcalcifications in 1657 Patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation with clinical, histopathologic, biologic features, and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 23:482–489CrossRefPubMed Rauch GM, Hobbs BP, Kuerer HM et al (2016) Microcalcifications in 1657 Patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation with clinical, histopathologic, biologic features, and local recurrence. Ann Surg Oncol 23:482–489CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Hofvind S, Iversen BF, Eriksen L, Styr BM, Kjellevold K, Kurz KD (2011) Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening. Acta Radiol 52:481–487CrossRefPubMed Hofvind S, Iversen BF, Eriksen L, Styr BM, Kjellevold K, Kurz KD (2011) Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening. Acta Radiol 52:481–487CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Tosteson AN et al (2015) Identifying Women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer. Ann Intern Med 162:673–681CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Tosteson AN et al (2015) Identifying Women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer. Ann Intern Med 162:673–681CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tagliafico AS, Calabrese M, Mariscotti G et al (2016) Adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interim report of a prospective comparative trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1882–1888CrossRefPubMed Tagliafico AS, Calabrese M, Mariscotti G et al (2016) Adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: interim report of a prospective comparative trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1882–1888CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A bimodal nomogram as an adjunct tool to reduce unnecessary breast biopsy following discordant ultrasonic and mammographic BI-RADS assessment
verfasst von
Ziting Xu
Yue Lin
Jiekun Huo
Yang Gao
Jiayin Lu
Yu Liang
Lian Li
Zhouyue Jiang
Lingli Du
Ting Lang
Ge Wen
Yingjia Li
Publikationsdatum
16.10.2023
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Radiology / Ausgabe 4/2024
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10255-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2024

European Radiology 4/2024 Zur Ausgabe

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.