nach oben

Quality of Life Research

Erschienen in:

01.06.2013

A comparison of the ICECAP-O with EQ-5D in a falls prevention clinical setting: are they complements or substitutes?

verfasst von: Jennifer C. Davis, Teresa Liu-Ambrose, Chris G. Richardson, Stirling Bryan

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 5/2013

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Our research explored whether two preference-based outcome measures (EuroQol EQ-5D and ICECAP-O) are complements or substitutes in the context of the Vancouver Falls Prevention Clinic for seniors.

Methods

The EQ-5D and ICECAP-O were administered once at 12 months post first clinic attendance. We report descriptive statistics for all baseline characteristics collected at first clinic visit and primary outcomes of interest. We ascertain feasibility by reporting item completion rates for the EQ-5D and ICECAP-O. Contingency tables for a priori assertions between the ICECAP-O and EQ-5D were used to demonstrate whether unique or similar aspects of benefit were captured. We used exploratory factor analysis, to ascertain the number of unique underlying latent factors associated with the attributes assessed by the EQ-5D and ICECAP-O.

Results

We report data on 215 seniors who attended the Vancouver Falls Prevention Clinic who had a mean age of 79.3 (6.2) years. The item completion rate was 99 % for the EQ-5D and 92 % for the ICECAP-O. The two contingency tables detailed few discrepancies. The results of the exploratory factor analysis indicate that the two instruments are tapping into distinct factors that are complementary.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that the EQ-5D and ICECAP-O provide complementary information.

Coast, J., Flynn, T. N., Natarajan, L., Sproston, K., Lewis, J., Louviere, J. J., et al. (2008). Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Social Science Medicine, 67(5), 874–882.PubMedCrossRef

Coast, J., Peters, T. J., Natarajan, L., Sproston, K., & Flynn, T. (2008). An assessment of the construct validity of the descriptive system for the ICECAP capability measure for older people. Quality of Life Research, 17(7), 967–976.PubMedCrossRef

Sen, A. (1987). Commodities and capabilities. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Sen, A., & Nussbaum, M. (1993). Capability and well-being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rowen, D., Brazier, J., Tsuchiya, A., & Alava, M. H. (2012). Valuing states from multiple measures on the same visual analogue sale: a feasibility study. Health Economics, 21(6), 715–729.

Al-Janabi, H., Flynn, T. N., & Coast, J. (2012). Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: The ICECAP-A. Quality of Life Research, 21(1), 167–176.PubMedCrossRef

Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005). Methods for the economic evaluation for health care programmes (3rd ed.). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.

Marra, C. A., Esdaile, J. M., Guh, D., Kopec, J. A., Brazier, J. E., Koehler, B. E., et al. (2004). A comparison of four indirect methods of assessing utility values in rheumatoid arthritis. Medical Care, 42(11), 1125–1131.PubMedCrossRef

Dolan, P. (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Medical Care, 35(11), 1095–1108.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Glendinning, C. (2003). Breaking down barriers: Integrating health and care services for older people in England. Health Policy, 65(2), 139–151.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Grewal, I., Lewis, J., Flynn, T., Brown, J., Bond, J., & Coast, J. (2006). Developing attributes for a generic quality of life measure for older people: Preferences or capabilities? Social Science Medicine, 62(8), 1891–1901.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Lord, S., Sherrington, C., & Menz, H. (2001). A physiological profile approach for falls prevention. In Falls in older people. Risk factors and strategies for prevention. (pp. 221–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Whitney, J. C., Lord, S. R., & Close, J. C. (2005). Streamlining assessment and intervention in a falls clinic using the timed up and go test and physiological profile assessments. Age and Ageing, 34(6), 567–571.PubMedCrossRef

15.

Coast, J., & Al-Janabi, H. (2008). http://www.icecap.bham.ac.uk/.

16.

Nasreddine, Z. S., Phillips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., Collin, I., et al. (2005). The montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695–699.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., et al. (1982). Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: A preliminary report. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 17(1), 37–49.PubMedCrossRef

18.

van Marwijk, H. W., Wallace, P., de Bock, G. H., Hermans, J., Kaptein, A. A., & Mulder, J. D. (1995). Evaluation of the feasibility, reliability and diagnostic value of shortened versions of the geriatric depression scale. British Journal of General Practice, 45(393), 195–199.PubMed

19.

Lord, S. R., Menz, H. B., & Tiedemann, A. (2003). A physiological profile approach to falls risk assessment and prevention. Physical Therapy, 83(3), 237–252.PubMed

20.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

21.

Muthén, L. K., Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén&Muthén.

22.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef

23.

Makai, P., Brouwer, W. B., Koopmanschap, M. A., & Nieboer, A. P. (2011). Capabilities and quality of life in Dutch psycho-geriatric nursing homes: An exploratory study using a proxy version of the ICECAP-O. Quality of Life Research, 21(5), 801–812.

24.

Flynn, T. N., Chan, P., Coast, J., & Peters, T. J. (2011). Assessing quality of life among British older people using the ICEPOP CAPability (ICECAP-O) measure. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 9(5), 317–329.PubMedCrossRef

25.

Neumann, P. J., Greenberg, D., Olchanski, N. V., Stone, P. W., & Rosen, A. B. (2005). Growth and quality of the cost-utility literature, 1976–2001. Value in Health, 8(1), 3–9.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Siegel, J. E., Weinstein, M. C., Russell, L. B., & Gold, M. R. (1996). Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA, 276(16), 1339–1341.PubMedCrossRef

27.

Brazier, J., Roberts, J., Tsuchiya, A., & Busschbach, J. (2004). A comparison of the EQ-5D and SF-6D across seven patient groups. Health Economics, 13(9), 873–884.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Tsuchiya, A., Brazier, J., & Roberts, J. (2006). Comparison of valuation methods used to generate the EQ-5D and the SF-6D value sets. Journal of Health Economics, 25(2), 334–346.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Torrance, G. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Zhu, Z., DePauw, S., et al. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40(2), 113–128.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Marra, C. A., Marion, S. A., Guh, D. P., Najafzadeh, M., Wolfe, F., Esdaile, J. M., et al. (2007). Not all “quality-adjusted life years” are equal. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(6), 616–624.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Marra, C. A., Woolcott, J. C., Kopec, J. A., Shojania, K., Offer, R., Brazier, J. E., et al. (2005). A comparison of generic, indirect utility measures (the HUI2, HUI3, SF-6D, and the EQ-5D) and disease-specific instruments (the RAQoL and the HAQ) in rheumatoid arthritis. Social Science Medicine, 60(7), 1571–1582.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: A comparison of the ICECAP-O with EQ-5D in a falls prevention clinical setting: are they complements or substitutes?
verfasst von: Jennifer C. Davis
Teresa Liu-Ambrose
Chris G. Richardson
Stirling Bryan
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2013
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0225-4

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2013

Introducing the WHOQOL-SRPB BREF: developing a short-form instrument for assessing spiritual, religious and personal beliefs within quality of life

Further evidence of reliability and validity of the Huntington’s disease quality of life battery for carers: Italian and French translations

Validity of the FACT Hepatobiliary (FACT-Hep) questionnaire for assessing disease-related symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer

Favorable effects of explanatory illustrations attached to a self-administered questionnaire for upper extremity disorders

The Hearing Handicap Inventory for Elderly-Screening (HHIE-S) versus a single question: reliability, validity, and relations with quality of life measures in the elderly community, Japan

Measurement invariance of the SF-12 across European-American, Latina, and African-American postpartum women