Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology 7/2012

01.07.2012 | Original Article

A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography?

verfasst von: Andrew T. Trout, Ramon Sanchez, Maria F. Ladino-Torres, Deepa R. Pai, Peter J. Strouse

Erschienen in: Pediatric Radiology | Ausgabe 7/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We have observed that day-to-day use of US for acute appendicitis does not perform as well as described in the literature.

Objective

Review the diagnostic performance of US in acute appendicitis with attention to factors that influence performance.

Materials and methods

Retrospective review of all sonograms for acute appendicitis in children from May 2005 to May 2010 with attention to the rate of identification of the appendix, training of personnel involved and diagnostic accuracy.

Results

The appendix was identified in 246/1,009 cases (24.4%), with identification increasing over time. The accuracy of US was 85–91% with 35 false-positives and 54 false-negatives. Pediatric sonographers were significantly better at identifying the appendix than non-pediatric sonographers (P < 0.0001). Increased weight was the only patient factor that influenced identification of the appendix (P = 0.006). CT use was stable over the 5 years but declined in cases where the appendix was identified by US.

Conclusion

In day-to-day use, US does not perform as purported in the literature. We do not visualize the appendix as often as we should and false-negative and false-positive exams are too common. To improve the diagnostic performance of this modality, involvement by experienced personnel and/or additional training is needed.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Brennan GD (2006) Pediatric appendicitis: pathophysiology and appropriate use of diagnostic imaging. CJEM 8:425–432PubMed Brennan GD (2006) Pediatric appendicitis: pathophysiology and appropriate use of diagnostic imaging. CJEM 8:425–432PubMed
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94PubMedCrossRef Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kaiser S, Frenckner B, Jorulf HK (2002) Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT–a prospective randomized study. Radiology 223:633–638PubMedCrossRef Kaiser S, Frenckner B, Jorulf HK (2002) Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT–a prospective randomized study. Radiology 223:633–638PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA et al (2011) ACR Appropriateness Criteria© right lower quadrant pain-suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 8:749–755PubMedCrossRef Rosen MP, Ding A, Blake MA et al (2011) ACR Appropriateness Criteria© right lower quadrant pain-suspected appendicitis. J Am Coll Radiol 8:749–755PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pohl D, Golub R, Schwartz GE et al (1998) Appendiceal ultrasonography performed by nonradiologists: does it help in the diagnostic process? J Ultrasound Med 17:217–221PubMed Pohl D, Golub R, Schwartz GE et al (1998) Appendiceal ultrasonography performed by nonradiologists: does it help in the diagnostic process? J Ultrasound Med 17:217–221PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Axelrod DA, Sonnad SS, Hirschl RB (2000) An economic evaluation of sonographic examination of children with suspected appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 35:1236–1241PubMedCrossRef Axelrod DA, Sonnad SS, Hirschl RB (2000) An economic evaluation of sonographic examination of children with suspected appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg 35:1236–1241PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Baldisserotto M, Marchiori E (2000) Accuracy of noncompressive sonography of children with appendicitis according to the potential positions of the appendix. AJR 175:1387–1392PubMed Baldisserotto M, Marchiori E (2000) Accuracy of noncompressive sonography of children with appendicitis according to the potential positions of the appendix. AJR 175:1387–1392PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B et al (2004) Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 230:472–478PubMedCrossRef Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B et al (2004) Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology 230:472–478PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Baldisserotto M, Peletti AB (2007) Is colour Doppler sonography a good method to differentiate normal and abnormal appendices in children? Clin Radiol 62:365–369PubMedCrossRef Baldisserotto M, Peletti AB (2007) Is colour Doppler sonography a good method to differentiate normal and abnormal appendices in children? Clin Radiol 62:365–369PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutierrez CJ, Mariano MC, Faddis DM et al (1999) Doppler ultrasound accurately screens patients with appendicitis. Am Surg 65:1015–1017PubMed Gutierrez CJ, Mariano MC, Faddis DM et al (1999) Doppler ultrasound accurately screens patients with appendicitis. Am Surg 65:1015–1017PubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Je BK, Kim SB, Lee SH et al (2009) Diagnostic value of maximal-outer-diameter and maximal-mural-thickness in use of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in children. World J Gastroenterol 15:2900–2903PubMedCrossRef Je BK, Kim SB, Lee SH et al (2009) Diagnostic value of maximal-outer-diameter and maximal-mural-thickness in use of ultrasound for acute appendicitis in children. World J Gastroenterol 15:2900–2903PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Peletti AB, Baldisserotto M (2006) Optimizing US examination to detect the normal and abnormal appendix in children. Pediatr Radiol 36:1171–1176PubMedCrossRef Peletti AB, Baldisserotto M (2006) Optimizing US examination to detect the normal and abnormal appendix in children. Pediatr Radiol 36:1171–1176PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat van Randen A, Lameris W, van Es HW et al (2010) Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis. Eur Radiol 20:1657–1666PubMedCrossRef van Randen A, Lameris W, van Es HW et al (2010) Profiles of US and CT imaging features with a high probability of appendicitis. Eur Radiol 20:1657–1666PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P et al (2001) Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology 218:757–762PubMed Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P et al (2001) Outer diameter of the vermiform appendix as a sign of acute appendicitis: evaluation at US. Radiology 218:757–762PubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rioux M (1992) Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix. AJR 158:773–778PubMed Rioux M (1992) Sonographic detection of the normal and abnormal appendix. AJR 158:773–778PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Hahn HB, Hoepner FU, Kalle T et al (1998) Sonography of acute appendicitis in children: 7 years experience. Pediatr Radiol 28:147–151PubMedCrossRef Hahn HB, Hoepner FU, Kalle T et al (1998) Sonography of acute appendicitis in children: 7 years experience. Pediatr Radiol 28:147–151PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Martin AE, Vollman D, Adler B et al (2004) CT scans may not reduce the negative appendectomy rate in children. J Pediatr Surg 39:886–890, discussion 886–890PubMedCrossRef Martin AE, Vollman D, Adler B et al (2004) CT scans may not reduce the negative appendectomy rate in children. J Pediatr Surg 39:886–890, discussion 886–890PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Holscher HC, Heij HA (2009) Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S. … or US versus CT? A European perspective. Pediatr Radiol 39:497–499PubMedCrossRef Holscher HC, Heij HA (2009) Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S. … or US versus CT? A European perspective. Pediatr Radiol 39:497–499PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Wiersma F, Sramek A, Holscher HC (2005) US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology 235:1018–1022PubMedCrossRef Wiersma F, Sramek A, Holscher HC (2005) US features of the normal appendix and surrounding area in children. Radiology 235:1018–1022PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Crady SK, Jones JS, Wyn T et al (1993) Clinical validity of ultrasound in children with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 22:1125–1129PubMedCrossRef Crady SK, Jones JS, Wyn T et al (1993) Clinical validity of ultrasound in children with suspected appendicitis. Ann Emerg Med 22:1125–1129PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Dilley A, Wesson D, Munden M et al (2001) The impact of ultrasound examinations on the management of children with suspected appendicitis: a 3-year analysis. J Pediatr Surg 36:303–308PubMedCrossRef Dilley A, Wesson D, Munden M et al (2001) The impact of ultrasound examinations on the management of children with suspected appendicitis: a 3-year analysis. J Pediatr Surg 36:303–308PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Schuh S, Man C, Cheng A et al (2011) Predictors of non-diagnostic ultrasound scanning in children with suspected appendicitis. J Pediatr 158:112–118PubMedCrossRef Schuh S, Man C, Cheng A et al (2011) Predictors of non-diagnostic ultrasound scanning in children with suspected appendicitis. J Pediatr 158:112–118PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Frush KS, Oldham KT (2009) Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S. … or US versus CT? A North American perspective. Pediatr Radiol 39:500–505PubMedCrossRef Frush KS, Oldham KT (2009) Imaging of acute appendicitis in children: EU versus U.S. … or US versus CT? A North American perspective. Pediatr Radiol 39:500–505PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Salvator AE et al (2001) Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology 220:103–107PubMed Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Salvator AE et al (2001) Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology 220:103–107PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hernandez JA, Swischuk LE, Angel CA et al (2005) Imaging of acute appendicitis: US as the primary imaging modality. Pediatr Radiol 35:392–395PubMedCrossRef Hernandez JA, Swischuk LE, Angel CA et al (2005) Imaging of acute appendicitis: US as the primary imaging modality. Pediatr Radiol 35:392–395PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Simonovsky V (1999) Sonographic detection of normal and abnormal appendix. Clin Radiol 54:533–539PubMedCrossRef Simonovsky V (1999) Sonographic detection of normal and abnormal appendix. Clin Radiol 54:533–539PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Ang A, Chong NK, Daneman A (2001) Pediatric appendicitis in “real-time”: the value of sonography in diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Emerg Care 17:334–340PubMedCrossRef Ang A, Chong NK, Daneman A (2001) Pediatric appendicitis in “real-time”: the value of sonography in diagnosis and treatment. Pediatr Emerg Care 17:334–340PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE et al (2011) Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology 259:231–239PubMedCrossRef Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE et al (2011) Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology 259:231–239PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Goldin AB, Khanna P, Thapa M et al (2011) Revised ultrasound criteria for appendicitis in children improve diagnostic accuracy. Pediatr Radiol 41:993–999PubMedCrossRef Goldin AB, Khanna P, Thapa M et al (2011) Revised ultrasound criteria for appendicitis in children improve diagnostic accuracy. Pediatr Radiol 41:993–999PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Migraine S, Atri M, Bret PM et al (1997) Spontaneously resolving acute appendicitis: clinical and sonographic documentation. Radiology 205:55–58PubMed Migraine S, Atri M, Bret PM et al (1997) Spontaneously resolving acute appendicitis: clinical and sonographic documentation. Radiology 205:55–58PubMed
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Pena BM, Taylor GA (2000) Radiologists’ confidence in interpretation of sonography and CT in suspected pediatric appendicitis. AJR 175:71–74PubMed Pena BM, Taylor GA (2000) Radiologists’ confidence in interpretation of sonography and CT in suspected pediatric appendicitis. AJR 175:71–74PubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A critical evaluation of US for the diagnosis of pediatric acute appendicitis in a real-life setting: how can we improve the diagnostic value of sonography?
verfasst von
Andrew T. Trout
Ramon Sanchez
Maria F. Ladino-Torres
Deepa R. Pai
Peter J. Strouse
Publikationsdatum
01.07.2012
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Pediatric Radiology / Ausgabe 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2358-6

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2012

Pediatric Radiology 7/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Hermes

Hermes

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

08.05.2024 Gesellschaft Nachrichten

In einer Leseranfrage in der Zeitschrift Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology möchte ein anonymer Dermatologe bzw. eine anonyme Dermatologin wissen, ob er oder sie einen Patienten behandeln muss, der eine rassistische Tätowierung trägt.

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.