Skip to main content
Erschienen in: BMC Health Services Research 1/2023

Open Access 01.12.2023 | Research

A multilevel Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Poisson modelling of factors associated with components of antenatal care offered to pregnant women in Nigeria

verfasst von: Omon Stellamaris Fagbamigbe, Olugbenga Sunday Olaseinde, Oluwasomidoyin O. Bello, Vincent Setlhare, Jackline Mosinya Nyaberi, Anthony Ike Wegbom, Ayo Stephen Adebowale, Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe

Erschienen in: BMC Health Services Research | Ausgabe 1/2023

Abstract

Background

The most recent WHO guideline on antenatal care (ANC) utilization reaffirmed the necessary and compulsory care and services a pregnant woman should receive to maximize the importance and gains of ANC. While most studies focused on the time of initiation and number of ANC contacts, emphasis was rarely placed on the components of ANC offered to women. This study assessed how complete the components of ANC received by pregnant women are as a proxy for the quality of ANC services offered in Nigeria. We also assessed the clustering of the components and state-level differentials and inequalities in the components of ANC received in Nigeria.

Methods

We used nationally representative cross-sectional data from the 2018 Nigeria Demographic Health Survey. We analysed the data of 11,867 women who had at least one ANC contact during the most recent pregnancy within five years preceding the survey. The assessed components were tetanus injection, blood pressure, urine test, blood test, iron supplement, malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp), and told about danger signs. Others are intestinal parasite drugs (IPD)intermittent and HIV/PMTCT counsel. Descriptive statistics, bivariable and multivariable multilevel Bayesian Monte Carlo Poisson models were used.

Results

In all, 94% had blood pressure measured, 91% received tetanus injection, had iron supplement-89%, blood test-87%, urine test-86%, IPTp-24%, danger signs-80%, HIV/PMTC-82% and IPD-22%. The overall prevalence of receiving all 9 components was 5% and highest in Ogun (24%) and lowest in Kebbi state (0.1%). The earlier the initiation of ANC, the higher the number of contacts, and the higher the quality of ANC received. Respondents with higher education have a 4% (adjusted incidence risk ratio (aIRR): 1.04, 95% credible interval (CrI): 1.01–1.09) higher risk of receiving more components of ANC relative to those with no education. The risk of receiving more ANC components was 5% (aIRRR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.10) higher among pregnant women aged 40 to 49 years than those aged 15 to 19 years. Women who decide their healthcare utilization alone had a 2% higher risk of getting more components than those whose spouses are the only decision taker of healthcare use. Other significant factors were household wealth status, spouse education, ethnicity, place of ANC, and skill of ANC provider. Pregnant women who had their blood pressure measured were very likely to have blood and urine tests, tetanus injections, iron supplements, and HIV talks.

Conclusions

Only one in every 20 pregnant women received all the 9 ANC components with wide disparities and inequalities across the background characteristics and the States of residence in Nigeria. There is a need to ensure that all pregnant women receive adequate components. Stakeholders should increase supplies, train, and create awareness among ANC providers and pregnant women in particular.
Hinweise

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at https://​doi.​org/​10.​1186/​s12913-023-09710-2.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Abkürzungen
aIRR
Adjusted Incidence Risk Ratio Ratio
ANC
Antenatal care
BIC
Bayesian Information Criteria
BP
Blood Pressure
BS
Blood Test
CI
Confidence Interval
EAs
Enumeration areas
FCT
Federal Capital Territory
IRB
Institutional Review Board
IPD
Intestinal parasite drugs
IPTp
Intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy
ICC
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
IRS
Iron Supplement
LGAs
Local government areas
LMIC
Low and Middle-Income Countries
NDHS
Nigeria Demographic Health Survey
PRMM
Pregnancy-related maternal mortality
PSU
Primary sampling unit
SES
Socioeconomic and
SSA
Sub-Sahara Africa
SDG
Sustainable development goals
TET
Tetanus Injection
UNICEF
United Nations Children’s Fund
UNFPA
United Nations Population Fund
US
Urine Test
VPC
Variance Partition Coefficient
WHO
World Health Organization

Introduction

Although improvements have been recorded in maternal and child health globally, most developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) have continued to lag in the pace of this improvement [1]. Most maternal and child health indicators put the Low and Middle-Income Countries (LMIC) including Nigeria at the lower end of the scale [13]. The Maternal and Child Health (MCH) situation in the SSA remained worrisome when compared to the advanced countries and some other developing countries. A childbearing woman in developed countries has only 1 in 5,400 chance of dying from pregnancy and childbirth-related complications compared with only 1 in 22 chances in SSA [1].
To facilitate the attainment of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on improved health and wellbeing [4], in its Strategy for Health 2016 to 2030, the UNICEF envisioned “a world where no child dies from a preventable cause and all children reach their full potential in health and wellbeing” [5]. Efforts focused on achieving this vision birthed the goal to “end preventable maternal, newborn and child deaths” [5]. This underscores the need to ensure guaranteed maternal and child health without inequality at any level. Antenatal care (ANC) is recognised worldwide as the main approach to ensure safe maternal and infant health outcomes. Compliance with ANC protocol is important in the management of pregnancy conditions and is essential for safe delivery [69]. The standards in the existing ANC protocol were reviewed in 2016 to reinvigorate the ANC program to guarantee the realization of the relevant goal of the SDGs by 2030 [9]. The reviewed WHO guideline on ANC utilization established three main pillars that can help maximize the gains and importance of ANC utilization. They are (i) initiation of first ANC contact in the first trimester of gestation (ii) having a minimum of 8 ANC contacts and (iii) receiving all components of ANC during the contacts with ANC providers. Therefore, it is not just sufficient to initiate ANC early and have at least 8 ANC contacts, a pregnant woman must receive all the components of ANC services. WHO therefore prescribed the components of ANC to achieve effective results all over the world [9]. Thus, among other reviewed standards, several services were packaged to make up for the minimum quality of ANC available to a pregnant woman. Emphasis was laid on the compulsory administration of specific components of ANC [9]. WHO identified and grouped the components to ensure standard quality of ANC into three (i) history taking, assessment, physical examination and laboratory tests, (ii) health promotion and education on nutrition, delivery, danger signs, and child health and (iii) care provisions such as tetanus toxoid immunization, and others [912]. The specifics of these components vary slightly across countries.
Although evidence shows that ANC coverage has increased in Nigeria [1316], improvement in coverage alone cannot guarantee safe maternal and infant health outcomes [17, 18]. A Nigerian study showed evidence of an unacceptable quality of ANC with only about 1 in 8 pregnant women who had ANC contacts being provided with the minimum quality standard [17]. The study further emphasized that the poor quality of ANC among childbearing women might have contributed to the non-realisation of the defunct Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) on child and maternal health in Nigeria.
Early initiation of ANC, a sufficient number of ANC contacts, attention by skilled health workers, living in urban areas, better education, short distance to health facilities, media exposure, and household wealth quintile have been associated with the quality of ANC received by pregnant women in Nigeria [2, 17, 1921]. Older pregnant women, higher parity, higher level of education, and higher household wealth status were identified as factors associated with receiving a good quality of ANC by a similar study in Nepal [20]. Also, a Kenyan study pointed out that the level of women’s literacy, employment status, and receiving all ANC services from a health facility had a relationship with having a good quality of ANC by pregnant women [22, 23]. Studies have identified that the commonest components of ANC services received by pregnant women were blood pressure measurement, iron supplement, and urine test [17, 22]; while education on PMTCT was low in Nigeria as only 2 in 5 tested for HIV during ANC visit [17] and negligible proportion had an ultrasound performed.
While most studies focused on the time of initiation of ANC contacts and the minimum number of ANC contacts made, such emphasis was rarely placed on the components of ANC offered to women during the ANC contacts. Whereas, up-to-date information on the components of ANC services could provide a good understanding of the level of compliance with the recommended components and standards of ANC in Nigeria and could provide relevant evidence-based information necessary to inform policy on the implementation of the WHO ANC guidelines. This study is also a response to the United Nations' call for periodical monitoring and evaluation of how close countries of the world are to attaining the specific targets of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) [4]. The call also encouraged sub-country analysis. Our study shows how close Nigeria is to SDG-3 target 3.1: “By 2030, end preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years of age, with all countries aiming to reduce neonatal mortality to at least as low as 12 per 1,000 live births and under-5 mortality to at least as low as 25 per 1,000 live births” [4]. The services received during ANC contacts are of paramount importance to the attainment of SDG-3. Therefore, this study assessed the number of components of ANC received by pregnant women in Nigeria and its associated factors. We also assessed state-level differentials and inequalities in the quality of ANC care across the states in Nigeria and examined the clustering of the ANC components (or its lack) to inform policy intervention and research translation. The study provided recommendations on the pathways for the improvement of maternal and child health outcomes in Nigeria.

Conceptual framework

Having ANC components could be influenced by different factors. These range from the personal characteristics of the individuals and the particular household they come from to the peculiarity of their communities and states of residence. Put together, women and their household compositional factors as well as the contextual factors based on community and state of residence and the overall health system could influence the components of ANC offered and received. Of importance are the community factors (such as poverty, illiteracy, rural residence, and poor media access and societal factors such as religion and ethnicity as they could affect the uptake of components. Based on existing literature [17, 19, 2225], the important individual-level factors are maternal age, education, employment status, access to media, household wealth tertiles, women's autonomy, birth interval, birth order, children ever born, current marital status, place of residence, religion, and ethnicity, family mobility, household headship, health insurance coverage. The community-level factors include community poverty, unemployment, illiteracy, and media access rates as well as state-level rural population percentage.

Methodologies

Study setting and data source

The study was retrospective and cross-sectional in design. Data were extracted from the nationally representative 2018 Nigeria Demographic Health Survey (NDHS) conducted by ICF Macro Calverton, Maryland, USA in conjunction with the Nigeria National Population Commission (NPC), Nigeria [15]. Administratively, Nigeria is divided into 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The states are further grouped into 6 regions as shown in Fig. 1. Although the regions have no administrative functions, people within each region are deemed to have similar characteristics, culture, ethnicity, vegetation etc. Each state is subdivided into local government areas (LGAs). Using the most recent 2006 Population Census, each LGA was subdivided into convenient areas called census enumeration areas (EAs).

Sampling techniques

A two-stage probability sampling was adopted to select the respondents who were women of childbearing age (15–49). The EAs were the primary sampling unit (PSU). In each state, depending on the population, about 38 EAs were selected with probability proportional to EA size making a total of 1,400 EAs in the first stage. Then a full list of households in all selected EAs in the first stage was drawn to serve as the sampling frame for household selection in the second stage. In the second stage, 30 households were selected in every EAs using equal probability systematic sampling. All eligible women of reproductive age (15–49 years) in each selected household were interviewed. Due to the non-proportional allocation of sample sizes at the different states, LGAs and EAs, as well as the possible differences in response rates, sampling weights were applied in all the descriptive analyses. A total of 41,821 women aged 15–49 years were interviewed [15].

The data

All respondents (women aged 15–49 years) were asked if they had any pregnancy or birth within 5 years preceding the survey (2013 to 2018). Those who had at least one birth were thereafter asked questions relating to conception, and pregnancy-related care including ANC visits made, time ANC began, ANC care provider, etc. of each birth delivery starting from the most recent. Our analysis is based on the information provided on the most recent deliveries and the associated pregnancy information. We assessed all pregnancy history between 2013 and 2018. Among the 21,785 women who provided information about the ANC visits during their most recent pregnancy within the five years that preceded the survey, 16,448 (75.5%) made at least one ANC visit. Furthermore, of those that had at least one ANC contact, only 11,867 (72.1%) provided the ANC components received during all ANC contacts for the most recent pregnancy. Our analysis was based on the components of ANC received by the 11,867 women.

Multilevel structure of the data

We identified three distinct levels: individual, community and state levels. The likelihood of a woman receiving a certain number of ANC components may be influenced by her background characteristics and her household characteristics (Level 1). The community (Level 2) and the state (Level 3) where a woman resides in Nigeria may also influence receiving ANC components. The “communities” are synonymous with “EAs”, “neighbourhoods” and “clusters”. The community behaviour could be informed by literacy level as well as other sociocultural factors. The states in Nigeria varied extensively in terms of the availability of resources, and rural–urban population. In all, there were 11,867 individuals at level 1, 418 communities at level 2 and 37 states at level 3.

Variables

The outcome variable in this study is the quality of ANC services using the number of ANC components received as a proxy. The identified components were receiving tetanus injection, intestinal parasite drugs (IPD), blood pressure, urine test, blood test, iron supplement, three or more doses of malaria intermittent preventive treatment in pregnancy (IPTp), being told about danger signs, and counselled on HIV/PMTCT (either talked about HIV transmitted mother to child, things to do to prevent getting HIV, getting tested for HIV). These components have been recommended and recognized in the literature [9, 10, 17, 20, 22, 26].
The independent variables include Level 1: maternal age (15–19,20–24, 25–29, 30–39, 40–49 years), education (no education, primary, secondary and higher), spouse education (no education, primary, secondary and higher), employment status (currently employed or not), spouse employment status (currently employed or not), access to media (at least one of radio, television, or newspaper), household wealth tertiles (lowest, middle, and highest), women's autonomy using “who decides respondents health care” (respondent alone, respondent/spouse, and spouse alone) as a proxy. Others are birth interval (firstborn, < 36 months, and >  = 36 months), birth order (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 +), children ever born (none, 1–2, 3–4, 4 +), current marital status (currently married or living together, divorced/separated/widowed, never married), religion (Islam, Christian, others), and ethnicity (Hausa/Fulani, Igbo, Yoruba, and others). Family mobility (had stayed less than five years at residence or not), wanted child when became pregnant (then, later or not more), household headship (male or female), health insurance coverage (yes or no), place of ANC (health institution or non-health institution such as missions, homes and traditional attendants) and ANC caregiver (skilled or unskilled). Level 2: the place of residence (rural/urban), the poverty rate (high or low), unemployment rate (high or low), illiteracy rate (high or low), and media access rate (high or low). We computed the community socioeconomic (SES) disadvantage composite score using principal component analysis of the proportion of respondents within each community with rural dwellers, no media access, illiterates, poor, and unemployed. The SES was categorized into three tertiles: lowest, middle, and highest. Level 3: proportion of the rural population in the states of residence. It was categorised as low rural proportion (0% to 33.3%); an average rural proportion (33.4% to 66.7%) and a high rural proportion (66.8% to 100%).

Statistical methods

Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, bivariable, and multivariable logistic regression using STATA version 16 (Stata Corp, Texas, USA). We invoked the “SVY” command in STATA to adjust for the study design and the sampling weights. Frequency tables showing percentages were used to describe the distribution of study respondents’ characteristics and the distribution of outcome variables by the respondents’ characteristics (Table 1).
Table 1
Respondents’ characteristics and having all ANC components during the most recent pregnancy
Characteristics
n (%)
Received All 9
  
%
*p-value
Age of mothers(years)
  
0.004
 15 – 19
705(6.0)
2.0
 
 20 – 24
2569(21.7)
4.1
 
 25 – 29
3314(27.9)
5.3
 
 30 – 39
4420(37.2)
6.0
 
 40 – 49
856(7.2)
5.4
 
Highest educational level
  
0.000
 No education
4057(34.2)
1.6
 
 Primary
1902(16.0)
5.2
 
 Secondary
4587(38.7)
6.9
 
 Higher
1320(11.1)
9.6
 
Spouse’s highest education
  
0.000
 No education
2828(25.3)
1.1
 
 Primary
1631(14.6)
5.0
 
 Secondary
4494(40.2)
6.4
 
 Higher
2209(19.7)
7.3
 
Who decides respondent’s healthcare
  
0.000
 Respondent alone
1176(10.5)
6.6
 
 Respondent and Spouse
3937(35.1)
7.0
 
 Spouse alone
6093(54.4)
3.4
 
Media exposure
  
0.000
 Unexposed to media
3519(29.7)
1.9
 
 Exposed to media
8348(70.3)
6.5
 
Ethnicity
  
0.000
 Hausa/Fulani
4668(39.3)
1.6
 
 Yoruba
1680(14.2)
12.9
 
 Igbo
2050(17.3)
8.5
 
 Others
3468(29.2)
4.1
 
Religion
  
0.000
 Islam
6750(56.9)
3.4
 
 Other Christians
5064(42.6)
7.6
 
 Others
53(0.5)
0.0
 
Marital Status
  
0.385
 Never married
267(2.3)
10.4
 
 Living with a spouse
11,280(95.1)
5.0
 
 Widowed/Divorced/Separated
320(2.7)
6.4
 
Household Wealth status
  
0.000
 Lowest
2834(23.9)
1.7
 
 Middle
3925(33.1)
4.0
 
 Richest
5107(43.0)
9.0
 
Children ever-born
  
0.001
 1 or 2 births
4260(38.9)
6.0
 
 3 or 4 births
3424(28.9)
6.2
 
 More than 4 births
3822(32.2)
3.2
 
Birth order
  
0.000
 First
2315(19.5)
6.6
 
 Second
2305(19.4)
5.4
 
 Third
1903(16.0)
6.4
 
 Fourth
1521(12.8)
5.9
 
 Fifth or higher
3822(32.2)
3.2
 
Birth interval
  
0.001
 First birth
2315(19.5)
6.6
 
  < 36 months
5520(46.6)
4.1
 
  >  = 36 months
4013(33.9)
5.8
 
Current employment status
  
0.000
 Employed
8346(70.3)
6.1
 
 Unemployed
3521(29.7)
2.9
 
Spouse current employment statement
  
0.000
 Employed
8846(74.5)
5.9
 
 Unemployed
3021(25.5)
2.8
 
Sex of the Household Head
  
0.110
 Male
10,716(90.3)
5.0
 
 Female
1151(9.7)
6.3
 
Wanted Last child
  
0.738
 Then
10,338(87.1)
5.1
 
 Later
1177(9.9)
5.4
 
 Never
352(3.0)
4.1
 
Family Mobility
  
0.019
 5 + yr
9561(80.6)
4.9
 
 Less stable 0-4 yr
2305(19.4)
6.3
 
Have health Insurance
  
0.223
 No
11,563(97.4)
5.1
 
 Yes
304(2.6)
7.0
 
Place of antenatal care
  
0.026
 Non-health facility
439(3.7)
1.9
 
 Health facility
11,428(96.3)
5.3
 
Provider of ANC assistance
  
0.000
 Unskilled provider
1724(14.5)
1.5
 
 Skilled provider
10,143(85.5)
5.7
 
No of ANC Visits
  
0.000
 1–3
2859(24.4)
2.0
 
 4–7
5960(51.0)
4.8
 
 8 + 
2872(24.6)
7.6
 
First ANC Visit
  
0.000
 Trimester 1
2805(23.7)
8.2
 
 Trimester 2
7432(62.7)
4.6
 
 Trimester 3
1611(13.6)
2.4
 
Region
  
0.000
 North central
1420(12.0)
4.5
 
 North East
2143(18.1)
3.1
 
 North West
3770(31.8)
1.5
 
 South East
1478(12.5)
8.3
 
 South South
1112(9.4)
5.8
 
 South West
1945(16.4)
12.2
 
Residence
  
0.000
 Urban
5458(46.0)
6.6
 
 Rural
6409(54.0)
3.9
 
Community Poverty Rate
  
0.001
 High
4863(41.0)
3.7
 
 Low
7004(59.0)
5.8
 
Community Illiteracy
  
0.000
 High
4967(41.9)
3.3
 
 Low
6900(58.1)
5.9
 
Community Unemployment
  
0.007
 High
5226(44.0)
4.1
 
 Low
6641(56.0)
5.8
 
Community Media barrier
  
0.167
 High
5817(49.0)
4.6
 
 Low
6049(51.0)
5.5
 
Community SES Disadvantage
  
0.000
 Lowest
4807(40.5)
9.7
 
 Middle
4296(36.2)
4.0
 
 Highest
2764(23.3)
1.3
 
Total
11,867
5.1
 
*Significance at χ2 0.05
We fitted a multilevel Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) Poisson-based Generalized Linear Model (GLMs) to the data, with women nested within EAs and the EAs nested within the states. The models have mixed outcomes consisting of fixed and random parts as shown in Eq. (1).
$$log\left(\gamma_{ijk}\right)=\underbrace{\beta_0+\sum\nolimits^t_{p=1}\beta_pX_{pijk}}_{Fixed}+\underbrace{U_{0jk}+V_{0k}}_{Random}$$
(1)
The “risk” that pregnant woman \(i\) of community \(j\) from state \(k\) will receive ANC component is denoted by \({\gamma }_{ijk}\), \({\mathrm{U}}_{ojk}\) is the random effect of mothers community \(j\) in state \(k\) and \({\mathrm{V}}_{ok}\) is the random effect of state \(k\), \({e}_{ijk}\) is the noise such that \({e}_{ijk}\sim N\left(0,{\sigma }_{e}^{2}\right)\), \({U}_{ojk}\sim N\left(0,{\sigma }_{U}^{2}\right)\) and \({V}_{ok}\sim N\left(0,{\sigma }_{V}^{2}\right)\) in a model with \(t\) covariates.
We reported the measure of the rates of receiving the components as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with their 95% credible intervals (CrI). Measures of variations were explored using the intraclass correlation (ICC) and median incidence rate ratios (MIRR) [27, 28]. The ICCs, an equivalent of the variance partition coefficient (VPC), is the percentage of the total variance in the risk of a pregnant woman obtaining the components that are related to the community and state where they live (i.e. a measure of clustering of the “risk” receiving ANC components in the same community and state). We also estimated the proportion of total variance which are accounted for at the community \(\left[{\sigma }_{U}^{2}/\left({\sigma }_{U}^{2}+{\sigma }_{V}^{2}+{\sigma }_{e}^{2}\right)\right]\) and the state \(\left[{\sigma }_{V}^{2}/\left({\sigma }_{U}^{2}+{\sigma }_{V}^{2}+{\sigma }_{e}^{2}\right)\right]\) levels. The MIRR is the estimate of the probability that a pregnant woman will receive additional components attributable to the community and state context. The Bayesian MCMC Multilevel Poisson model was implemented using MLwin v3.03 and implemented in Stata V16 with the following parameters: Burnin = 5000; Chain = 50,000, Thinning = 50.
At the bivariable level, we identified all independent variables that were significant at p < 0.20 and used them as candidate variables in the multivariable model. We then estimated the adjusted odds ratios of characteristics associated with the components of ANC services. The “collin” command in Stata was used to identify collinear variables and the associated Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). Based on the VIF, the less important pair of collinear variables was dropped from the multiple regression. In the Bayesian MCMC Multilevel Poisson model, we stated the respective levels: levels 1, 2 and 3. We started with a null model (no independent variable), then individual-level alone, then community-level alone, then state-level alone and finally the model. These models were compared using Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC). These were summarised in the supplementary Table A. We used the principal component (PCA) and factor analysis procedure to explore clustering among the components. The PCA method maintains all theoretically relevant variables and avoids the negative influence of high inter-correlation among the variables [29, 30]. The “cluster single-linkage” and “loadingplot” commands in Stata were used to analyse the data and visualize the clustering respectively.

Ethics approval

This study was based on the analysis of existing survey data. The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Inner-City Fund International (ICF) Macro at Fairfax, Virginia in the USA reviewed and approved the protocol for the Demographic and Health Surveys Project Phase III (Number FWA000008450). The 2010–2018 DHS’s were categorized under that approval. The IRB of ICF Macro complied with the United States Department of Health and Human Services requirements for the “Protection of Human Subjects” (45 CFR 46). The specific ethical guidelines for the conduct of the study by the IRB on benevolence, non-maleficence and confidentially were followed strictly. Written informed consent was obtained from every study participant before participation and all information was collected without identifiers and kept confidential. We were granted full access to use the data by ICF with authorisation letter 144,644 but we are not allowed to share the data. All intending users are required to request from the original data owners at http://​dhsprogram.​com.

Results

The data was collected from a cross-section of women selected using two-stage probability sampling across the 37 states in Nigeria. In all, 11,867 women provided information about the ANC components received during ANC visits for their most recent pregnancy during the 5 years preceding the survey. According to the owners of the data, in the households interviewed, 42,121 women aged 15–49 years were identified for individual interviews; interviews were completed with 41,821 women, yielding a response rate of 99.3% with 99.2% in urban areas and 99.4% in the rural areas [15]. However, we do not have any information on the population composition of pregnant women in Nigeria. The availability of this would have enabled the assessment of the level of representativeness of the respondents. During the last pregnancy, 94% had their blood pressure measured, nine of every ten women (91%) received a tetanus injection, 89% were given an iron supplement, 87% had a blood test, 86% had a urine test, 82% received counselling on HIV/PMTC, 80% were told about danger signs while only 24% got IPTp and only 22% received IPD (Fig. 2).
Figure 3 shows that only 5% of the respondents received all 9 components (Fig. 3). The commonest (35%) number of components received was 7. About 61% and 90% received at least 7 and at least 5 components respectively.
Table 1 shows the distribution of the respondents by their background characteristics and the prevalence of receiving all the 9 studied components. The prevalence of having the 9 components was highest (6%) among women aged 30 to 39 years compared with 2% among those aged 15 to 19 years. Nearly a quarter (10%) of the pregnant women with higher education who had at least one ANC contact received all the 9 ANC components while less than 2% of those with no education did. The proportion of all the 9 ANC components was lowest among women whose spouse alone decide health care access (3%), no media exposure (2%), Hausa/Fulani (2%), from households in the lowest wealth tertile (2%), North East (3%) North West (2%) and rural areas (4%) as shown in Table 1. All the explanatory variables considered were significantly (p < 0.001) associated with receiving all the ANC components received except whether the pregnancy was wanted or not and the type of ANC facility attended. Also, all characteristics in Table 1 were associated with having all 9 components, except marital status, sex of household head, whether the pregnancy was wanted or not, health insurance, and community media access. Having all the components was significantly higher among women from communities with low rates of illiteracy, poverty, and community socioeconomic disadvantage.
Figure 4 shows the map of Nigeria with the geographical distribution of the percentage of ANC attendees that received all nine components across the states. The highest prevalence of receiving all the 9 studied components was highest in Abia (32%), none (0%) in Zamfara, Borno (0.1%) and Kebbi (0.3%). Benue (8.3%), Kwara (8.6%) and Adamawa (9.3%) are the only states in the North with at least 5% women receiving all 9 components. The only five states with 10% or higher were from the southern part of Nigeria. The distribution of having all ANC components received during the most recent pregnancy by States and regions in Nigeria is shown in Supplementary Table A.

Relationship between the number of ANC contacts, the timing of first ANC contact, and receiving all 9 ANC components received in Nigeria

The number of ANC contacts made during the last pregnancy and the timing of the first ANC contact were both significantly associated with the adequacy of ANC components received (Table 1 and Fig. 5). Figure 5 shows that a linear association exists between the number of ANC contacts made, the timing of the first ANC contacts, and the adequacy of ANC care received. Pregnant women who had first ANC contact during the first trimester had a higher (8%) prevalence of having all 9 components than those who started in the third trimester (2%). Similarly, pregnant women who had 8 or more ANC contact had a higher (8%) prevalence of having all 9 components than those who had less than 4 contacts (2%).

Factors associated with the number of ANC components received

Table 2 shows the crude and adjusted risk of receiving additional components of ANC among the respondents from the multilevel Bayesian MCMC Poisson model. The Bayesian information criteria for model 5 for the lowest among all the five models considered. The five-way MCMC graphical diagnostics of model 5 at the community and state levels are presented in Fig. 6 and Fig. 7 respectively. The Figures show the convergence of the adjusted model presented in Table 2. The Figures gave credence that the adopted model converged and fit for predicting the number of ANC quality received by the women. Respondents with higher education have a 4% (adjusted incidence risk ratio (aIRR): 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01–1.09) higher risk of receiving more components of ANC relative to those with no education (Table 2). The risk of receiving more ANC components was 5% (aIRR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.01–1.10) higher among pregnant women aged 40 to 49 years than those aged 15 to 19 years. Women who decide their healthcare utilization alone had a 2% higher risk of getting more components than those whose spouses are the only decision taker of healthcare use. Pregnant women from in South East were 6% more likely to receive a higher number of components of ANC relative to those in the North West. Also, respondents from the households in the richest wealth quartile were 3% more likely to receive a higher number of components of ANC relative to those from households in the low wealth category. The risk of having a higher number of components was 4% higher in communities with the lowest SES disadvantaged than those with the highest disadvantage. Other significant variables with having a higher number of components of ANC are spouse education, ethnicity, religion, respondent’s current employment status, family mobility, having health insurance, place of ANC, the skill of ANC provider, and the proportion of the rural population in the states of residence.
Table 2
Crude and Adjusted correlates of the number of ANC components received during the most recent pregnancy (NDHS 2018)
Characteristics
IRR(95% CI)
significance
aIRR(95% CI)
significance
Fixed Effects
Age of mothers
 15 – 19
Reference
   
 20 – 24
1.05(1.02–1.09)
0.003
1.03(0.98–1.07)
0.096
 25 – 29
1.09(1.05–1.13)
0.000
1.04(0.99–1.09)
0.045
 30 – 39
1.09(1.06–1.13)
0.000
1.04(1.01–1.09)
0.038
 40 – 49
1.08(1.03–1.12)
0.001
1.05(1.01–1.10)
0.045
Highest educational level
 No education
Reference
   
 Primary
1.06(1.04–1.09)
0.000
1.01(0.98–1.04)
0.300
 Secondary
1.14(1.12–1.16)
0.000
1.04(1.01–1.07)
0.010
 Higher
1.20(1.17–1.23)
0.000
1.04(1.01–1.09)
0.024
Spouse’s highest education
 No education
Reference
   
 Primary
1.08(1.05–1.11)
0.000
1.03(1.01–1.05)
0.049
 Secondary
1.15(1.12–1.17)
0.000
1.05(1.02–1.08)
0.000
 Higher
1.18(1.15–1.21)
0.000
1.05(1.02–1.08)
0.000
Who decides respondent’s healthcare
 Respondent alone
1.05(1.02–1.07)
0.001
1.02(1.01–1.03)
0.048
 Respondent and Spouse
1.06(1.04–1.08)
0.000
1.00(0.98–1.02)
0.454
 Spouse alone
Reference
   
Media exposure
 Exposed to media
1.13(1.11–1.15)
0.000
1.03(1.01–1.05)
0.002
Ethnicity
 Hausa/Fulani
Reference
   
 Yoruba
1.13(1.10–1.16)
0.000
1.03(1.01–1.07)
0.315
 Igbo
1.15(1.13–1.18)
0.000
1.05(1.01–1.11)
0.032
 Others
1.09(1.04–1.15)
0.001
1.01(0.98–1.04)
0.038
Religion
 Islam
Reference
   
 Christians
1.08(1.07–1.10)
0.000
0.99(0.96–1.02)
0.254
 Others
1.03(0.93–1.14)
0.554
0.95(0.84–1.07)
0.201
Marital Status
 Never married
1.01(0.94–1.07)
0.864
 + 
 
 Living with a spouse
1.01(0.97–1.06)
0.549
  
 Widowed/Divorced/Separated
Reference
   
Household Wealth status
 Low
Reference
   
 Middle
1.09(1.07–1.11)
0.000
1.02(1–00-1.04)
0.026
 Richest
1.17(1.15–1.19)
0.000
1.03(1.01–1.06)
0.034
Children ever-born
 1 or 2 births
1.04(1.02–1.06)
0.000
1.01(0.98–1.04)
0.204
 3 or 4 births
1.04(1.02–1.06)
0.000
1.01(0.98–1.03)
0.378
 More than 4 births
Reference
   
Current employment status
 Employed
1.03(1.01–1.05)
0.001
0.97(0.93–1.01)
0.074
Spouse current employment status
 Employed
1.04(1.02–1.06)
0.000
1.04(1.01–1.09)
0.039
Place of antenatal care
 Health facility
1.42(1.35–1.49)
0.000
1.37(1.29–1.44)
0.000
Provider of ANC assistance
 Skilled provider
1.19(1.16–1.22)
0.000
1.10(1.07–1.12)
0.000
Household head sex
 Male
1.03(1.01–1.05)
0.016
1.00(0.98–1.03)
0.390
Wanted Last child
 Then
1.03(0.98–1.07)
0.243
 + 
 
 Later
1.01(0.97–1.06)
0.576
  
 Never
Reference
   
Family Mobility
 Less stable 0-4 yr
1.04(1.03–1.06)
0.000
1.00(0.98–1.02)
0.472
Have health Insurance
    
 Yes
1.09(1.05–1.14)
0.000
1.01(0.96–1.06)
0.338
Region
 North West
Reference
   
 North Central
1.07(1.04–1.1)
0.000
1.00(0.93–1.07)
0.462
 North East
1.00(0.98–1.02)
0.933
1.01(0.94–1.08)
0.399
 South East
1.16(1.13–1.19)
0.000
1.06(1.01–1.12)
0.017
 South South
1.05(1.02–1.08)
0.001
1.00(0.92–1.08)
0.493
 South West
1.12(1.1–1.15)
0.000
1.06(0.96–1.15)
0.123
Random Effects
Community Level
Residence
 Urban
1.09(1.07–1.11)
0.000
1.01(0.99–1.03)
0.154
Community SES Disadvantage
 Lowest
1.19(1.17–1.21)
0.000
1.04(1.01–1.07)
0.023
 Middle
1.12(1.10–1.14)
0.000
1.01(0.98–1.05)
0.170
 Highest
Reference
   
Community Unemployment rate
 Low
1.00(0.99–1.02)
0.559
 + 
 
Community media barrier rate
 Low
1.07(1.06–1.09)
0.000
1.01(0.99–1.03)
0.176
Community Illiteracy rate
    
 High
1.05(1.03–1.07)
0.000
1.03(1.01–1.04)
0.048
Community Poverty rate
 High
1.03(1.02–1.05)
0.000
1.01(0.99–1.04)
0.175
State Level
Rural population proportion
 Low
1.09(1.07–1.11)
0.000
1.03(1.01–1.06)
0.034
 Middle
0.91(0.97–1.01)
0.160
0.95(0.91–1.00)
0.053
 High
Reference
   
Model Estimates
State level: MIRR = 1.05 (1.04–1.08), VPC (ICC) = 0.09(0.05–0.17), % Explained variation = 56.2(29.9–77.3) Community Level: MIRR = 1.02 (1.01–1.07), VPC (ICC) = 0.10(0.05–0.33), % Explained variation = 49.0(28.6–75.4)
IRR Incidence Rate Ratio, MIRR Median Incidence Rate Ratio, CrI Credible Interval, VPC Variance Partition Coefficient, ICC intraclass correlation, BIC Bayesian Information Criteria, + dropped from adjusted model

Clustering of ANC components received

Figure 8 shows the clustering of components of ANC received. It shows that pregnant women who received information on HIV, are likely to receive information on danger sign warnings and get tetanus injections while having urine tests, blood pressure and blood test formed a cluster and finally having IPD and IPTp formed another cluster. As shown, there are lower chances of having IPD and IPTp compared with the other components.

Discussions

Main results and comparison with existing literature

This study was designed to assess the level of ANC components offered to pregnant women in Nigeria during ANC contacts in Nigeria and the associated factors. We found that only one in every twenty pregnant women received all the 9 ANC components assessed in this study. The ANC components are having blood pressure measured, receiving a tetanus injection, having a urine test, having a blood test, being given an iron supplement, reported taking three or more doses of IPTp, IPD, and being told about danger signs and HIV/PMTCT. In comparison with the findings of Fagbamigbe et al., the proportion of women who received all ANC components offered remained low [17]. The authors assessed the quality of ANC in Nigeria using data collected in the same setting five years earlier, the authors found that only 12% of the respondents had the 7 critical components of ANC [17]. One would have expected a much higher tremendous improvement in the quality of ANC services following the rejuvenation of Nigeria's primary healthcare system in recent times through the World Bank sponsored “Nigerian State Health Investment Programme (NSHIP)” [31]. The low level is despite the well-known fact that the quality of ANC care significantly reduces mortality, morbidity, and disabilities and improves health maternal and child health outcomes [3234]. Globally, ANC and its compliance remain the safest approach for safe motherhood [68].
Although at least 79% of the women received each of the 7 of the 9 components of ANC during the last pregnancy, only 24% and 22% each had IPTp and IPD respectively. Nigeria is a malaria-infested country, despite that the disease is preventable, treatable, and curable, with over 25% of the annual 25–30 million pregnant women in malaria-endemic areas in Africa [35], yet less than a quarter received the prescribed doses of IPTp. It is worrisome that only a quarter of pregnant women in Nigeria had IPTp during their last pregnancy and only 17% of women with a live birth in the 2 years preceding the survey reported having at least 3 doses of IPTp [15]. Malaria is one of the foremost public health problems in the country. Nigeria alone accounts for a quarter of the burden of malaria in Africa. This was why the Federal Ministry of Health recommended that all pregnant women should have at least three doses of IPTp in the course of each pregnancy. There is an urgent need to increase the uptake of IPTp in Nigeria. The low level of pregnant women offered IPD resonates with the little attention paid to the fight against intestinal parasites during pregnancy in Nigeria, the long clamour for its use to address this public health problem notwithstanding [36, 37]. Nigeria, just like most sub-Saharan African countries, harbours the greatest proportion of global intestinal parasitic infections largely as a result of her socioeconomic and environmental challenges [3840].
Socio-demographic and economic characteristics pose a significant influence on the number of ANC components offered to pregnant women. In this study, similar to the findings of other studies in LMIC, various characteristics including respondents’ age, education, and economic class significantly influenced the adequacy of ANC components received [20, 4143]. In particular, pregnant women with higher educational attainment had a higher likelihood of receiving a higher number of components of ANC relative to those with no education. Similarly, there is a higher likelihood of receiving all components among pregnant women aged 40 to 49 years relative to those aged 15 to 19 years just as those from households in the wealthiest quintile had higher chances of receiving complete ANC components. Although education mediates in the choice of place of ANC services [41, 44], and more educated women are more likely to belong to households in wealthier quintiles [29] and initiate ANC earlier [33, 45], it is not certain if different categories of women attending the same facility received different components based on their educational status. This will require further studies. Women with better-educated spouses also have significantly higher chances of receiving all the components.
Women who make decisions on their healthcare utilization alone or jointly with their spouses had significantly higher chances of getting more components than those whose spouses are the only decision-maker in women's healthcare. Our finding is in agreement with existing literature [41, 44, 46]. This ease of decision-making on women's healthcare utilization can greatly influence the timeliness of ANC service uptake, the number of ANC contacts made, and consequently, the quality of ANC services received.
Although insignificant in the multivariable model, the proportion that received all the components among the Christians nearly tripled the proportion among the Muslim women. This might be ascribed to the fact that Christians provide mission delivery and care and thereby provide the components better than others. Also, Christians may often receive double ANC service. Most times, Christian pregnant women receive ANC services from both the mission houses as well as other government facilities [47, 48]. This could have increased the quality of ANC services among Christian women than among other women. Nonetheless, the differences in the number of ANC components received across the religious groups could be largely due to the states of residence of the respondent as most Muslim women reside in the northern states while Christian women are mostly from the southern states. These differentials could be explained by the prevalent low level of education, poverty and nomadic lifestyle of the northerners. These may hinder their use of ANC and by extension, the number of components received.
Another significant variable in the receipt of a higher number of ANC components is ethnicity. A higher number of components were commoner among the Igbo women than the Hausa/Fulani women but insignificantly different when compared with the Yoruba women [33, 45]. From this study, there were wide variations in the adequacy of components received by these background characteristics. Although insignificant in the adjusted model, receipt of higher numbers of the component was higher among pregnant women who have less mobility, did not experience violence and who have health insurance. Women with health insurance have a higher likelihood of having quality ANC services. This finding points to the fact that the components are mostly offered when the ANC services are covered by insurance than when they are provided free of charge.
We found that pregnant women from the same communities have a similar likelihood of receiving similar components. Those from the least disadvantaged social-economic status communities had a preponderance of receiving a higher number of ANC components than those from the most disadvantaged communities. Pregnant women from communities with a low proportion of illiterate women also had higher chances of receiving a higher number of components just as those from states with a low rural population received higher numbers of components. The skill and distance of ANC providers to a community can greatly influence the adequacy of ANC components offered [49].
There were wide variations in the completeness of components received by background characteristics and the state of origin of the women. There is a need to overturn the inadequacies and eliminate disparities and variations in receiving all the ANC components. These variations and disparities could contribute to poor pregnancy outcomes [22]. Of significance in this study, are the type of health facility where ANC services were sourced and the skill of the ANC service provider. Pregnant women who attended institutional health care services including public and private standard hospitals and those attended to by qualified nurses and doctors had a higher level of receiving a higher number of ANC components. Similar studies have associated these factors with the quality of ANC services [22, 24, 43, 50]. This association could be ascribed to a better knowledge of the importance of the components among trained nurses, midwives, and doctors than the other unskilled providers who are usually found in non-institutional facilities [12].
We found that the number of ANC visits made during pregnancy and the timing of the first ANC visit were both significantly associated with the number of ANC components received. The earlier the initiation of ANC contacts, the higher the prevalence of having a higher number of ANC components. Fagbamigbe et al. had already suggested that early initiation of ANC contacts and having a sufficient number of contacts may increase the number of components of ANC received [2, 3]. Also, the higher the number of ANC contacts made, the higher the prevalence of having a higher number of ANC components. This is intuitive as initiating ANC contact early during the first trimester could increase the proportion of pregnant women making eight or more visits and the quality of ANC received will increase proportionately. Our finding is corroborated by findings of earlier studies that the high quality of ANC services is a direct consequence of early initiation and the sufficient number of ANC contacts [22, 24, 43, 50]. Literature is replete that ANC services significantly promote maternal and child health outcomes and by extension, reduction of maternal and child mortalities [22, 41, 51, 52].
It is striking that all the states in the Northern regions of Nigeria except Kwara and FCT had less than the national average that received all the 9 components of ANC. The average proportion who received all the 9 components in the North Central, Northeast, and North West were 5%, 3%, and 2% respectively. The prevalence in Kebbi State was 0.3% while Borno had 0.1%. Similar geographical variations in the quality of ANC have been documented [12]. States with the highest prevalence of ANC attendance had the highest prevalence of women receiving all components and vice versa. Although the prevalence is generally poor in Nigeria, the States with low ANC utilization and low prevalence of having all ANC components should take a cue from states such as Lagos, Ogun, Abia, and Anambra with better indicators. Additionally, we found clustering among having talks on HIV prevention and transmission, talk on danger signs and having tetanus injection while having urine test, blood pressure and blood test formed a cluster and finally having IPD and IPTp formed another cluster. There were distinct variabilities in the clustering of these ANC components.

Implications for policy

There is a need to ensure that all pregnant women receive all ANC components. Stakeholders should increase supplies, train, and create awareness among ANC providers and pregnant women. States such as Sokoto should understudy what works in states such as Abia, Anambra, Enugu, and Oyo with high ANC utilization and a high level of adequate ANC components received by pregnant women. We recommend a timely initiation of ANC services alongside a sufficient number of ANC contacts. There is a need to enhance the socio-economic status of women in terms of education and ensure women have autonomous decision-making power on their health care utilization.

Study strengths and limitations

A major limitation of this study is the use of secondary data that prevented us from a detailed assessment of health system factors. Besides, we couldn’t assess within-facility variations due to limited data. Also, our data was supplied by respondents without any way of considering facility-level data and facility-level factors occasioned by the secondary nature of the data used. The data were based mostly on respondents’ ability to recall the number of ANC contacts during pregnancy, except few cases that were found on ANC cards. A recall bias is not unlikely. Caution should be exercised when interpreting our findings. The identified factors in this study are only associated with the number of ANC components received and should not be taken for causes of the number of ANC components received as the study was only cross-sectional in design. Local Government Area (LGA) is a potential level in the multilevel analysis but couldn’t be used since LGA-level data and LGA-level characteristics are not available in the dataset.
However, our findings are generalizable as the sample was nationally representative. More so, the data source has been reported to use rigorously tested collection tools, procedures, and trained personnel on questionnaire administration. The computationally intensive methods used for data analysis guaranteed the accuracy and reliability of our estimates. This study is probably the first to explore the clustering of ANC components received by pregnant women in Nigeria.

Conclusions

The overall prevalence of receiving all the 9 components of ANC received during ANC contacts in Nigeria is poor. There is a need to ensure that all pregnant women receive an adequate and optimal number of ANC components. Different factors influenced the number of ANC components received. Notable among them are the institution and skill of the ANC provider, education, and social-economic status of the women. The study shows a strong relationship between the timeliness of ANC initiation and having a minimum of 8 ANC contacts as they both increased the adequacy of ANC components received during the contacts. Although there are some states with high ANC utilization but inadequate ANC components. Our study suggested that early initiation of ANC during the first trimester and having the recommended number of ANC contacts are critical to having all ANC components, which in turn ensures that a pregnant woman and her unborn child take optimal advantage of ANC services.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the ICF for granting access to the dataset.

Declarations

Ethics approval was obtained from the ICF Institutional Review Board, United States (Number FWA000008450) by the ICF International, the owners of the population-based secondary DHS datasets. We were granted full access to use the data by ICF International with authorisation letter 144644 but we are not allowed to share the data. All intending users are required to request from the original data owners at dhsprogram.com. Duly signed informed consent to participate was obtained from all consenting participants before the interview started. Further information on the data and ethical considerations are available at dhsprogram.com.
All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://​creativecommons.​org/​publicdomain/​zero/​1.​0/​) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat WHO, Unicef, UNFPA, UNPD, Group WB. Trends in maternal mortality. to 2015. Publ WHO. 1990;2015(14):1–34. WHO, Unicef, UNFPA, UNPD, Group WB. Trends in maternal mortality. to 2015. Publ WHO. 1990;2015(14):1–34.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagbamigbe AF, Olaseinde O, Fagbamigbe OS. Timing of first antenatal care contact, its associated factors and state-level analysis in Nigeria: a cross-sectional assessment of compliance with the WHO guidelines. BMJ Open. 2021;11:1–14.CrossRef Fagbamigbe AF, Olaseinde O, Fagbamigbe OS. Timing of first antenatal care contact, its associated factors and state-level analysis in Nigeria: a cross-sectional assessment of compliance with the WHO guidelines. BMJ Open. 2021;11:1–14.CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Haruna U, Dandeebo G, Galaa SZ. Improving access and utilization of maternal healthcare services through focused antenatal care in rural Ghana: a qualitative study. Adv Public Heal. 2019;2019:1–11.CrossRef Haruna U, Dandeebo G, Galaa SZ. Improving access and utilization of maternal healthcare services through focused antenatal care in rural Ghana: a qualitative study. Adv Public Heal. 2019;2019:1–11.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Lassi ZS, Mansoor T, Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Essential pre-pregnancy and pregnancy interventions for improved maternal, newborn and child health. Reprod Health. 2014;11(Suppl):1.CrossRef Lassi ZS, Mansoor T, Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Essential pre-pregnancy and pregnancy interventions for improved maternal, newborn and child health. Reprod Health. 2014;11(Suppl):1.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yeoh PL, Hornetz K, Dahlui M. Antenatal care utilisation and content between low-risk and high-risk pregnant women. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:1–17.CrossRef Yeoh PL, Hornetz K, Dahlui M. Antenatal care utilisation and content between low-risk and high-risk pregnant women. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:1–17.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat WHO. WHO Recommendation on Antenatal care for positive pregnancy experience. 2016. p. 1–34. ISBN:9789241549912. WHO. WHO Recommendation on Antenatal care for positive pregnancy experience. 2016. p. 1–34. ISBN:9789241549912.
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Morhason-Bello IO, Fagbamigbe AF, Mumuni TO, Adesina OA, Abdus-Salam AR, Ifemeje A, et al. Evaluation of correct knowledge of key danger signs in pregnancy among antenatal clinic attendees at a tertiary health facility in Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19:227–32.CrossRefPubMed Morhason-Bello IO, Fagbamigbe AF, Mumuni TO, Adesina OA, Abdus-Salam AR, Ifemeje A, et al. Evaluation of correct knowledge of key danger signs in pregnancy among antenatal clinic attendees at a tertiary health facility in Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19:227–32.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagbamigbe AF, Akanbiemu FA, Adebowale AS, Olumide AM, Korter G. Practice, knowledge and perceptions of antenatal care services among pregnant women and nursing mothers in Southwest Nigeria. Int J Matern Child Heal. 2013;1:7–16.CrossRef Fagbamigbe AF, Akanbiemu FA, Adebowale AS, Olumide AM, Korter G. Practice, knowledge and perceptions of antenatal care services among pregnant women and nursing mothers in Southwest Nigeria. Int J Matern Child Heal. 2013;1:7–16.CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat National Population Commission [Nigeria] and ICF International. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Nigeria: Abuja; 2014. National Population Commission [Nigeria] and ICF International. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2013. Nigeria: Abuja; 2014.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat National Population Commission(NPC)[Nigeria], ICF International. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Nigeria, And Rockville, Maryland, USA: Abuja; 2019. National Population Commission(NPC)[Nigeria], ICF International. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey 2018. Nigeria, And Rockville, Maryland, USA: Abuja; 2019.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Akanbiemu AF, Olumide MA, Fagbamigbe AF, Adebowale AS. Effect of perception and free maternal health services on antenatal care facilities utilization in selected rural and semi-urban communities of Ondo State Nigeria. Br J Med Med Res. 2013;3:681–97.CrossRef Akanbiemu AF, Olumide MA, Fagbamigbe AF, Adebowale AS. Effect of perception and free maternal health services on antenatal care facilities utilization in selected rural and semi-urban communities of Ondo State Nigeria. Br J Med Med Res. 2013;3:681–97.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Joshi C, Torvaldsen S, Hodgson R, Hayen A. Factors associated with the use and quality of antenatal care in Nepal: A population-based study using the demographic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:1–11.CrossRef Joshi C, Torvaldsen S, Hodgson R, Hayen A. Factors associated with the use and quality of antenatal care in Nepal: A population-based study using the demographic and health survey data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014;14:1–11.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Ekott MI, Ovwigho U, Ehigiegba A, Fajola A, Fakunle B. Perception of pregnant women about antenatal care in a cottage hospital in Port Harcourt. Nigeria J Community Health. 2013;38:360–5.CrossRefPubMed Ekott MI, Ovwigho U, Ehigiegba A, Fajola A, Fakunle B. Perception of pregnant women about antenatal care in a cottage hospital in Port Harcourt. Nigeria J Community Health. 2013;38:360–5.CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Afulani PA, Buback L, Essandoh F, Kinyua J, Kirumbi L, Cohen CR. Quality of antenatal care and associated factors in a rural county in Kenya: an assessment of service provision and experience dimensions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–16.CrossRef Afulani PA, Buback L, Essandoh F, Kinyua J, Kirumbi L, Cohen CR. Quality of antenatal care and associated factors in a rural county in Kenya: an assessment of service provision and experience dimensions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1–16.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Afulani PA. Rural/Urban and socioeconomic differentials in quality of antenatal care in Ghana. PLoS One. 2016;10:e0117996.CrossRef Afulani PA. Rural/Urban and socioeconomic differentials in quality of antenatal care in Ghana. PLoS One. 2016;10:e0117996.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Nyamtema AS, Jong AB, Urassa DP, Hagen JP, van Roosmalen J. The quality of antenatal care in rural Tanzania: what is behind the number of visits? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Nyamtema AS, Jong AB, Urassa DP, Hagen JP, van Roosmalen J. The quality of antenatal care in rural Tanzania: what is behind the number of visits? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012;12:70.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Mansur AMSA, Rezaul KM, Mahmudul HM, Chowdhury S. Quality of antenatal care in primary health care centers of Bangladesh. J Fam Reprod Heal. 2005;8:175–81. Mansur AMSA, Rezaul KM, Mahmudul HM, Chowdhury S. Quality of antenatal care in primary health care centers of Bangladesh. J Fam Reprod Heal. 2005;8:175–81.
26.
Zurück zum Zitat WHO. WHO antenatal care randomized trial: manual for the implementation of the new model-WHO program to map best reproductive health practices. Geneva: International Health; 2002. WHO. WHO antenatal care randomized trial: manual for the implementation of the new model-WHO program to map best reproductive health practices. Geneva: International Health; 2002.
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Fagbamigbe AF, Bamgboye EA, Yusuf BO, Akinyemi JO, Issa BK, Ngige E, et al. The Nigeria wealth distribution and health seeking behaviour : evidence from the 2012 national HIV / AIDS and reproductive health survey. Health Econ Rev. 2015;5:e1-10.CrossRef Fagbamigbe AF, Bamgboye EA, Yusuf BO, Akinyemi JO, Issa BK, Ngige E, et al. The Nigeria wealth distribution and health seeking behaviour : evidence from the 2012 national HIV / AIDS and reproductive health survey. Health Econ Rev. 2015;5:e1-10.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Mohanty SK. Alternative wealth indices and health estimates in India. Genus. 2008;12:LXV–37. Mohanty SK. Alternative wealth indices and health estimates in India. Genus. 2008;12:LXV–37.
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Sato R, Belel A. Effect of performance-based financing on health service delivery: a case study from Adamawa state, Nigeria. Int Health. 2020;13:4–7. Sato R, Belel A. Effect of performance-based financing on health service delivery: a case study from Adamawa state, Nigeria. Int Health. 2020;13:4–7.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Simkhada B, Teijlingen E, Porter M, Simkhada P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61:244–60.CrossRefPubMed Simkhada B, Teijlingen E, Porter M, Simkhada P. Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: systematic review of the literature. J Adv Nurs. 2008;61:244–60.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Wekesa AW, Mulambalah CS, Muleke CI, Odhiambo R. Intestinal helminth infections in pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at kitale district hospital Kenya. J Parasitol Res. 2014;2014:823923.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wekesa AW, Mulambalah CS, Muleke CI, Odhiambo R. Intestinal helminth infections in pregnant women attending antenatal clinic at kitale district hospital Kenya. J Parasitol Res. 2014;2014:823923.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Abaka-Yawson A, Sosu SQ, Kwadzokpui PK, Afari S, Adusei S, Arko-Mensah J. Prevalence and determinants of intestinal parasitic infections among pregnant women receiving antenatal care in Kasoa polyclinic Ghana. J Environ Public Health. 2020;2020:9315025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abaka-Yawson A, Sosu SQ, Kwadzokpui PK, Afari S, Adusei S, Arko-Mensah J. Prevalence and determinants of intestinal parasitic infections among pregnant women receiving antenatal care in Kasoa polyclinic Ghana. J Environ Public Health. 2020;2020:9315025.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Tay SCK, Nani EA, Walana W. Parasitic infections and maternal anaemia among expectant mothers in the Dangme East District of Ghana. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:1–9.CrossRef Tay SCK, Nani EA, Walana W. Parasitic infections and maternal anaemia among expectant mothers in the Dangme East District of Ghana. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10:1–9.CrossRef
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Gudu W, Addo B. Factors associated with utilization of skilled service delivery among women in rural Northern Ghana: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:1–10.CrossRef Gudu W, Addo B. Factors associated with utilization of skilled service delivery among women in rural Northern Ghana: a cross sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:1–10.CrossRef
48.
Zurück zum Zitat Awotunde OT, Amole IO, Adesina SA, Adeniran A, Olaolorun DA, Durodola AO, et al. Pattern of antenatal care services utilization in a mission hospital in Ogbomoso South-west Nigeria. J Adv Med Pharm Sc. 2019;21:1–11. Awotunde OT, Amole IO, Adesina SA, Adeniran A, Olaolorun DA, Durodola AO, et al. Pattern of antenatal care services utilization in a mission hospital in Ogbomoso South-west Nigeria. J Adv Med Pharm Sc. 2019;21:1–11.
49.
Zurück zum Zitat Omo-Aghoja LO, Aisien OA, Akuse JT, Bergstrom S, Okonofua FE. Maternal mortality and emergency obstetric care in Benin City South-South Nigeria. J Clin Med Res. 2010;2:55–60. Omo-Aghoja LO, Aisien OA, Akuse JT, Bergstrom S, Okonofua FE. Maternal mortality and emergency obstetric care in Benin City South-South Nigeria. J Clin Med Res. 2010;2:55–60.
50.
Zurück zum Zitat Magoma M, Requejo J, Merialdi M, Campbell OMR, Cousens S, Filippi V. How much time is available for antenatal care consultations? Assessment of the quality of care in rural Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Magoma M, Requejo J, Merialdi M, Campbell OMR, Cousens S, Filippi V. How much time is available for antenatal care consultations? Assessment of the quality of care in rural Tanzania. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
51.
Zurück zum Zitat Kanyangarara M, Munos MK, Walker N. Quality of antenatal care service provision in health facilities across sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from nationally representative health facility assessments. J Glob Health. 2017;7:021101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kanyangarara M, Munos MK, Walker N. Quality of antenatal care service provision in health facilities across sub-Saharan Africa: evidence from nationally representative health facility assessments. J Glob Health. 2017;7:021101.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
52.
Zurück zum Zitat McDonagh M. Is antenatal care effective in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality? Heal Policy Plan. 1996;11:1–15.CrossRef McDonagh M. Is antenatal care effective in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality? Heal Policy Plan. 1996;11:1–15.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
A multilevel Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo Poisson modelling of factors associated with components of antenatal care offered to pregnant women in Nigeria
verfasst von
Omon Stellamaris Fagbamigbe
Olugbenga Sunday Olaseinde
Oluwasomidoyin O. Bello
Vincent Setlhare
Jackline Mosinya Nyaberi
Anthony Ike Wegbom
Ayo Stephen Adebowale
Adeniyi Francis Fagbamigbe
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2023
Verlag
BioMed Central
Erschienen in
BMC Health Services Research / Ausgabe 1/2023
Elektronische ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09710-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2023

BMC Health Services Research 1/2023 Zur Ausgabe