Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology 2/2019

08.08.2018 | Original Paper

A prospective, multi-center cohort study: investigating the ability of warfarin-treated patients to predict their INR

verfasst von: Kathleen McNamara, Matthew Witry, Ginelle Bryant, Carrie Koenigsfeld, Nic Lehman, Craig Logemann, Megan Mormann, Amy Rueber, Morgan Herring, James D. Hoehns

Erschienen in: Clinical Research in Cardiology | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In practice, warfarin-treated patients may share insight regarding their international normalized ratio (INR) value before it is measured. The accuracy and potential utility of these predictions have not been evaluated.

Objective

To (1) test how accurately patients can predict their INR; (2) identify demographic factors associated with their ability to predict their INR accurately; and (3) identify demographic factors associated with the patient’s INR being in the therapeutic range.

Methods

A prospective, multi-center cohort study enrolled patients from eight anticoagulation clinics in Iowa. Inclusion criteria were: age ≥ 18 years, warfarin use ≥ 60 days, INR goal of 2.0–3.0, and expected warfarin use > 6 months. Subjects completed a data collection form during enrollment and before each INR measurement. Data included demographics, a set of medication taking beliefs and practices, self-reported adherence, past INR values, INR prediction and reason(s) for the prediction.

Results

There were 87 subjects enrolled with 372 INR measurements. The mean (SD) number of INRs per subject was 4.3 (1.8). Thirty percent of subjects reported they could tell when their INR is out of goal range. Patients predicted that 90.5% of their INRs would be within goal range, although only 65.5% of INRs were therapeutic. Patients correctly predicted a low INR as low or high INR as high in only 9.4% of out of range instances. A set of demographic characteristics and medication beliefs were not associated with prediction accuracy or percentage of INR measurements in range (PINRR). Most patients did not give a reason for their predicted result. For those that did, the most common factor was perceived stability at current dose.

Conclusion

While some patients believed they could predict when their INR was out of range, only few were able to do so. Most patients assumed a therapeutic INR and missed when their INR was high or low. Patients should be advised against modifying their warfarin dose without consulting the provider that manages their therapy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT 02764112.
Fußnoten
1
The Adherence Estimator is a registered trademark of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA. Copyright © 2008 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. All rights reserved.
 
Literatur
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Eikelboom J, Flaker G, Commerford P, Franzosi MG, Healey JS, Yusuf S (2008) Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range. Circulation 118:2029–2037. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.750000 CrossRefPubMed Connolly SJ, Pogue J, Eikelboom J, Flaker G, Commerford P, Franzosi MG, Healey JS, Yusuf S (2008) Benefit of oral anticoagulant over antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation depends on the quality of international normalized ratio control achieved by centers and countries as measured by time in therapeutic range. Circulation 118:2029–2037. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1161/​CIRCULATIONAHA.​107.​750000 CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Holbrook A, PSchulman S, Witt DM, Vandvik PO, Fish J, Kovacs MJ, Svensson PJ, Veenstra DL, Crowther M, Guyatt GH. Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2012;141(2 Suppl):e152s–e184s. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-2295 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Holbrook A, PSchulman S, Witt DM, Vandvik PO, Fish J, Kovacs MJ, Svensson PJ, Veenstra DL, Crowther M, Guyatt GH. Evidence-based management of anticoagulant therapy: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2012;141(2 Suppl):e152s–e184s. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1378/​chest.​11-2295 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
Zurück zum Zitat McEvoy GK (ed) (2018) AHFS: drug information. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Besthesda McEvoy GK (ed) (2018) AHFS: drug information. American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Besthesda
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Aronson JK (2016) Vitamin K analogues. In: Aronson JK (ed) Meyler’s side effects of drugs, 16th edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 494–499 Aronson JK (2016) Vitamin K analogues. In: Aronson JK (ed) Meyler’s side effects of drugs, 16th edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 494–499
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, Van Der Meer FJM, Briet E (1993) A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost 69:236–239CrossRef Rosendaal FR, Cannegieter SC, Van Der Meer FJM, Briet E (1993) A method to determine the optimal intensity of oral anticoagulant therapy. Thromb Haemost 69:236–239CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan PH, Li WH, Hai JJ, Chan EW, Wong IC, Tse HF, Lip GY, Siu CW. Time in therapeutic range and percentage of international normalized ratio in the therapeutic range as a measure of quality of anticoagulation control in patients with atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol 2016;32(10):1247.e23–1247.e28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2015.10.029 CrossRef Chan PH, Li WH, Hai JJ, Chan EW, Wong IC, Tse HF, Lip GY, Siu CW. Time in therapeutic range and percentage of international normalized ratio in the therapeutic range as a measure of quality of anticoagulation control in patients with atrial fibrillation. Can J Cardiol 2016;32(10):1247.e23–1247.e28. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​cjca.​2015.​10.​029 CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Pokorney SD, Simon DN, Thomas L, Fonarow GC, Kowey PR, Chang P, Singer DE, Ansell J, Blanco RG, Gersh B, Mahaffey KW, Hylek EM, Go AS, Piccini JP, Peterson ED (2015) Patients’ time in therapeutic range on warfarin among US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from ORBIT-AF registry. Am Heart J 170(1):141–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2015.03.017 CrossRefPubMed Pokorney SD, Simon DN, Thomas L, Fonarow GC, Kowey PR, Chang P, Singer DE, Ansell J, Blanco RG, Gersh B, Mahaffey KW, Hylek EM, Go AS, Piccini JP, Peterson ED (2015) Patients’ time in therapeutic range on warfarin among US patients with atrial fibrillation: results from ORBIT-AF registry. Am Heart J 170(1):141–148. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​ahj.​2015.​03.​017 CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
A prospective, multi-center cohort study: investigating the ability of warfarin-treated patients to predict their INR
verfasst von
Kathleen McNamara
Matthew Witry
Ginelle Bryant
Carrie Koenigsfeld
Nic Lehman
Craig Logemann
Megan Mormann
Amy Rueber
Morgan Herring
James D. Hoehns
Publikationsdatum
08.08.2018
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Clinical Research in Cardiology / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 1861-0684
Elektronische ISSN: 1861-0692
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1345-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Clinical Research in Cardiology 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Kardiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.