Background
Methods/design
Participants, interventions, and outcomes
Design
Study setting
Study population
Eligibility criteria for PWD
Eligibility criteria for patient’s informal carers
Usual care
Control group: Usual care
Intervention group: Tai chi in addition to usual care
Inputs | Activities | Outputs | Impacts | Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|
Human resources:
• Tai Chi instructors to deliver the intervention • Research team to make telephone calls to remind dyads to attend classes
Products:
• Booklet to support practice of home-based Tai Chi • Homework sheets to support practice of home-based Tai Chi • Alarm clocks to help remind dyads to practise Tai Chi at home
Estates:
• Venues in the NHS / community accessible by public transport and that have free car parking for hire of the Tai Chi classes |
Intervention contact:
• Weekly 90 min Tai Chi class for 20 weeks (45mins Tai Chi, 45mins socialising/Q&A with instructor) • A home visit by Tai Chi instructor in weeks 3–4 to support Tai Chi practice at home through behaviour change techniques (joint action & coping planning with carer) • Telephone contact by research team in weeks 2–18 to remind to attend classes if consecutively fail to attend 2 classes for unknown reason
Intervention led by carer:
• PWD to practise Tai Chi 20 mins per day • Daily self-monitoring & weekly instructor feedback: PWD to complete a daily diary of Tai Chi practised at home and hand to instructor at Tai Chi class weekly | • Joint action plan for practising Tai Chi at home • Joint coping plan for practising Tai Chi at home • Diaries of Tai Chi practised at home | • Increased participation in Tai Chi; physical activity designed to improve balance and prevent falls • Increased support to do Tai Chi via weekly instructor-led classes • Increased social support to practise Tai Chi through weekly contact with instructor and peers at the classes, and telephone reminders • Increased support to do Tai Chi at home via home booklet, homework sheets, action and coping planning, self-monitoring, instructor feedback, and alarm clock reminder |
Direct:
• Reduction in risk of falls via increased dynamic balance (postural stability) • Further reduction in risk of falls via: (a) increased functional balance (postural stability) (b) increased static balance (postural stability) (c) reduced fear of falls (d) delayed deterioration in global cognitive functioning (e) delayed deterioration in visual-spatial cognitive functioning • Reduction in risk of falls in the carer via: (a) increased dynamic balance (postural stability) (b) increased static balance (postural stability) Indirect (via the above): • Reduction in rate of falls • Increased quality of life • Increased quality of life in the carer • Reduced carer burden |
Item | Description |
---|---|
Exercise prescription items | |
Time | Each session will last 90 min; 45 min’ Tai Chi followed by up to 45 min’ informal discussion. |
Length | 20 week course designed for the trial. |
Frequency | Weekly Tai Chi class. |
Instructional method items | |
Style | Old-frame Chen |
Number of forms | 8 warm-up patterns (Baduanjin) and 5 Tai Chi form patterns |
Names of forms | 8 warm-up patterns (Baduanjin): Note: Some patterns differ to the more common Baduanjin patterns found online and Chinese government sponsored Baduanjin, as the Elemental Tai Chi lineage is different. Patterns are refined as the course progresses. 1. Raising the Sky 2. Gathering the Heavens 3. Cow Looks at the Moon 4. Directing the Ocean (slightly adapted for older generation) 5. Shaolin Archer 6. Qi Gong Punching 7. Separating Heaven and Earth 8. Shaking the Earth 5 Tai Chi form patterns 1. Grand Ultimate Beginning 2. Immortal Pounds Mortar 3. Lazy to Roll Sleeves 4. Six Seals and Four Closes 5. Single Whip |
Movement principles | The basic tenets of Tai Chi are emphasised throughout the course. Each class will emphasise good body posture, slow and controlled body movements, and correct joint positioning in regard to the knee (to never extend beyond the foot). |
Breathing techniques | The Baduanjin will emphasise moving with the breath, with slow and controlled breathing during body movements. Breathing during the Tai Chi form will be encouraged to be natural with no specific breathing emphasised, because the addition of Buddhist breathing or Daoist reverse breathing would be too advanced for beginners. Each class will end with standing meditation. |
Relaxation | The course itself is designed to elicit a mental state of calm without the requirement to explicitly instruct students to be calm. The meditation at the end of each class is also a relaxation exercise. |
Progression | Progression of Tai Chi will be taught over the 20-week course. In particular, participants will be encouraged to start from their current level of physical ability and develop over the course (e.g. if cannot stand for the whole session to begin with, work toward being able to stand for the whole session). In addition, participants will gradually be taught the warm-up patterns and Tai Chi form patterns with repetition of all patterns every week. New warm-up and Tai Chi form patterns will be gradually introduced |
Instructor credentials | Both instructors are experienced and have qualifications at senior instructor level for public Tai Chi classes. |
Number of instructors | 2 |
Unsupervised practice | Participants will be asked to practise Tai Chi at home 20 min per day (or if not possible then the equivalent across the week). Carers are to facilitate the person with dementia to practise Tai Chi at home. Home practice is encouraged by a 30-min home visit by the Tai Chi instructor and provision of coloured home exercise booklets and homework sheets for each week (see intervention section). |
Additional information | The intervention is delivered each week using as its ethos 7 core principles: 1. Safety is paramount 2. Instruction is to be tailored to each participant’s capability 3. Participants are to do Tai Chi standing up (not seated) 4. Participants are to be challenged to progress in their physical ability (e.g. to hold positions for longer periods) 5. Classes will have a friendly and enjoyable environment 6. Weekly emphasis on the importance of home practice 7. Weekly invitation for participants to socialise at the end of each class with each other and talk with the instructor |
Assessment of treatment adherence
Outcomes
Item | What it measures | How it is measured | Unit of analysis | Justification |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary outcome
| ||||
Difference in score from the person with dementia between the two arms at six months post-baseline: | ||||
Timed Up and Go (TUG) test [64] | Dynamic balance | In addition to using a stopwatch, performance on the TUG will be measured using a Balance Sensor (THETAmetrix) that contains an accelerometer to digitally record biomechanical movement, and is a small, inexpensive device that is wireless and corrects for tilt dynamically. The data on the device will be downloaded immediately after each test and stored on the researcher’s laptop / tablet and labelled using the participant’s unique ID number. | The TUG is quick and simple to administer in the community [49] and has been recommended for screening for falls risk [50] and assessing gait and balance for preventing falls [51]. While no particular measure of dynamic balance has been recommended in the literature, systematic reviews have identified that the TUG has excellent reliability [42], a strong correlation with falls in retrospective studies [47], is more effective at ruling in falls (0.74 specificity) among individuals classified at high risk of falls [52], and is more suitable with older people who are relatively less healthy and have lower functioning [48]. Devices such as the balance sensor have been shown to produce reliable and valid data for the TUG and its subcomponents [53, 54]. | |
Secondary outcomes
| ||||
Difference in score between the two arms at six months post-baseline on the following: | ||||
Person with dementia - ×2 balance tests | ||||
Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [55] | The BBS is an objective measure designed to assess functional balance and fall risk in adult populations [55]. The BBS takes an overall assessment of an individual’s balance; “underlying motor systems, static stability, dynamic stability, functional stability limits, anticipatory postural control, and sensory integration” p. 13 [56]. | This is a 14 item scale with a 5-point response for each item (0–4), with the sum score used (minimum to maximum possible scores of 0–56, with 0–20 high fall risk, 21–40 medium fall risk, and 41–56 low fall risk). | Total score will be analysed (potential range 0–56) and will be assumed to be interval scaled. | It has been recommended in a recent consensus as one of two core outcome sets for measuring standing balance in adult populations [56]. This consensus reported that this scale would be more useful among those with limited functioning (it is prone to ceiling effects among the generally healthy population) [56]. We chose the BBS for this study based on its likely ease of use among people with dementia, existing published evidence of its suitability for use with people with dementia [36, 57], and its feasibility for use in people’s homes. |
Postural sway while standing on the floor and on a foam mat [35] | Static balance under usual and challenging conditions | In both instances, a continuous value will be measured as total (antero-posterior + medio-lateral) normalised path length of the acceleration sway trace of the pelvis during the task. This will be recorded using a Balance Sensor (THETAmetrix), mounted over the upper sacrum (s2 spinous process) to digitally record body sway. | The unit of measurement will be in milli-g/second (mg/s). | |
Person with dementia – × 4 structured interview scales | ||||
Iconographical Falls Efficacy Scale (Icon-FES, short form) [60] | Fear of falling | This is a 10-item scale of fear of falling with a 4-point response for each question (1–4). | Sum score (minimum to maximum possible scores of 10–40, higher scores indicating greater fear). It will be assumed that this is interval scaled data (scale of 10–40). | The Icon-FES is better at identifying people at higher risk of falls compared with the Falls Efficacy Scale-International and does not produce a floor effect [60]. |
Mini-Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (M-ACE) [22] | Brief measure of global cognitive functioning | Five items: attention (assesses orientation, scored 0–4), memory (scored 0–7), fluency (assesses language, scored 0–7), visuospatial function (scored 0–5), and memory (assesses recall, scored 0–7), with a total score of 0–30. | The sum score is used, with values on an interval scale of 0–30 with higher scores indicating greater cognitive function. | The M-ACE is more sensitive than the Mini Mental State Examination and is less likely to have ceiling effects, which makes it particularly useful with people with mild cognitive impairment [22]. |
Statue task (Reed & Spiers: Development of a spatial judgement task for use in Alzheimer’s disease: The effect of permanency in spatial environments with age, unpublished) | Brief measure of visual-spatial cognitive functioning that uses a tablet to administer the task (Reed & Spiers: Development of a spatial judgement task for use in Alzheimer’s disease: The effect of permanency in spatial environments with age, unpublished). | Presents participants with a series of visual scenes. The participant is asked to look at scenes with three statues and a stool, and to answer a series of questions that assesses their ability to perceive the objects in three-dimensional space and their relationships to each other. The computer automatically records the time taken to complete the task and number of errors made. | A continuous measure is used for time taken to complete (in seconds) and a discrete measure for the number of errors made (frequency count). | This is a measure of specific cognitive functioning from the hippocampus, which is therefore a more sensitive measure to change than a global assessment of cognitive functioning. |
ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people (ICECAP-O) [61] | Quality of life | 5 item scale with a 4-point response for each (1–4) | Sum score used (minimum to maximum possible scores of 5–20 with higher scores indicating greater capability). It will be assumed the measure is interval scaled. | This measure is from the perspective of capability to be independent, which is associated with fall risk, general balance and mobility, and sensitive to cognitive status [62]. It is also a measure recommended in guidelines on economic evaluation of fall prevention interventions [63], with results that can be compared with other economic evaluations that used the ICECAP-O. |
Carer – ×2 balance tests | ||||
Timed Up and Go (TUG) test [64] | As above | As above | As above | As above |
Postural sway while standing on the floor and on a foam mat [35] | As above | As above | As above | As above |
Carer – × 2 structured interview scales | ||||
ICEpop CAPability measure for Older people (ICECAP-O) [61] | As above | As above | As above | As above |
Zarit Burden Interview (short-form) [65] | Carer burden | 12-item scale with a 5-point response for each (0–4) | Sum score used (minimum to maximum possible scores of 0–48 with higher scores indicating greater burden). An assumption will be made that the data are interval scaled. |
Sample size
Recruitment
-
Contacting PWD identified from searches on NHS research, NHS clinic, and voluntary sector databases.
-
Opportunistic recruitment of patients using NHS memory assessment service clinics, NHS older people mental health services, NHS outpatient clinics, voluntary sector memory advisors, and GPs.
-
Recruitment via the Join Dementia Research website, endorsed by the Health Research Authority, to facilitate patient recruitment into dementia studies (http://jdr-delivery.nihr.ac.uk/).
-
Recruitment via potential participants’ direct responses to study promotion including leaflets/posters in dementia cafés, support groups, general practices, chemists, pharmacies, day-care centres, newspapers, radio, social media, and informal newsletters.