nach oben

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Erschienen in:

01.08.2009 | Original Article

A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance

verfasst von: Johannes Siegrist, Natalia Wege, Frank Pühlhofer, Morten Wahrendorf

Erschienen in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health | Ausgabe 8/2009

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objective

We evaluate psychometric properties of a short version of the original effort–reward imbalance (ERI) questionnaire. This measure is of interest in the context of assessing stressful work conditions in the era of economic globalization.

Methods

In a representative sample of 10,698 employed men and women participating in the longitudinal Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP) in Germany, a short version of the ERI questionnaire was included in the 2006 panel wave. Structural equation modeling and logistic regression analysis were applied.

Results

In addition to satisfactory internal consistency of scales, a model representing the theoretical structure of the scales provided the best data fit in a competitive test (RMSEA = 0.059, CAIC = 4124.19). Scoring high on the ERI scales was associated with elevated risks of poor self-rated health.

Conclusions

This short version of the ERI questionnaire reveals satisfactory psychometric properties, and can be recommended for further use in research and practice.

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Antoniou ASG, Cooper CC (eds) (2005) Research companion to organizational health psychology. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

Benach J, Mutaner C, Benavides FG, Amable M, Jodar P (2002) A new occupational health agenda for a new work environment. Scand J Work Environ Health 28:191–196PubMed

Boomsma A, Hoogland JJ (2001) The robustness of LISREL modeling revisited. In: Cudeck R, du Toit S, Sörbom D (eds) Structural equation models: present and future. A Festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog. Scientific Software International, Chicago

Bosma H, Peter R, Siegrist J, Marmot M (1998) Two alternative job stress models and the risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health 88:68–74PubMedCrossRef

Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS (eds) Testing structural equation models. Sage, Newbury Park

Byrne BM (2001) Structural equation modeling With AMOS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London

Cartwright S, Cooper CC (eds) (2008) The Oxford handbook of organizational well being. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF (1996) The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1:16–29. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.16 CrossRef

de Jonge J, van der Linden S, Schaufeli W, Peter R, Siegrist J (2008) Factorial invariance and stability of the effort–reward imbalance scales: a longitudinal analysis of two samples with different time lags. Int J Behav Med 15:62–72PubMedCrossRef

Godin I, Kittel F (2004) Differential economic stability and psychosocial stress at work: associations with psychosomatic complaints and absenteeism. Soc Sci Med 58:1543–1553. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00345-9 PubMedCrossRef

Hu L-T, Bentler P (1995) Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle RH (ed) Structural equation modeling. concepts, issues and applications. Sage, London

Idler EL, Benyamini Y (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: review of 27 community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38:21–37. doi:10.2307/2955359 PubMedCrossRef

Joksimovic L, Starke D, von dem Knesebeck O, Siegrist J (2002) Perceived work stress, overcommitment, and self-reported musculoskeletal pain: a cross-sectional investigation. Int J Behav Med 9:122–138. doi:10.1207/S15327558IJBM0902_04 PubMedCrossRef

Landsbergis PA (2003) The changing organization of work and the safety and health of working people: a commentary. J Occup Environ Med 45:61–71. doi:10.1097/00043764-200301000-00014 PubMedCrossRef

Marcoulides GA, Hershberger SL (1997) Multivariate statistical methods: a first course. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah

Moutsatsos E (2008) Economic globalization and its effects on labor. In: Schnall PL, Dobson M, Rosskam E, Baker D, Landsbergis P (eds) Unhealthy work: causes, consequences and cures. Baywood Press, Amityville, NY

Muthén LK, Muthén BO (2002) How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Struct Equ Modeling 9:599–620. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8 CrossRef

Niedhammer I, Tek L, Starke D, Siegrist J (2004) Effort–reward imbalance model and self reported health: cross sectional and perspective evidence from the causal cohort. Soc Sci Med 58:1531–1541. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00346-0 PubMedCrossRef

Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

Nurminen M (2008) Worklife expectancies of fixed-term employees in Finland 1997–2006. Scand J Work Environ Health 34:83–95PubMed

Perrewe PL, Ganster DC (eds) (2002) Historical and current perspectives on stress and health. JAI Elsevier, Amsterdam

Rödel A, Siegrist J, Hessel A, Brähler E (2004) Psychometrische Testung des Fragebogens zur Messung beruflicher Gratifikationskrisen an einer repräsentativen deutschen Stichprobe. Z Differ Diagn Psychol 25:227–238. doi:10.1024/0170-1789.25.4.227

Schnall PL, Dobson M, Rosskam E, Baker D, Landsbergis P (eds) (2008) Unhealthy work: causes, consequences and cures. Baywood Press, Amityville, NY

Siegrist J (1996) Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1:27–41. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.1.1.27 PubMedCrossRef

Siegrist J, Starke D, Chandola T, Godin I, Marmot M, Niedhammer I, Peter R (2004) The measurement of effort−reward imbalance at work: European comparisons. Soc Sci Med 58:1483–1499. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(03)00351-4

Siegrist J, Theorell T (2006) Socioeconomic position and health. The role of work and employment. In: Siegrist J, Marmot M (eds) Social inequalities in health: new evidence and policy implications. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Siegrist J, Wahrendorf M, von dem Knesebeck O, Jürgens H, Börsch-Supan A (2006) Quality of work, well-being, and intended early retirement of older employees–baseline results from the SHARE study. Eur J Public Health 17:62–68. doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckl084 PubMedCrossRef

Spiegel JM, Labonte R, Ostry A (2004) Understanding “globalization” as a determinant of health determinants: a critical perspective. Int J Occup Environ Health 10:360–367PubMed

Stansfeld SA, Fuhrer R, Shipley MJ, Marmot MG (1999) Work characteristics predict psychiatric disorder: prospective results from the Whitehall II Study. Occup Environ Med 56:302–307PubMedCrossRef

Starke D, Niedhammer I (2002) Gender and effort-reward imbalance at work. In: Wamala SP, Lynch J (eds) Gender and social inequities in health. Lund, Studentlitteratur

Tabanelli MC, Depolo M, Cooke RMT, Sarchielli G Bonfiglioli, Mattioli S, Violante FS (2008) Available instruments for measurement of psychosocial factors in the work environment. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82:1–12. doi:10.1007/s00420-008-0312-6

The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP) http://www.diw.de/soep. Accessed 28. Oct 2008

Tsutsumi A, Kawakami N (2004) A review of empirical studies on the model of effort–reward imbalance at work: reducing occupational stress by implementing a new theory. Soc Sci Med 59:2335–2359. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.03.030 PubMedCrossRef

Tsutsumi A, Nagami M, Morimoto K, Matoba T (2002) Responsiveness of measures of effort–reward imbalance questionnaire to organizational change: a validation study. J Psychosom Res 52:249–256. doi:10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00291-X PubMedCrossRef

Tsutsumi A, Iwata N, Wakita T, Kunagai R, Noguchi H, Kawakami N (2008) Improving the measurement accuracy of the effort–reward imbalance scales. Int J Behav Med 15:109–119. doi:10.1080/10705500801929718 PubMedCrossRef

Vahtera J, Kivimaki M, Pentti J, Linna A, Virtanen M, Virtanen P, Ferrie JE (2004) Organisational downsizing, sickness absence, and mortality: 10-town prospective cohort study. BMJ 328:555. doi:10.1136/bmj.37972.496262.0D

van Vegchel N, de Jonge J, Bosma H, Schaufeli W (2005) Reviewing the effort–reward imbalance model: drawing up the balance of 45 empirical studies. Soc Sci Med 60:1117–1131. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.043 PubMedCrossRef

Weiner H (1992) Perturbing the organism. The biology of stressful experience. Chicago University Press, Chicago

Titel: A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: effort–reward imbalance
verfasst von: Johannes Siegrist
Natalia Wege
Frank Pühlhofer
Morten Wahrendorf
Publikationsdatum: 01.08.2009
Verlag: Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in: International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health / Ausgabe 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0340-0131
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1246
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0384-3

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2009

Interpreting epidemiological evidence in the presence of multiple endpoints: an alternative analytic approach using the 9-year follow-up of the Seychelles child development study

Ethnic differences in unemployment and ill health

Occupational styrene exposure and neurobehavioural functions: a cohort study with repeated measurements

What characterizes cleaners sustaining good musculoskeletal health after years with physically heavy work?

Is exposure to silica associated with lung cancer in the absence of silicosis? A meta-analytical approach to an important public health question

Evaluation of urinary biomarkers of exposure to benzene: correlation with blood benzene and influence of confounding factors