Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Tumor Biology 5/2011

01.10.2011 | Review

Active surveillance in prostate cancer: the need to standardize

verfasst von: Xavier Filella, Juan Alcover, Rafael Molina

Erschienen in: Tumor Biology | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Active surveillance has been proposed as an option for patients with low-risk prostate cancer in order to reduce the effects caused by overdiagnosis. Delaying treatment and applying it only if there is evidence of progression requires a careful identification of these patients. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum levels lower than 10 μg/L and Gleason score lower than 7 are the main criteria used to select patients for active surveillance based on experience accumulated in the last two decades. In the selection of patients with active surveillance two points are taken into consideration: (a) Gleason score changes introduced by the Consensus Conference of 2005; (b) differences between assays in the measurement of PSA serum levels, in the selection of patients for active surveillance. Improving the accuracy of patient’s selection for active surveillance requires that Gleason score reassignment must be taken into account, as well as the harmonization between PSA assays. The use of incorrect results leads to misclassification of patients, undermining the goals of active surveillance.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Yatani R, Chigusa I, Akazaki K, Stemmermann GN, Welsh RA, Correa P. Geographic pathology of latent prostatic carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1982;29:611–6.PubMedCrossRef Yatani R, Chigusa I, Akazaki K, Stemmermann GN, Welsh RA, Correa P. Geographic pathology of latent prostatic carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 1982;29:611–6.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Klotz L. Low-risk prostate cancer can and should often be managed with active surveillance and selective delayed intervention. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5:2–3.PubMedCrossRef Klotz L. Low-risk prostate cancer can and should often be managed with active surveillance and selective delayed intervention. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2008;5:2–3.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Galper SL, Chen MH, Catalona WJ, Roehl KA, Richie JP, D’Amico AV. Evidence to support a continued stage migration and decrease in prostate cancer specific mortality. J Urol. 2006;175:907–12.PubMedCrossRef Galper SL, Chen MH, Catalona WJ, Roehl KA, Richie JP, D’Amico AV. Evidence to support a continued stage migration and decrease in prostate cancer specific mortality. J Urol. 2006;175:907–12.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1320–8.PubMedCrossRef Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, et al. Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:1320–8.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Etzioni R, Penson DF, Legler JM, di Tommaso D, Boer R, Gann PH, et al. Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer Incidente Trenes. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2002;94:981–90.PubMed Etzioni R, Penson DF, Legler JM, di Tommaso D, Boer R, Gann PH, et al. Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer Incidente Trenes. J Nat Cancer Inst. 2002;94:981–90.PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Johansson JE, Andrén O, Andersson SO, Dickman PW, Holmberg L, Magnuson A, et al. Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2004;291:2713–9.PubMedCrossRef Johansson JE, Andrén O, Andersson SO, Dickman PW, Holmberg L, Magnuson A, et al. Natural history of early, localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2004;291:2713–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Abrahamsson PA, Artibani W, Chapple CR, Wirth M. European Association of Urology position statement on screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2009;56:270–1.PubMedCrossRef Abrahamsson PA, Artibani W, Chapple CR, Wirth M. European Association of Urology position statement on screening for prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2009;56:270–1.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Bastian PJ, Carter BH, Bjartell A, Seitz M, Stanislaus P, Montorsi F, et al. Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1321–32.PubMedCrossRef Bastian PJ, Carter BH, Bjartell A, Seitz M, Stanislaus P, Montorsi F, et al. Insignificant prostate cancer and active surveillance: from definition to clinical implications. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1321–32.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, et al. Updated nomogram to predict pathological stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason Score (Partin Tables) Based on Cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology. 2007;69:1095–101.PubMedCrossRef Makarov DV, Trock BJ, Humphreys EB, Mangold LA, Walsh PC, Epstein JI, et al. Updated nomogram to predict pathological stage of prostate cancer given prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason Score (Partin Tables) Based on Cases from 2000 to 2005. Urology. 2007;69:1095–101.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Choo R, DeBoer G, Klotz L, Danjoux C, Morton GC, Rakovitch E, et al. PSA doubling time of prostate carcinoma managed with watchful observation alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:615–20.PubMedCrossRef Choo R, DeBoer G, Klotz L, Danjoux C, Morton GC, Rakovitch E, et al. PSA doubling time of prostate carcinoma managed with watchful observation alone. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50:615–20.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Choo R, Klotz L, Danjoux C, Morton GC, DeBoer G, Szumacher E, et al. Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression. J Urol. 2002;167:1664–9.PubMedCrossRef Choo R, Klotz L, Danjoux C, Morton GC, DeBoer G, Szumacher E, et al. Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression. J Urol. 2002;167:1664–9.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Chun FK, Haese A, Ahyai SA, Walz J, Suardi N, Capitanio U, et al. Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men. Cancer. 2008;113:701–9.PubMedCrossRef Chun FK, Haese A, Ahyai SA, Walz J, Suardi N, Capitanio U, et al. Critical assessment of tools to predict clinically insignificant prostate cancer at radical prostatectomy in contemporary men. Cancer. 2008;113:701–9.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Lane JA, Hamdy FC, Martin RM, Turner EL, Neal DE, Donovan JL. Latest results from the UK trials evaluating prostate cancer screening and treatment: the CAP and ProtecT studies. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:3095–101.PubMedCrossRef Lane JA, Hamdy FC, Martin RM, Turner EL, Neal DE, Donovan JL. Latest results from the UK trials evaluating prostate cancer screening and treatment: the CAP and ProtecT studies. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:3095–101.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat van den Bergh RCN, Roemeling S, Roobol MJ, Roobol W, Schröder FH, Bangma CH. Prospective validation of active surveillance in prostate cancer: the PRIAS Study. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1560–3.PubMedCrossRef van den Bergh RCN, Roemeling S, Roobol MJ, Roobol W, Schröder FH, Bangma CH. Prospective validation of active surveillance in prostate cancer: the PRIAS Study. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1560–3.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Klotz L. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: patient selection and management. Curr Oncol. 2010;17 Suppl 2:S11–7.PubMed Klotz L. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: patient selection and management. Curr Oncol. 2010;17 Suppl 2:S11–7.PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, et al. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol. 2011;59:61–71.PubMedCrossRef Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V, et al. EAU Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol. 2011;59:61–71.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Ghani KR, Grigor K, Tulloch DN, Bollina PR, McNeill SA. PSA doubling time of prostate carcinoma managed with watchful observation alone. Eur Urol. 2005;47:196–201.PubMedCrossRef Ghani KR, Grigor K, Tulloch DN, Bollina PR, McNeill SA. PSA doubling time of prostate carcinoma managed with watchful observation alone. Eur Urol. 2005;47:196–201.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Barrows GH, Penson DF, Kowalczyk PDH, Sanders MM, et al. Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1248–53.PubMedCrossRef Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Barrows GH, Penson DF, Kowalczyk PDH, Sanders MM, et al. Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1248–53.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Amin MB, Elevad LL, the ISUP Grading Comité. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1228–42.PubMedCrossRef Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC, Amin MB, Elevad LL, the ISUP Grading Comité. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1228–42.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Chan TY, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Epstein JL. Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3 + 4 versus Gleason score 4 + 3 tumor at radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2000;56:823–7.PubMedCrossRef Chan TY, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Epstein JL. Prognostic significance of Gleason score 3 + 4 versus Gleason score 4 + 3 tumor at radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2000;56:823–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Herman CM, Kattan MW, Ohori M, Scardino PT, Wheeler TM. Primary Gleason pattern as a predictor of disease progresión in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of 823 men treated with radical prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:657–60.PubMedCrossRef Herman CM, Kattan MW, Ohori M, Scardino PT, Wheeler TM. Primary Gleason pattern as a predictor of disease progresión in Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: a multivariate analysis of 823 men treated with radical prostatectomy. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:657–60.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Lau WK, Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Weaver AL, Sebo TJ, Zincke H. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4. J Urol. 2001;166:1692–7.PubMedCrossRef Lau WK, Blute ML, Bostwick DG, Weaver AL, Sebo TJ, Zincke H. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4. J Urol. 2001;166:1692–7.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Wright JL, Salinas CA, Lin DW, Kolb S, Koopmeiners J, Feng Z, et al. Prostate cancer specific mortality and Gleason 7 disease differences in prostate cancer outcomes between cases with Gleason 4 _ 3 and Gleason 3 _ 4 tumors in a population based cohort. J Urol. 2009;182:2702–7.PubMedCrossRef Wright JL, Salinas CA, Lin DW, Kolb S, Koopmeiners J, Feng Z, et al. Prostate cancer specific mortality and Gleason 7 disease differences in prostate cancer outcomes between cases with Gleason 4 _ 3 and Gleason 3 _ 4 tumors in a population based cohort. J Urol. 2009;182:2702–7.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Klotz L. Low-risk prostate cancer can and should often be managed with active surveillance and selective delayed intervention. Nat Clin Parcticae Urol. 2008;5:2–3.CrossRef Klotz L. Low-risk prostate cancer can and should often be managed with active surveillance and selective delayed intervention. Nat Clin Parcticae Urol. 2008;5:2–3.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Semjonow A, Brandt B, Oberpenning F, Roth S, Hertle L. Discordance Prostate Suppl. 1996;7:3–16.CrossRef Semjonow A, Brandt B, Oberpenning F, Roth S, Hertle L. Discordance Prostate Suppl. 1996;7:3–16.CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Jarrigue V. The need for a lower total PSA cut-off value with PSA assays calibrated to the new WHO standard. Clinical Laboratory International April 2007. Jarrigue V. The need for a lower total PSA cut-off value with PSA assays calibrated to the new WHO standard. Clinical Laboratory International April 2007.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen FH, Roobol M, Bangma CH, van Schaik RH. Clinical impact of new prostate-specific antigen WHO standardization on biopsy rates and cancer detection. Clin Chem. 2008;54:1999–2006.PubMedCrossRef Jansen FH, Roobol M, Bangma CH, van Schaik RH. Clinical impact of new prostate-specific antigen WHO standardization on biopsy rates and cancer detection. Clin Chem. 2008;54:1999–2006.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephan C, Klaas M, Müller C, Schnorr D, Loening SA, Jung K. Interchangeability of measurements of total and free prostate-specific antigen in serum with 5 frequently used assay combinations: an update. Clin Chem. 2006;52:59–64.PubMedCrossRef Stephan C, Klaas M, Müller C, Schnorr D, Loening SA, Jung K. Interchangeability of measurements of total and free prostate-specific antigen in serum with 5 frequently used assay combinations: an update. Clin Chem. 2006;52:59–64.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Stephan C, Kramer J, Meyer HA, Kristiansen G, Ziemer S, Deger S, et al. Different prostate-specific antigen assays give different results on the same blood sample: an obstacle to recommending uniform limits for prostate biopsies. BJU Int. 2007;99:1427–31.PubMedCrossRef Stephan C, Kramer J, Meyer HA, Kristiansen G, Ziemer S, Deger S, et al. Different prostate-specific antigen assays give different results on the same blood sample: an obstacle to recommending uniform limits for prostate biopsies. BJU Int. 2007;99:1427–31.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Slev PR, La’ulu SL, Roberts WL. Intermethod differences in results for total PSA, free PSA, and percentage of free PSA. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;129:952–8.PubMedCrossRef Slev PR, La’ulu SL, Roberts WL. Intermethod differences in results for total PSA, free PSA, and percentage of free PSA. Am J Clin Pathol. 2008;129:952–8.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Sturgeon C, Dati F, Duffy MJ, Hasholzner U, Klapdor R, Lamerz R, et al. Quality requirements and control: EGTM recommendations. European Group on Tumour Markers. Anticancer Res. 1999;19:2791–4. Sturgeon C, Dati F, Duffy MJ, Hasholzner U, Klapdor R, Lamerz R, et al. Quality requirements and control: EGTM recommendations. European Group on Tumour Markers. Anticancer Res. 1999;19:2791–4.
Metadaten
Titel
Active surveillance in prostate cancer: the need to standardize
verfasst von
Xavier Filella
Juan Alcover
Rafael Molina
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2011
Verlag
Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in
Tumor Biology / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1010-4283
Elektronische ISSN: 1423-0380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-011-0193-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Tumor Biology 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Alectinib verbessert krankheitsfreies Überleben bei ALK-positivem NSCLC

25.04.2024 NSCLC Nachrichten

Das Risiko für Rezidiv oder Tod von Patienten und Patientinnen mit reseziertem ALK-positivem NSCLC ist unter einer adjuvanten Therapie mit dem Tyrosinkinase-Inhibitor Alectinib signifikant geringer als unter platinbasierter Chemotherapie.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

ICI-Therapie in der Schwangerschaft wird gut toleriert

Müssen sich Schwangere einer Krebstherapie unterziehen, rufen Immuncheckpointinhibitoren offenbar nicht mehr unerwünschte Wirkungen hervor als andere Mittel gegen Krebs.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.