Introduction
An unprecedented worldwide pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has killed more than 6 million people worldwide [
1]. Vaccination as the most effective prophylaxis measure is imperative [
2‐
4]. Many countries have approved the use of inactivated vaccines [
5,
6]. Inactivated vaccines have been widely used since ancient times [
7]. CoronaVac that was a β-propyl lactone-inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine developed by Sinovac Life Sciences in China and generated protective efficacy up to 79.34% [
8‐
10]. Most previously published reports on CoronaVac vaccine have focused on vaccine-induced neutralizing antibidies [
11‐
13]. However, the adaptive immune system is important for control of most viral infections. So far, studies associated with vaccine-induced immune protection for SARS-CoV-2 remain varied, with data from mRNA and adenovirus vaccines indicating the involvement of both cellular and humoral mechanisms [
14,
15].
Growing evidence suggests that T cell response, particularly CD4
+T cells play key role in defending against viral infections and may induce long-term immune responses [
16‐
18]. Data from cilinical studies showed that the loss of CD4
+T cells responses were significantly related to disease severity in COVID-19 patients [
19]. In addition, antigen-specific T cells were detected in SARS-CoV patients who had been infected for several years, suggesting an important role for antigen-specific T cells in generating lasting immunity against viruses [
20]. A balanced humoral and Th1-type cellular immune response may be important for the prevention of COVID-19 and the development of effective vaccine-induced immunity [
21,
22]. Data demonstrated that a predominant Th1-type response was detected in mRNA and adenovirus-vectored individuals [
20,
23]. Little is known about the kinetics of priming for vaccine-induced CD4
+T and CD8
+T cells in the context of CoronaVac vaccination.
Clinical data showed that vaccine-induced antibody levels gradually decreased over time [
24], and the durable protective effect induced by vaccines still needs long-term attention. Memory B cells are important components of long-lasting humoral immune memory [
25]. The effective induction of longevous memory B cells is critical to preventing virus infection and protecting against re-exposure [
26‐
28]. Studies of COVID-19 patients have suggested memory B cells were durable for over eight months post-infection [
28]. In the context of mRNA vaccination, remarkable B cell activation and proliferation was detected [
26,
29]. Therefore, prediction of vaccine efficacy should not solely rely on NAbs titers. Rather, memory B cells should be taken into account.
Virus infections induce a proinflammatory response including expression of cytokines [
30]. Cytokines play central roles in the host response to viral infections as well as in the immunopathology associated with many viral diseases [
31]. Therefore, assessing cytokine immune profiles induced by vaccine may be better characterize the immune response induced by the vaccine.
In this study, we collected blood samples from CoronaVac vaccination individuals in Ningxia on day 40, 180 after two dose vaccination, and on day 60 after booster vaccination. To assess the mechanisms contributing to protective immunity of CoronaVac vaccines, we mapped the kinetics of vaccine-induced antibodies, memory B cells, the differentiation and function of RBD-spcific CD4+T and CD8+T cells, and cytokine profile in plasma. Finally, we assessed the relation between cellular response and humoral response. This study will provide reference data for further research on inactivated vaccine based vaccination protocols to produce higher immune efficacy.
Materials and methods
Human subjects
Sixty-four individuals (35 unvaccinated donors, 29 vaccinated donors) agreed enrolled in the study and were approved by the Institutional Review Committee of Ningxia Medical University. They were negative for specific antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein and reported no prior history of COVID-19 or being positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection. These participants had no history of major systemic diseases such as autoimmune diseases, congestive heart failure, hepatitis B or C or HIV and were considerd healthy. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. All donor samples were collected between 2021 and early 2022. Blood samples were collected at four different time points: before vaccination (unvaccinated, n = 35), day 40 post the 2nd dose (40d dose2, n = 29), six months post the 2nd dose (180d dose2, n = 29), and day 60 post the 3rd dose (60d dose3, n = 29). Vaccinated donors received a dosage of 600 SU/0.5 mL CoronaVac vaccines on days 0 and 38 and received the 3rd dose vaccine 6 months after the second vaccination. The characteristics of these participants were presented in Table
1.
Table 1
Participant characteristics
Gender |
Male (%) | 49% (17/35) | 48% (14/29) |
Female (%) | 51% (18/35) | 52% (15/29) |
Past medical history |
No known | N/A | N/A |
Hyperlipidemia | 9% (3/35) | 7% (2/29) |
Hypertension | N/A | 7% (2/29) |
Asthma | N/A | N/A |
Known or suspected sick contact/exposure | N/A | N/A |
Residency |
Ningxia (%) | 100% (35/35) | 100% (29/29) |
Antibody test positivity | N/A | N/A |
Preparation of PBMCs and plasma
Whole blood obtained from heparinised venous blood was left undisturbed at 23 °C for 30 min. Blood samples were centrifuged at 450 g for 5 min to separate PBMC and plasma. Plasma was subpacked and stored at – 80 °C. PBMCs were obtained by Ficoll (TBD, LTS1077) after 1:1 dilution in Hank’s. Red blood cells in PBMC were removed by red blood cell lysis buffer (Solarbio, China). PBMCs were stored in serum-free cell freezing medium (NCM, C40050) in liquid nitrogen if not immediately used for the downstream process.
ELISA for estimating RBD protein-specific antibodies
ELISA was conducted to determine the antibodies and titres of serum binding antibodies to SARSCoV-2 RBD. Corning 96-well Stripwell Flat Bottom Microplates (Corning® 9102) were coated with 2.5 μg/mL SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein overnight at 4 °C. Plates were washed 5 times the next day with PBST (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20) to remove unbound RBD protein and then blocked with 5% skim milk (Biotopped, D6340) in PBST for 2 h at 37 °C. For tilter, twofold serially diluted plasma were added to the wells and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. For RBD specific antibodies, plasma was added to the wells after 1:500 dilution in 5% milk and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. For IgG, Rb pAb to Hu IgG (HRP) antibody (abcam, ab6759) was used at a 1:10,000 dilution. For IgM, Rb pAb to Hu IgM (HRP) antibody (abcam, ab97210) was used at a 1:8000 dilution. For IgA, Rb pAb to Hu IgA (HRP) antibody (abcam, ab73901) was used at a 1:2000 dilution. For IgG subsets, Mouse anti-human IgG1-4 Fc secondary antibody (nitrogen, MH1715, MH1722, MH1732, MH1742) was used at a 1:200 dilution. Plates were washed 5 times with PBST. Plates were developed with TMB Two-component Substrate solution (solarbio, PR1210) for 5–30 min at room temperature. The reaction was stopped with ELISA stop solution. Plates were read on a Spectramax Plate Reader at 450 nm using Thermo Scientific Multiskan SkyHigh.
Flow cytometry
PBMCs (5 × 10
5) were resuspended in 100 μL of Buffer2 (as prevous reported [
32]) for the surface stain. Then, the surface markers were added to stain the cells for half-hour at 4 °C, protected from light. For intracellular cytokine staining, samples were then fixed for 8 min protecting from light using 4% paraformaldehyde and permeabilised for 2 h in the dark using Buffer2 (as prevous reported [
32]). After washing, the cells were stained using intranuclear antibodies in the dark for half-hour at 4 °C. 300 μL of Buffer2 was added to the cells. The data was analysed using the program FlowJo version 10.0. All antibodies are shown in Table
2.
CD3 | AF700 | SK7 | Biolegend | 344,822 |
CD4 | BV605 | OKT4 | Biolegend | 317,438 |
CD8 | Percp5.5 | SK1 | Biolegend | 344,710 |
OX40 | BV510 | Ber-AC735 | Biolegend | 350,026 |
4-1BB | BV421 | 4B4-1 | Biolegend | 309,820 |
CD69 | PE | FN50 | Biolegend | 310,906 |
TNF | APC | Mab11 | Biolegend | 502,912 |
IFN | BV510 | 45B3 | Biolegend | 502,912 |
IL-2 | BV421 | MQ1-17H12 | Biolegend | 500,307 |
IL17A | FITC | BL168 | Biolegend | 512,330 |
IL-4 | PE | MP4-25D2 | Biolegend | 500,826 |
Cell stimulation
For intracellular cytokines, cells were stimulated by 10 μg/mL SARS-CoV-2 specific RBD protein for 24 h in 48-well plates. Cells were diluted into 1 × 106 PBMC per well. BFA (Solarbio) was added into stimulated cells in the last 6 h of incubation. Following a twenty-four hours stimulation, the cells were collected and used for intracellular cytokine staining.
For the AIM assay, cells were co-cultured with 10 μg/mL of SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein for six hours in 1 μg/mL of purified NA/LE Mouse anti-human CD28 antibody (BD Biosciences, 555,725). Positive controls were performed with 1 μg/mL of PHA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 10,576,015). Anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-4-1BB, anti-OX40, and anti-CD69 antibodise were added to the cells suspension. Cells were washed in Buffer2 and added 300 μL of Buffer2 into cells for flow cytometry.
ELISA for detecting cytokines
Cells were co-cultured with 10 μg/mL of SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein for six hours in the presence of 1 μg/mL of purified NA/LE Mouse anti-human CD28 antibody. After incubation for 6 h, ELISA was used to detected the supernatants cytokines including IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-2, IL-17A, and IL-4 according to the manufacturer's protocol (BD Biosciences).
SARS-CoV-2 specific memory B cell ELISPOT assay
PBMCs were cultured at 1.5 × 106 cells/well in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO) supplemented with a cultural medium in 48-well plates alone or with Human Memory B-cell Stimpack (Mabtech, USA), including the TLR7/8 agonist R848 (1 μg/mL) and recombinant human IL-2 (10 ng/mL).
After incubation for 5 days, cells were harvested, washed with Hank’s, diluted into 5 × 105/well in completed medium, and finally plated on prepared ELISPOT plates. 10 μg/mL SARS-CoV-2 RBD antigen was coated on 96-well filtration plate (Mabtech, USA) overnight at 4 °C and washed thrice with a 10% FBS RPMI medium. Then plates were blocked by 10% FBS RPMI medium for two hours at 23 °C. Cells from 5-day cultures were plated in ELISPOT plates in the culture media described above at concentrations of 5 × 105 cells/well to detect SARS-CoV-2 RBD specific IgG+ ASCs. After a 24 h incubation in a 5% CO2 incubator, firstly, the plate was washed twice with ddH2O and then washed thrice with PBST. Monoclonal antibody to human IgG (Mabtech, USA) diluted 1:200 using PBS with 10% FBS was added to wells and incubated for two hours in 37 °C incubator box. Plates were washed thrice with PBST. Next, streptavidin-HRP diluted to 1:1000 in PBS with 10% FBS was added to wells and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. Plates were first washed four times using PBST and then washed twice using PBS. Color developed was used with AEC Substrate Set (BD) for 5–30 min at 23 °C. ddH2O was used to terminate the reaction. Results were analysed using AID ELISpot Reader Classic.
Cytometric bead array for estimating cytokine immune profiles
The Cytometric Bead Array Human Th1/Th2/Th17 Cytokine Kit and the Inflammatory Cytokines Kit (BD) were used to detecte the cytokines in plasma according to the manufacturer’s instruction. In simple terms, beads coated with capture antibodies response to IL-17A, IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-10, IL-6, IL-4, IL-2, IL-12p70, IL-1β, and IL-8 were added to 50 µL plasmas and incubated in a 12 × 75-mm tube in the dark for 1.5 h at 23 °C. Added 1 ml of wash buffer into each test tube and centrifuged at 200 g for 5 min. 50 µL of cytokine PE Detection Reagent was added to the mixture and incubated for 1.5 h at 23 °C. Finally, the sample was washed and analyzed on the flow cytometer. The samples were analysed using FACS Array software.
Statistical analysis
Graphpad prism 8 and Origin 2021 were used for statistical analysis. Data were presented as means ± standard deviations. Comparing ratio differences between two groups used Wilcoxon Tests. Multiple comparisons used Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-test. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to analyse correlation. Statistical significance was considered p ≤ 0.05.
Discussion
Adaptive immune response has been thought to play a key role in SARS-CoV-2 infection. T cell responses seem to be important in reducing disease severity and may mediate long-term protection against the virus [
17‐
19]. Data coming from sever COVID-19 patients found an damaged function of CD4
+T cells, associated with lower IFN-γ secretion [
34]. In addition, vaccine-induced multi-protein specific T cell responses were largely preserved against the SARS-CoV-2 variant [
35‐
37]. Recent studies proved inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced multi-protein specific T cell response against the Omicron variant and cross-recognition of the different variants by CD4
+ and CD8
+T-cells was maintained after booster vaccination [
36,
37]. We observed activation of CD4
+T and CD8
+T cells at early state after prime and stonger after booster vaccination, indicating efficacy of priming T cells in eliciting cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2. In addition, we found up to a half reductions of activated RBD-specific T cells at six months when compared to 40 days after the two dose of vaccine. This result was consistent with previously published article [
38]. However, another study found the response to membrane and nucleoprotein remained largely unchanged after the third vaccination dose [
35]. Importantly, vaccine-induced CD4
+T cell responses to RBD protein were more prominent than CD8
+T cell responses, in agreement with recent study [
35]. Data showed substantial cross-reactive coronavirus T cells was observed in unexposed individuals [
18,
39,
40]. Our result showed that RBD-specific CD4
+T and CD8
+T cells in 6% and 10% of unvaccinated individuals and a few cells expressed IL-2, TNF-α and IL-17A were detected, which may be indicate some degree of cross-reactivity and pre-existing immunity to SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein in some individuals.
In addition, we found CoronaVac vaccine induced a predominant Th1 response and a weak Th17 response on day 40 after prime immunization, and on day 60 after boost immunization, which was consistent with previously published reports [
23,
38]. The ICS and ELISA results showed a high percentage of PBMC positive for Th1 cytokines IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-2 in vaccinated individuals, but a low percentage of expressed IL-4 associated with the Th2 response. However, these cytokines were not detected by 6 months after prime vaccination. This means that booster vaccination is important to prevent SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Vaccine-induced polyfunctional T cells appear to have greater protective value. In our study, higher frequencies of multifunctional CD4 and CD8
+T cells were observed on day 40 in prime vaccination and 60 in booster vaccination. Although the multifunctional RBD-specific T cells could wane over time, CD4
+T cells co-expressing two cytokines were still detectable at six months following prime vaccination. These results demonstated that inactived vaccine induced a broad and robust CD4
+T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein, which may be contribut to long-term protective immunity.
Consistent with published study [
38], we observed that booster vaccination effectively recalled specific antibodies responses to SARS-CoV-2 RBD protein, which had declined substantially 6 months after two doses of vaccination. In addition, the vaccine-induced IgG antibody was dominated by IgG1. Establishing immune memory is essential in the defense against SARS-CoV-2 infection [
28]. The humoral immune response in our study confirmed that inactived vaccines induced a population of memory B cells that were durable for at least at six months after prime vaccination. Strikingly, the frequency of RBD-specific memory B cells that was focused on RBD significantly increased following booster vaccination, indicating that three dose of vaccines would be capable of rapidly producing functional antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Studies [
9‐
12] have shown that a third dose of CoronaVac effectively recalled specific antibodies to SARS-CoV-2, which could be attributed to the durable memory B cell responses. In addition, we interrogated the correlation of CD4
+T cell responses with CD8
+T cell and humoral response. The notion that the functional role in protective immunity of CD4
+T cell responses was proved by the correlation between CD4
+T cells with CD8
+T cell and humoral responses.
Cytokines coordinate the immune response was important to prevent systemic damage [
41]. TNF-α and IL-17A were abundantly secreted cytokines in the 40d dose2 cohort and the 60d dose3 cohort. IL-12p70, a key cytokine that initiated the Th1 response, was remarkable increased following booster vaccination. These results were similar to ICS assay. The cytokine profile signatures of the vaccinated individuals in the 40d dose2 and 60d dose3 cohorts revealed several main clusters of correlations. Some of these cytokines play an auxiliary role in the proliferation of T and B cells. These results suggested prime and boost vaccination changed the cytokine signature of plasma. A broader and more complex cytokine pattern correlated with the dose of vaccination and the complexity of the cytokine correlation gradually weaken.
Our study has a few limitations. The sample size was small and the time points sampled in this study may not better detect the complete kinetics of the response of each immune component. Another limitation was that the study population generally tends to be young individuals. Therefore, the data may not complete represent the persistence of vaccine-induced immune response in elderly individuals. Finally, our study only measured S-RBD specific T and B cells responses. Additional studies will be required to detected other structural proteins including S, N and M due to non-S specific T and B cells have been shown to correlate with disease severity or protection.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.