Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Urolithiasis 5/2011

01.10.2011 | Original Paper

An alternative treatment for high-burden ureteral stones: percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy

verfasst von: Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu, Mehmet Resit Goren, Tufan Cicek, Bulent Ozturk, Hakan Ozkardes

Erschienen in: Urolithiasis | Ausgabe 5/2011

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The treatment of large proximal ureteral stones continues to be controversial. We evaluated the antegrade percutaneous approaches for the proximal ureteral stones in our clinic. In this study, 73 percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy (PAU) operations applied to proximal ureteral stones between February 2005 and December 2009 were included. The stones were located between ureteropelvic junction and 4th lumbar vertebra. PAUs were applied through appropriate calyx with the patients in prone position. During operations, amplatz dilatators were used for dilatation, and pneumatic lithotripter was used for stone fragmentation. Patients were evaluated according to their success rate, complications, hospitalization period, and preference of drainage tube etc. Patients’ mean age was 52.21 years, the mean stone diameter was 19.47 mm (range 15–25), the mean stone burden was 283.76 ± 49.12 mm2 (mean ± SD) (range 188.5–392.7) and the mean hospitalization time 1.69 days. Single access done in 68 patients and two accesses were needed in 5 patients. Sixty-eight patients (93.1%) became stone-free. Nephrostomy tubes were placed in 12 patients after operation, while tubeless approach was preferred in 61 patients. Complications were seen in five patients. There were not any complications reported during the follow-up period. PAU is an effective and safe treatment modality if appropriate calyx access was performed. The possibility of renal stone treatment in the same session is an important advantage of this modality.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Kijvikai K, Haleblian GE, Preminger GM, de la Rosette J (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi: an old discussion revisited. J Urol 178:1157–1163PubMedCrossRef Kijvikai K, Haleblian GE, Preminger GM, de la Rosette J (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy for the management of proximal ureteral calculi: an old discussion revisited. J Urol 178:1157–1163PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Wolf JS Jr (2007) Treatment selection and outcomes: ureteral calculi. Urol Clin North Am 34:421–430PubMedCrossRef Wolf JS Jr (2007) Treatment selection and outcomes: ureteral calculi. Urol Clin North Am 34:421–430PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Wignall GR, Canales BK, Denstedt JD, Monga M (2008) Minimally invasive approaches to upper urinary tract urolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am 35:441–454, viiiPubMedCrossRef Wignall GR, Canales BK, Denstedt JD, Monga M (2008) Minimally invasive approaches to upper urinary tract urolithiasis. Urol Clin North Am 35:441–454, viiiPubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Maheshwari PN, Oswal AT, Andankar M, Nanjappa KM, Bansal M (1999) Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi? J Endourol 13:441–444PubMedCrossRef Maheshwari PN, Oswal AT, Andankar M, Nanjappa KM, Bansal M (1999) Is antegrade ureteroscopy better than retrograde ureteroscopy for impacted large upper ureteral calculi? J Endourol 13:441–444PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pedro RN, Netto NR Jr (2008) Proximal ureteral calculi: shock wave or ureterolithotripsy? Urol Int 81:198–201PubMedCrossRef Pedro RN, Netto NR Jr (2008) Proximal ureteral calculi: shock wave or ureterolithotripsy? Urol Int 81:198–201PubMedCrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Goel R, Aron M, Kesarwani PK, Dogra PN, Hemal AK, Gupta NP (2005) Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: still the treatment of choice in developing countries. J Endourol 19:54–57PubMedCrossRef Goel R, Aron M, Kesarwani PK, Dogra PN, Hemal AK, Gupta NP (2005) Percutaneous antegrade removal of impacted upper-ureteral calculi: still the treatment of choice in developing countries. J Endourol 19:54–57PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Kumar V, Ahlawat R, Banjeree GK, Bhaduria RP, Elhence A, Bhandari M (1996) Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi. Arch Esp Urol 49:86–91PubMed Kumar V, Ahlawat R, Banjeree GK, Bhaduria RP, Elhence A, Bhandari M (1996) Percutaneous ureterolitholapaxy: the best bet to clear large bulk impacted upper ureteral calculi. Arch Esp Urol 49:86–91PubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Toth CS, Varga A, Flasko T, Tallai B, Salah MA, Kocsis I (2001) Percutaneous ureterolithotomy: direct method for removal of impacted ureteral stones. J Endourol 15:285–290PubMedCrossRef Toth CS, Varga A, Flasko T, Tallai B, Salah MA, Kocsis I (2001) Percutaneous ureterolithotomy: direct method for removal of impacted ureteral stones. J Endourol 15:285–290PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Srivastava A, Ahlawat R, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M (1992) Management of impacted upper ureteric calculi: results of lithotripsy and percutaneous litholapaxy. Br J Urol 70:252–257PubMed Srivastava A, Ahlawat R, Kumar A, Kapoor R, Bhandari M (1992) Management of impacted upper ureteric calculi: results of lithotripsy and percutaneous litholapaxy. Br J Urol 70:252–257PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Tiselius HG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Sarica K, Türk C (2008) Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology Tiselius HG, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Sarica K, Türk C (2008) Guidelines on Urolithiasis. European Association of Urology
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Juan YS, Shen JT, Li CC, Wang CJ, Chuang SM, Huang CH, Wu WJ (2008) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 24:204–209PubMedCrossRef Juan YS, Shen JT, Li CC, Wang CJ, Chuang SM, Huang CH, Wu WJ (2008) Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the management of impacted, large, proximal ureteral stones. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 24:204–209PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Istanbulluoglu MO, Cicek T, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H (2010) A good alternative for treatment of large upper ureter stones: percutaneous nephroureterolithotomy Turkish J Urol 36: Epub ahead of print Istanbulluoglu MO, Cicek T, Ozturk B, Ozkardes H (2010) A good alternative for treatment of large upper ureter stones: percutaneous nephroureterolithotomy Turkish J Urol 36: Epub ahead of print
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Gonen M, Cicek T, Ozkardes H (2009) Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 41:541–545PubMedCrossRef Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Gonen M, Cicek T, Ozkardes H (2009) Effectiveness of totally tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized study. Int Urol Nephrol 41:541–545PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Cicek T, Gonen M, Ozkardes H (2008) Case report: bilateral simultaneous tubeless and stentless nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22:25–28PubMedCrossRef Istanbulluoglu MO, Ozturk B, Cicek T, Gonen M, Ozkardes H (2008) Case report: bilateral simultaneous tubeless and stentless nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 22:25–28PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Muslumanoglu AY, Karadag MA, Tefekli AH, Altunrende F, Tok A, Berberoglu Y (2006) When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones? Int J Urol 13:1385–1388PubMedCrossRef Muslumanoglu AY, Karadag MA, Tefekli AH, Altunrende F, Tok A, Berberoglu Y (2006) When is open ureterolithotomy indicated for the treatment of ureteral stones? Int J Urol 13:1385–1388PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Basiri A, Simforoosh N, Ziaee A, Shayaninasab H, Moghaddam SM, Zare S (2008) Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 22:2677–2680PubMedCrossRef Basiri A, Simforoosh N, Ziaee A, Shayaninasab H, Moghaddam SM, Zare S (2008) Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 22:2677–2680PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
An alternative treatment for high-burden ureteral stones: percutaneous antegrade ureteroscopy
verfasst von
Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu
Mehmet Resit Goren
Tufan Cicek
Bulent Ozturk
Hakan Ozkardes
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2011
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Urolithiasis / Ausgabe 5/2011
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Elektronische ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0351-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2011

Urolithiasis 5/2011 Zur Ausgabe

Sind Frauen die fähigeren Ärzte?

30.04.2024 Gendermedizin Nachrichten

Patienten, die von Ärztinnen behandelt werden, dürfen offenbar auf bessere Therapieergebnisse hoffen als Patienten von Ärzten. Besonders gilt das offenbar für weibliche Kranke, wie eine Studie zeigt.

Harninkontinenz: Netz-Op. erfordert über lange Zeit intensive Nachsorge

30.04.2024 Harninkontinenz Nachrichten

Frauen mit Belastungsinkontinenz oder Organprolaps sind nach einer Netz-Operation keineswegs beschwerdefrei. Vielmehr scheint die Krankheitslast weiterhin hoch zu sein, sogar höher als von harninkontinenten Frauen, die sich nicht haben operieren lassen.

Adjuvante Immuntherapie verlängert Leben bei RCC

25.04.2024 Nierenkarzinom Nachrichten

Nun gibt es auch Resultate zum Gesamtüberleben: Eine adjuvante Pembrolizumab-Therapie konnte in einer Phase-3-Studie das Leben von Menschen mit Nierenzellkarzinom deutlich verlängern. Die Sterberate war im Vergleich zu Placebo um 38% geringer.

Bei Senioren mit Prostatakarzinom auf Anämie achten!

24.04.2024 DGIM 2024 Nachrichten

Patienten, die zur Behandlung ihres Prostatakarzinoms eine Androgendeprivationstherapie erhalten, entwickeln nicht selten eine Anämie. Wer ältere Patienten internistisch mitbetreut, sollte auf diese Nebenwirkung achten.

Update Urologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.