Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Rheumatology International 5/2019

Open Access 13.03.2019 | Observational Research

Analysis of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet volume to platelet count ratio in children with acute stage of immunoglobulin A vasculitis and assessment of their suitability for predicting the course of the disease

verfasst von: Majka Jaszczura, Anna Góra, Ewa Grzywna-Rozenek, Małgorzata Barć-Czarnecka, Edyta Machura

Erschienen in: Rheumatology International | Ausgabe 5/2019

Abstract

Immunoglobulin A vasculitis (IgAV) is the most common systemic vasculitis in developmental age. The disease is most often characterized by a self-limiting course and good prognosis, but sometimes serious complications, like gastrointestinal bleeding or glomerulonephritis, may develop. The neutrophil to lymphocyte (NLR) and the platelet to lymphocyte (PLR) ratios are indicators related to clinical outcome in various inflammatory diseases. The mean platelet volume to platelet count ratio (MPR) has not been evaluated in patients with IgAV. The aim of this study was to analyze the values of the NLR, PLR and MPR in patients with an acute stage of IgAV compared to healthy children and to assess their suitability for predicting the severity of the disease. All children with IgAV hospitalized in our institution between 2012 and 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. The selected laboratory data were recorded before starting the treatment; these results allowed for NLR, PLR, and MPR calculation. The study involved 71 IgAV children. 57.7% of patients revealed signs of systemic involvement (including GT bleeding and/or glomerulonephritis) and 42.3% were nonsystemic (presenting skin and joint symptoms). 83% of patients were classified as mild and 17% as severe course of the disease. The NLR and the PLR were significantly higher in all IgAV children and in the systemic involvement group in comparison with non-systemic. The MPR was significantly lower in all IgAV group with the exception of children without systemic involvement. The NLR is a more valuable indicator than the PLR to identify patients at higher risk of systemic involvement in the course of IgAV. Clinical usefulness of the MPR requires further research.
Hinweise

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Introduction

Immunoglobulin A vasculitis (IgAV), formerly known as Henoch-Schonlein Purpura, is the most common vasculitis in childhood. It is a leukocytoclastic vasculitis with IgA1-dominant immune deposits, affecting the small vessels of the skin, gastrointestinal tract, kidney and frequently causes arthritis [1]. The disease is most often characterized by a mild, self-limiting course and good prognosis, but in some cases, serious complications may develop. Symptoms from the gastrointestinal tract (GT) concern 50–70% of patients [2]; most often, these are abdominal pains and latent bleeding from GT. Haematemesis, melaena and severe complications such as intussusception or GT perforation are less frequent. According to various sources, renal involvement occurs in 40–50% of cases, usually haematuria and/or proteinuria appear within 4–6 weeks from the beginning of the disease. The risk of developing chronic renal failure in the pediatric population does not exceed 7% [3]. Considering the possibility of serious complications in the course of IgAV, research is needed to identify patients at higher risk of developing severe extracutaneous symptoms. Inexpensive and easily available laboratory parameters that can be used to assess the severity of systemic inflammation include the following ratios: neutrophils/lymphocytes (NLR) and platelets/lymphocytes (PLR). The shifts in the percentage formula of white blood cells (neutrophilia and lymphopenia) are the physiological response of the immune system to the ongoing inflammatory process, injury or stress [4], and NLR and PLR reflect these changes. Until now, their relationship with the severity of the disease and/or prognosis in patients with autoimmune diseases, malignancies, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, and in the pediatric population also in allergic diseases such as bronchial asthma or atopic dermatitis were studied [511]. Few studies indicate significant differences in NLR and PLR values in IgAV patients compared to healthy subjects. Elevated NLR and PLR, as well as low MPV (mean platelet volume), appear to be indicators related to GT bleeding in the course of IgAV [1214]. The MPV/PLT ratio (MPR), considered a marker for platelet activation and inflammation, has not been evaluated in patients with IgAV. The aim of this study was to analyze the values of NLR, PLR, and MPR in patients with acute stage of IgAV compared to healthy children and to assess their suitability for predicting the severity of the disease.

Materials and methods

The study included 71 children with IgAV hospitalized in the Pediatric Department of the Clinical Hospital No. 1 in Zabrze in 2012–2017. Diagnosis of the disease was based on the EULAR/PRINTO/PRES criteria [15], which as a prerequisite for the diagnosis mention a detectable, non-thrombocytopenic purpura or ecchymosis located mainly on the lower limbs along with meeting at least one of the other criteria (diffuse abdominal colicky pain; arthritis/arthralgias; renal involvement—hematuria/proteinuria; biopsy showing IgA deposition). The clinical scoring scale (Table 1) from Muslu et al. and De Matia et al. modified by Fessatou S et al., which is the sum of points depending on the severity of joint, renal and gastrointestinal symptoms, was used to assess the disease severity (mild ≤ 4 points, severe > 4) [1618]. Gastrointestinal bleeding was defined as haematemesis, melaena, hematochezia, and positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT). Renal involvement was defined as hematuria (> 5 RBC in the field of vision), macroscopic hematuria or proteinuria (> 300 mg/24 h).
Table 1
The clinical scoring system in patients with IgAV [1618]
Arthritis score
 0
No symptom
 1
Artralgia and/or slight swelling (normal walk)
 2
Artralgia and/or moderate swelling (difficult to walk)
 3
Artralgia and/or severe swelling (refuse to walk)
Abdominal score
 0
No symptom
 1
Mild abdominal pain and/or occult blood in stool (+)
 2
Moderate abdominal pain (transient complaints brought to medical attention) and/or occult blood in stool (++/+++)
 3
Severe abdominal pain and/or melena and/or hematemesis and/or intussusception and/or surgical consultation required
Renal score
 0
No proteinuria and/or 3–5 RBC/HPF
 1
Proteinuria 30 mg/dl and/or microalbuminuria and/or 10–15 RBC/HPF
 2
Proteinuria 30–150 mg/dl and/or > 50 RBC/HPF
 3
Proteinuria 150 mg/dl and/or macroscopic haematuria
RBC red blood cells, HPF high-power field
43 healthy children were included in the control group, selected in terms of age and gender (Table 2). Children from the control group attended the outpatient pediatric clinic for non-immunological, non-inflammatory health problems and needed venous puncture. A blood sample for laboratory tests was collected at the time of the patient’s admission to the hospital (before the start of treatment) and tested in the central laboratory within the first hour after collection. Standard tubes with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)were used. The following laboratory data were recorded: hemoglobin level (Hgb), white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil and lymphocyte count, platelet count (PLT), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), C-reactive protein (CRP) and immunoglobulins level. The haemogram-derived parameters were determined using an automatic hematology analyzer and the total and differential leukocyte counts in blood were measured using an automated blood cell counter. For all tested parameters, the norms for age were included. NLR was calculated by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count, PLR was calculated by dividing the platelets count by the lymphocyte count and MPR was calculated by dividing the MPV by the platelets count. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice on 01.07.2014 (KNW/0022/KB1/66/14; KNW/0022/KB1/66/III/14/16/17) and written informed consent was obtained from children’s parents.
Table 2
Demographic, clinical and selected laboratory characteristic of study and control groups
Parameter
IgAV group (n = 71)
Control group (n = 43)
Median age (years) (Q25Q75)
6 (5–9)
8 (5–13)
Gender M/F
32/39
20/23
BMI (kg/m2)
16.17 (14.53–19.25)
16.81 (15.2–18.7)
Laboratory data (median)
  
 IgA (g/l)
1.81 (1.5–2.27)*
1.37 (0.8–1.87)
 IgG (g/l)
9.43 (7.97–11.67)
10.25 (8.58–10.96)
 IgM (g/l)
0.895 (0.74–1.19)
0.98 (0.78–1.22)
 IgE (IU/ml)
74 (14.26–204.65)
55.69 (20.96–116.19)
 C3 (g/l)
1.25 (1.13–1.39)
Not studied
 C4 (g/l)
0.25 (0.21–0.295)
Not studied
Median duration of symptoms on admission (days) (Q25Q75)
3 (2–6)
 
Month of diagnosis
 Spring
20 (28%)
 Summer
12 (17%)
 Autumn
22 (31%)
 Winter
17 (24%)
Trigger
 Respiratory tract infection
35 (49%)
 Gastrointestinal infection
5 (7%)
 Unknown
31 (44%)
Symptoms and signs
 
 Purpura (P)
71 (100%)
 Arthritis/ arthralgia (A)
43 (60.6%)
 Gastointestinal tract involvment (GI)
46 (64.8%)
  Abdominal pain
40 (56%)
  Gastointestinal bleeding (GB)
41 (57.7%)
  Melena/ hematochezia
8 (11%)
  Positive FOBT
33 (80%)
 Kidneys involvemnt (KI)
16 (22.5%)
  Proteinuria (> 300 mg/24 h)
2 (2.8%)
  Hematuria (> 5 RBC wpw)
5 (7%)
  Proteinuria and hematuria
9 (12.7%)
 Other
 
  Scrotum involvment (epididymitis, oedema)
2 (2.8%)
  Headache
1 (1.4%)
Severity score
 Mild (≤ 4 points)
59 (83%)
 Severe (> 4 points)
12 (17%)
Systemic involvment
 
 Yes: GB + KI
41 (57.7%)
 No: P + A
30 (42.3%)
*IgA concentration in whole IgAV group vs control group: p < 0.0001

Statistical evaluation

Statistical calculations were made using the MedCalc ver. 18.2.1 (Ostend, Belgium). For all parameters, the normality of distribution was determined by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Summary statistics were expressed as medians and 25–75th percentiles (Q25Q75). Comparative analysis of groups was performed using the non-parametric test (Mann–Whitney U test). Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were performed to determine possible factors associated with systemic involvement in IgAV. p < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The children from the study and control groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, and BMI. Demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups are presented in Table 2.

Characteristic of IgAV patients

Patients were included after a median duration of symptoms of 3 days. In 49% of patients, IgAV was triggered by the infection mostly of the respiratory tract. The occurrence of petechial purpura in some children was preceded by arthritis (n = 7, 9.9%) or abdominal discomfort (n = 6, 8.5%). In four children, GT obstruction, appendicitis, and intussusception were initially suspected. The majority of patients presented symptoms from GT (64.8%) and joints (60.6%), and 22.5% of children showed signs of glomerulonephritis. 4 subgroups were distinguished within the study group depending on the severity of the disease and the presence of systemic involvement. According to the disease severity scale, 83% of patients (n = 59) were classified as mild (1) and 17% (n = 12) as severe (2). 57.7% (n = 41) of patients revealed signs of systemic involvement (3), including GT bleeding and/or glomerulonephritis, and 42.3% (n = 30) were non-systemic (4) presenting skin and joint symptoms. No isolated renal involvement was observed in any of the patients studied.
The comparison of selected parameters in all separate subgroups and in the control group is presented in Table 3.
Table 3
Comparison of selected laboratory parameters between patients with mild and severe course of the disease, between patients with and without systemic involvement and in comparison with control group
Parameter
IgAV
Control group
Hgb (g/dL)
 
12.94 (12.13–13.7)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
12.8 (12.4–13.7)
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
12.9 (12.35–14.3)
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
12.8 (12.4–13.7)
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
13.1 (9.6–16)
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
12.67 (11.5–15.2)
 
PLT (× 103/uL)
 
303 (243–332)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
355 (289–400)*
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
372.5 (311–411.5)*
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
352 (289–399)*
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
369 (317–416)*
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
325.5 (281–388)
 
MPV (fL)
 
8.32 (7.68–9.5)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
8.35 (7.55–9.3)
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
8 (7.43–9.3)
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
8.4 (7.55–9.3)
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
8.2 (6.4–10.8)
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
8.5 (7.1–10.3)
 
PDW (fL)
 
12.25 (10.6-13.58)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
11 (9.79–13.6)
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
11.9 (10.3–13.7)
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
11 (9.7–13.4)
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
10.8 (9.8–13.8)
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
11.38 (9.65–13.25)
 
WBC (× 103/uL)
 
6.61 (5.58–7.93)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
10.19 (8.14-13)*
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
12.1 (10.35–14.13)* #
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
9.9 (7.6–12.9)*
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
11.86 (9.1–13.3)* ^
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
9.45 (7.5–11.23)*
 
Neutrophils (× 103/uL)
 
3.47 (2.32–4.12)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
6.04 (4.51–8.78)*
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
7.7 (5.7–9.95)* #
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
5.6 (4.11–8.02)*
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
6.74 (5.45–9.34)* ^
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
4.8 (3.26–6.41)*
 
Lymphocytes (× 103/uL)
 
2.4 (1.95–2.14)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
2.92 (2.23–3.93)*
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
2.6 (2.03–4)
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
2.93 (2.3–3.96)*
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
2.79 (2.08–3.4)
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
3.21 (2.4–4.46)*
 
CRP (mg/l)
 
0.6 (0.23–0.99)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
8.21 (3.53–21.99)*
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
13.3 (5.1–37.66)*
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
8.2 (2.98–15.7)*
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
10.04 (5.04–32.57)*
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
6.65 (1.64–11.27)*
 
NLR
 
1.22 (0.97–1.91)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
1.903 (1.31–3.06)*
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
2.79 (1.63–4.2)*
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
1.8 (1.28–2.84)*
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
2.77 (1.59–3.93)* ^
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
1.61 (1.15–1.96)
 
PLR
 
126.79 (95.47-152.32)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
121.58 (89.6–147.6)
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
136 (220−95.3)
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
129.6 (387.7-85.76)
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
139.64 (96.34–160.43)^
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
100.89 (79.96–131.3)
 
MPR
 
0.029 (0.024–0.037)
 All IgAV group (n = 71)
0.023 (0.02–0.03)*
 
 Severe course (n = 12)
0.021 (0.019–0.03)*
 
 Mild course (n = 59)
0.025 (0.02–0.031)*
 
 Systemic involvment (n = 41)
0.022 (0.019–0.027)*
 
 Without systemic involvment (n = 30)
0.026 (0.022–0.032)
 
MPV mean platelet volume, PDW platelet distribution width, NLR neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, PLR platelet/ lymphocyte ratio, MPR mean platelet volume/platelets count ratio
*p < 0.05 in comparison with control group
#p < 0.05 children with severe course in comparison with mild course
^p < 0.05 children with systemic involvment in comparison with children without systemic involvement

IgAV patients in comparison with the control group

Children with IgAV had significantly higher values of WBC, neutrophils, PLT, NLR, CRP compared to the control group, regardless of the severity (for WBC, neutrophils, CRP all IgAV children vs control, mild vs control, severe vs control: p < 0.0001; for NLR all IgAV children vs control, mild vs control, severe vs control: p < 0.002; for PLT all IgAV children vs control, mild vs control, severe vs control: p < 0.01). Similar differences in the parameters assessed were observed in children with systemic involvement (systemic involvement vs control for WBC, neutrophils, CRP, NLR: p < 0.0001, for PLT: p < 0.001). In the group without systemic involvement, in addition to higher WBC, neutrophils and CRP (vs control p < 0.002) a significantly higher lymphocyte count was found. The lymphocyte count in the whole IgAV group was higher than the control (p = 0.05), but this difference probably resulted from higher lymphocyte values in the group with mild and no systemic involvement (vs control p < 0.05; p < 0.01 respectively). In all groups of IgAV children with the exception of children without systemic involvement, the MPR was statistically significantly lower than that in the control group (all IgAV children vs control: p = 0.005, mild vs control: p = 0.01, severe vs control: p = 0.04, systemic involvement vs control: p = 0.002). There was no significant statistical difference in the value of Hgb, MPV, PDW, and PLR between these groups and the control group.

The severe-course group in comparison with the mild-course group

In the group of patients with severe IgAV, statistically significant higher values of WBC and neutrophils were found in comparison to the mild group (p = 0.034; p = 0.021, respectively).

The systemic-involvement group in comparison with the without-systemic-involvement group

In the group of patients with systemic involvement, statistically significantly higher values of WBC, neutrophils, NLR and PLR were found (p = 0.02, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.003, respectively) in comparison to patients without organ involvement.

The logistic regression analysis for possible risk factors of systemic involvement and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves

The logistic regression analysis of WBC, neutrophils, NLR and PLR to identify the predictive factors for systemic involvements in IgAV showed that the higher risk of systemic involvement was associated with higher neutrophil counts and higher NLR and PLR (Table 4).
Table 4
Logistic regression analysis of the association of WBC, Neutrophil count, NLR, PLR and systemic involvement in IgAV. OR—odds ratio, 95% CI lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval for the odds ratio
Parameter
OR
95% CI lower
95% CI upper
p value
WBC
1.158
0.999
1.342
0.051
Neutrophil count
1.377
1.104
1.718
0.005
NLR
2.274
1.329
3.89
0.003
PLR
1.013
1.001
1.024
0.031
ROC curve analysis revealed that statistically significant predictors of systemic involvement in IgAV children included NLR, PLR and neutrophil counts. The largest AUC (area under the curve) was demonstrated for the NLR (AUC = 0.738, p < 0.0001), which at the optimal cutoff value determined using the Youden index at the level of 2.73 showed a high specificity (90%). The parameter with the highest sensitivity (75.6%) at the cutoff of 5.45 (Youden index) was the neutrophil count (Table 5). MPR is the statistically least valuable indicator of systemic involvement. The comparison of ROC curves for selected parameters is shown in Fig. 1.
Table 5
ROC curves analysis of NLR, neutrophils count, PLR and MPR for predicting systemic involvment
Parameter
Cut-off value
Sensitivity %
Specificity %
AUC
95% CI
p value
Youden index
NLR
2.73
53.7
90
0.738
0.623–0.853
< 0.0001
0.44
Neutrophils
5.45
75.6
60
0.734
0.617–0.852
0.0001
0.36
PLR
124.04
65.9
73.3
0.709
0.585–0.833
0.001
0.39
MPR
0.023
63.4
63.3
0.506
0.506–0.766
0.04
0.27
Bold values are statistically significant

Discussion

In searching for parameters useful for predicting the course of IgAV (risk of systemic involvement) and making decisions about treatment, it is important to know the complex mechanisms responsible for migration and infiltration of neutrophils into the perivascular space, which ultimately contributes to the development of inflammation with their dominant participation [19]. As the ratio of particular types of white blood cells, rather than their total number, is considered to have a higher prognostic value in assessing the severity of inflammation, in our study, we assessed the ratio of neutrophils to lymphocytes as well as PLR and MPR ratios.
The significantly higher neutrophil counts and the value of the NLR in children with IgAV documented in our study confirm their participation in the pathogenesis of the disease. It is known that neutrophils are not only the first effector cells flowing into the site of injury/inflammation removing extracellular pathogens but they also affect the activation, regulation, and function of other cells of the immune system, among others, through the release of cytokines, extracellular traps, and effector molecules [20]. The current research shows that the NLR, showing changes in particular populations in the total leukocyte pool, is associated with higher severity of inflammation and, thus, with a more severe course of the disease [13, 21]. This is confirmed by the results of our research because NLR, like the neutrophils count, was higher in children with the severe course of the disease and/or systemic involvement. Moreover, ROC curve analysis showed that NLR is the best predictor of systemic involvement in children with IgAV with an optimal cutoff value of 2.73 (sensitivity 53.7%, specificity 90%). Previous research by Makay et al. and Hee Hong et al. which showed significantly higher NLR values in the group of patients with GT bleeding coincide with ours (cutoff value 2.82, 81% sensitivity, 76% specificity and cutoff value 2, 86, sensitivity 73%, specificity 68% respectively) [13, 22]. In our study, we also showed elevated PLT and PLR in the group of children with systemic involvement (cutoff value 124.04, sensitivity 65.9%, specificity 73.3%). Similarly, Gayret et al. showed that PLT and PLR are significantly higher in children with GT bleeding but in contrast to the studies of other authors and ours he did not confirm the increase of neutrophils and NLR in this group of patients [14].
Reactive thrombocytosis can be observed in various clinical conditions (acute or chronic infection, trauma, malignancy). The aforementioned cellular shifts associated with the immune response to the ongoing non-specific inflammatory process (neutrophilia, lymphopenia) influence changes in the values of both PLR and NLR. Significantly increased levels of cytokines in the acute phase of IgAV, including TNF-alpha, IL-6, IL-8, are responsible for thrombocytosis, elevated CRP, more severe course of the disease, and a higher risk of renal involvement [2326]. Three main elements are considered to be a measure of platelet activation: MPV (which determines the average size of platelets and reflects their production in the bone marrow), PDW (index of inhomogeneity of the size of the platelets) and the number of platelets [27]. The healthy population shows an inverse relationship between MPV and platelet count [28]. Reactive thrombocytosis is often accompanied by low MPV and PDW [29]. Activated platelets play an important role in the systemic inflammatory response through the release of inflammatory mediators and the presentation of surface molecules (including P-selectin, E-selectin) that affect their interactions with other cells [30]. Larger platelets are more active, contain more mediators (serotonin, adenosine diphosphate, platelet-derived growth factor, β-thromboglobulin) and show greater expression of adhesion molecules (glycoproteins Ib, and glycoprotein IIb-IIIa) [31]. In addition, due to the presence of a ligand for P-selectin on the surface of neutrophils (PSGL-1, P-selectin glycoprotein ligand-1), the platelets can affect neutrophils and stimulate cytokine synthesis by neutrophils and their migration to surrounding tissues [32]. It has been previously shown that low MPV may correlate with GT bleeding in the course of IgAV [12, 13]. We have not demonstrated such dependencies in our work. MPV and PDW were similar in children with IgAV and did not differ from those observed in healthy children. Data on the usefulness of the MPV in other inflammatory diseases are divergent. In the acute phase of rheumatic diseases, a decrease in MPV [33, 34] or its increase associated with higher activity of juvenile idiopathic arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, SLE may occur [5, 35, 36]. Some studies indicate the usefulness of MPV in monitoring anti-inflammatory therapy in rheumatoid arthritis [37]. Conflicting research results concern vascular diseases, indicating an increase in MPV values in peripheral and coronary artery diseases [38, 39] or a lack of MPV association with coronary disease severity [40]. According to Shin DH et al., larger MPV is not associated with higher platelet reactivity, but indicates their reduced aggregation, because larger platelets may not be fully mature and appear as a result of their accelerated release from the bone marrow [31].
MPR calculated by dividing the MPV by the PLT is suggested to be the better indicator of platelet activation and, thus, the severity of the inflammatory process. The relationship between MPR and prognosis in critically ill patients, in malignancies and in febrile seizures in children [31, 4143] has been studied so far. In the presented study, the MPR was significantly lower in all IgAV children and in the systemic involvement group. This indicates the usefulness of MPR to predict systemic involvement in IgAV. The ROC curve analysis showed the lowest sensitivity and specificity for this index (63.4% and 63.3%, respectively, p = 0.04), which means that it requires further research on a larger group of patients.
It is important that the interpretation of results includes physiological cellular shifts (between the circulating pool and the tissue pool) that occur during bleeding and cause neutrophilia during the first hours [44]. Other factors that may affect the tested ratios, i.e., thyroid dysfunction, diabetes, renal and hepatic failure, are less important in children than in the adult patients (they were not observed in our cohort); however, they should be kept in mind [45]. The causes of thrombocythemia include chronic iron deficiency, hyposplenism, congenital lack of spleen, status after spleen removal, alcoholism, hemolytic anemia [46, 47] and used drugs (antibiotics, corticosteroids, non-steroidal inflammatory drugs). As it is known, in children with IgAV, the incidence is higher in autumn and winter and is usually associated with the infectious factor, which was also confirmed by our research (55% of new cases in the autumn and winter season and 56% occurrence of the infectious trigger factor). Therefore, changes in leukocyte populations reflect the body’s response to an ongoing inflammatory process per se and it may be modified by the pharmacological treatment. The logistic regression analysis showed a higher risk of systemic involvement with higher values of NLR and the analysis of ROC curves showed NLR as the best predictor of organ involvement. PLR was also found to be associated with systemic involvement but with lower AUC. That is why NLR is a more valuable indicator to identify patients at higher risk for systemic involvement in the course of IgAV.
In our study group, all patients with renal involvement also presented features of GT bleeding; therefore, it was impossible to assess the above ratios in children with only renal involvement. Ozturk and Ekinci (2 patients with only renal involvement) [44] and Nagy et al. (6 patients with only renal involvement) [48] suggest that IgAV should be considered as systemic involvement or extracutaneous involvement as a determinant of a severe course of the disease. In the group we studied, we additionally applied an objective scale of disease severity, including joint, renal and GT symptoms (Table 1) [1618]. We did not show a significant difference in NLR, PLR and MPR between the severe and mild group. It may be result from the low number of patients in severe group (n = 12) and the fact that to the mild group were classified children with less severe systemic involvement who did not yet meet the point criterion. The limitation of the scale used is related to not including other rare manifestations of IgAV, such as acute scrotum, central nervous system disorders, myositis, myocardial involvement, which may be severe. In addition, it should be analyzed, as suggested by other authors, whether the selected cutoff point in the severity of the disease (4 points) was rightly adopted.
Additionally, it would be valuable to assess the correlation between the extent of skin lesions and the indicators: NLR, PLR, and MPR, which has not been studied so far. In our study group, such an assessment was not possible because of the similar distribution of skin lesions in all patients.
The retrospective character of single-center studies and a small study group may limit the value of statistical analyses. Another limiting factor may result from the different time from the onset of the disease symptoms to the collection of a blood sample; however, it should be noted that the first (pre-treatment) peripheral blood count was used for the analysis.
In conclusion, NLR is a more valuable indicator than PLR to identify patients at higher risk of systemic involvement in the course of IgAV. MPR was significantly lower in the systemic involvement group, which also indicates its usefulness in assessing the course of the disease. However, due to the fact that it was characterized by the lowest sensitivity and specificity, its use requires further research. Due to the multitude of factors affecting the results of peripheral blood counts, the above ratios should not be decisive in clinical doubts. As always, clinical observation and individual approach to the patient are most important. It is necessary to determine the cutoff values of the tested ratios, which will allow for selecting patients with GT symptoms who should receive early corticosteroids or isolating patients who require increased supervision (e.g., hospital observation). Further prospective and multicenter studies on the usefulness of the above-mentioned parameters for predicting the severity of the disease and seeking new ratios to facilitate clinical decision making are needed.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Study was approved by Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Silesia in Katowice on 01.07.2014 (KNW/0022/KB1/66/14; KNW/0022/KB1/66/III/14/16/17).
All participants signed an informed consent declaration.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​4.​0/​), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Unsere Produktempfehlungen

e.Med Interdisziplinär

Kombi-Abonnement

Für Ihren Erfolg in Klinik und Praxis - Die beste Hilfe in Ihrem Arbeitsalltag

Mit e.Med Interdisziplinär erhalten Sie Zugang zu allen CME-Fortbildungen und Fachzeitschriften auf SpringerMedizin.de.

e.Med Innere Medizin

Kombi-Abonnement

Mit e.Med Innere Medizin erhalten Sie Zugang zu CME-Fortbildungen des Fachgebietes Innere Medizin, den Premium-Inhalten der internistischen Fachzeitschriften, inklusive einer gedruckten internistischen Zeitschrift Ihrer Wahl.

Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Trapani S, Micheli A, Grisolia F et al (2005) Schonlein purpura in childhood: epidemiological and clinical analysis of 150 cases over a 5-year period and review of literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum Dec 35(3):143–153CrossRef Trapani S, Micheli A, Grisolia F et al (2005) Schonlein purpura in childhood: epidemiological and clinical analysis of 150 cases over a 5-year period and review of literature. Semin Arthritis Rheum Dec 35(3):143–153CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Zahorec R (2001) Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts—rapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill. Bratisl Lek Listy 102:5e14 Zahorec R (2001) Ratio of neutrophil to lymphocyte counts—rapid and simple parameter of systemic inflammation and stress in critically ill. Bratisl Lek Listy 102:5e14
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Güneş A, Ece A, Şen V, Uluca U, Aktar F, Tan I, Yel S, Yolbaş I (2015) Correlation of mean platelet volume, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and disease activity in children with juvenile ıdiopathic arthritis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(7):11337–11341 (Published online 2015 Jul 15)PubMedPubMedCentral Güneş A, Ece A, Şen V, Uluca U, Aktar F, Tan I, Yel S, Yolbaş I (2015) Correlation of mean platelet volume, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and disease activity in children with juvenile ıdiopathic arthritis. Int J Clin Exp Med 8(7):11337–11341 (Published online 2015 Jul 15)PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Muslu A, Islek I, Gok F, Aliyazicioglu Y, Dagdemir A, Dundaroz R, Kucukoduk S, Sakarcan A (2002) Endothelin levels in Henoch-Schonlein purpura. Pediatr Nephrol 17(11):920–925 (Epub 2002 Sep 25)CrossRefPubMed Muslu A, Islek I, Gok F, Aliyazicioglu Y, Dagdemir A, Dundaroz R, Kucukoduk S, Sakarcan A (2002) Endothelin levels in Henoch-Schonlein purpura. Pediatr Nephrol 17(11):920–925 (Epub 2002 Sep 25)CrossRefPubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat De Mattia D, Penza R, Giordano P, Del Vecchio GC, Aceto G, Altomare M, Schettini F (1995) Von Willebrand factor and factor XIII in children with Henoch-Schonlein purpura. Pediatr Nephrol 9(5):603–605CrossRefPubMed De Mattia D, Penza R, Giordano P, Del Vecchio GC, Aceto G, Altomare M, Schettini F (1995) Von Willebrand factor and factor XIII in children with Henoch-Schonlein purpura. Pediatr Nephrol 9(5):603–605CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Besbas N, Saatci U, Ruacan S, Ozen S, Sungur A, Bakkaloglu A, Elnahas AM (1997) The role of cytokines in Henoch Schonlein purpura. Scand J Rheumatol 26(6):456–460CrossRefPubMed Besbas N, Saatci U, Ruacan S, Ozen S, Sungur A, Bakkaloglu A, Elnahas AM (1997) The role of cytokines in Henoch Schonlein purpura. Scand J Rheumatol 26(6):456–460CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Kamath S, Blann AD, Lip GY (2001) Platelet activation: assessment and quantification. Eur Heart J 22(17):1561–1571CrossRefPubMed Kamath S, Blann AD, Lip GY (2001) Platelet activation: assessment and quantification. Eur Heart J 22(17):1561–1571CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Lozano M, Narvaez J, Faundez A, Mazzara R, Cid J, Jou JM et al (1998) Platelet count and mean platelet volume in the Spanish population. Med Clin (Barc) 110:774–777 Lozano M, Narvaez J, Faundez A, Mazzara R, Cid J, Jou JM et al (1998) Platelet count and mean platelet volume in the Spanish population. Med Clin (Barc) 110:774–777
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Syed NN, Usman M, Khurshid M (2007) Thrombocytosis: age dependent aetiology and analysis of platelet indices for differential diagnosis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 50(3):628–633PubMed Syed NN, Usman M, Khurshid M (2007) Thrombocytosis: age dependent aetiology and analysis of platelet indices for differential diagnosis. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 50(3):628–633PubMed
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Şahin A, Yetişgin A, Şahin M, Durmaz Y, Cengiz AK (2015) Can mean platelet volume be a surrogate marker of inflammation in rheumatic diseases? West Indian Med J 65(1):165–169PubMed Şahin A, Yetişgin A, Şahin M, Durmaz Y, Cengiz AK (2015) Can mean platelet volume be a surrogate marker of inflammation in rheumatic diseases? West Indian Med J 65(1):165–169PubMed
35.
Zurück zum Zitat Canpolat F, Akpinar H, Eskioglu F (2010) Mean platelet volume in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 29:325–328CrossRefPubMed Canpolat F, Akpinar H, Eskioglu F (2010) Mean platelet volume in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 29:325–328CrossRefPubMed
36.
Zurück zum Zitat Yavuz S, Ece A (2014) Mean platelet volume as an indicator of disease activity in juvenile SLE. Clin Rheumatol 33:637–641CrossRefPubMed Yavuz S, Ece A (2014) Mean platelet volume as an indicator of disease activity in juvenile SLE. Clin Rheumatol 33:637–641CrossRefPubMed
38.
Zurück zum Zitat Choi CU, Seo HS, Kim YK, Na JO, Lim HE, Kim JW et al (2011) Can mean platelet volume predict coronary vasospasm? Platelets 22:173–178. pmid:21194396CrossRefPubMed Choi CU, Seo HS, Kim YK, Na JO, Lim HE, Kim JW et al (2011) Can mean platelet volume predict coronary vasospasm? Platelets 22:173–178. pmid:21194396CrossRefPubMed
39.
Zurück zum Zitat Berger JS, Eraso LH, Xie D, Sha D, Mohler ER 3rd (2010) Mean platelet volume and prevalence of peripheral artery disease, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004. Atherosclerosis 213:586–591(pmid:20940069)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Berger JS, Eraso LH, Xie D, Sha D, Mohler ER 3rd (2010) Mean platelet volume and prevalence of peripheral artery disease, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2004. Atherosclerosis 213:586–591(pmid:20940069)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
40.
Zurück zum Zitat De Luca G, Santagostino M, Secco GG, Cassetti E, Giuliani L, Franchi E et al (2009) Mean platelet volume and the extent of coronary artery disease: results from a large prospective study. Atherosclerosis 206:292–297 (pmid:19426979)CrossRefPubMed De Luca G, Santagostino M, Secco GG, Cassetti E, Giuliani L, Franchi E et al (2009) Mean platelet volume and the extent of coronary artery disease: results from a large prospective study. Atherosclerosis 206:292–297 (pmid:19426979)CrossRefPubMed
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Li J et al (2018) Combination of mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio and the APACHE II score better predicts the short-term outcome in patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Kidney Blood Press Res 43:479–489CrossRefPubMed Li J et al (2018) Combination of mean platelet volume/platelet count ratio and the APACHE II score better predicts the short-term outcome in patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Kidney Blood Press Res 43:479–489CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Fenaux P, Simon M, Caulier MT et al (1990) Clinical course of essential thrombocythemia in 147 cases. Cancer 66:549–556CrossRefPubMed Fenaux P, Simon M, Caulier MT et al (1990) Clinical course of essential thrombocythemia in 147 cases. Cancer 66:549–556CrossRefPubMed
47.
Zurück zum Zitat Beer PA, Erber WN, Campbell PJ, Green AR (2011) How I treat essential thrombocythemia? Blood 117:1472–1482CrossRefPubMed Beer PA, Erber WN, Campbell PJ, Green AR (2011) How I treat essential thrombocythemia? Blood 117:1472–1482CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Analysis of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, platelet to lymphocyte ratio and mean platelet volume to platelet count ratio in children with acute stage of immunoglobulin A vasculitis and assessment of their suitability for predicting the course of the disease
verfasst von
Majka Jaszczura
Anna Góra
Ewa Grzywna-Rozenek
Małgorzata Barć-Czarnecka
Edyta Machura
Publikationsdatum
13.03.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
Rheumatology International / Ausgabe 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0172-8172
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-160X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-019-04274-z

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 5/2019

Rheumatology International 5/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.