Background
Methods
Systematic literature review
Selection of studies and data extraction
Study | Country/region | Study design | Outcomes measure(s)/definition | Key finding(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bloch et al. [12] | Denmark | Population-based study | BCVA ≤0.1 (20/200) in both eyes; tunnel vision defined as constriction to ≤5 degrees eccentricity or homonymous hemianopia | The incidence rate of legal blindness attributable to AMD in citizens aged > 50 years decreased from 52.2 cases per year per 100,000 in 2000 to 25.7 cases per year per 100,000 in 2010 (50% reduction) |
Borooah et al. [15] | Scotland | Population-based study | Blindness (severe sight impairment) defined as: • Snellen VA of < 3/60 with a full visual field • VA between 3/60 and 6/60 with a severe reduction of field of vision (e.g. tunnel vision), or • VA of ≥6/60 but with a very reduced field of vision with their better eye | Incidence of legal blindness due to nAMD per 100,000 population (age-sex standardized): • 2004: 8.5 • 2005: 8.6 • 2006: 9.1 • 2007: 8.8 • 2008: 7.1 • 2009: 6.8 • 2010: 4.9 • 2011: 4.8 Following the introduction of IVTR there were annual decreases in the incidence of blindness. Cases fell to a trough of 4.8/100,000 in 2011 in either eye (drop of 47%) |
Bressler et al. [16] | US | Simulation-based study | Legal blindness was defined as VA ≤38 ETDRS letters (comparable to a Snellen equivalent of 20/200) in the better-seeing eye | In case of no treatment, 16,268 individuals would become legally blind over 2 years. The treatment reduced the number of cases of legal blindness by 72% to 4484 individuals. |
Campbell et al. [17] (abstract) | US | Cohort-based study | Legally blind, VA 20/200 in better-seeing eye; eyes with incident nAMD and ≥ 12 months of follow-up; two cohorts of patients that are selected to have one cohort before and one after the advent of anti-VEGF therapy | In 2002 (n = 84), prevalence of visual impairment (2 years) • 29% (95% CI, 19–39) In 2008 (n = 41), prevalence of visual impairment (2 years) • 2% (95% CI, 0–13) Reduction in odds (2002–2008); 95% CI, 59–100 |
Johnston et al. [13] | UK | Cohort-based study | VA ≤38 ETDRS letters in the better-seeing eye | Percentage of blindness described in the study • 2008: 6.9% • 2009: 3.9% • 2010: 2.0% • 2011: 2.4% Cumulative incidence of new blindness at follow-up, with significant reductions in the rates between year cohorts • At 1 year: 5.1% • At 2 years: 8.6% • At 3 years: 12.0% • At 4 years: 15.6% |
Keenan et al. [18] | UK | Cohort-based study | 0–24 letters correspond to eligibility for full CVI; 25–39 letters to eligibility for partial CVI | The proportion of patients in the study eligible at baseline for full or partial CVI decreased from 13.8% in 2008 to 7.1% in 2012 (P = 0.04). |
Minassian et al. [19] | UK | Simulation-based study | Blindness defined as VA of < 6/60 in the better seeing eye | Blindness was expected to increase from 90,254 in 2010 to 120,452 in 2020, assuming that 75% of those eligible patients are treated with the approved anti-VEGF |
Mitchell et al. [20] | Australia | Simulation-based study | BCVA < 6/60 (approximate ETDRS letter score ≤ 38) in the better-seeing eye | Without treatment, 2246 individuals would become legally blind over 2 years. With treatment, the incidence of blindness was reduced by 68–72% |
Rostron et al. [21] | UK | Population-based study | Sight impairment and severe visual impairment used on the UK certificate of visual impairment & incidence of visual impairment certification due to AMDa | After the introduction of ranibizumab in 2008, the incidence of visual impairment certification due to nAMD dropped from 225 per million population in 2005 to 137 per million in 2010 after 2008 |
Skaat et al. [22] | Israel | Population-based study | BCVA of < 1/60 or central visual field ≤10 degrees in the less impaired eye; incidence of certified blind population in Israel due to AMD and other causes | The incidence of newly registered legal blindness at the end of the studied decade was half that at the beginning, declining from 33.8 per 100,000 population in 1999 to 16.6 per 100,000 population in 2008 |
Sloan et al. [23] | US | Cohort-based study | Sight impairment based on the ICD-9-CM codes for severe vision loss and blindness decrease in vision, vision loss/blindness | Vision loss or blindness was 2.04% in the 2 years following a first exudative AMD diagnosis; the introduction of anti-VEGF therapy reduced vision loss or blindness by 46% (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47–0.63) |
Results
SLR results
Impact on vision-related outcomes
Blindness
Visual impairment and ability to drive
Impact on VRQoL
Impact of anti-VEGF therapy on patient’s QoL
Study | Study design | Outcomes measure(s)/definition | Key finding(s) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Impact of anti-VEGF therapy on patient’s quality of life (four studies; five publications) | ||||
Zhu et al. [28] (abstract) | Prospective open-label clinical trial | Patients’ VRQoL using the NEI-VFQ-25 at 6, 12,18, and 24 months | Improvement in VRQoL at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months: Composite score: 4.5 ± 9.2/4.4 ± 11.8/5.6 ± 11.2/4.6 ± 12.4 o Good responder: 4.4 ± 8.9/6.8 ± 10.1 o Poor responder: 4.6 ± 9.6/2.5 ± 12.7 o Mental health: 6.2 ± 13.3/4.3 ± 15.2 o Driving: 1.7 ± 19.8/− 2.1 ± 16.9 | |
Inoue et al. [27] | Observational non-interventional study | NEI VFQ-25 scores preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months/12 months | Score at baseline: Composite score: 72.3 o Mental health: 68.4 o Driving: 69 | Score at 3/12 months: • 75.8/78.5 o 77.2/78.6 o 70.1/69 |
IVR treatment resulted in a higher postoperative NEI VFQ-25 score Improved VA at 12 months was associated with a greater improvement in NEI VFQ-25 | ||||
Finger et al. [25] | Observational, non-interventional study | The VRQoL at 6 and 12 months was measured by the IVI using its three subscales: Accessing information, Mobility, and Emotional well-being | Score at baseline: • Accessing information: − 0.54 ± 2.33 • Mobility: − 0.82 ± 2.68 • Emotional well-being: − 0.97 ± 2.68 | Score at 6 months/12 months • –0.67 ± 2.07/− 0.55 ± 2.35 • –0.93 ± 2.53/− 0.69 ± 2.69 • –1.17 ± 2.68/− 1.11 ± 3.06 |
Finger et al. [26] | Observational, non-interventional study | Patients’ VRQoL using the NEI-VFQ at 12 months | Improvements in VRQoL at 12 months: + 0.73 ± 0.37 | |
Depression and anxiety after anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD (six studies) | ||||
Casten et al. [29] | Observational, non-interventional study | • PHQ-9 rating severity of depressive symptoms at baseline and at 3 months • Subjective opinion of how helpful injections and obstacles to treatment | • At 3 months, 20% of patients had clinically significant depressive symptoms (mean [SD] PHQ-9 score, 6.8 [1.6]) • Compared with non-depressed patients, depressed patients had a greater decline in vision over 3 months • Depression was unrelated to changes in NEI-VFQ scores or obstacles to treatment | |
Cooley et al. [30] (abstract) | Prospective observational study | PSS, CES-D, IVI; Relationships among changes in VA, IVI, PSS, and CES-D were analyzed using linear regression | • Greater social support at initiation of anti-VEGF treatment was associated with reduced depression at follow-up • Decrease in self-reported visual functioning was related to higher stress level at follow-up, whereas VA change was not | |
Lee et al. [31] | Cross-sectional study | Prevalence of depression using geriatric depression scale | • The prevalence of depression: 26.2% with AMD; it was suggested that age was the most important factor associated with depression in AMD • With older age, the severity of depression also increases | |
Segal et al. [32] | Observational non-interventional study | Pre-procedural anxiety using VASA | Positive correlation between increased preprocedural anxiety and perceived pain | |
Post-procedural pain using VAS | Correlation between procedure and perceived pain in intravitreal injections | |||
Senra et al. [33] | Observational, cross-sectional study; mixed methods | Qualitative data on patients’ experience with treatment | 56% of patients reported anxiety related to anti-VEGF treatment. The main sources of anxiety: fear of going blind due to intravitreal injections and concerns about treatment effectiveness, rather than pain | |
Standardized validated questionnaires to quantify clinically significant levels of anxiety (HADS-Α), depression (HADS-D), and posttraumatic stress (patients) (IES-R), cognitive function (MMSE) and caregivers’ burden | • 17% of patients showed clinical levels of anxiety • 12% showed clinical levels of depression • Depression levels, but not anxiety, were significantly higher in patients who received ≤3 injections compared with patients who received 4–12 injections and patients who received > 12 injections | |||
Sloan et al. [23] | Longitudinal | Number of patients newly diagnosed with depression during the follow-up period (measure or method not stated) | A new diagnosis of depression during the follow-up period was found to be 2%; there was no statistical difference between those who had anti-VEGF treatment and those who did not | |
Need for admission to a long-term care facility | Receipt of anti-VEGF therapy was associated with a 19% lower probability of entry into a long-term care facility |
Depression and anxiety while receiving anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD
Impact on costs
Study | Study population | Study design | Outcomes measure(s)/definition | Key finding(s) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Trend of increasing costs | ||||
Campbell et al. [41] | Canada; Ontario Health Insurance Plan | Claims analysis | Total drug costs (anti-VEGF) for Ontario and Canada (2005–2007). | Increase of 8-fold between September 2005 and November 2007 This rapid increase preceded the availability of ranibizumab, strongly suggesting that off-label intravitreal injection of bevacizumab has been highly prevalent |
Coleman et al. [51] (abstract) | US Medicare beneficiaries (5% sample, n = 6290) | Claims analysis | Total eye-related Medicare costs per patient for 5-year study period (1995–1999) based on reimbursed eye-related professional fees; costs of treatment before introduction of PDT and anti-VEGF | Mean (SD): 2371 (2449); median $1607 |
Day et al. [49] | US Medicare beneficiaries | Claims analysis | Distribution of mean Medicare payments for nAMD (1994, 2000, 2006) | Increase of costs largely due to anti-VEGF; dramatic rise between 2004 and 2006 then plateaued Diagnosis more than doubled between 1994 and 2006 |
Kume et al. [48] | Japanese patients with employee health insurance | Claims analysis | Medical expenses per 10,000 patients (2005–2013) | Increase of 9-fold over 9 years, from $1530 to $13,700 Increase of AMD patients by 300% |
Qualls et al. [50] | US Medicare beneficiaries | Claims analysis | Direct medical costs per patient/per case, 1 year before and after the index year (2004–2008) | Costs rose from 2004 to 2006, then plateaued Costs in 2008 cohort were 50% higher than in 2004 Costs attributable to anti-VEGF injections: 4% in 2004; 75% in 2008 cohort |
Rosenfeld et al. [52] | US Medicare and Medicaid | Claims analysis | Total drug costs (anti-VEGF) for Medicare/Medicaid population (2008–2015) | Increase of 2-fold over 8 years, due to an increased number of nAMD patients being treated with anti-VEGF |
Cost savings | ||||
Hanemoto et al. [42] | Patients and their private caregivers from one hospital in Japan | Cross-sectional survey | Mean estimated total annual caregiving costs | 90,327.11 ¥ total annual costs Treatment via T&E rather than PRN reduced number of hospital visits, a reduction in caregiver burden (time, costs, and emotional impact) |
Windsor et al. [43] | US Medicare beneficiaries | Cohort | Medicare reimbursement rate; actual Medicare spending (2008–2015) | $9.0 billion of government savings by using OCT guided anti-VEGF therapy |
Cost estimates reported per country | ||||
Campbell et al. [41] | Canada; Ontario Health Insurance Plan | Claims analysis | Total drug costs (anti-VEGF) for Ontario and Canada (2005–2007) | Projected total cost (of anti-VEGF drugs) in Canada (2007): • Bevacizumab: $2,769,000 • Ranibizumab: $180,000,000 |
Fabiano et al. [44] | Patients from five hospitals in Italy | Clinical database | Mean per-capita costs of treatment and specialist (2016) | 2536 € (treated < 1 year) 1839 € (treated > 1 year) |
Kiss et al. [53] (abstract) | US Patients (data source not reported) | Claims analysis | Mean annual costs per patient (2011–2015) | Treatment = naïve patients • First year with intravitreal aflibercept vs ranibizumab: $10,417 vs $11,032; • First 2 years: $15,410 vs. $15,393 Previously treated patients • First year with intravitreal aflibercept and ranibizumab: $11,521 vs $11,589 • First 2 years: $19,202 vs $18,548 |
Matamoros et al. [45] | French patients who are members of Association DMLA/Retina France | Cross-sectional survey | Mean cost per year per patient/net annual cost for patient (2012–2013) | 1741 € (SD 3397 €, range 0–3176) |
Qualls et al. [50] | US Medicare beneficiaries | Claims analysis | Direct medical costs per patient/per case, 1 year before and after the index year (2004–2008) | Costs rose between 2004 and 2006, then plateaued. Costs in 2008 cohort were 50% higher than in 2004. Costs attributable to anti-VEGF injections: 4% in 2004; 75% in 2008 cohort |
Rosenfeld et al. [52] | US Medicare and Medicaid | Claims analysis | Total drug costs (anti-VEGF) for Medicare/Medicaid population (2008–2015) | Total annual drug costs in 2008: • Intravitreal aflibercept: not applicable • Bevacizumab: $35,502,851 (583,351 doses) • Ranibizumab: $704,066,862 (327,663 doses) Total annual drug costs in 2015: • Intravitreal Aflibercept: $1,738,642,274 (836,425 doses) • Bevacizumab: $89,488,151 (1,225,348 doses) • Ranibizumab: $1,133,896,626 (542,820 doses) |
Schmidt et al. [47] | Patients of largest public ophthalmologic clinic in Switzerland | Claims analysis | Total healthcare costs per patient/per month, directly attributed to anti-VEGF therapy (2006–2014) | 2186.98 CHF (95% CI: 1184.58 to 3189.38) In the subgroup of patients with AMD, the costs for ophthalmologic treatment sank by 97.23 CHF/year (95% CI, 985.38–790.92; P = 0.829) |
Shalaby et al. [46] | Patients from UK NHS ophthalmological units (189 requests; 95.8% responses) | Cross-sectional request | Estimated annual costs of anti-VEGF drugs (incl. VAT) (2015) | Total: £539,764,992 Bevacizumab only: £729,500 |