Background
In the third year of the fight against COVID-19, the World Health Organization declared that the COVID-19 pandemic no longer constitutes a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), but this does not mean that COVID-19 is over as a global health threat. To date, clinical experience has shown that COVID-19 is heterogeneous, ranging from asymptomatic and mild infection to severe and fatal disease. Aging itself is a prominent risk factor for severe disease and death from COVID-19 [
1]. Given the high proportion of severe to critical cases and high fatality rate observed in elderly COVID-19 patients [
2], COVID-19 has emerged as an emergent disease of aging [
3].
Vaccines always work by tricking our immune system into developing "immune memory" mediated by B and T cells against specific infectious pathogens and are one of the most effective ways to prevent infection or reduce symptom severity [
4]. With aging, the immune response undergoes dynamic remodeling, and immunosenescence occurs, which is a phenomenon of gradual deterioration of innate and adaptive immune responses [
5]. Immunosenescence leads not only to increased susceptibility to infection but also to an impaired immune response to vaccination [
6,
7]. With changing demographics around the globe, often described as "the gray tsunami", understanding the immune response of the elderly to homologous and heterologous COVID-19 booster vaccines is not an option, it is a necessity [
8].
The application of high throughput sequencing technology combined with bioinformatics methods in systems biology analysis is ideal for studying the immune response mediated by viral infection and vaccination [
9‐
12]. Previously, systems biology analyses of the BNT162b mRNA vaccine [
13], influenza vaccine [
14], and VSV-EBOV vaccine [
15] have fully revealed the dynamics of the complex global immune response of the host after vaccination. Here, we employed IgG antibody detection and transcriptional profiling analyses in young (age < 70) and elderly (age ≥ 70) adults using blood samples following inactivated BBIBP-CorV and protein subunit ZF2001 booster vaccination. Our results revealed that 7 days after vaccination, elderly people exhibit dysregulation and damage related to functional pathways such as T-cell activation and differentiation, resulting in a delayed immune response to the COVID-19 vaccine booster. However, 28 days after vaccination, the cytokine-related functional pathways in the elderly were significantly activated, and antibody levels were similar to those in young adults.
Discussion
As the COVID-19 pandemic has refocused attention on the vulnerability of elderly adults to emerging infectious diseases, it is critical to examine the response of elderly adults to the third booster dose and to discuss the impact of aging on immunity and vaccination. Systematic biology studies, which combine conventional immunological approaches and transcriptional landscapes, have become a key approach for a comprehensive understanding of the immune response to vaccination at the molecular level [
16,
17]. This study used a systematic biology approach to assess specific antibody levels and transcriptional response profiles to the third booster dose in elderly participants over 70 years of age. Overall, our data showed a tardive but effective antibody response, and variable immune-related transcriptional footprints in the elder adults compared to younger participants.
Both in the clinical setting and in research, the response to vaccination is most commonly assessed by the levels of antibodies within circulation [
18]. Our study found that IgG antibody responses in elder adults were lower after 7 days of vaccination, but after 28 days of vaccination, they could achieve similar levels of characteristics to those in younger adults. Similar delays in the antibody response have been observed in previous surveillance of other vaccines, including attenuated yellow fever vaccines [
19] and primary inactivated hepatitis B vaccine [
20]. This delayed antibody response may be caused by age-related declines in innate and adaptive immune responses. Interestingly, several recent studies of the COVID-19 vaccine are consistent with antibody results that we monitored after 28 days of vaccination, with no striking difference in age-related antibody responses [
21,
22]. In a one-center study involving 4970 volunteers, it was found that IgG levels were multiple highs in older individuals evacuated with mRNA-1273 than BNT162b2 [
23]. And elderly adults could still develop a robust antibody response to the third dose [
24,
25].
The development of high-throughput technologies has allowed vaccinologists to study vaccine-induced immune responses in greater depth than ever before [
16]. The down-regulated characteristics DEGs of BBIBP-CorV homologous boost and ZF2001 heterologous boost in the elder group on day 7 were enriched in many innate immune pathways. The impairment of immune-related transcriptional responses has also been observed in the elderly after vaccination with other vaccines. For example, the response characteristics of the elderly are dysregulated after the influenza vaccine [
26‐
28]. The immune response to the hepatitis B vaccine was also impaired in the elderly [
20,
29]. However, 28 days after the booster vaccine, "response to chemokine", "chemokine-mediated signaling pathway", "leukocyte migration", and "humoral immune response" were widely activated in the elderly group. Given the critical role of the innate immune response in regulating the strength, quality, and duration of the later adaptive immune response [
30], the characterization of innate immune activation can, in part, predict whether a vaccine will induce appropriate protection [
31]. The transcriptional impairment and activation of immune responses 7 and 28 days after the booster vaccination may be the underlying mechanism leading to significant changes in the antibody response in the elderly group.
The WGCNA helped to identify key molecular and cellular features of protective immunity that were significantly associated with sample characteristics. Our results show that 7 days after the COVID-19 booster vaccination the age of participants was significantly negatively correlated with the modules involved in functional pathways related to T helper cell stimulation, activation, and differentiation. T helper cells (CD4 T cells) are one of the important subsets of T cells [
32], and play a central role in the induction and regulation of adaptive immunity [
33]. The impaired CD4 T cell population dynamics may also be the reason for the hyporesponsiveness in elderly on day 7. However, after 28 days of vaccination, chemokine-related gene co-expression modules were significantly positively correlated with age. These functions are mainly performed by some immune-related up-regulated hub genes, including CCL2, CXCL1, CXCL8, CXCR1, IL1A, TNF, and PTGS2. Chemokines play an important role in the inflammatory response by attracting leukocytes to the site of infection through their strong chemotactic ability and are crucially involved in the regulation and maintenance of immune responses [
34]. The role of chemokine/chemokine receptor systems in vaccines needs further investigation.
The limitations of the study are that it did not directly explore the subpopulation frequencies of PBMCs, nor did not delve into the mechanisms of cellular immunity, which also play an important role in evaluating the efficacy of vaccines. In addition, due to the short follow-up time, the durability of the third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine needs further study.
Materials and methods
Study population and sample isolation
In November 2021, we recruited healthy SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals who had completed two doses of inactivated vaccine for more than 6 months to participate in this study in Liaocheng City, Shandong Province. All participants were assigned according to age characteristics to a younger group (age < 70) and an elder group (age ≥ 70) for a third homologous boost with BBIBP-CorV or heterologous boost with ZF2001. The anticoagulant and procoagulant venous blood samples were collected 7 and 28 days after booster vaccination, and serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples were isolated for further study.
Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 IgG detection
The IgG antibodies were detected using an indirect ELISA kit (Vazyme, China) based on the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. All serum samples were diluted to a concentration gradient of 1:200, and optical density (OD) was read at 450 nm and 630 nm after incubation, enzyme labeling, chromogenic reaction, and termination steps. The specific operation was carried out in strict accordance with the instructions. The standard curve was prepared with 6 standard substances with known antibody concentrations provided in the kit, and the OD value of the sample to be tested was converted to the antibody concentration. The antibody concentration of the IgG antibody was calculated after three repetitions. The mean with SD was used to describe antibody titers and statistical significance was analyzed by unpaired t-tests with log-transformation using GraphPad Prism 8.0.
Transcriptome sequencing
The transcriptome high-throughput sequencing of PBMC samples from participants was performed according to our previous research methods [
35]. Total RNA was extracted from PBMCs by using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and integrity of total RNA were checked using the Qubit RNA Assay Kit in a Qubit 4.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, USA) and the RNA Nano 6000 Assay Kit of the Bioanalyzer 2100 System (Agilent Technologies, USA) respectively. A total amount of 100 ng total RNA per sample was used to prepare the rRNA-depleted cDNA library by Stranded Total RNA Prep Ligation with Ribo-Zero Plus Kit (Illumina, USA). The final library size and quality were evaluated using an Agilent DNA 1000 Kit (Agilent Technologies, USA), and the fragments were found to be between 250 and 350 bp in size. The library was sequenced using an Illumina NextSeq 2000 platform to generate 100 bp paired-end reads.
Differentially expressed gene (DEG) identification
The quality control(QC), trimming, and mapping of the RNA-seq raw fasta data to the human reference genome hg38 were performed in the CLC Genomics Workbench. The gene expression level was measured based on the transcripts per million (TPM). We calculated normalization factors using iterative edgeR [
36] and limma [
37] packages, and the standardization and filtering of gene expression were accomplished by the voom, lmFit, and eBayes functions. DEGs were filtered out according to
p-value < 0.05 and 2^logFC_cutoff criteria, and visualized as volcanoes and heatmaps by the pheatmap package in R (version 4.1.0).
Protein protein interaction (PPI) network construction
In order to explore the relationship between proteins encoded by identified up and down-regulated DEGs, the initial PPI networks for the protein products of DEGs were constructed using the STRING Database (version 11.5) [
38], and then the network was visualized and analyzed with Cytoscape software (version 3.8.28) [
39]. The molecular complex detection (MCODE) plugin in Cytoscape software was used to screen the characteristic DEGs from the initial PPI networks.
Pathway enrichment analysis
To be aware of the prospective functions of characteristic DEGs identified by the PPI network analysis, Gene Ontology (GO) terms were identified using the clusterProfiler 4.0 package [
40].
P < 0.05, subjected to Bonferroni adjustment, was defined as the cut‑off criterion. Data visualization was performed using the ggplot2, enrichplot, GOplot, topGO, circlize, and ComplexHeatmap packages in R (version 4.1.0).
To identify gene modules related to the age characteristics in the COVID-19 booster vaccine, we performed weighted gene co-expression network analysis based on transcriptional profiles and sample characteristics through the WGCNA package [
41] in R software. First, the best β value was confirmed with a scale-free fit index larger than 0.85 as well as the highest mean connectivity by performing a gradient test from 1 to 30. Subsequently, the topological overlap matrix (TOM) transformed by the adjacency matrix was then clustered by dissimilarity between genes, and we performed hierarchical clustering to identify modules. Finally, the co-expressed genes were determined by calculating the module membership (MM) and gene significance (GS) of the genes in the target modules. The immune landscape of important modules was analyzed using the ClueGO plugin [
42] of Cytoscape software (version 3.8.2).
P < 0.05, subjected to Bonferroni adjustment, was defined as the cut − off criterion.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (
http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.