nach oben

Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine

Erschienen in:

22.04.2020 | Outcomes Research in Orthopedics (O Ayeni, Section Editor)

Approach to a Failed Hip Arthroscopy

verfasst von: Michelle E. Arakgi, Ryan M. Degen

Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Hip arthroscopy has seen increasing utilization over the last decade. This is largely related to increased recognition and improved techniques for treating femoroacetabilar impingement (FAI). Though hip arthroscopy generally yields favorable outcomes, there are a subset of patients who have residual or recurrent symptoms that require reoperation. The current review discusses an algorithmic approach to evaluating patients following a failed hip arthroscopy including a framework for clinical and radiographic assessment, available treatment options, and associated outcomes in revision surgery.

Recent Findings

Residual FAI has been demonstrated to be the most common indication for revision arthroscopy. Other indications include residual or recurrent labral pathology, gross instability, microinstability, or adhesions. Appropriate history and imaging are important to determine the cause for residual symptoms. Novel techniques including labral and capsular reconstruction, and modified remplissage procedures have been developed to deal with complex revision cases. Though studies have shown improved outcomes after revision surgery, they have been shown to result in inferior outcomes compared to a matched cohort following primary hip arthroscopy.

Summary

Management of a failed hip arthroscopy remains a complex problem. Focused history, cross-sectional imaging, and revision hip arthroscopy with novel techniques can improve outcomes, albeit to a lesser extent than patients undergoing successful primary hip arthroscopy. The information provided here can help guide treatment and set appropriate patient expectations for revision surgery.

Montgomery SR, Ngo SS, Hobson T, Nguyen S, Alluri R, Wang JC, et al. Trends and demographics in hip arthroscopy in the United States. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(4):661–5.PubMed

Colvin AC, Harrast J, Harner C. Trends in hip arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg. 2012;94(4) e23-e23.

Bozic KJ, Chan V, Valone FH,3rd, Feeley BT, Vail TP. Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization in the United States. J Arthroplast 2013 Sep;28(8 Suppl):140–143.PubMed

Palmer AJ, Malak TT, Broomfield J, Holton J, Majkowski L, Thomas GE, et al. Past and projected temporal trends in arthroscopic hip surgery in England between 2002 and 2013. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016;2(1):e000082.PubMedPubMedCentral

Harris JD, Mccormick FM, Abrams GD, Gupta AK, Ellis TJ, Bach BR, et al. Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients. Arthroscopy. 2013;29(3):589–95.PubMed

• West CR, Bedard NA, Duchman KR, Westermann RW, Callaghan JJ. Rates and risk factors for revision hip arthroscopy. Iowa Orthop J. 2019;39(1):95–9 Study indicated that 4% of patients underwent revision hip arthroscopy over an 8-year period. Revisions occurred within 18months of primary surgery. Age < 50 was a risk factor for revision surgery. Residual impingement was the most common cause for revision. PubMedPubMedCentral

Bogunovic L, Gottlieb M, Pashos G, Baca G, Clohisy JC. Why do hip arthroscopy procedures fail? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(8):2523–9.PubMedPubMedCentral

Gwathmey FW, Jones KS, Byrd JWT. Revision hip arthroscopy: findings and outcomes. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017sssss;4(4):318–23.PubMedPubMedCentral

Woodward RM, Philippon MJ. Persistent or recurrent symptoms after arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement: a review of imaging findings. J Med Imaging Radiation Oncol. 2018;63(1):15–24.

10.

•• Sardana V, Philippon MJ, de Sa D, Bedi A, Ye L, Simunovic N, et al. Revision hip arthroscopy indications and outcomes: a systematic review. Arthroscopy. 2015;31(10):2047–55 Systematic review indicating that though revision hip arthroscopy can improve PRO the improvements are inferior to those seen in primary hip arthroscopy. The main indication for revision was residual impingement. PubMed

11.

Ekhtiari S, Coughlin RP, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR. Strategies in revision hip arthroscopy. Ann Joint. 2018:3(1).

12.

Banerjee P, McLean CR. Femoroacetabular impingement: a review of diagnosis and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2011;4(1):23–32.PubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Groh M, Herrera J. A comprehensive review of hip labral tears. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2009;2(2):105–17.PubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Hase T, Ueo T. Acetabular labral tear: arthroscopic diagnosis and treatment. Arthroscopy. 1999;15(2):138–41.PubMed

15.

Lewis CL, Sahrmann SA. Acetabular labral tears. Phys Ther. 2006;86:110–21.PubMed

16.

Shu B, Safran MR. Hip instability: anatomic and clinical considerations of traumatic and atraumatic instability. Clin Sports Med. 2011;30(2):349–67.PubMed

17.

•• Safran MR. Microinstability of the hip-gaining acceptance. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019;27(1):12–22 Review study discussing new concept of microinstability. The authors discuss the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management or microinstability. PubMed

18.

Hoppe DJ, Truntzer JN, Shapiro LM, Abrams GD, Safran MR. Diagnostic accuracy of 3 physical examination tests in the assessment of hip microinstability. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(11):2325967117740121.PubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Domb BG, Brooks AG, Guanche CA. Physical examination of the hip. In: Guanche CA, editor. Hip and Pelvis Injuries in Sports Medicine Philidephia: Wolters Kluwer/Lipincott Williams and Wilkins; 2010. p. 62–70.

20.

Domb BG, Stake CE, Lindner D, El-Bitar Y, Jackson TJ. Arthroscopic capsular plication and labral preservation in borderline hip dysplasia: two-year clinical outcomes of a surgical approach to a challenging problem. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41(11):2591–8.PubMed

21.

Safran MR. Evaluation of the painful hip in tennis players. Aspetar Sports Med J. 2014;3:516–23.

22.

Locks R, Bolia I, Utsunomiya H, Briggs K, Philippon MJ. Current concepts in revision hip arthroscopy. Hip Int. 2018;28(4):343–51.PubMed

23.

Philippon MJ, Ferro FP, Nepple JJ. Hip capsulolabral spacer placement for the treatment of severe capsulolabral adhesions after hip arthroscopy. Arthrosc Tech. 2014;3(2):e289–92.PubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Willimon SC, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. Intraarticular adhesions following hip arthroscopy: a risk factor analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:822–5.PubMed

25.

Yen YM, Kocher MS. Chondral lesions of the hip: microfracture and chondroplasty. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2010;18(2):83–9.PubMed

26.

Saito M, Tsukada S, Yoshida K, Okada Y, Tasaki A. Correlation of alpha angle between various radiographic projections and radial magnetic resonance imaging for cam deformity in femoral head-neck junction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017;25(1):77–83.PubMed

27.

Wong TT, Weeks JK, Ahmed FS, Francescone MA, Rasiej MJ, Liu MZ, et al. How many radiographs does it take to screen for femoral cam morphology?: a noninferiority study. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2019;12.

28.

Dolan MM, Heyworth BE, Bedi A, Duke G, Kelly BT. CT reveals a high incidence of osseous abnormalities in hips with labral tears. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(3):831–8.PubMed

29.

Crim J. Imaging evaluation of the hip after arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement. Skelet Radiol. 2017;46(10):1315–26.

30.

•• Su AW, Hillen TJ, Eutsler EP, Bedi A, Ross JR, Larson CM, et al. Low-dose computed tomography reduces radiation exposure by 90% compared with traditional computed tomography among patients undergoing hip-preservation surgery. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(5):1385–92 Low-dose CT results in a 90% reduction in radiation exposure compared with traditional CT without compromising image quality. PubMedPubMedCentral

31.

McCarthy JC, Glassner PJ. Correlation of magnetic resonance arthrography with revision hip arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(12):4006–11.PubMedPubMedCentral

32.

•• O'Connor M, Steinl GK, Padaki AS, Duchman KR, Westermann RW, Lynch TS. Outcomes of Revision Hip Arthroscopic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019:363546519869671 Recent systematic review and meta-analysis of over 4000 patients examining outcomes in revision hip arthroscopy. Patients had improvements in PRO. When compared to primary hip arthroscopy, the mean PROs were inferior. After revision hip arthroscopic surgery, the rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty ranged from 0 to 14.3%, and the rates of further arthroscopic revision ranged from 2 to 14%.

33.

Nwachukwu BU, Chang B, Rotter BZ, Kelly BT, Ranawat AS, Nawabi DH. Minimal clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after revision hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(6):1862–8.PubMed

34.

Nwachukwu BU, Fields K, Chang B, Nawabi DH, Kelly BT, Ranawat AS. Preoperative outcome scores are predictive of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(3):612–9.PubMed

35.

Nho SJ, Beck EC, Nwachukwu BU, Cvetanovich GL, Neal WH, Harris JD, et al. Survivorship and outcome of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome performed with modern surgical techniques. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(7):1662–9.PubMed

36.

Ross JR, Larson CM, Adeoye O, Kelly BT, Bedi A. Residual deformity is the most common reason for revision hip arthroscopy: a three-dimensional CT study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(4):1388–95.PubMed

37.

Philippon MJ, Faucet SC, Briggs KK. Arthroscopic hip labral repair. Arthrosc Tech. 2013;2(2):e73–6.PubMedPubMedCentral

38.

Al Mana L, Coughlin RP, Desai V, Simunovic N, Duong A, Ayeni OR. The hip labrum reconstruction: indications and outcomes-an updated systematic review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019;12(2):156–65.PubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Chandrasekaran S, Vemula SP, Martin TJ, Suarez-Ahedo C, Lodhia P, Domb BG. Arthroscopic technique of capsular plication for the treatment of hip instability. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(2):e163–7.PubMedPubMedCentral

40.

Waterman BR, Chen A, Neal WH, Beck EC, Ukwuani G, Clapp IM, et al. Intra-articular volume reduction with arthroscopic plication for capsular laxity of the hip: a cadaveric comparison of two surgical techniques. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(2):471–7.PubMed

41.

Levy DM, Grzybowski J, Salata MJ, Mather RC 3rd, Aoki SK, Nho SJ. Capsular plication for treatment of iatrogenic hip instability. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(6):e625–30.PubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Nishikino S, Hoshino H, Hotta K, Furuhashi H, Koyama H, Matsuyama Y. Arthroscopic capsular repair using proximal advancement for instability following hip arthroscopic surgery: a case report. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019;6(1):91–6.PubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Fagotti L, Soares E, Bolia IK, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. Early outcomes after arthroscopic hip capsular reconstruction using iliotibial band allograft versus dermal allograft. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(3):778–86.PubMed

44.

Dierckman BD, Guanche CA. Anterior hip capsuloligamentous reconstruction for recurrent instability after hip arthroscopy. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014;43(12):E319–23.

45.

Fujishiro T, Nishikawa T, Takikawa S, Saegusa Y, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M. Reconstruction of the iliofemoral ligament with an artificial ligament for recurrent anterior dislocation of total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2003;18(4):524–7.

46.

Trindade CA, Sawyer GA, Fukui K, Briggs KK, Philippon MJ. Arthroscopic capsule reconstruction in the hip using iliotibial band allograft. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(1):e71–4.PubMedPubMedCentral

47.

Perez-Carro L, Escajadillo NF, Escajadillo LF, Arriaza CR, Garcia MS, Fernandez AA. Simultaneous acetabular labrum reconstruction and remplissage of the femoral head-neck junction. Arthrosc Tech. 2019;8(12):e1443–9.PubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Frank JM, Chahla J, Mitchell JJ, Soares E, Philippon MJ. Remplissage of the femoral head-neck junction in revision hip arthroscopy: a technique to correct excessive cam resection. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5(6):e1209–13.PubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Tahoun MF, Tey M, Mas J, Abd-Elsattar Eid T, Monllau JC. Arthroscopic repair of Acetabular cartilage lesions by chitosan-based scaffold: clinical evaluation at minimum 2 years follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(10):2821–8.PubMed

50.

Degen RM, Pan TJ, Chang B, Mehta N, Chamberlin PD, Ranawat AS, et al. Risk of failure of primary hip arthroscopy-a population-based study. J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017;4(3):214–23.PubMedPubMedCentral

51.

•• Rosinsky PJ, Go CC, Shapira J, Maldonado DR, Lall AC, Domb BG. Validation of a Risk Calculator for Conversion of Hip Arthroscopy to Total Hip Arthroplasty in a Consecutive Series of 1400 Patients. J Arthroplast. 2019;34(8):1700–6 A recent study identifying multiple risk factors for conversion to THA including older age, femoral head chondral lesions, lack of performing a femoral osteochondroplasty, performance of an acetabular osteochondroplasty, and revision arthroscopy. The authors used these variables to create a predictive tool for the need of THA following hip arthroscopy and found greater than 70% accuracy. Patients with risk factors presenting with ongoing symptoms following arthroscopy may need to be appropriately counseled on their potential risk of requiring THA.

52.

Rosinsky PJ, Kyin C, Shapira J, Maldonado DR, Lall AC, Domb BG. Hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy: are short-term outcomes affected? A systematic review of the literature. Arthroscopy. 2019 Sep;35(9):2736–46.PubMed

Titel: Approach to a Failed Hip Arthroscopy
verfasst von: Michelle E. Arakgi
Ryan M. Degen
Publikationsdatum: 22.04.2020
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine / Ausgabe 3/2020
Elektronische ISSN: 1935-9748
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09629-9

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

25.04.2024 | Hypertonie | Nachrichten

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Approach to a Failed Hip Arthroscopy

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

The History and Evolution of Elbow Medial Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction: from Tommy John to 2020

State of the Union on Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction in 2020: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes

Hamstring Autograft for Lateral Ligament Stabilization

Predicting Patient-Centered Outcomes from Spine Surgery Using Risk Assessment Tools: a Systematic Review

Survivorship Following Hip Arthroscopy: Lessons Learned from a Comprehensive Database

Recent Research Advances in Biologic Bone Graft Materials for Spine Surgery

Arthropedia

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

Ärztliche Empathie hilft gegen Rückenschmerzen

Stereotaktische Radiatio schlägt konventionelle Bestrahlung

Vorsicht mit hohen NSAR-Dosen bei ankylosierender Spondylitis!

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie