Background
“Despite all, it became a rich time for her family and friends, and most of all [the effect of the care was that] my friend herself could complete her life in peace.”(participant about her friend with terminal cancer)
Methods
Design
Participants
Questionnaire
Data analysis
Dimensions/categories in appropriate care | Description of appropriate care (A) | Categories in inappropriate carea |
---|---|---|
Dimension 1: Supportive care | Care directed at support, helping the patient and relatives to cope with the situation and supporting him in his (everyday) needs | |
1.1 Continuous support | The caregiver provides the patient with guidance and support, is available, stays in touch, anticipates and responds to changes. | 1.1 Absence of A |
1.2 Physical care | Sufficient/affectionate physical care by nurses or nursing aides. | 1.2 Absence of A |
1.3 Care for relatives | Formal caregivers provide sufficient care or support to relatives. | 1.3 Absence of A |
1.4 Psychosocial care | Care aimed at improving psychosocial wellbeing, such as care provided by psychologists and chaplains, support groups, and care which enables the patient to perform his social roles or to undertake pleasant activities. | 1.4 Absence of A |
1.5 Continuity and coordination | The involved caregivers work together and communicate, care is available and accessible. | 1.5 Absence of A |
1.6 Social support | Presence of informal care or support by relatives and acquaintances. | 1.6 Absence of A |
1.7 Other care aspects | Other supportive care, e.g. alternative medicine, physiotherapy. | -c |
Dimension 2: Treatment decisions | Decisions made on treatment or other medical interventions, involving a physician | |
2.1 Forgoing treatment | Forgoing or withdrawing treatment or diagnostic testing aimed at cure or life-prolongation. | 2.1 Identical to A |
2.2 Symptom control | Sufficient treatment aimed to prevent or reduce physical symptoms. | 2.2 Absence of A |
2.3 Assisted dying | Euthanasia or assisted dying, or the physician agrees to perform euthanasia or assisted dying if suffering were to become unbearable. | 2.3 Refusal or postponing of A |
2.4 Potentially curative/life-prolonging treatment | Treatment or diagnostic testing aimed at cure or life-prolongation. | 2.4 Identical to A |
Dimension 3: Location | The location of the patient (continuous or intermittent) | |
3.1 Home | Being home (as much as possible) or going home. | 3.1 Identical to A |
3.2 Long-term care facility | Residing in a nursing home, residential home or hospice. | 3.2 Identical to A |
3.3 Hospital | Being admitted to a hospital or visiting a hospital (as outpatient or for emergency care). | 3.3 Identical to A |
3.4 Other location | Other location, e.g. psychiatric institution. | -c |
Dimension 4: Role of the patient’s wish | Role of the patient’s wish in decision making | |
4.1 Patient’s wish is followed | The patient’s wish is asked, expressed and/or followed (including following the patient’s advance care directive or relatives as surrogate decision maker). | 4.1 Absence of A |
4.2 Patient is in control | The patient maintains control over the situation (e.g. in medical decision-making, self-care). | 4.2 Absence of A |
Dimension 5: Communication | Patient-physician communication is sufficient | |
5.1 Dialogue | The physician and patient (regularly) discuss future care (advance care planning) and make shared decisions. | 5.1 Absence of A |
5.2 Right attitude | The caregiver has a respectful, empathic or open attitude. | 5.2 Absence of A |
5.3 Being listened to | The caregiver shows interest in and listens to the patient. | 5.3 Absence of A |
5.4 Being informed | The patient and/or relatives are well informed (about the situation, prognosis, treatment options and side effects). | 5.4 Absence of A |
Other | ||
-b | - | 6.1 Errors and complications |
Results
Participants
n = 592 % | |
---|---|
Participant gender | |
Female | 67 |
Participant age | |
mean (range) | 60 (23-88) |
18-49 | 15 |
50-64 | 47 |
65-79 | 33 |
80 and up | 5 |
Ethnicity | |
Ethnic minorityb | 6 |
Religion | |
None | 53 |
Christian | 41 |
Other | 7 |
(Former) health care worker | |
Yes | 44 |
The questionnaire was reached through: | |
Right to Die-NLc | 44 |
A colleague or acquaintance | 21 |
Through social media/surfing, not further specified | 12 |
Organizations for health care professionalsd | 8 |
Specific patient organizationse | 5 |
Organization for older peoplef | 5 |
General patient organizationsg | 4 |
Described case | |
Appropriate care | 48 |
Inappropriate care | 28 |
Both | 25 |
Relationship of patient to participant (total of 738 cases):i | |
Participant is the patient | 8 |
Parent (in law) of the participant | 59 |
Partner | 21 |
Brother/sister (in law) | 9 |
Related, otherwise | 7 |
Unrelated | 6 |
Patient is deceased | 74 |
What is appropriate and inappropriate care?
Nr | Care | Characteristics | Care dimensions (categories) | Description |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Appropriate | Male, 70-79 years, general decline, heart, lung and neurological disease, described by his daughter (40-49) | Supportive care (1.1, 1.3, 1.5, 1.6), Treatment decisions (2.1), Location (3.1), Patient’s wish (4.1). | While Mr Schoen was in the hospital for tests, he became increasingly confused. Therefore, his family decided to forgo further testing and bring him home. His wife and children were able to care for Mr Schoen, in close cooperation with a small team of nurses and the GP, who knew the patient well. The care was tailored to the family’s wishes, but the professional caregivers also intervened when necessary. The family felt supported and Mr Schoen died in a calm familiar setting. |
2 | Inappropriate | Female, 40-49 years, cancer, described by her brother (50-59) | Supportive care (1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.5), Communication (5.4). | Ms Kramer was discharged from the hospital knowing she would die soon. From that moment, it was unclear who was responsible for the care. Ms Kramer’s brother described: ‘We did not know how to take care of a dying person, what tools were available, what medicine we could give and how to get these.’ The home care sent different nurses every day, who did not know the situation. Their GP did not provide them with the information they needed. ‘At the same time, we did not know which questions we should have asked.’ After her death, her family was left with feelings of guilt because they felt Ms Kramer did not receive optimal care in her final days. |
3 | Inappropriate | Female, 70-79 years, cancer, described by her son (50-59) | Treatment decisions (2.4, 2.2), Communication (5.3, 5.4) | Ms Bijlsma was given the choice between actively treating her tumour with radiotherapy or to focus on palliation. She chose to receive radiotherapy but was not fully informed about possible side-effects when she made this decision. Her son described: ‘My mother absolutely did not expect it to cause so much pain, which did not reside until her death. (..) The pain made my mother very angry.’ The GP and the oncologist were deterred by her bad mood and did not seem to pay attention to her pain. It was not until she was admitted to a hospice that she received proper pain management. |
4 | Appropriate | Male, 90-99 years, cancer, heart disease and diabetes, described by his daughter (50-59) | Treatment decisions (2.4), Patient’s wish (4.1). | Despite his age, Mr van Zijl was young at heart. He was scared to die, so he wished to continue active treatment for cancer. His daughter described: ‘The treating physicians have ‘granted’ him one or two surgeries more than they would have done in a comparable person with a lesser will to live.’ His life was prolonged by a few months, in which time he could take care of his wife. Moreover, ‘it gave him the assurance that he had done everything possible to stay alive as long as possible’. |
Patient and care characteristics associated with inappropriate care
Appropriate care | Inappropriate care | P-value of a differenceb | |
---|---|---|---|
n = 429 % | n = 309 % | ||
Patient characteristics | |||
Patient gender | |||
Female | 49 | 53 | n.s. |
Patient age | |||
Mean (range) | 74 (20-102) | 74 (10-101) | n.s. |
Diagnosisc: | |||
Cancerde | 58 | 47 | 0.002 |
Other physical diseasesdf | 29 | 37 | 0.025 |
Old age/general decline | 21 | 24 | n.s. |
Dementia | 13 | 14 | n.s. |
Psychiatric diseased | 0.5 | 3 | 0.011 |
None | 1 | 1 | n.s. |
Care characteristics | |||
Location of carec: | |||
Home, primary cared | 57 | 36 | <0.001 |
Home, specialist outpatient care | 17 | 18 | n.s. |
Hospital, inpatient departmentd | 25 | 36 | 0.001 |
Nursing home or residential home | 25 | 28 | n.s. |
Hospiced | 8 | 3 | 0.003 |
Other | 3 | 2 | n.s. |
Responsible for this carec | |||
Physiciansd | 74 | 82 | 0.013 |
-General practitionersd | 43 | 32 | 0.006 |
-Clinical specialistsd | 19 | 37 | <0.001 |
-Elderly care physicians | 5 | 6 | n.s. |
-Otherd | 1 | 4 | 0.015 |
Nursing staffd | 59 | 28 | <0.001 |
Patient and/or relativesd | 19 | 8 | <0.001 |
Otherg | 8 | 8 | n.s. |
Is appropriate care similar for different diseases?
Appropriate care | Inappropriate care | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cancer | Other physical diseases | General decline | Dementia | Cancer | Other physical diseases | General decline | Dementia | |
n = 250 | n = 124 | n = 91 | n = 55 | n = 144 | n = 114 | n = 75 | n = 44 | |
1. Supportive care | -c | - | - | - | 0.73 (0.36-1.5) | - | - | 2.4 (1.1-5.6) |
2. Treatment decisions | - | - | - | 0.49 (0.25-0.96) | - | - | 0.43 (0.21-0.88) | 0.21 (0.09-0.48) |
2.1 Forgoing treatment | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
2.2 Symptom control | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
2.3 Assisted dying | - | - | - | 0.23 (0.06-0.92) | - | - | - | 0.24 (0.06-0.92) |
2.4 Curative treatment | - | 4.0 (1.4-11.4) | - | 0.33 (0.04-2.7) | - | - | - | - |
3. Location | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3.2 (1.1-9.4) |
4. Patient’s wish | 1.6 (0.84-3.0) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
5. Communication | - | 1.7 (0.97-3.1) | - | - | - | - | - | 0.24 (0.06-0.92) |