Past
Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) was first established in the therapy of early-stage melanoma,1 then subsequently adopted for other oncologic entities. Currently, it is a pivotal part of the staging and therapy for breast cancer patients. In this context, various agents for sentinel lymph node localization have proven suitable for reaching high detection rates and low false-negative rates.2 Radioactive localization using technetium99 (Tc99) in combination with blue dye or as a single tracer has long been considered the “gold standard.” However due to the short half-life of technetium, injections need to be scheduled close to surgery. Radiation protection measures, and in Germany additional lymphoscintigraphy, are mandatory and extend the preparation time. A more flexible schedule and thus an increase in patient comfort might be achieved by using superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO). Proven equivalent to Tc99 for primary SNB by multiple meta-analyses,2, 3 SPIO can be administered up to 7 days before surgery.
Present
This study enrolled 59 patients at Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin to investigate the impact of SPIO use for SNB on the care process, reimbursement, surgical time, and patient comfort compared with 99Tc.4 The preoperative preparation time was significantly shorter for the SPIO group (SPIO, 5.4 ± 1.3 min vs TC99, 82 ± 20 min; p < 0.0001), even with omission of the time spent for lymphoscintigraphy (TC99, 54.4 ± 13.6 min; p < 0.0001). Also, the duration of the sentinel lymph node extraction was slightly shorter (SPIO, 5 min [range, 3–15 min] vs TC99, 10 min [range, 7–15 min]; p = 0.151). With SPIO, the duration of the whole SNB procedure also was shorter (SPIO, 9 min [range, 4–15 min] vs TC99, 10 min [range, 7–15 min]; p = 0.412) despite the fact that the iron-based system was a new method at our institution. Concerning pain assessment and reimbursement, the study could not detect any significant differences between the two groups. The study was limited by its small sample size, non-randomized group allocation, and variation in surgical procedures (mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery). In hindsight, detailed patient-reported experience measurements would have been favorable for examination of patient comfort.
Anzeige
Future
The aforementioned findings show that SPIO-based sentinel-node localization facilitates a shortened preoperative preparation time and has no negative impact on reimbursement in the German health care setting. Due to a multitude of reasons such as lack of health care professionals, decreased financial resources, and development of even more complex therapy regimens, specialized oncologic care probably will be provided in fewer but larger centers, thus increasing travel time for patients and making scheduling of procedures even more critical. Flexible and less time-consuming alternatives to radioactive sentinel node-marking, such as the SPIO-guided approach, are necessary, especially in rural areas, where nuclear medicine facilities usually are scarce. Further studies should investigate the safety of SPIO for SNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Currently, dual tracing with TC99 and blue dye is recommended in this context. In addition, the SPIO application method and dose for patients in need of postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) still need to be examined.5
Disclosure
Maria Margarete Karsten received a speaker’s fee from SYSMEX Deutschland (Norderstedt, Germany). The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest.
Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.