Skip to main content
Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery 1/2019

16.08.2018 | Original Scientific Report

Assessment of Avoidable Readmissions in a Visceral Surgery Department with an Algorithm: Methodology, Analysis and Measures for Improvement

verfasst von: Fabio Agri, Anne-Claude Griesser, Estelle Lécureux, Pierre Allemann, Markus Schäfer, Yves Eggli, Nicolas Demartines

Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery | Ausgabe 1/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Standardized quality indicators assessing avoidable readmission become increasingly important in health care. They can identify improvements area and contribute to enhance the care delivered. However, the way of using them in practice was rarely described.

Methods

Retrospective study uses prospective inpatients’ information. Thirty-day readmissions were deemed potentially avoidable or non-avoidable by a computerized algorithm, and annual rate was reported between 2010 and 2014. Observed rate was compared to expected rate, and medical record review of potentially avoidable readmissions was conducted on data between January and June 2014.

Results

During a period of ten semesters, 11,011 stays were screened by the algorithm and a potentially avoidable readmission rate (PAR) of 7% was measured. Despite stable expected rate of 5 ± 0.5%, an increase was noted concerning the observed rate since 2012, with a highest value of 9.4% during the first semester 2014. Medical chart review assessed the 109 patients screened positive for PAR during this period and measured a real rate of 7.8%. The delta was in part due to an underestimated case mix owing to sub-coded comorbidities and not to health care issue.

Conclusions

The present study suggests a methodology for practical use of data, allowing a validated quality of care indicator. The trend of the observed PAR rate showed a clear increase, while the expected PAR rate was stable. The analysis emphasized the importance of adequate “coding chain” when such an algorithm is applied. Moreover, additional medical chart review is needed when results deviate from the norm.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Rosenberg MA, Browne MJ (2001) The impact of the inpatient prospective payment system and diagnosis-related groups: a survey of the literature. NAAJ 5(4):84–94 Rosenberg MA, Browne MJ (2001) The impact of the inpatient prospective payment system and diagnosis-related groups: a survey of the literature. NAAJ 5(4):84–94
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Böcking W, Ahrens U, Kirch W et al (2005) First results of the introduction of DRGs in Germany and overview of experience from other DRG countries. J Public Health 13:128–137CrossRef Böcking W, Ahrens U, Kirch W et al (2005) First results of the introduction of DRGs in Germany and overview of experience from other DRG countries. J Public Health 13:128–137CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Busato A, von Below G (2010) The implementation of DRG-based hospital reimbursement in Switzerland: a population-based perspective. Health Res Policy Syst 8:31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Busato A, von Below G (2010) The implementation of DRG-based hospital reimbursement in Switzerland: a population-based perspective. Health Res Policy Syst 8:31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Borzecki AM, Chen Q, Restuccia J et al (2015) Do pneumonia readmissions flagged as potentially preventable by the 3 M PPR software have more process of care problems? A cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 24:753–763CrossRefPubMed Borzecki AM, Chen Q, Restuccia J et al (2015) Do pneumonia readmissions flagged as potentially preventable by the 3 M PPR software have more process of care problems? A cross-sectional observational study. BMJ Qual Saf 24:753–763CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat The National Association for the development of quality in hospitals and clinics (2017) www.anq.ch. Accessed 16 Mar 2017 The National Association for the development of quality in hospitals and clinics (2017) www.​anq.​ch. Accessed 16 Mar 2017
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Oddone EZ, Weinberger M, Horner M et al (1996) Classifying general medicine readmission—are they preventable? J Gen Intern Med 11:597–607CrossRefPubMed Oddone EZ, Weinberger M, Horner M et al (1996) Classifying general medicine readmission—are they preventable? J Gen Intern Med 11:597–607CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yam CH, Wong EL, Chan FW (2010) Measuring and preventing potentially avoidable hospital readmission: a review of the literature. Hong Kong Med J 16:383–389PubMed Yam CH, Wong EL, Chan FW (2010) Measuring and preventing potentially avoidable hospital readmission: a review of the literature. Hong Kong Med J 16:383–389PubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Howard-Anderson J, Busuttil A, Lonowski S et al (2016) From discharge to readmission: understanding the process from the patient perspective. J Hosp Med 11(6):407–412CrossRefPubMed Howard-Anderson J, Busuttil A, Lonowski S et al (2016) From discharge to readmission: understanding the process from the patient perspective. J Hosp Med 11(6):407–412CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Henderson J, Graveney MJ, Goldacre MJ (1993) Should emergency readmission be used as health service indicators and in medical audit? Health Serv Manag Res 6(2):109–116CrossRef Henderson J, Graveney MJ, Goldacre MJ (1993) Should emergency readmission be used as health service indicators and in medical audit? Health Serv Manag Res 6(2):109–116CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 360(14):1418–1428CrossRefPubMed Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA (2009) Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med 360(14):1418–1428CrossRefPubMed
15.
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Halfon P, Eggli Y, Prêtre-Rohrbach I et al (2006) Validation of the potentially avoidable hospital readmission rate as a routine indicator of the quality of hospital care. Med Care 44(11):972–981CrossRefPubMed Halfon P, Eggli Y, Prêtre-Rohrbach I et al (2006) Validation of the potentially avoidable hospital readmission rate as a routine indicator of the quality of hospital care. Med Care 44(11):972–981CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Halfon P, Eggli Y, van Melle G et al (2002) Measuring potentially avoidable hospital readmission. J Clin Epidemiol 55(6):573–587CrossRefPubMed Halfon P, Eggli Y, van Melle G et al (2002) Measuring potentially avoidable hospital readmission. J Clin Epidemiol 55(6):573–587CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat McIntyre LK, Arbabi S, Robinson EF et al (2016) Analysis of risk factors for patient readmission 30 days following discharge from general surgery. JAMA Surg 151(9):855–861CrossRefPubMed McIntyre LK, Arbabi S, Robinson EF et al (2016) Analysis of risk factors for patient readmission 30 days following discharge from general surgery. JAMA Surg 151(9):855–861CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW et al (2015) Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United Sates. JAMA 313(5):483–495CrossRefPubMed Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW et al (2015) Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United Sates. JAMA 313(5):483–495CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Kassin MT, Owen RM, Perez SD et al (2012) Risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission among general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 215(3):322–330CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kassin MT, Owen RM, Perez SD et al (2012) Risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission among general surgery patients. J Am Coll Surg 215(3):322–330CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Burns EM, Rigby E, Mamidanna R et al (2011) Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health 34(1):138–148CrossRef Burns EM, Rigby E, Mamidanna R et al (2011) Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. J Public Health 34(1):138–148CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Maass C, Kuske S, Lessing C et al (2015) Are administrative data valid when measuring patient safety in hospitals? A comparison of data collection methods using a chart review and administrative data. Int J Qual Health Care 27(4):305–313CrossRefPubMed Maass C, Kuske S, Lessing C et al (2015) Are administrative data valid when measuring patient safety in hospitals? A comparison of data collection methods using a chart review and administrative data. Int J Qual Health Care 27(4):305–313CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL et al (2001) Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8(4):299–308CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bates DW, Cohen M, Leape LL et al (2001) Reducing the frequency of errors in medicine using information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8(4):299–308CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadaten
Titel
Assessment of Avoidable Readmissions in a Visceral Surgery Department with an Algorithm: Methodology, Analysis and Measures for Improvement
verfasst von
Fabio Agri
Anne-Claude Griesser
Estelle Lécureux
Pierre Allemann
Markus Schäfer
Yves Eggli
Nicolas Demartines
Publikationsdatum
16.08.2018
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
World Journal of Surgery / Ausgabe 1/2019
Print ISSN: 0364-2313
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-2323
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4755-y

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2019

World Journal of Surgery 1/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Chirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

S3-Leitlinie „Diagnostik und Therapie des Karpaltunnelsyndroms“

Karpaltunnelsyndrom BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Karpaltunnelsyndrom ist die häufigste Kompressionsneuropathie peripherer Nerven. Obwohl die Anamnese mit dem nächtlichen Einschlafen der Hand (Brachialgia parästhetica nocturna) sehr typisch ist, ist eine klinisch-neurologische Untersuchung und Elektroneurografie in manchen Fällen auch eine Neurosonografie erforderlich. Im Anfangsstadium sind konservative Maßnahmen (Handgelenksschiene, Ergotherapie) empfehlenswert. Bei nicht Ansprechen der konservativen Therapie oder Auftreten von neurologischen Ausfällen ist eine Dekompression des N. medianus am Karpaltunnel indiziert.

Prof. Dr. med. Gregor Antoniadis
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S2e-Leitlinie „Distale Radiusfraktur“

Radiusfraktur BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Das Webinar beschäftigt sich mit Fragen und Antworten zu Diagnostik und Klassifikation sowie Möglichkeiten des Ausschlusses von Zusatzverletzungen. Die Referenten erläutern, welche Frakturen konservativ behandelt werden können und wie. Das Webinar beantwortet die Frage nach aktuellen operativen Therapiekonzepten: Welcher Zugang, welches Osteosynthesematerial? Auf was muss bei der Nachbehandlung der distalen Radiusfraktur geachtet werden?

PD Dr. med. Oliver Pieske
Dr. med. Benjamin Meyknecht
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.

S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“

Appendizitis BDC Leitlinien Webinare
CME: 2 Punkte

Inhalte des Webinars zur S1-Leitlinie „Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis bei Erwachsenen“ sind die Darstellung des Projektes und des Erstellungswegs zur S1-Leitlinie, die Erläuterung der klinischen Relevanz der Klassifikation EAES 2015, die wissenschaftliche Begründung der wichtigsten Empfehlungen und die Darstellung stadiengerechter Therapieoptionen.

Dr. med. Mihailo Andric
Berufsverband der Deutschen Chirurgie e.V.