Assessment of treatment responses in children and adolescents with Ewing sarcoma with metabolic tumor parameters derived from ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT and circulating tumor DNA

The purpose of this study was to perform a prospective integrated analysis of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to assess responses to multimodal chemotherapy in children and adolescents suffering from Ewing sarcoma (EwS).

A total of 20 patients with histologically confirmed EwS underwent multiple ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, performed at the time of each patient’s initial diagnosis and after the second and fifth induction chemotherapy block (EWING2008 treatment protocol, NCT00987636). Additional PET examinations were performed as clinically indicated in some patients, e.g., in patients suspected of having progressive or relapsing disease. All 263 ¹⁸F-FDG-positive lesions in the field of view suggestive of tumor tissue were assessed quantitatively to calculate PET-derived parameters, including whole-body metabolic tumor volume (wb-MTV) and whole-body total lesion glycolysis (wb-TLG), as well as the following data: standardized uptake value (SUV)max and SUVmean. Tumor-specific ctDNA in patient plasma samples was quantified using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), and the correlations between ctDNA levels and PET-derived parameters were analyzed. Metabolic responses to multimodal chemotherapy as assessed with PET-parameters were compared to biochemical responses as assessed with changes in ctDNA levels.

Twenty patients underwent a total of 87 ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT scans, which detected 263 FDG-positive tumor lesions. Significant correlations between SUVmax, SUVmean, wb-MTV and wb-TLG values, and ctDNA levels were observed (all p < 0.0001). All patients suffering from EwS, with histology serving as gold standard, also presented with a positive corresponding ctDNA sample and a positive 18F-FDG-PET/CT examination before initiation of therapy. There were no false-negative results. Evaluation of treatment response after the fifth block of induction chemotherapy showed that the agreement between the metabolic response and biochemical response was 90%, which was statistically significant (Cohen κ = 0.62; p < 0.05). Non-detectable ctDNA after the second block of induction chemotherapy was associated with complete biochemical and metabolic responses after the fifth block of induction chemotherapy in 16/17 patients (94%). During a median follow-up period of 36 months (range: 8–104 months), four patients had tumor relapses, which, in all cases, were accompanied by an increase in plasma ctDNA levels and a positive ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT. No false-negative results were observed in the study cohort. Complete biochemical and metabolic responses after the fifth block of induction chemotherapy had a high positive predictive value for disease remission during the follow-up period; specifically, the positive predictive value was 88%.

The combination of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT and ctDNA quantification is a very promising noninvasive tool for assessing treatment responses and detecting tumor relapses in children and young adolescents suffering from EwS who are undergoing multimodal chemotherapy.