Anzeige
Erschienen in:
21.09.2018 | Epidemiology
Association between prolonged metastatic free interval and recurrent metastatic breast cancer survival: findings from the SEER database
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 1/2019
Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhaltenAbstract
Purpose
The prevalence of patients living with prolonged interval between initial breast cancer diagnosis and development of subsequent metastatic disease may be increasing with improved treatment. In order to counsel these patients as to their prognosis, we investigated the association between metastatic free interval (MFI) and subsequent survival from newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in a population-level U.S. cohort.
Methods
The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database was used to identify patients with both an initial stage 1–3 breast cancer diagnosis and subsequent MBC diagnosis recorded from 1988 to 2014. Patients were stratified by MFI (< 5 years, 5–10 years, > 10 years). The association between MFI and metastatic breast cancer-specific mortality (MBCSM) was analyzed with Fine–Gray competing risks regression.
Results
Five-year recurrent metastatic breast cancer-specific survival rate was 23%, 26%, and 35% for patients with MFI < 5, 5–10, and > 10 years, respectively. Patients with > 10 year MFI were less likely to die of breast cancer when compared with a referent group with < 5 years MFI (standard hazard ratio (SHR) 0.77 [95% CI 0.65–0.90] P < 0.001). There was no significant difference for patients with MFI of 5–10 years (SHR 0.92 [95% CI 0.81–1.04, P 0.191]) compared to < 5 years. Other prognostic factors like White race, lower tumor grade, and ER/PR-positive receptors were also associated with improved cancer-specific survival after diagnosis of MBC.
Conclusion
Prolonged MFI greater than 10 years between initial breast cancer diagnosis and subsequent metastatic disease was found to be associated with improved recurrent MBC 5-year survival and decreased risk of breast cancer-specific mortality. This has potential implications for counseling patients as to prognosis, choice of treatment, as well as the stratification of patients considered for MBC clinical trials.