Despite the absence of specific biomarkers for diagnosing LVVs, several serological or cell-associated molecules have been evaluated, aiming to reduce the diagnostic delay frequently encountered in these conditions. A selection of biomarkers supporting the diagnosis of TA and GCA is provided in Table
1.
Table 1
A selection of blood biomarkers with their role in different disease phases in patients with TAK and GCA
| ++ | + | ++ | +++ | Widely available and inexpensive. Greater utility for diagnosis and prognosis in GCA than in TA. | Influenced by concomitant conditions (e.g. age, anaemia). Not specific for vasculitis. Inaccurate to detect arterial remodelling. Unreliable during anti-IL6 treatments. |
| ++ | + | ++ | +++ | Widely available and inexpensive. More specific than ESR. Greater utility for diagnosis and prognosis in GCA than in TA. | Not specific for vasculitis. Inaccurate to detect arterial remodelling. Unreliable during anti-IL-6 treatments. |
| + | – | + | ++ | Possible role in predicting relapse and detecting infections in patients treated with TCZ. | Lower availability compared with traditional biomarkers. Not defined diagnostic value in GCA. |
| Not defined | + | + | ++ | Potential biomarker of arterial inflammation. | Not specific for arteritis. Increased in different conditions, including bacterial infections. Lower availability compared with other biomarkers |
| + | + | + | + | Potential biomarker of subclinical vascular inflammation. In GCA, possible role in detecting recent optic nerve ischemia | Lower availability compared with other biomarkers. |
| – | +++ | + | +++ | Biomarker of myocardial strain with prognostic value. | Concentrations rise in cardiac and renal failure, independent of TA. |
| Not defined | Not defined | + | + | Potential biomarker of arterial remodelling. | Lower availability compared with other biomarkers. |
| Not defined | + | + | + | Possible role in predicting relapse and monitoring disease activity in patients receiving anti-IL-6 pathway treatments. | Lower availability compared with other biomarkers. |
| + | + | + | ++ | Possible role in monitoring disease activity, less influenced by anti-IL-6 pathway treatments than ESR and CRP. | Lower availability compared with other biomarkers. |
Acute Phase Reactants Included in Routine Laboratory Investigations
Acute phase reactants performed among routine laboratory investigations include erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP). These examinations are inexpensive and widely used in clinical practice. CRP is directly produced by the liver in response to interleukin (IL)-6 [
17,
18]. Conversely, a raised ESR is related to multifactorial mechanisms, including increased levels of fibrinogen, alpha-1 and gamma-globulins, as well as reduced plasma albumin and anaemia [
19,
20]. ESR increases progressively with age, and this is believed to reflect the accrual of oxidative damage and the progressive establishment of a pro-inflammatory milieu in the elderly, collectively known as ‘inflammaging’ [
21]. There is no consensus concerning the upper limits of normal for the ESR, although a simple rule identifies the cut-off at age/2 (+ 5, if female) [
22]. However, no cause was identified in up to 47% of subjects with an ESR between 50 and 99 mm/h [
23], limiting the specificity of such marker.
Elevation in the concentration of acute phase reactants is frequent during active TA and may help to uncover an inflammatory state and pave the way for further workup. The intensity of the systemic inflammatory response is highly variable and normal acute phase reactants were observed in 10–30% of patients in some studies [
4,
24••]. A proportion of these patients [
4,
24••], however, were diagnosed in an inactive phase of TA and it is unclear whether they might have experienced a prior systemic inflammatory response.
In GCA, a highly intense systemic inflammatory response is typical. Indeed, ESR values above 50 mm/h are part of the 1990 classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) for GCA [
25]
. However, in a cohort of 177 patients with biopsy-proven GCA [
10], eighteen (10.2%) showed normal values of both ESR and CRP (defined as an ESR value of ≤ 22 mm/h in men and ≤ 29 mm/h in women, and a value of CRP ≤ 8 mg/L), at the time of diagnosis. It should be noted that only 7 of these 18 patients were GC-naïve at the time of the biopsy and this might have influenced the results. Visual disturbance despite normal ESR and CRP was present in 3 of the 7 patients, of whom one had visual loss. A systematic review showed the percentage of patients with GCA with normal inflammatory indices may range from 0 to 22% [
26].
Another major acute phase parameter is serum amyloid A (SAA), synthetised and secreted by the liver in different isoforms and at inflamed sites including the temporal arteries [
27]. It has been recently observed that this SAA participates in blood vessel modification, invasion and destruction [
28]. SAA also induces the synthesis of IL-6 and has proangiogenic properties through upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) [
29]. A cross-sectional study on a cohort of 99 TA patients (with a mean disease duration of 73 months) showed higher levels of serum SAA as compared to healthy controls [
30]. Despite mean SAA levels significantly differed from TA subjects and controls, overlap was substantial and patients could not be accurately discriminated by using SAA serum levels alone [
30].
In GCA, SAA serum concentration levels significantly differ between untreated GCA and healthy controls, with an average 83-fold increase in the former as compared to controls [
31]. Interestingly, SAA concentrations were the strongest positive correlate of IL-6 levels [
31]. No study has compared SAA in treatment-naïve GCA and treated active or inactive disease versus healthy controls. Being identified as a marker of disease activity, SAA may also be helpful in defining a relapse [
32]. However, similar to ESR and CRP, as SAA levels may increase also in other conditions (such as microbial infections), its value for diagnosing GCA appears to be limited.
Other Potential Biomarkers
Considering the inflammatory milieu of LVV, biomarker research in the field has studied several other inflammatory molecules. IL-6 is one of the pivotal pro-inflammatory cytokines and may be locally generated in the inflamed arteries both in TA and GCA [
33,
34]. High IL-6 release is considered to account for the prominent systemic inflammatory symptoms observed in several patients [
12]. Despite its key role in LVV pathogenesis and the efficacy of IL-6-targeted therapies, no study has verified the diagnostic value of serum IL-6 for GCA and TA. Indeed, although IL-6 measurement is becoming increasingly available in many laboratories, it is likely to have similar limitations to the analysis of ESR and CRP despite much higher costs. Considering the insufficient evidence to support its use, IL-6 analysis is seldom requested in current clinical practice. Serum IL-18 is raised both in TA and GCA [
12,
35‐
37]. IL-18 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine believed to be produced predominantly by vascular antigen-presenting cells which activate Th1 and Th17 cells [
12]. However, an important overlap in IL-18 levels was observed between LVV patients and controls, with poor discrimination of LVVs from other inflammatory conditions [
12,
35‐
37].
Pentraxin-3 (PTX-3) is an acute phase protein synthetised locally at sites of inflammation, where it is believed to exert important actions in the opsonisation of self and foreign antigens and to contribute to structural and functional activity of the extracellular matrix. Plasma levels of PTX-3 were elevated in TA and GCA [
38,
39], as well as in other vascular conditions such as atherosclerosis, acute myocardial infarction and following acute vascular damage during stenting procedures [
40‐
43].
Considering that the pathogenesis of LVV involves multiple branches of the immune system (antigen-presenting cells, T and B cells), research has focused on autoantibodies. However, specific autoantibodies have never been reported in the LVVs and the role of B cells in these conditions remains elusive. However, several autoantibodies have been identified, including anti-endothelial (AECA), antiphospholipid and anti-ferritin antibodies. A specific pathogenic role for these autoantibodies remains to be demonstrated, since all conditions characterised by tissue injury may elicit autoantibody production. AECA are widely reported in the vasculitides including LVV. Although AECA have been associated with LVV disease pathogenesis, their precise role in disease development and progression is not defined. Antigenicity remains of interest and recent studies have identified endothelial protein C receptor and scavenger receptor class B type 1 as AECA antigenic targets in TA [
44].
Antiphospholipid antibodies have been observed in 30–80% of patients with GCA [
45‐
48] and in up to 41% with TA [
49]. The potential use of these antibodies as activity markers is discussed below. Anti-ferritin antibodies have been identified in 92% of untreated active GCA patients (with progressively lower prevalence in patients with flares during therapy and in inactive GCA) [
50], and also in 62% of TA patients [
51]. These antibodies were found to be less abundant in other diseases and healthy controls. Further studies are required to confirm these results and to define any potential pathogenic role and clinical utility [
52].
An alternative strategy has been adopted in studies evaluating multiple potential biomarkers in parallel. In TA, screening based on a 440-cytokine protein array [
53] identified higher plasma levels of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1, P-cadherin and MMP-9 and lower levels of WNT inhibitory factor (WIF)-1 in the plasma of TA patients as compared to healthy controls. A validation in two independent cohorts confirmed higher plasma levels of TIMP-1 and P-cadherin as compared to controls. P-cadherin is a cell adhesion molecule involved in multiple processes including cell migration and growth, while TIMP-1 is a metalloproteinase inhibitor with a proposed role in fibrotic conditions and it may be speculated that this protein contributes to vascular remodelling and arterial wall fibrosis. The involvement of metalloproteinases in vascular remodelling is also highlighted by findings from another study that found higher levels of MMP-9 in peripheral blood in GCA [
54]. Increased MMP-9 mRNA was detected in the lamina media of the inflamed arteries, a finding consistent with the pathogenic model of local synthesis of matrix-remodelling factors in LVVs.
Recent studies have evaluated blood biomarkers that might help to identify occult GCA in the setting of PMR, by comparing patients with or without LV-GCA in FDG-PET. One study found that ESR and the concentrations of both the soluble tyrosine kinase receptor Tie-2 and angiopoietin-2, markers of angiogenesis, were significantly elevated in patients with PMR and LV-GCA as compared to those with PMR only [
55••]. Angiopoietin-2 outperformed the discriminative potential of both CRP and ESR. Another study indicated that low levels of MMP-3 might indicate the presence of underlying GCA in patients with clinical PMR [
56].