Skip to main content
Hauptrubriken
CME Facharzt-Training Webinare Zeitschriften Bücher e.Medpedia Podcast
Service
Jobbörse Info & Hilfe
Fachgebiete
Anästhesiologie Allgemeinmedizin Arbeitsmedizin Augenheilkunde Chirurgie Dermatologie Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe HNO Innere Medizin Kardiologie Neurologie Onkologie und Hämatologie Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Pädiatrie Pathologie Psychiatrie Radiologie Rechtsmedizin Urologie Zahnmedizin
Themen
Typ-2-Diabetes und Adipositas Klimawandel und Gesundheit Neues aus dem Markt COVID-19 Praxis und Beruf Seltene Erkrankungen GOÄ & EBM Panorama
Sammlungen
Kasuistiken Algorithmen & Infografiken Blickdiagnosen Arthropedia FlapFinder (für Dermatochirurgen) Videos Kongressberichterstattung Medizin für Apothekerinnen und Apotheker Für Ärztinnen und Ärzte in Weiterbildung Für Medizinstudierende

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Im April diskutierten die Herz-Kreislauf-Spezialisten aus der ganzen Welt auf dem  Kongress des American College of Cardiology (ACC) u.a. neue Therapieansätze bei akutem Myokardinfarkt, koronarer Herzerkrankung, kardiogenem Schock oder Aortenklappenstenose. In unserem Kongress-Dossier haben wir für Sie Berichte über die „Late-Breaking Trials“ und andere wichtige Studien zusammengestellt. 
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Current Oncology Reports
Erschienen in: Current Oncology Reports 1/2015

01.01.2015 | Head and Neck Cancers (E Hanna, Section Editor)

Body Image: a Critical Psychosocial Issue for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

verfasst von: Michelle Cororve Fingeret, Irene Teo, Keelan Goettsch

Erschienen in: Current Oncology Reports | Ausgabe 1/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Increasing attention is being given to evaluating and treating body image difficulties of patients undergoing cancer treatment. Head and neck cancer significantly alters physical appearance and bodily functioning and therefore directly impacts body image. Research involving body image in head and neck cancer patients is growing, and this review considers published findings from 2013 to 2014. Primary attention is given to discussing recent advancements in body image assessment, qualitative studies, descriptive research, and psychosocial intervention studies relevant to body image. Limitations and necessary advancements in this field are noted, and a commentary is provided on the state of the current literature.
Literatur
1.
Fingeret, M. Body image and disfigurement. In: MD Anderson manual of psychosocial oncology. New York: McGraw Hill; 2010. p. 271–86.
2.
Fingeret MC et al. Associations among speech, eating, and body image concerns for surgical patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2013;35(3):354–60.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
3.
Rhoten BA, Murphy B, Ridner SH. Body image in patients with head and neck cancer: a review of the literature. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(8):753–60.PubMedCrossRef
4.••
Djan R, Penington A. A systematic review of questionnaires to measure the impact of appearance on quality of life for head and neck cancer patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(5):647–59. This useful review article identifies available tools for evaluating body image in patients with head and neck cancer and critically appraises their psychometric properties.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Klassen A et al. Measuring quality of life in cosmetic surgery patients with a condition-specific instrument: the Derriford Scale. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51(5):380–4.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Ringash J, Bezjak A. A structured review of quality of life instruments for head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 2001;23(3):201–13.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Gliklich RE, Goldsmith TA, Funk GF. Are head and neck specific quality of life measures necessary? Head Neck. 1997;19(6):474–80.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Hassan SJ, Weymuller EA. Assessment of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1993;15(6):485–96.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Lee EH et al. A systematic review of patient-reported outcome instruments of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the dermatologic population. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(2):e59–67.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Cano S et al. The patient outcomes of surgery—head/neck (POS-head/neck): a new patient-based outcome measure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(1):65–73.PubMedCrossRef
11.
12.•
Kissane DW et al. Preliminary evaluation of the reliability and validity of the Shame and Stigma Scale in head and neck cancer. Head Neck J Sci Spec Head Neck. 2013;35(2):172–83. This new measure shows promise for evaluating important body image issues related to shame and stigma that are not covered by other available assessment tools in the field.CrossRef
13.
Annunziata MA, Giovannini L, Muzzatti B. Assessing the body image: relevance, application and instruments for oncological settings. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20(5):901–7.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Fingeret MC et al. Multidimensional analysis of body image concerns among newly diagnosed patients with oral cavity cancer. Head Neck J Sci Spec Head Neck. 2010;32(3):301–9.
15.
Albornoz CR et al. Measuring health-related quality of life outcomes in head and neck reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg. 2013;40(2):341–9.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Lang HD et al. The psychological experience of living with head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(12):2648–63.PubMedCrossRef
17.•
Henry M et al. Looking beyond disfigurement: the experience of patients with head and neck cancer. J Palliat Care. 2014;30(1):5–15. This qualitative study offers important insights into the patient perspective of living with head and neck cancer, and findings are linked to practical recommendations for improving psychosocial care.PubMed
18.
Costa EF, et al. A qualitative study of the dimensions of patients’ perceptions of facial disfigurement after head and neck cancer surgery. Spec Care Dentist. 2013.
19.
McGarvey AC et al. Lymphoedema following treatment for head and neck cancer: impact on patients, and beliefs of health professionals. Eur J Cancer Care. 2014;23(3):317–27.CrossRef
20.
Chigurupati R et al. Quality of life after maxillectomy and prosthetic obturator rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(8):1471–8.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zhang X et al. Free fibula flap: assessment of quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer who have had defects reconstructed. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(6):2010–3.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zhu JF et al. Measures of health-related quality of life and socio-cultural aspects in young patients who after mandible primary reconstruction with free fibula flap. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:250.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
Wang A et al. Quality of life assessment in patients treated for metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. J Laryngol Otol. 2013;127(S2):S39–47.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Howren MB et al. Psychological factors associated with head and neck cancer treatment and survivorship: evidence and opportunities for behavioral medicine. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013;81(2):299–317.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
25.
Rhondali W et al. Association between body image dissatisfaction and weight loss among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: a preliminary report. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2013;45(6):1039–49.CrossRef
26.
Wong JC et al. Negative cancer stereotypes and disease-specific self-concept in head and neck cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(5):1055–63.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Chen AM et al. Quality of life among long-term survivors of head and neck cancer treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(2):129–33.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Clarke S-A, et al. Appearance concerns and psychosocial adjustment following head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional study and nine-month follow-up. Psychol Health Med. 2013(ahead-of-print):1–14.
29.
Wang H-L, et al. Shoulder pain, functional status, and health-related quality of life after head and neck cancer surgery. Rehabil Res Pract. 2013;2013.
30.
31.
Lebel S et al. The psychosocial impact of stigma in people with head and neck or lung cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22(1):140–52.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Fingeret MC et al. The nature and extent of body image concerns among surgically treated patients with head and neck cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2012;21(8):836–44.PubMedCrossRef
33.••
Semple C, et al. Psychosocial interventions for patients with head and neck cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013(7). This review demonstrates the vital need to develop evidence-based interventions for improving quality of life and body image of cancer patients. The lack of research in this area is concerning.
34.
Bessell A et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Face IT, a computer-based psychosocial intervention for disfigurement-related distress. Psychol Health Med. 2012;17(5):565–77.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Body Image: a Critical Psychosocial Issue for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
verfasst von
Michelle Cororve Fingeret
Irene Teo
Keelan Goettsch
Publikationsdatum
01.01.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Current Oncology Reports / Ausgabe 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1523-3790
Elektronische ISSN: 1534-6269
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-014-0422-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2015

Current Oncology Reports 1/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Gastrointestinal Cancers (B Czito, Section Editor)

Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Contemporary Outcomes With Multimodality Therapy

Gastrointestinal Cancers (B Czito, Section Editor)

Update on Treatment of Liver Metastases: Focus on Ablation Therapies

Head and Neck Cancers (E Hanna, Section Editor)

Defining Value-Driven Care in Head and Neck Oncology

Gastrointestinal Cancers (B Czito, Section Editor)

Endoscopic Approaches for Early-Stage Esophageal Cancer: Current Options

Head and Neck Cancers (E Hanna, Section Editor)

Prognosis and Biology in Esthesioneuroblastoma: the Emerging Role of Hyams Grading System

Neu im Fachgebiet Onkologie

„Überwältigende“ Evidenz für Tripeltherapie beim metastasierten Prostata-Ca.

22.05.2024 Prostatakarzinom Nachrichten

Patienten mit metastasiertem hormonsensitivem Prostatakarzinom sollten nicht mehr mit einer alleinigen Androgendeprivationstherapie (ADT) behandelt werden, mahnt ein US-Team nach Sichtung der aktuellen Datenlage. Mit einer Tripeltherapie haben die Betroffenen offenbar die besten Überlebenschancen.

So sicher sind Tattoos: Neue Daten zur Risikobewertung

22.05.2024 Melanom Nachrichten

Das größte medizinische Problem bei Tattoos bleiben allergische Reaktionen. Melanome werden dadurch offensichtlich nicht gefördert, die Farbpigmente könnten aber andere Tumoren begünstigen.

CAR-M-Zellen: Warten auf das große Fressen

22.05.2024 Onkologische Immuntherapie Nachrichten

Auch myeloide Immunzellen lassen sich mit chimären Antigenrezeptoren gegen Tumoren ausstatten. Solche CAR-Fresszell-Therapien werden jetzt für solide Tumoren entwickelt. Künftig soll dieser Prozess nicht mehr ex vivo, sondern per mRNA im Körper der Betroffenen erfolgen.

Blutdrucksenkung könnte Uterusmyome verhindern

21.05.2024 Krebsvorsorge in der Gynäkologie Nachrichten

Frauen mit unbehandelter oder neu auftretender Hypertonie haben ein deutlich erhöhtes Risiko für Uterusmyome. Eine Therapie mit Antihypertensiva geht hingegen mit einer verringerten Inzidenz der gutartigen Tumoren einher.

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen
Bildnachweise