nach oben

Erschienen in:

01.02.2024 | Research

Bonding performance and interfacial adaptation of modern bulk-fill restorative composites after aging in artificial saliva: an in vitro study

verfasst von: Paula Maciel Pires, Aline de Almeida Neves, Monika Lukomska-Szymanska, Paul Farrar, Álvaro Ferrando Cascales, Salvatore Sauro

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed at comparing the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) and interfacial adaptation of a modern self-curing and a light-curing restorative bulk-fill composite to a conventional composite applied with the layering technique.

Methods

Forty-eight occlusal cavities were divided in three main groups (16/group) based on tested materials: (i) STELA, bulk-fill self-curing restorative (STELA, SDI Ltd.); (ii) 3 M-BULK, bulk-fill composite (Filtek One Bulk-Fill, 3 M Oral Care); and (iii) 3 M-CTR, a conventional composite (Filtek Supreme XTE, 3 M Oral Care). These were used in combination with their adhesives in self-etch (SE) or etch-and-rinse (ER) mode. Specimens stored in artificial saliva (24 h or 12 months) were evaluated for MTBS and fractography. The interfacial analysis was performed through confocal microscopy. ANOVA and Fisher’s LSD post hoc tests were performed with a level of significance of 5%.

Results

All the tested materials applied in ER mode presented (24 h) greater bond strength than in SE mode. Although all materials showed a significant drop in the bond strength after prolonged storage, STELA showed the highest bonding performance and interfaces with few gaps. 3 M-BULK had the lowest bond strength and an interface with several voids and gaps.

Conclusions

All materials were affected by interface degradation and bonding reduction over prolonged aging. However, their use in combination with adhesives applied in ER mode may offer greater immediate bonding performance.

Clinical relevance.

The use of restorative light-curing bulk-fill composites may generate gaps at the bonding interface and voids. STELA may represent a suitable alternative to avoid such issues.

Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G (2002) Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomater 23:1819–1829. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00308-8CrossRef

Ferracane JL (2020) Resin composite-state of the art. Dent Mater 27:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.020CrossRef

Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N (2010) Shrinkage stresses generated during resin-composite applications: a review. J Dent Biomech 2010:131630. https://doi.org/10.4061/2010/131630CrossRefPubMed

Ferracane JL (2005) Developing a more complete understanding of stresses produced in dental composites during polymerisation. Dent Mater 21:36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.10.004CrossRefPubMed

Cho E, Sadr A, Inai N, Tagami J (2011) Evaluation of resin composite polymerisation by three dimensional micro-CT imaging and nanoindentation. Dent Mater 27:1070–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.008CrossRefPubMed

Carvalho RM, Pereira JC, Yoshiyama M, Pashley DH (1996) A review of polymerisation contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. Oper Dent 21:17–24PubMed

Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL (1996) Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res 75:871–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750030301. (Mar)CrossRefPubMed

Rosatto CM, Bicalho AA, Veríssimo C, Bragança GF, Rodrigues MP, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A, Soares CJ (2015) Mechanical properties, shrinkage stress, cuspal strain and fracture resistance of molars restored with bulk-fill composites and incremental filling technique. J Dent 43:1519–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2015.09.007CrossRefPubMed

Umer F, Khan FR (2011) Postoperative sensitivity in class V composite restorations: comparing soft start vs. constant curing modes of LED. J Conserv Dent 14:76–79. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.80738CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Yu P, Xu YX, Liu YS (2022) Polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress of bulk-fill and non-bulk-fill resin-based composites. J Dent Sci 17:1212–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.12.004CrossRefPubMed

11.

Hansen EK (1986) Effect of cavity depth and application technique on marginal adaptation of resins in dentin cavities. J Dent Res 65:1319–1321. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345860650110701CrossRefPubMed

12.

Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL (1997) Microleakage of four class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quintessence Int 28:135–144PubMed

13.

Sengupta A, Naka O, Mehta SB, Banerji S (2023) The clinical performance of bulk-fill versus the incremental layered application of direct resin composite restorations: a systematic review. Evid Based Dent 24:143. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-023-00905CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Fronza BM, Ayres A, Pacheco RR, Rueggeberg FA, Dias C, Giannini M (2017) Characterization of inorganic filler content, mechanical properties, and light transmission of bulk-fill resin composites. Oper Dent 42:445–455. https://doi.org/10.2341/16-024-LCrossRefPubMed

15.

Son SA, Park JK, Seo DG, Ko CC, Kwon YH (2017) How light attenuation and filler content affect the microhardness and polymerisation shrinkage and translucency of bulk-fill composites? Clin Oral Investig 21:559–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1920-2CrossRefPubMed

16.

Moszner N, Fischer UK, Ganster B, Liska R, Rheinberger V (2008) Benzoyl germanium derivatives as novel visible light photoinitiators for dental materials. Dent Mater 24:901–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.004CrossRefPubMed

17.

Kaisarly D, Meierhofer D, El Gezawi M, Rösch P, Kunzelmann KH (2021) Effects of flowable liners on the shrinkage vectors of bulk-fill composites. Clin Oral Investig 25:4927–4940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03801-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Sauro S, Makeeva I, Faus-Matoses V, Foschi F, Giovarruscio M, Maciel Pires P, Martins Moura ME, Almeida Neves A, Faus-Llácer V (2019) Effects of ions-releasing restorative materials on the dentine bonding longevity of modern universal adhesives after load-cycle and prolonged artificial saliva aging. Materials (Basel) 12:722. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12050722ADSCrossRefPubMed

19.

Oglakci B, Kazak M, Donmez N, Dalkilic EE, Koymen SS (2019) The use of a liner under different bulk-fill resin composites: 3D GAP formation analysis by x-ray microcomputed tomography. J Appl Oral Sci 25(28):e20190042. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0042CrossRef

20.

Burrer P, Par M, Fürer L, Stübi M, Marovic D, Tarle Z, Attin T, Tauböck TT (2023) Effect of polymerization mode on shrinkage kinetics and degree of conversion of dual-curing bulk-fill resin composites. Clin Oral Investig 27:3169–3180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04928-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Ilie N (2022) Fracture and viscoelastic behavior of novel self-adhesive materials for simplified restoration concepts. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 125:104970CrossRefPubMed

22.

Braga RR, Ferracane JL (2002) Contraction stress related to degree of conversion and reaction kinetics. J Dent Res 81:114–118CrossRefPubMed

23.

Thadathil Varghese J, Raju R, Farrar P, Prentice L, Prusty BG (2023) Comparative analysis of self-cure and dual cure-dental composites on their physico-mechanical behaviour. Aust Dent J 22. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.13004

24.

Sauro S, Pashley DH (2016) Strategies to stabilise dentine-bonded interfaces through remineralising operative approaches: state of the art. Int J Adhes Adhes 69:39–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2016.03.014CrossRef

25.

Al-Zain AO, Baeesa L, Jassoma E, Alghilan MA, Hariri M, Ismail EH, Münchow EA (2023) Assessment of internal porosities for different placement techniques of bulk-fill resin-based composites: a micro-computed tomography study. Clin Oral Invest. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05337-zCrossRef

26.

Ferracane JL, Hilton TJ (2016) Polymerization stress-is it clinically meaningful? Dent Mater 32:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.020CrossRefPubMed

27.

Maciel Pires P, Ionescu AC, Pérez-Gracia MT, Vezzoli E, Soares IPM, Brambilla E, de Almeida NA, Sauro S (2022) Assessment of the remineralisation induced by contemporary ion-releasing materials in mineral-depleted dentine. Clin Oral Investig 26:6195–6207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04569-9CrossRefPubMed

28.

Pires PM, Neves AA, Makeeva IM, Schwendicke F, Faus-Matoses V, Yoshihara K, Banerjee A, Sauro S (2020) Contemporary restorative ion-releasing materials: current status, interfacial properties and operative approaches. Br Dent J 229:450–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41415-020-2169-3CrossRefPubMed

29.

Watson TF, Bartlett DW (1994) Adhesive systems: composites, dentine bonding agents and glass ionomers. Br Dent J 19(176):227–231. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808410CrossRef

30.

Lööf J, Svahn F, Jarmar T, Engqvist H, Pameijer CH (2008) A comparative study of the bioactivity of three materials for dental applications. Dent Mater 24(5):653–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.028CrossRefPubMed

31.

Sauro S, Osorio R, Watson TF, Toledano M (2015) Influence of phosphoproteins’ biomimetic analogs on remineralization of mineral-depleted resin-dentin interfaces created with ion-releasing resin-based systems. Dent Mater 31:759–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.013CrossRefPubMed

32.

Abuna G, Feitosa VP, Correr AB, Cama G, Giannini M, Sinhoreti MA, Pashley DH, Sauro S (2016) Bonding performance of experimental bioactive/biomimetic self-etch adhesives doped with calcium-phosphate fillers and biomimetic analogs of phosphoproteins. J Dent 52:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.07.016CrossRefPubMed

33.

Sofan E, Sofan A, Palaia G, Tenore G, Romeo U, Migliau G (2017) Classification review of dental adhesive systems: from the IV generation to the universal type. Ann Stomatol (Roma) 8:1–17. https://doi.org/10.11138/ads/2017.8.1.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

34.

Maciel Pires P, Dávila-Sánchez A, Faus-Matoses V, Nuñez Martí JM, Lo Muzio L, Sauro S (2022) Bonding performance and ultramorphology of the resin-dentine interface of contemporary universal adhesives. Clin Oral Investig 26(6):4391–4405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04402-3CrossRefPubMed

35.

Hayashi J, Espigares J, Takagaki T, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Numata T, Chan D, Sadr A (2019) Real-time in-depth imaging of gap formation in bulk-fill resin composites. Dent Mater 35(4):585–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2019.01.020CrossRefPubMed

36.

Nie J, Yap AU, Wang XY (2018) Influence of shrinkage and viscosity of flowable composite liners on cervical microleakage of class II restorations: a micro-CT analysis. Oper Dent 43(6):656–664. https://doi.org/10.2341/17-091-LCrossRefPubMed

37.

Hashimoto M (2010) A review–micromorphological evidence of degradation in resin-dentin bonds and potential preventional solutions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 92(1):268–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31535CrossRefPubMed

38.

Sabatini C, Pashley DH (2014) Mechanisms regulating the degradation of dentin matrices by endogenous dentin proteases and their role in dental adhesion. A Rev Am J Dent 27(4):203–214

39.

Nishitani Y, Yoshiyama M, Wadgaonkar B, Breschi L, Mannello F, Mazzoni A, Carvalho RM, Tjäderhane L, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2006) Activation of gelatinolytic/collagenolytic activity in dentin by self-etching adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 114(2):160–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2006.00342.xCrossRefPubMed

40.

Tay FR, Pashley DH (2003) Water treeing–a potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 16:6–12PubMed

41.

Sauro S, Watson TF, Mannocci F, Miyake K, Huffman BP, Tay FR, Pashley DH (2009) Two-photon laser confocal microscopy of micropermeability of resin-dentin bonds made with water or ethanol wet bonding. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 90(1):327–337. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31290CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Spencer P, Wang Y (2002) Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 62(3):447–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10364CrossRefPubMed

43.

Ye Q, Park JG, Topp E, Wang Y, Misra A, Spencer P (2008) In vitro performance of nano-heterogeneous dentin adhesive. J Dent Res 87(9):829–833. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700911CrossRefPubMed

44.

Sauro S, Mannocci F, Toledano M, Osorio R, Thompson I, Watson TF (2009) Influence of the hydrostatic pulpal pressure on droplets formation in current etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: a video rate/TSM microscopy and fluid filtration study. Dent Mater 25(11):1392–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.010CrossRefPubMed

45.

De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B (2005) A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res 84(2):118–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400204CrossRefPubMed

46.

Anchieta RB, Machado LS, Martini AP, Santos PH, Giannini M, Janal M, Tovar N, Sundfeld RH, Rocha EP, Coelho PG (2015) Effect of long-term storage on nanomechanical and morphological properties of dentin-adhesive interfaces. Dent Mater 31(2):141–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.11.010CrossRefPubMed

47.

Sauro S, Pashley DH, Montanari M, Chersoni S, Carvalho RM, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay FR, Prati C (2007) Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 23(6):705–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.010CrossRefPubMed

48.

Tay FR, Frankenberger R, Krejci I, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Lai CN (2004) Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization I In vivo evidence. J Dent 32(8):611–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2004.04.006CrossRefPubMed

49.

Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A (1984) The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63(12):1396–1399. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101CrossRefPubMed

50.

Pashley DH (1991) Dentin bonding: overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent 3(2):46–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1991.tb00808.xCrossRefPubMed

51.

Perdigão J, Reis A, Loguercio AD (2013) Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent 25(4):219–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12016CrossRefPubMed

52.

Sauro S, Osorio R, Watson TF, Toledano M (2012) Assessment of the quality of resin-dentin bonded interfaces: an AFM nano-indentation, μTBS and confocal ultramorphology study. Dent Mater 28(6):622–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.02.005CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Bonding performance and interfacial adaptation of modern bulk-fill restorative composites after aging in artificial saliva: an in vitro study
verfasst von: Paula Maciel Pires
Aline de Almeida Neves
Monika Lukomska-Szymanska
Paul Farrar
Álvaro Ferrando Cascales
Salvatore Sauro
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05525-5

Update Zahnmedizin

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Bonding performance and interfacial adaptation of modern bulk-fill restorative composites after aging in artificial saliva: an in vitro study