Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Brain Topography 3/2015

01.05.2015 | Original Paper

Brain Dynamics of Distractibility: Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mechanisms of Auditory Attention

verfasst von: Aurélie Bidet-Caulet, Laure Bottemanne, Clara Fonteneau, Marie-Hélène Giard, Olivier Bertrand

Erschienen in: Brain Topography | Ausgabe 3/2015

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Attention improves the processing of specific information while other stimuli are disregarded. A good balance between bottom-up (attentional capture by unexpected salient stimuli) and top-down (selection of relevant information) mechanisms is crucial to be both task-efficient and aware of our environment. Only few studies have explored how an isolated unexpected task-irrelevant stimulus outside the attention focus can disturb the top-down attention mechanisms necessary to the good performance of the ongoing task, and how these top-down mechanisms can modulate the bottom-up mechanisms of attentional capture triggered by an unexpected event. We recorded scalp electroencephalography in 18 young adults performing a new paradigm measuring distractibility and assessing both bottom-up and top-down attention mechanisms, at the same time. Increasing task load in top-down attention was found to reduce early processing of the distracting sound, but not bottom-up attentional capture mechanisms nor the behavioral distraction cost in reaction time. Moreover, the impact of bottom-up attentional capture by distracting sounds on target processing was revealed as a delayed latency of the N100 sensory response to target sounds mirroring increased reaction times. These results provide crucial information into how bottom-up and top-down mechanisms dynamically interact and compete in the human brain, i.e. on the precarious balance between voluntary attention and distraction.
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Alcaini M, Giard MH, Thevenet M, Pernier J (1994) Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked response. Psychophysiology 31(6):611–615CrossRefPubMed Alcaini M, Giard MH, Thevenet M, Pernier J (1994) Two separate frontal components in the N1 wave of the human auditory evoked response. Psychophysiology 31(6):611–615CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Bidet-Caulet A, Fischer C, Besle J, Aguera PE, Giard MH, Bertrand O (2007) Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. J Neurosci 27(35):9252–9261CrossRefPubMed Bidet-Caulet A, Fischer C, Besle J, Aguera PE, Giard MH, Bertrand O (2007) Effects of selective attention on the electrophysiological representation of concurrent sounds in the human auditory cortex. J Neurosci 27(35):9252–9261CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(3):201–215CrossRefPubMed Corbetta M, Shulman GL (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 3(3):201–215CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Coull JT (1998) Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog Neurobiol 55(4):343–361CrossRefPubMed Coull JT (1998) Neural correlates of attention and arousal: insights from electrophysiology, functional neuroimaging and psychopharmacology. Prog Neurobiol 55(4):343–361CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Czigler I, Csibra G, Csontos A (1992) Age and inter-stimulus interval effects on event-related potentials to frequent and infrequent auditory stimuli. Biol Psychol 33(2–3):195–206CrossRefPubMed Czigler I, Csibra G, Csontos A (1992) Age and inter-stimulus interval effects on event-related potentials to frequent and infrequent auditory stimuli. Biol Psychol 33(2–3):195–206CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Davis H, Mast T, Yoshie N, Zerlin S (1966) The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: recovery process. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 21:105–113CrossRefPubMed Davis H, Mast T, Yoshie N, Zerlin S (1966) The slow response of the human cortex to auditory stimuli: recovery process. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 21:105–113CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1977) On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14(5):456–467CrossRefPubMed Duncan-Johnson CC, Donchin E (1977) On quantifying surprise: the variation of event-related potentials with subjective probability. Psychophysiology 14(5):456–467CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Edgington ES (1995) Randomization tests: revised and expanded. Statistics: textbooks and monographs, vol 147, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York Edgington ES (1995) Randomization tests: revised and expanded. Statistics: textbooks and monographs, vol 147, 3rd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York
Zurück zum Zitat Escera C, Alho K, Winkler I, Naatanen R (1998) Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci 10(5):590–604CrossRefPubMed Escera C, Alho K, Winkler I, Naatanen R (1998) Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. J Cogn Neurosci 10(5):590–604CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Escera C, Alho K, Schroger E, Winkler I (2000) Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol 5(3–4):151–166CrossRefPubMed Escera C, Alho K, Schroger E, Winkler I (2000) Involuntary attention and distractibility as evaluated with event-related brain potentials. Audiol Neurootol 5(3–4):151–166CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Escera C, Yago E, Corral MJ, Corbera S, Nunez MI (2003) Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching. Eur J Neurosci 18(8):2408–2412CrossRefPubMed Escera C, Yago E, Corral MJ, Corbera S, Nunez MI (2003) Attention capture by auditory significant stimuli: semantic analysis follows attention switching. Eur J Neurosci 18(8):2408–2412CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Friedman D, Cycowicz YM, Gaeta H (2001) The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25(4):355–373CrossRefPubMed Friedman D, Cycowicz YM, Gaeta H (2001) The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain’s evaluation of novelty. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 25(4):355–373CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Giard MH, Fort A, Mouchetant-Rostaing Y, Pernier J (2000) Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans. Front Biosci 5:D84–94CrossRefPubMed Giard MH, Fort A, Mouchetant-Rostaing Y, Pernier J (2000) Neurophysiological mechanisms of auditory selective attention in humans. Front Biosci 5:D84–94CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Golob EJ, Pratt H, Starr A (2002) Preparatory slow potentials and event-related potentials in an auditory cued attention task. Clin Neurophysiol 113(10):1544–1557CrossRefPubMed Golob EJ, Pratt H, Starr A (2002) Preparatory slow potentials and event-related potentials in an auditory cued attention task. Clin Neurophysiol 113(10):1544–1557CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hari R, Kaila K, Katila T, Tuomisto T, Varpula T (1982) Interstimulus interval dependence on the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54:561–569CrossRefPubMed Hari R, Kaila K, Katila T, Tuomisto T, Varpula T (1982) Interstimulus interval dependence on the auditory vertex response and its magnetic counterpart: implications for their neural generation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 54:561–569CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Harmony T, Bernal J, Fernandez T, Silva-Pereyra J, Fernandez-Bouzas A, Marosi E, Rodriguez M, Reyes A (2000) Primary task demands modulate P3a amplitude. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 9(1):53–60CrossRefPubMed Harmony T, Bernal J, Fernandez T, Silva-Pereyra J, Fernandez-Bouzas A, Marosi E, Rodriguez M, Reyes A (2000) Primary task demands modulate P3a amplitude. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 9(1):53–60CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hillyard SA, Hink RF, Schwent VL, Picton TW (1973) Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 182(108):177–180CrossRefPubMed Hillyard SA, Hink RF, Schwent VL, Picton TW (1973) Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 182(108):177–180CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Holeckova I, Fischer C, Giard MH, Delpuech C, Morlet D (2006) Brain responses to a subject’s own name uttered by a familiar voice. Brain Res 1082(1):142–152CrossRefPubMed Holeckova I, Fischer C, Giard MH, Delpuech C, Morlet D (2006) Brain responses to a subject’s own name uttered by a familiar voice. Brain Res 1082(1):142–152CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Hugdahl K, Nordby H (1994) Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities. Behav Neural Biol 62(1):21–32CrossRefPubMed Hugdahl K, Nordby H (1994) Electrophysiological correlates to cued attentional shifts in the visual and auditory modalities. Behav Neural Biol 62(1):21–32CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Imada T, Watanabe M, Mashiko T, Kawakatsu M, Kotani M (1997) The silent period between sounds has a stronger effect than the interstimulus interval on auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 102(1):37–45CrossRefPubMed Imada T, Watanabe M, Mashiko T, Kawakatsu M, Kotani M (1997) The silent period between sounds has a stronger effect than the interstimulus interval on auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 102(1):37–45CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Ljungberg JK, Parmentier FB, Leiva A, Vega N (2012) The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: the role of event information. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 38(5):1461–1468. doi:10.1037/a0028149 CrossRefPubMed Ljungberg JK, Parmentier FB, Leiva A, Vega N (2012) The informational constraints of behavioral distraction by unexpected sounds: the role of event information. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 38(5):1461–1468. doi:10.​1037/​a0028149 CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lv JY, Wang T, Qiu J, Feng SH, Tu S, Wei DT (2010) The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory–visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study. Exp Brain Res 205(1):81–86. doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2360-x CrossRefPubMed Lv JY, Wang T, Qiu J, Feng SH, Tu S, Wei DT (2010) The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory–visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study. Exp Brain Res 205(1):81–86. doi:10.​1007/​s00221-010-2360-x CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Lyytinen H, Blomberg AP, Naatanen R (1992) Event-related potentials and autonomic responses to a change in unattended auditory stimuli. Psychophysiology 29(5):523–534CrossRefPubMed Lyytinen H, Blomberg AP, Naatanen R (1992) Event-related potentials and autonomic responses to a change in unattended auditory stimuli. Psychophysiology 29(5):523–534CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Marinkovic K, Halgren E, Maltzman I (2001) Arousal-related P3a to novel auditory stimuli is abolished by a moderately low alcohol dose. Alcohol Alcohol 36(6):529–539CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed Marinkovic K, Halgren E, Maltzman I (2001) Arousal-related P3a to novel auditory stimuli is abolished by a moderately low alcohol dose. Alcohol Alcohol 36(6):529–539CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Mars RB, Debener S, Gladwin TE, Harrison LM, Haggard P, Rothwell JC, Bestmann S (2008) Trial-by-trial fluctuations in the event-related electroencephalogram reflect dynamic changes in the degree of surprise. J Neurosci 28(47):12539–12545. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2925-08.2008 CrossRefPubMed Mars RB, Debener S, Gladwin TE, Harrison LM, Haggard P, Rothwell JC, Bestmann S (2008) Trial-by-trial fluctuations in the event-related electroencephalogram reflect dynamic changes in the degree of surprise. J Neurosci 28(47):12539–12545. doi:10.​1523/​JNEUROSCI.​2925-08.​2008 CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Miltner W, Johnson RJ, Braun C (1991) Auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: II effects of interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology 5:27–42 Miltner W, Johnson RJ, Braun C (1991) Auditory and somatosensory event-related potentials: II effects of interstimulus interval. Psychophysiology 5:27–42
Zurück zum Zitat Muller HJ, Findlay JM (1988) The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. Acta Psychol (Amst) 69(2):129–155CrossRef Muller HJ, Findlay JM (1988) The effect of visual attention on peripheral discrimination thresholds in single and multiple element displays. Acta Psychol (Amst) 69(2):129–155CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Muller HJ, Rabbitt PM (1989) Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15(2):315–330CrossRefPubMed Muller HJ, Rabbitt PM (1989) Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 15(2):315–330CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Muller-Gass A, Schroger E (2007) Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction. Brain Res 1136(1):169–177CrossRefPubMed Muller-Gass A, Schroger E (2007) Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction. Brain Res 1136(1):169–177CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Naatanen R (1982) Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol Bull 92(3):605–640CrossRefPubMed Naatanen R (1982) Processing negativity: an evoked-potential reflection of selective attention. Psychol Bull 92(3):605–640CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Näätänen R (1990) The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav Brain Sci 13:201–233CrossRef Näätänen R (1990) The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behav Brain Sci 13:201–233CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Näätänen R (1992) Attention and brain function. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale Näätänen R (1992) Attention and brain function. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale
Zurück zum Zitat Näätänen R, Picton TW (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24:375–425CrossRefPubMed Näätänen R, Picton TW (1987) The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. Psychophysiology 24:375–425CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Näätänen R, Winkler I (1999) The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 125(6):826–859CrossRefPubMed Näätänen R, Winkler I (1999) The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 125(6):826–859CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Nelson DA, Lassman FM (1968) Effects of intersignal interval on the human auditory evoked response. J Acoust Soc Am 44:1529–1532CrossRefPubMed Nelson DA, Lassman FM (1968) Effects of intersignal interval on the human auditory evoked response. J Acoust Soc Am 44:1529–1532CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Parmentier FB, Elford G, Escera C, Andres P, San Miguel I (2008) The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition 106(1):408–432CrossRefPubMed Parmentier FB, Elford G, Escera C, Andres P, San Miguel I (2008) The cognitive locus of distraction by acoustic novelty in the cross-modal oddball task. Cognition 106(1):408–432CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF (1989) Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro 72:184–187CrossRef Perrin F, Pernier J, Bertrand O, Echallier JF (1989) Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr Clin Neuro 72:184–187CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Polich J, Aung M, Dalessio DJ (1988) Long latency auditory evoked potentials: intensity, interstimulus interval, and habituation. Pavlov J Biol Sci 23:35–40PubMed Polich J, Aung M, Dalessio DJ (1988) Long latency auditory evoked potentials: intensity, interstimulus interval, and habituation. Pavlov J Biol Sci 23:35–40PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat SanMiguel I, Corral MJ, Escera C (2008) When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory–visual distraction paradigm. J Cogn Neurosci 20(7):1131–1145CrossRefPubMed SanMiguel I, Corral MJ, Escera C (2008) When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory–visual distraction paradigm. J Cogn Neurosci 20(7):1131–1145CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat SanMiguel I, Linden D, Escera C (2010a) Attention capture by novel sounds: distraction versus facilitation. Eur J Cogn Psychol 22(4):481–515CrossRef SanMiguel I, Linden D, Escera C (2010a) Attention capture by novel sounds: distraction versus facilitation. Eur J Cogn Psychol 22(4):481–515CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat SanMiguel I, Morgan HM, Klein C, Linden D, Escera C (2010b) On the functional significance of novelty-P3: facilitation by unexpected novel sounds. Biol Psychol 83(2):143–152CrossRefPubMed SanMiguel I, Morgan HM, Klein C, Linden D, Escera C (2010b) On the functional significance of novelty-P3: facilitation by unexpected novel sounds. Biol Psychol 83(2):143–152CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Schröger E, Bendixen A, Denham SL, Mill RW, Bohm TM, Winkler I (2013) Predictive regularity representations in violation detection and auditory stream segregation: from conceptual to computational models. Brain Topogr. doi:10.1007/s10548-013-0334-6 PubMed Schröger E, Bendixen A, Denham SL, Mill RW, Bohm TM, Winkler I (2013) Predictive regularity representations in violation detection and auditory stream segregation: from conceptual to computational models. Brain Topogr. doi:10.​1007/​s10548-013-0334-6 PubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John ER (1965) Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150(3700):1187–1188CrossRefPubMed Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John ER (1965) Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150(3700):1187–1188CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Suwazono S, Machado L, Knight RT (2000) Predictive value of novel stimuli modifies visual event-related potentials and behavior. Clin Neurophysiol 111(1):29–39CrossRefPubMed Suwazono S, Machado L, Knight RT (2000) Predictive value of novel stimuli modifies visual event-related potentials and behavior. Clin Neurophysiol 111(1):29–39CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Yago E, Escera C, Alho K, Giard MH, Serra-Grabulosa JM (2003) Spatiotemporal dynamics of the auditory novelty-P3 event-related brain potential. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 16(3):383–390CrossRefPubMed Yago E, Escera C, Alho K, Giard MH, Serra-Grabulosa JM (2003) Spatiotemporal dynamics of the auditory novelty-P3 event-related brain potential. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 16(3):383–390CrossRefPubMed
Zurück zum Zitat Zhang P, Chen X, Yuan P, Zhang D, He S (2006) The effect of visuospatial attentional load on the processing of irrelevant acoustic distractors. Neuroimage 33(2):715–724CrossRefPubMed Zhang P, Chen X, Yuan P, Zhang D, He S (2006) The effect of visuospatial attentional load on the processing of irrelevant acoustic distractors. Neuroimage 33(2):715–724CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Brain Dynamics of Distractibility: Interaction Between Top-Down and Bottom-Up Mechanisms of Auditory Attention
verfasst von
Aurélie Bidet-Caulet
Laure Bottemanne
Clara Fonteneau
Marie-Hélène Giard
Olivier Bertrand
Publikationsdatum
01.05.2015
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Brain Topography / Ausgabe 3/2015
Print ISSN: 0896-0267
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-6792
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-014-0354-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2015

Brain Topography 3/2015 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 Parkinson-Krankheit Nachrichten

Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.