Skip to main content
Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2017

01.12.2016 | Original Article

Breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: report of a nationwide survey by the CINV Study Group of Japan

verfasst von: Kazuo Tamura, Keisuke Aiba, Toshiaki Saeki, Yoichi Nakanishi, Toshiharu Kamura, Hideo Baba, Kazuhiro Yoshida, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Yuko Kitagawa, Yoshihiko Maehara, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Koichi Hirata, Masaki Kitajima, The CINV Study Group of Japan

Erschienen in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Ausgabe 2/2017

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

We conducted a nationwide survey on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in Japan and demonstrated good compliance with Japanese CINV guidelines, resulting in good control of vomiting. However, almost half the patients experienced breakthrough CINV. We analyzed the survey results in relationship to the management of patients with breakthrough CINV.

Methods

This multicenter, prospective, observational study analyzed data for 1910 patients in Japan scheduled for moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC and HEC, respectively). Patients who developed CINV despite prophylactic use of antiemetics were administered rescue drugs. Patients who received cisplatin-based HEC (C-HEC), non-cisplatin-based HEC (N-HEC), or MEC were evaluated separately.

Results

A total of 989 patients experienced CINV, of whom 412 (44%) received rescue antiemetics during the study period. The rate at which patients with breakthrough CINV were started on rescue drugs ranged from 13% to 24%. Rescue drugs were given more frequently on days 2–4 for C-HEC and MEC and on days 1–2 for N-HEC. Eighty-six percent of patients received metoclopramide or domperidone. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists, antipsychotics, and anti-anxiety drugs were used for 11–5% of patients. The mean duration of antiemetic use was 2.6 days.

Conclusions

Fewer than half of the patients with breakthrough CINV were treated with rescue antiemetics, suggesting that CINV was mild in the remaining patients. However, CINV was sufficiently severe to prevent eating in other patients, indicating the need for new drugs with different mechanisms to control CINV.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Tamura K, Aiba K, Saeki T, CINV Study Group of Japan et al (2015) Testing the effectiveness of antiemetic guidelines: results of a prospective registry by the CINV Study Group of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 20:855–865CrossRef Tamura K, Aiba K, Saeki T, CINV Study Group of Japan et al (2015) Testing the effectiveness of antiemetic guidelines: results of a prospective registry by the CINV Study Group of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 20:855–865CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Carelle N, Piotto E, Bellanger A et al (2002) Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer (Phila) 95:155–163CrossRef Carelle N, Piotto E, Bellanger A et al (2002) Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer (Phila) 95:155–163CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Roila F, Herrstedt J, Aapro M et al (2010) Guideline update for MASCC and ESMO in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results of the Perugia consensus conference. Ann Oncol 21(suppl 5):v232–v243CrossRefPubMed Roila F, Herrstedt J, Aapro M et al (2010) Guideline update for MASCC and ESMO in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results of the Perugia consensus conference. Ann Oncol 21(suppl 5):v232–v243CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ et al (2011) Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 29:4189–4198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ et al (2011) Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 29:4189–4198CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2016) Antiemesis. In: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology version 2. 2016. Available via the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. http://www.nccn.org/. Accessed 28 June 2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2016) Antiemesis. In: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology version 2. 2016. Available via the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. http://​www.​nccn.​org/​. Accessed 28 June 2016
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (2010) Guidelines for appropriate use of antiemetic drugs, version 1 (in Japanese). Kanehara, Tokyo Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (2010) Guidelines for appropriate use of antiemetic drugs, version 1 (in Japanese). Kanehara, Tokyo
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (2015) Guidelines for appropriate use of antiemetic drugs, version 1 (in Japanese). Kanehara, Tokyo Japan Society of Clinical Oncology (2015) Guidelines for appropriate use of antiemetic drugs, version 1 (in Japanese). Kanehara, Tokyo
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB et al (1983) On the receiving end: patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19:203–208CrossRefPubMed Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB et al (1983) On the receiving end: patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19:203–208CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Glare P, Pereira G, Kristjanson LJ et al (2004) Systematic review of the efficacy of antiemetics in the treatment of nausea in patients with far-advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 12:432–440CrossRefPubMed Glare P, Pereira G, Kristjanson LJ et al (2004) Systematic review of the efficacy of antiemetics in the treatment of nausea in patients with far-advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 12:432–440CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat de Wit R, de Boer AC, vd Linden GH et al (2001) Effective cross-over to granisetron after failure to ondansetron, a randomized double blind study in patients failing ondansetron plus dexamethasone during the first 24 hours following highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 85:1099–1101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Wit R, de Boer AC, vd Linden GH et al (2001) Effective cross-over to granisetron after failure to ondansetron, a randomized double blind study in patients failing ondansetron plus dexamethasone during the first 24 hours following highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Br J Cancer 85:1099–1101CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Musso M, Scalone R, Bonanno V et al (2009) Palonosetron (Aloxi) and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple-day chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 17:205–209CrossRefPubMed Musso M, Scalone R, Bonanno V et al (2009) Palonosetron (Aloxi) and dexamethasone for the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting in patients receiving multiple-day chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 17:205–209CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Ikari Y, Ogata K, Nakashima Y et al (2014) Safety and pharmacokinetic evaluation of repeated intravenous administration of palonosetron 0.75 mg in patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 22:1959–1964CrossRefPubMed Ikari Y, Ogata K, Nakashima Y et al (2014) Safety and pharmacokinetic evaluation of repeated intravenous administration of palonosetron 0.75 mg in patients receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 22:1959–1964CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Navari RM, Nagy CK, Gray SE (2013) The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 21:1655–1663CrossRefPubMed Navari RM, Nagy CK, Gray SE (2013) The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 21:1655–1663CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Abe M, Kasamatsu Y, Kado N et al (2015) Efficacy of olanzapine combined therapy for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy resistant to standard antiemetic therapy. Biomed Res Int. doi:10.1155/2015/956785 Abe M, Kasamatsu Y, Kado N et al (2015) Efficacy of olanzapine combined therapy for patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy resistant to standard antiemetic therapy. Biomed Res Int. doi:10.​1155/​2015/​956785
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Chiu L, Chow R, Popovic M et al (2016) Efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis and rescue of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a systemic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 24:2381–2392CrossRefPubMed Chiu L, Chow R, Popovic M et al (2016) Efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis and rescue of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a systemic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 24:2381–2392CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Grunberg SM, Deuson RR, Mavros P et al (2004) Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics. Cancer (Phila) 100:2261–2268CrossRef Grunberg SM, Deuson RR, Mavros P et al (2004) Incidence of chemotherapy-induced nausea and emesis after modern antiemetics. Cancer (Phila) 100:2261–2268CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: report of a nationwide survey by the CINV Study Group of Japan
verfasst von
Kazuo Tamura
Keisuke Aiba
Toshiaki Saeki
Yoichi Nakanishi
Toshiharu Kamura
Hideo Baba
Kazuhiro Yoshida
Nobuyuki Yamamoto
Yuko Kitagawa
Yoshihiko Maehara
Mototsugu Shimokawa
Koichi Hirata
Masaki Kitajima
The CINV Study Group of Japan
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2016
Verlag
Springer Japan
Erschienen in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Ausgabe 2/2017
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Elektronische ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-016-1069-7

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2017

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2017 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.