Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research 8/2014

01.10.2014 | Book Review

Cappelleri JC, Zou KH, Bushmakin AG, Alvir JMJ, Alemayehu D, Symonds T: Patient-reported outcomes, measurement, implementation and interpretation

CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2014 (Hardback), ISBN: 978-1-4398-7367-0

verfasst von: Adam B. Smith

Erschienen in: Quality of Life Research | Ausgabe 8/2014

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Excerpt

The recent book, Patient-Reported Outcomes, Measurement, Implementation and Interpretation, by Cappelleri and his colleagues [1] is a timely synthesis of the current thinking and practice of psychometrics applied to patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and PRO data analysis. Written primarily by statisticians drawn from the same large multinational pharmaceutical company, the book is squarely aimed at health economists, outcomes researchers and statisticians in the industry who may require a foundation in psychometrics and the analysis of PRO data. That said it may also be of benefit and utility to advanced researchers in academia and consultancy wanting to increase their knowledge in this field. …
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Cappelleri, J. C., Zou, K. H., Bushmakin, A. G., Alvir, J. M. J., Alemayehu, D., & Symonds, T. (2014). Patient-reported outcomes: Measurement, implementation and interpretation. Boca Raton: CRC Press. Cappelleri, J. C., Zou, K. H., Bushmakin, A. G., Alvir, J. M. J., Alemayehu, D., & Symonds, T. (2014). Patient-reported outcomes: Measurement, implementation and interpretation. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., et al. (2011). Content validity—Establishing and reporting the evidence in newly-developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part 1—Eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14, 967–977.PubMedCrossRef Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., et al. (2011). Content validity—Establishing and reporting the evidence in newly-developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO good research practices task force report: Part 1—Eliciting concepts for a new PRO instrument. Value Health, 14, 967–977.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Reeve, R. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., et al. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res, 22(8), 1889–1905.CrossRef Reeve, R. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., et al. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Qual Life Res, 22(8), 1889–1905.CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Cappelleri JC, Zou KH, Bushmakin AG, Alvir JMJ, Alemayehu D, Symonds T: Patient-reported outcomes, measurement, implementation and interpretation
CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2014 (Hardback), ISBN: 978-1-4398-7367-0
verfasst von
Adam B. Smith
Publikationsdatum
01.10.2014
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Quality of Life Research / Ausgabe 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0789-2

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2014

Quality of Life Research 8/2014 Zur Ausgabe