Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Neuroradiology 4/2007

01.04.2007 | Interventional Neuroradiology

Carotid angioplasty and stent placement for restenosis after endarterectomy

verfasst von: Yasha Kadkhodayan, Christopher J. Moran, Colin P. Derdeyn, DeWitte T. Cross III

Erschienen in: Neuroradiology | Ausgabe 4/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Recurrent carotid stenosis following endarterectomy is a common complication, and reoperation may be associated with increased morbidity. The goal of this study was to determine the procedural safety and long-term complication rates of carotid angioplasty and stenting for recurrent stenosis.

Methods

Of 248 consecutive carotid angioplasty and/or stenting procedures performed at our institution between March 1996 and November 2005, 83 procedures for recurrent stenosis following endarterectomy were performed in 75 patients (mean age 68 years; 43 men, 32 women) without cerebral protection devices. The patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed for vascular imaging reports and available clinical follow-up. Procedural and long-term complication rates were calculated.

Results

Recurrent stenosis was reduced from a mean of 80.6% to no significant stenosis in 82 of 83 procedures. The procedural stroke rate was 3 out of 83 procedures (3.6%). The procedural transient ischemic attack (TIA) rate was 2 out of 83 procedures (2.4%). Mean follow-up was 22.4 months (range 0.1 to 86.7 months) with at least 6 months follow-up for 54 of 83 procedures (65%). There were five TIAs and no strokes on follow-up (new TIAs at 25.5 and 43.4 months; recurrent TIAs at 1, 11.1, and 12 months, all with normal angiograms). The composite 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, or death rate was 5 of 83 procedures (6.0%).

Conclusion

In this series, angioplasty and stenting were effective in relieving stenosis secondary to recurrent carotid disease after endarterectomy, and have low rates of ischemic complications.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M et al (1998) Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339:1415–1425PubMedCrossRef Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M et al (1998) Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339:1415–1425PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (1995) Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273:1421–1428CrossRef Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study (1995) Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 273:1421–1428CrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Gagne PJ, Riles TS, Jacobowitz GR, Lamparello PJ et al (1993) Long term follow up of patients undergoing reoperation for recurrent carotid artery disease. J Vasc Surg 18:991–1001PubMedCrossRef Gagne PJ, Riles TS, Jacobowitz GR, Lamparello PJ et al (1993) Long term follow up of patients undergoing reoperation for recurrent carotid artery disease. J Vasc Surg 18:991–1001PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Carballo RE, Towne JB, Seabrook GR, Freischlag JA, Cambria RA (1996) An outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy: the incidence and natural history of recurrent stenosis. J Vasc Surg 23:749–754PubMedCrossRef Carballo RE, Towne JB, Seabrook GR, Freischlag JA, Cambria RA (1996) An outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy: the incidence and natural history of recurrent stenosis. J Vasc Surg 23:749–754PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Avramovic JR, Fletcher JP (1992) The incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis after carotid endarterectomy and its relationship to neurological events. J Cardiovasc Surg 33:54–58 Avramovic JR, Fletcher JP (1992) The incidence of recurrent carotid stenosis after carotid endarterectomy and its relationship to neurological events. J Cardiovasc Surg 33:54–58
6.
Zurück zum Zitat AbuRahma AF, Jennings TG, Wulu JT, Tarakji L, Robinson PA (2001) Redo carotid endarterectomy versus primary carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 32:2787–2792PubMed AbuRahma AF, Jennings TG, Wulu JT, Tarakji L, Robinson PA (2001) Redo carotid endarterectomy versus primary carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 32:2787–2792PubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Cho JS, Pandurangi K, Conrad MF et al (2004) Safety and durability of redo carotid operation: an 11-year experience. J Vasc Surg 39:155–161PubMedCrossRef Cho JS, Pandurangi K, Conrad MF et al (2004) Safety and durability of redo carotid operation: an 11-year experience. J Vasc Surg 39:155–161PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al (2004) Protected carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501PubMedCrossRef Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al (2004) Protected carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501PubMedCrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Yadav JS, Roubin GS, King P, Iyer S, Vitek J (1996) Angioplasty and stenting for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: initial experience. Stroke 27:2075–2079PubMed Yadav JS, Roubin GS, King P, Iyer S, Vitek J (1996) Angioplasty and stenting for restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: initial experience. Stroke 27:2075–2079PubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lanzino G, Mericle RA, Lopes DK, Wakhloo AK, Guterman LR, Hopkin LN (1999) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for recurrent carotid artery stenosis. J Neurosurg 90:688–694PubMedCrossRef Lanzino G, Mericle RA, Lopes DK, Wakhloo AK, Guterman LR, Hopkin LN (1999) Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stent placement for recurrent carotid artery stenosis. J Neurosurg 90:688–694PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Vitek JJ, Roubin GS, New G, Al-Mubarek N, Iyer SS (2001) Carotid angioplasty with stenting in post-carotid endarterectomy restenosis. J Invasive Cardiol 13:123–125PubMed Vitek JJ, Roubin GS, New G, Al-Mubarek N, Iyer SS (2001) Carotid angioplasty with stenting in post-carotid endarterectomy restenosis. J Invasive Cardiol 13:123–125PubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat New G, Roubin GS, Iyer SS et al (2000) Safety, efficacy, and durability of carotid artery stenting for restenosis following carotid endarterectomy: a multicenter study. J Endovasc Ther 7:345–352PubMedCrossRef New G, Roubin GS, Iyer SS et al (2000) Safety, efficacy, and durability of carotid artery stenting for restenosis following carotid endarterectomy: a multicenter study. J Endovasc Ther 7:345–352PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat EVA-3S Investigators (2006) Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 355:1660–1671CrossRef EVA-3S Investigators (2006) Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 355:1660–1671CrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat SPACE Collaborative Group (2006) 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368:1239–1247CrossRef SPACE Collaborative Group (2006) 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368:1239–1247CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Stoney RJ, String ST (1976) Recurrent carotid stenosis. Surgery 80:705–710PubMed Stoney RJ, String ST (1976) Recurrent carotid stenosis. Surgery 80:705–710PubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Callow AD (1982) Recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg 117:1082–1085PubMed Callow AD (1982) Recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg 117:1082–1085PubMed
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Meyer FB, Piepgras DG, Sundt TM Jr, Fode NC, Marsh WR (1994) Recurrent carotid stenosis. In: Meyer FB (ed) Sundt’s occlusive cerebrovascular disease. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 310–321 Meyer FB, Piepgras DG, Sundt TM Jr, Fode NC, Marsh WR (1994) Recurrent carotid stenosis. In: Meyer FB (ed) Sundt’s occlusive cerebrovascular disease. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 310–321
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Kadkhodayan Y, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT, Moran CJ (2005) Procedure complications of carotid angioplasty and stent placement without cerebral protection devices. Neurosurg Focus 18:1–7CrossRef Kadkhodayan Y, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT, Moran CJ (2005) Procedure complications of carotid angioplasty and stent placement without cerebral protection devices. Neurosurg Focus 18:1–7CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat ARCHeR Trial Collaborators (2006) Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg 44:258–269CrossRef ARCHeR Trial Collaborators (2006) Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg 44:258–269CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Hobson RW II, Goldstein JE, Jamil Z et al (1999) Carotid restenosis: operative and endovascular management. J Vasc Surg 29:228–238PubMedCrossRef Hobson RW II, Goldstein JE, Jamil Z et al (1999) Carotid restenosis: operative and endovascular management. J Vasc Surg 29:228–238PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat AbuRahma AF, Bates MC, Stone PA, Wulu JT (2001) Comparative study of operative treatment and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting for recurrent carotid disease. J Vasc Surg 34:831–838PubMedCrossRef AbuRahma AF, Bates MC, Stone PA, Wulu JT (2001) Comparative study of operative treatment and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stenting for recurrent carotid disease. J Vasc Surg 34:831–838PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Bowser AN, Bandyk DF, Evans A et al (2003) Outcome of carotid stent-assisted angioplasty versus open surgical repair of recurrent carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 38:432–438PubMedCrossRef Bowser AN, Bandyk DF, Evans A et al (2003) Outcome of carotid stent-assisted angioplasty versus open surgical repair of recurrent carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 38:432–438PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Rockman CB, Bajakian D, Jacobowitz GR et al (2004) Impact of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting on management of recurrent carotid artery stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg 18:151–157PubMedCrossRef Rockman CB, Bajakian D, Jacobowitz GR et al (2004) Impact of carotid artery angioplasty and stenting on management of recurrent carotid artery stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg 18:151–157PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Carotid angioplasty and stent placement for restenosis after endarterectomy
verfasst von
Yasha Kadkhodayan
Christopher J. Moran
Colin P. Derdeyn
DeWitte T. Cross III
Publikationsdatum
01.04.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Neuroradiology / Ausgabe 4/2007
Print ISSN: 0028-3940
Elektronische ISSN: 1432-1920
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-006-0206-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4/2007

Neuroradiology 4/2007 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Neurologie

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Frühe Alzheimertherapie lohnt sich

25.04.2024 AAN-Jahrestagung 2024 Nachrichten

Ist die Tau-Last noch gering, scheint der Vorteil von Lecanemab besonders groß zu sein. Und beginnen Erkrankte verzögert mit der Behandlung, erreichen sie nicht mehr die kognitive Leistung wie bei einem früheren Start. Darauf deuten neue Analysen der Phase-3-Studie Clarity AD.

Viel Bewegung in der Parkinsonforschung

25.04.2024 Parkinson-Krankheit Nachrichten

Neue arznei- und zellbasierte Ansätze, Frühdiagnose mit Bewegungssensoren, Rückenmarkstimulation gegen Gehblockaden – in der Parkinsonforschung tut sich einiges. Auf dem Deutschen Parkinsonkongress ging es auch viel um technische Innovationen.

Update Neurologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.