Background
Cardio-metabolic diseases (CMDs) broadly comprise of diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases (CVD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their common interconnected risk factors such as obesity, insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, dyslipidaemia, and hypertension. They are a growing public health problem worldwide [
1] accompanying socioeconomic and nutrition transitions [
2‐
4]. Coronary heart disease (CHD), cerebrovascular disease, and diabetes together account for 30% of global mortality and 80% of these deaths occur in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs) [
2,
5‐
7]. In 2010, globally, 4,000,000 deaths were due to diabetes, the highest in absolute numbers was (1,008,000) in India [
8]. The largest fraction of deaths from CHD (37%) and stroke (30%) attributable to high blood glucose were in South-Asia [
9]. Further, in people of South-Asian origin, onset of diabetes [
10‐
12], other cardio-metabolic risk factors [
13,
14], and late-stage disease events [
15,
16] occur at lower body mass indices and younger ages than other ethnic groups [
16‐
23].
Key recommendations of the 2011 United Nations high-level meeting on non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and the US Institute of Medicine are initiation and strengthening of surveillance for NCDs [
24] and the creation of integrated, comprehensive, sustainable, on-going nationwide surveillance systems [
25]. In South-Asia, current efforts are limited to local surveys with vast state-wise heterogeneity and variable data quality [
26‐
28]. Furthermore, projections of national income losses related to CMDs are based on models using inputs from limited local studies [
29]; data on individual and household costs and social burdens are also scarce [
30]. Current efforts by the Governments of India and Pakistan in setting up nationwide surveillance of NCDs are limited to self-reported surveys [
31,
32]. A robust surveillance system would need to be representative of the population of interest, utilise standardised methods that are not solely reliant on self-reporting, be amenable to scaling up, would be sustainably financed by the country/region itself, and also become a platform for further research opportunities and policy guidance (much like the role of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] in the United States) [
33,
34].
We present the design and methods of a model surveillance system for CMDs, the CARRS (
Centre for c
Ardiometabolic
Risk
Reduction in
South-Asia)-Surveillance Study, which could be adopted for continuing assessments of burdens in South-Asian countries. The CARRS-Surveillance study builds on the WHO STEPS (World Health Organisation stepwise Approach to Surveillance) model [
35] to capture prevalence of risk factors, CMDs, and their socioeconomic impact in serial representative surveys to understand trends, but goes a step further to convert the cross-sectional survey into a large, urban, sub-continent wide prospective cohort at lower-costs, to understand the incidence of risk factors, diseases, complications, and mortality. Thus, apart from estimating burdens, it can be used to develop South-Asian assessment and clinical management systems to tailor care and preventive approaches.
Methods
Study design
This is a hybrid cohort-modelled cross-sectional multi-centre surveillance study to be conducted over a period of four years. Two cross-sectional surveys conducted three years apart on standalone representative samples of each of the three city-wide populations, using objective measures will permit estimation of the prevalence and trends of CMDs and their risk factors. Those enrolled in the first cross-sectional survey will be followed as a cohort in a three-year study to estimate (i) the incidence of new risk factors (such as obesity, hypertension, diabetes,); (ii) incidence of later-stage target organ diseases such as peripheral vascular disease, stroke, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, chronic stable angina, CKD, retinopathy, neuropathy, and amputation; (iii) assessment of health service utilisation and costs including hospitalisation and outpatient use and (iv) morbidity and mortality associated with CMDs.
The first cross-sectional survey has been completed with ongoing first year of cohort-follow-up. The survey was comprehensive, undertaking assessments of quality of Life (QoL), and socioeconomic burdens on individuals and families with regards to these diseases. Participants underwent anthropometric measurements, blood pressure (BP) assessment, and provided biochemical specimens. The cohort follow-up was limited to patient reports with recording of BP and anthropometry. CMDs and their complications were diagnosed using standard definitions and coded using the International Classification of Diseases 10 (ICD-10) codes.
The study sites are metropolitan urban settings with large, growing (due to continued births and migration from various parts of the country), and heterogeneous populations. Estimates suggest that population size in Chennai (4.68 million) [
36], Karachi (13 million) [
37], and Delhi (16.3 million) [
36], and the diversity in their composition make these cities current and future archetypes of rapid socio-economic, demographic, epidemiologic, and nutrition/lifestyle transitions in the South-Asian region.
Sample size estimation
Utilising risk factor prevalence estimates from previously published Indian and Pakistani studies and anticipating a response rate of 80% with a design effect factor of 1.5 (to account for cluster sampling), the sample size estimates were generated for males and females in three age strata in each urban setting. As shown in table
1, the highest required sample size (3983 rounded-off to 4000 participants) permits each site to reliably estimate one or more of the CMD risk factors for each of the gender and age strata leading to a total sample size of 12,000.
Table 1
Sample size estimation (per site)
Tobacco use | 1.96 | 0.05 | 0.23 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 6 | 3062 |
Hypertension | 1.96 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 6 |
3983
|
Diabetes | 1.96 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 6 | 2204 |
Overweight (BMI ≥ 23) | 1.96 | 0.05 | 0.65 | 1.5 | 0.8 | 6 | 3933 |
With regards to the cohort follow-up, separate consent has been taken from participants to be followed up for three years or longer. An overall 15 - 25% loss-to-follow-up by the 3-year data collection time-period is anticipated due to the high probability of migration among the young population for job opportunities, marriage (in case of females), etc. Retention efforts (in the form of maintaining updated contact information; collecting contact details of friends and relatives; periodic reminder calls; courtesy calls/visits) have been put in place to keep track of participants and minimise loss-to-follow-up. Although the study at present is not powered to estimate incidence of CMDs and their risk factors, it has the potential to determine such incidence rates if the follow-up period is increased and the study is scaled up by adding follow up of subsequent cross-sectional samples.
Sampling method
Households were selected in each of the three cities using a multi-stage cluster random sampling technique. Each city has its own distinctive municipal sub-divisions, encompassing municipal corporations, wards and Census Enumeration Blocks (CEB), which were used sequentially as sampling frames to randomly select households. While wards were the primary sampling units (PSUs) for Chennai and Delhi, CEBs or clusters were the PSUs for Karachi. STATA version 10.1 (Statacorp, TX) [
38] and data from the most recent census were used to randomly select the wards, CEBs, and households (defined below.). To give each household an equal chance of being selected for the study and to identify households constructed after the last census survey, manual listing and mapping of all households in each CEB was done before randomly selecting them.
Two participants, one male and one female, aged 20 years or older, were selected from each household based on inclusion and exclusion criteria given below. Two methods were used for within household sampling – (i) for households with one to two adults (≥20 years), the sampling strategy described in the 2002 Health Information National Trends Study (HINTS) in the USA was used [
39]. According to HINTS, one or both individuals (one male and one female) were selected and enrolled into the study based on eligibility criteria and informed consent; (ii) for households with more than two eligible adults, the “Kish method” used in the WHO’s STEPS surveys [
35] was applied. Recruitment of participants, and data and specimen collection were conducted through three visits to each participant’s place of residence, respectively (Visit-0, Visit-1, and Visit-2).
Inclusion and exclusion criteria for CARRS – Surveillance Study
Inclusion criteria
Any individual aged ≥20 years and permanently residing in the selected household.
For the purpose of this study, a permanent resident was defined as a person living in the selected household, was related to the household head and ate at least 3 meals in a week with the family.
Households were defined as “a group of people who live together, usually pool their income and eat at least one meal together a day when they are at home. This does not include people who have migrated permanently or are considered visitors” [(Integrated Disease Surveillance Project (IDSP)][
31]
.
Exclusion criteria
Pregnant women were not included in the study since their biochemical parameters would vary from the normal physiology due to pregnancy, further their patterns of diet and physical activity would also be different from usual.
Bed-ridden individuals were excluded because of the difficulty in taking anthropometric measurements in these individuals. However, reasons for being confined to bed were collected from such individuals to estimate prevalence of CMDs among this excluded group (since CMDs can be the cause for being bed-ridden).
Surveillance indicators and study instruments
To provide consistency and reproducibility of the results across multiple sites, comprehensive and uniform data collection instruments were used to capture measurements (table
2). Household data were collected through interviewer administered paper questionnaires in English or the preferred local languages (Hindi, Tamil, and Urdu). Validated questions were derived from English questionnaires used in the WHO Multinational MONItoring of trends and determinants in CArdiovascular disease (MONICA) study [
40], WHO STEPS studies [
35], and from previous regional and national surveys. Using these, culturally-appropriate and methodologically-relevant closed-questions, an instrument for South-Asia was developed and pilot tested for face and construct validity prior to use in the study. Several sections of the baseline questionnaire (such as the QoL, CMD history, tobacco and alcohol consumption questions) were based on validated questionnaires that already exist in regional languages (Tamil, Hindi and Urdu). Questionnaires to elicit medical and treatment history, costs and QoL are being used to collect incident events during the ongoing cohort follow-up. Further, verbal autopsy is being performed using a reliable instrument to ascertain cause of death of participants who die during the course of follow-up and for whom either death certificate was unavailable or cause of death not certified. For the adapted instruments collecting a variety of CMD risks and diseases (e.g. tobacco, history of CMD, heart failure, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), the subjective history provided by participants was validated against laboratory and other diagnostic gold standards (e.g., salivary cotinine for tobacco consumption). These in-built steps to validate the self-reported data distinguishes the CARRS-Surveillance as a stronger model compared to the IDSP [
31] and the INDEPTH network (International Network of field sites for continuous Demographic Evaluation of Populations and Their Health in developing countries (
http://www.indepth-network.org) [
41].
Table 2
Summary of the surveillance indicators, measures, methods and instruments
Demographic and Social Characteristics* | Age / Sex / Marital Status / Religion | Questionnaires | Chennai Urban Population Study (CUPS), Chennai Urban Rural Epidemiological Study (CURES), Establishment of Sentinel Surveillance System for CVD in Indian Industrial Populations (Sentinel Surveillance Study) |
Education / Income / Occupation |
Household assets | Standard of Living Index (SLI) |
Contact Details (and supplemental contacts) | |
Behavioral risk factors* | Tobacco use | Questionnaire / Cotinine in saliva (5 % of participants) | CUPS, CURES, Sentinel Surveillance Study |
Alcohol use | Questionnaire |
Dietary habits | Questionnaire/ validation by 24-hour dietary recall in a sub-sample | INTERHEART Study |
Physical activity | Questionnaire | International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)– short |
Sleep | Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) |
Physiological and biochemical risk factors** | Hypertension | Blood pressure measurement | Standardized method (American Heart Association) and validated instrument (certified by British Hypertensive Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation) |
Dyslipidemia | Laboratory estimation of serum total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol, very low density lipoprotein cholesterol, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, Apolipoprotein A and B (not done in Karachi) | Standardized across all three study sites |
Obesity | Anthropometry (height / weight / body circumferences / skinfold thickness / body composition/bio-impedance) | Standard procedures based on National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey-III with instruments used in epidemiological studies on South Asian population |
Diabetes | Laboratory estimation of fasting plasma glucose, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) | Standardized across all three study sites |
Female Reproductive history* | Menarche/ gestational history (pregnancy induced hypertension, gestational diabetes), menopause (surgical / physiological / whether on hormone replacement therapy) / contraception | Questionnaire | CUPS, CURES, India Health Study (IHS) |
Quality of Life* | Mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression (related to cardiometabolic diseases; CMDs and their risk factors) | Questionnaire | European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) |
Morbidity** | Stroke / Myocardial infarction / Congestive heart failure / Chronic stable angina | Questionnaires including medication history; | Rose Angina, CURES, IHS, Sentinel Surveillance, Community Heart Failure questionnaire |
Medical records of documented events or procedures, serum urea and creatinine and albumin for CKD |
Chronic kidney disease (CKD)/ Dialysis / Renal transplantation |
Amputation/diabetes retinopathy |
Procedures, Revascularization, Hospitalization | Initiative for Cardiovascular Health Research in the developing countries (IC-Health) macroeconomic study |
Treatment history, health services, quality of care and health care costs** | Awareness and risk factor control | Questionnaire | IC-Health macroeconomic study |
Access to health care services |
Utilization of services |
Health insurance / coverage |
Costs of treating CMDs and their risk factors |
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Asthma* | Prevalence of COPD & asthma in the population | Questionnaire | NHANES III and the present standards of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) |
Family history* | Prevalence of CMDs and their risk factors in members of the family related to the participants | Questionnaire | Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial |
Mortality*** | All cause | Follow-up surveys; Death Certificates; Verbal Autopsy | Modified version of Registrar General of India – Center for Global Health Research (RGI-CGHR) Prospective Study on Million Deaths (Form 10C) |
| Cardiovascular disease specific; Diabetes-specific | | |
Biological sample collection and storage
Biological sample collection involved drawing 15 ml of blood (in fasting state) from each participant, collecting urine (early morning void), and 1000 to 2000 μl of saliva (fasting) in Salivettes. While blood and urine were collected from all participants, saliva was collected from 5% of the study participants (i.e. 200 participants per site). The samples were transported from field sites in cold chain to the laboratories for analysis. Sample aliquots were also stored in cryo-vials at - 80 degrees Celsius for future studies. The methods of analysis and external quality control have been standardised for all biological samples across the study sites (table
3). There is one exception in that Apolipoprotein A and B analyses were not conducted in Karachi due to lack of required laboratory facilities for the test.
Table 3
Biological samples and their methods of analysis
Diabetes | Fasting plasma glucose | Hexokinase/Kinetic | Hexokinase/Kinetic | Glucose Oxidase / End Point |
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) | High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) | HPLC | HPLC |
Dyslipidemia | Total cholesterol | Cholesterol Oxidase Peroxidase (CHOD-POD) end point | CHOD-POD end point | Enzymatic Colorimetric method (CHOD-PAP) |
High density lipoprotein cholesterol | Direct | Direct | Direct |
Low density lipoprotein cholesterol | Friedwald Formula | Friedwald Formula | Friedwald Formula |
Very low density lipoprotein cholesterol | Calculation | Calculation | Calculation |
Triglycerides | Enzymatic methods (GPO-PAP end point) | Enzymatic methods (GPO-PAP end point) | Enzymatic methods (GPO-PAP end point) |
Apolipoprotein A, Apolipoprotein B | Immuno-turbidimetric | Immuno-turbidimetric | Will not be done |
Kidney disease | Serum urea | Urease Glutamate Dehydrogenase (GLDH) / Kinetic | Urease GLDH/ Kinetic | Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN): Enzymatic conductivity rate method |
Serum creatinine | Jaffe Kinetic | Jaffe Kinetic | Modified Jaffe’s Method |
Microalbuminuria | Immuno-turbidimetry | Immuno-turbidimetry | Rate nephelometry |
Tobacco exposure | Salivary cotinine | Elisa kit | Elisa kit | Elisa kit |
Clinical and anthropometric assessments
Two clinical (BP and pulse rate) and eight anthropometric measurements of participants were taken during the visits: Clinical measurements - BP and Pulse rate. Anthropometric measurements - Mid-arm circumference, Waist circumference, Hip circumference, Triceps skin-fold, Sub-scapular skin-fold, Supra-patellar skin-fold, Height (Standing) and Body composition analysis by Bio-impedance.
The equipment and methods used for BP and anthropometric measurements were standardised and certified, and have been used in other epidemiological studies in the South-Asian population. BP was measured using electronic sphygmomanometer; Omron HEM-7080 and HEM-7080IT-E; Omron Corporation, Tokyo, Japan (certified by the British Hypertensive Society and the American association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation [AAMI] protocols). Skinfold Calipers (Holtain Ltd., UK) and non-stretch measuring tape (Gulick II, Country Technology, Gays Mills, WI) were used to measure skin-fold thickness and body circumferences, respectively. Height was measured using a portable Stadiometer (SECA Model 213, SecaGmbh Co, Hamburg, Germany). Apart from these, body-composition analysers (instrument which measures body fat by sending out weak electric currents to measure impedance/electrical resistance by different tissues of the body); Tanita BC-418 in Delhi and Chennai, and BC-545 in Karachi were used to measure compartmental body fat distribution. To ensure standardisation, both instruments were tested in 50 male and 50 female participants to compare the parameters measured; i.e. weight, body mass index, basal metabolic rate, body fat and visceral fat. The results showed that all measured parameters were highly co-related for both males and females (r > 0.95, p < 0.05) between the two instruments, except body fat in males (r = 0.67, p = 0.67). Methods for BP measurement and anthropometric measures were based on the recommendation of the American Heart Association’s Council on High Blood Pressure Research [
42] and the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES-III) [
43].
Data management
An online system was developed in an ‘open source’ platform PHP (Hypertext PreProcessor, scripting language for the web page/front end) and MySQL (My Structured Query Language) for data entry and database management at each site. This online database has been programmed to have automated in-built checks for logic which are ‘clinically reasonable’ (such as ranges, absolute and relative values, context and structure). It provides an efficient means of data entry, storage, and quality control. Data are available at the coordinating site for immediate feedback and timely corrections. The data have been stored in pass-word protected files and questionnaires in locked cabinets in all study sites, and only the study personnel have access to these. All information related to participant identification was de-linked from the data files before analysis to maintain anonymity.
Quality control strategies
Quality control (QC) strategies were applied using a framework which comprehensively considers each phase of the study and applies inter-related themes to every level of the study and are described in table
4. Apart from standardisation of laboratory methods (table
3), QC involved laboratory procedure assessment at two levels.
Level-1, internal quality control: Local laboratories attached with the study centre followed their own internal quality control standard operating procedures (SOPs) to ensure accuracy, precision, and reproducibility.
Level-2; external quality control: Irrespective of the nature of existing laboratory accreditation and / or SOP’s, all study site laboratories were enrolled into an external quality assessment program for clinical chemistry, HbA1c (glycated haemoglobin), lipid and human urine. This was implemented with support from the Randox International Quality Assurance Scheme (RIQAS), UK. The frequency of external quality control sample was two per month for clinical chemistry, lipid and urine, and one per month for HbA1c.
Table 4
Quality assurance strategies
| ● Critical review of protocols | ● Fluidity and feasibility of field operations assessed | ● Monitoring field activities | ● Audit and evaluate validity of findings prior to publication |
Coordinating center
| | | | |
| ● Common manual of operations for three study sites | | | |
| | | | ● Internal peer reviews prior to publication |
| ● Coordination of timelines & activities | | | |
Investigators
| ● Reviewed the design and planning of the study | ● Results were audited after completion of the pilot | ● Monitoring | ● Validity checks |
| | | | ● Results reviewed |
| ● Regular steering committee meetings | | | |
Field Personnel
| ● Extensive training over a period of 7–10 days – theory and practical, field visits and shadowing by the study managers | ● Evaluated all field and documenting techniques | ● Random checks, re-training | |
| ● Easy-to-carry operations guide provided | | | |
Survey Questionnaires
| ● Peer-reviewed | ● Established clarity and face validity in small field sample | ● Regular checks done to assess completeness | ● Compromised or inadequately completed questionnaires identify and discard |
| ● Translated into local languages | | | |
| ● Internal consistency estimates and reliability exercises through review of literature on survey instruments and their published data | | | |
Measuring Equipment
| ● Centrally procured | ● Evaluated calibration techniques, acceptability of use in field | ● Regular calibration of equipment; faulty equipment replaced as and when required | |
| ● Central training | | | |
| ● Calibration guidelines and checks developed | | | |
Specimens
| ● Kits and equipment procured centrally | ● Evaluated adherence to protocols, labeling, processing, storage and handling ● Interim analysis conducted to detect outliers | ● Random checks done | ● Samples stored for future investigation |
| | | ● External temperature gauge labels to monitor sample temperature | |
| | | | ● Compromised samples identify and discard |
| ● Specific protocols for each biochemical assay was developed | | | |
| ● Extensive training (labeling, handling, storage) | | | |
Laboratory
| ● Laboratory selected and reference laboratory identified based on National Accreditation Board for Testing and Calibration Laboratories, Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (NABL) or College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL, USA(CAP) certification | ● Evaluated procedural fluidity | ● Internal quality checks and calibration | Assessment of intra- and inter-laboratory coefficients of variation |
| | | ●Regular external validation – lyophilized samples from reference laboratory | |
| | ● Evaluated intra- and inter-laboratory variability | | |
| | ● Analysis conducted to detect outliers | | |
| ● Internal and external quality assessment protocols and schedule of regularity developed | | | |
Communication
| ● Reporting structures were established | ● Agility of transfers assessed | | |
| ● Data transfer planned | | | |
Documentation
| ● Checklists and logbooks were maintained | ● Recording legibility assessed | | ● Audit logbooks for response rates and field activity indicators maintained |
| Training in appropriate and legible documentation | | | |
Data Storage & Confidentiality
| ● Data back-up and protection policies have been established | ● Accessibility, simplicity and flexibility of software assessed | ● Locked and password-protected data storage | ● Datasets de-identified |
| | | | ● Access to personal identifiers limited |
| | | ● Active back-up | |
| ● Training of all staff | | | |
Data Entry
| ● Protocols, consistent data cleaning methods and verification systems were established | ● Variability assessments conducted | ● Interim analyses to identify duplicate entries | ● Reporting on outliers |
| | | | ● Validity checks |
| | | ● Decision log to document issues | |
| | | | ● Database errors tracked |
COE-CARRS Surveillance Investigators’ Group
Steering Committee: Dorairaj Prabhakaran, K. M. Venkat Narayan, K Srinath Reddy, Nikhil Tandon, V. Mohan, Muhammed M. Kadir, Mohammed K. Ali, Vamadevan S Ajay
Operations: Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikhil Tandon, K. M. Venkat Narayan, Mohammed K Ali, Muhammed M. Kadir, S. Roopa, Hassan M. Khan, R. Pradeepa, M. Deepa, Vamadevan S Ajay, Dimple Kondal, Ruby Gupta, Pragya Sharma
Coordinating Centre (Delhi): Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikhil Tandon, S. Roopa, Vamadevan S Ajay, Manisha Nair, Nivedita Devasenapathy, Divya Pillai
Development of questionnaires and manual of operations: Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Nikhil Tandon, K. M. Venkat Nararayan, Mohammed K. Ali, Manisha Nair, Nivedita Devasenapathy, R. Pradeepa , Ed Gregg, Anwar Merchant, Romaina Iqbal
Data management and statistical team: Dimple Kondal, Shivam Pandey, Praggya, Naveen
Laboratory: Lakshmy Ramakrishnan, Ruby Gupta, Savita
Information Technology: Ramanathan K, Ansel J D’Cruz, Gnanashekaran K.
Online data entry software: Mahesh Dorairaj
Data collection team
Chennai:
Field supervisor: Rahul T
Field interviewers: Alagarsamy, Anthony JV, Arul Dass.A, Arul Pitchai.S, Ashok Kumar, Balaji V, Dhanasekar L, KalaiVani D, Kumar M, Nandhakumar, Prathiban K, Sampath, Saravana Kumar P, SaravananR, Senthil RajaR, ShenbagaValliE, SivamanikandanK, SureshT, Uma Sankari G
Laboratory assistants: Geetha Priya L, Gowri, Irin Jayakumari A, Padmapriya, Ramakrishnan R, Revathy, Satish Raj S, Sudha M, Suresh, Vijay Baskar S
Data entry operators: Narayanan, Nirmala
Delhi:
Field supervisor: Liladhar Dorlikar
Field interviewers: Parag Jyoti Das, Kulwant Kaur, Sweta Kumari, Meena Thakur, Garima Rautela, Avijeet Malik, Anita Yadav, Makhan, Rishi Garg, Arun
Laboratory assistants: Priyanka Nautiyal, Sunil Dogra, Geetha
Data entry operators: Naveen Kaushik, Avnish
Karachi:
Field supervisor: Mehboob John Samuel
Field interviewers & laboratory assistants: Yousuf Sadiq, Shukrat Khan, Shahirah Ziarat Khan, Nadia Khan, Noureen Khan, Naseem Sehar, Asif Shabaz, Fakhrah Perveen, Karan Inayat, Tajir Hussain, Tariq Hussain, Nasreen Khan
Data entry operator: Sayed Arif Hussain Kazmi
Acknowledgements
This study is coordinated by CoE-CARRS (Center of Excellence - Center for CArdio-metabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia ) based at Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), New Delhi, India in collaboration with Centre for Chronic Disease Control (CCDC), New Delhi, Emory University, Atlanta, U.S.A, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation (MDRF), Chennai, India and Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan. We hereby, acknowledge the contributions of the field and research staff of the “CARRS Surveillance Investigators’ Group” (a list of all members is included above).
This project is funded in whole or in part by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract No. HHSN268200900026C, and the United Health Group, Minneapolis, Mn, USA.
Several members of the research team at PHFI, Emory University, and CCDC were/are supported by the Fogarty International Clinical Research Scholars – Fellows programme (FICRS-F) through Grant Number 5R24TW007988 from NIH, Fogarty International Center (FIC) through Vanderbilt University, Emory’s Global Health Institute, and D43 NCDs in India Training Program through Award Number D43HD05249 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD) and FIC. However, the contents of this paper are solely the responsibility of the writing group and do not necessarily represent the official views of FIC, Vanderbilt University, Emory University, PHFI, NICHD, or the NIH.
Competing interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests financial or non-financial with regards to this study. The interpretation of data and presentation of information is not influenced by any personal or financial relationship with any individual or organization.
Authors’ contributions
All authors listed in the paper have contributed sufficiently to fulfil the criteria for authorship. Apart from this there is no other individual who has contributed sufficiently and who fulfil the criteria for authorship but has not been included as an author for this paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.