Background
The ion and fluid homeostasis in the mammalian brain is tightly controlled to preserve the intracranial pressure (ICP) within a normal range. Cerebral edema, as occurring in pathologies such as traumatic brain injury and stroke, can cause the ICP to rise to life-threateningly high levels [
1]. In severe cases, a decompressive craniectomy can be initiated to lower the ICP [
2]. Alternatively, osmotherapy can be used to osmotically extract cerebral fluid into the blood circulation by intravenous (i.v.) infusion of mannitol or NaCl [
3], although it remains disputed which of these osmotic agents is most efficient for brain water extraction. The initial target when applying osmotherapy is a plasma osmolarity up to 320 mOsm but depending on the clinical circumstances, this recommended value may be exceeded [
1]. Osmotherapy induces an immediate loss of brain fluid, which can, however, be reduced or even reversed due to yet incompletely understood mechanisms; a phenomenon referred to as the rebound effect [
4,
5]. The rebound effect has been suggested to arise from a compensatory accumulation of cerebral osmolytes, generating an osmotic gradient favoring fluid movement back into the brain particularly upon dilution of the plasma osmolarity by renal excretion and/or withdrawal of the osmotic agent [
4,
5]. It remains uncertain to what extent brain ion accumulation participates in the rebound response, and if so, which molecular transporting mechanisms contribute to this volume regulatory response. The secretion of ions may take place at one or both of the two major interfaces between the brain and blood: the capillary endothelium forming the blood–brain barrier (BBB) and/or the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-secreting choroid plexus epithelium, which forms the blood–CSF barrier (BCSFB) [
6,
7]. The capillary endothelium and the choroid plexus epithelium express several ion-transporting mechanisms, i.e. the Na
+–K
+–2Cl
− co-transporter 1 (NKCC1), the Na
+–H
+ anti-porter 1 (NHE1), Na
+-coupled bicarbonate transporters (NBCs), and the amiloride-sensitive Na
+ channel (ENaC) [
8‐
10]. These transport mechanisms may be potential candidates for brain ion and water regulation, and could, as such, participate in electrolyte translocation from blood to brain during the elevated blood osmolarity resulting from osmotherapy treatment. Inhibition of a subset of these ion transporters has been associated with improved outcome in an experimental animal model of stroke [
11,
12], which may indicate involvement of such transport mechanisms in brain ion and water dynamics. Here, we employed in vivo investigations of healthy non-edematous rats to obtain the brain volume regulatory response to increased plasma osmolarity in the absence of pathological events, such as stroke/haemorrhage, and investigate a putative role of a range of transport mechanisms in the brain volume regulatory gain of ions.
Discussion
We have demonstrated in rats that following osmotherapy (~ 50 mOsm increase in plasma osmolarity), water is osmotically extracted from the brain, although to a lesser extent than can be predicted from theoretical calculations. The reduced osmotic extraction was assigned predominantly to brain Na
+ and Cl
− accumulation (6–15% for Na
+ and 22–38% for Cl
−) and to a minor extent, if any, brain K
+ accumulation (up to 3% increase) as a function of increased plasma osmolarity, in agreement with an earlier report [
14]. Notably, it is not simply the ion
concentration that increases with the systemic hyperosmolarity but the actual ion
content. These findings indicate that specific volume regulatory transporting mechanisms are activated in response to and/or as a consequence of increased plasma osmolarity. Employment of NaCl as the osmotic agent contributed to an increased Na
+ and Cl
− concentration in the plasma, which, in itself, could affect the brain electrolyte content. However, we observed that mannitol-mediated osmotherapy of identical magnitude and delivered volume led to similar effects on the brain electrolyte/water content [
14], indicating that plasma hyperosmolarity, and not the increased plasma Na
+ and Cl
− concentrations, causes the brain electrolyte accumulation. Osmotic extraction of cerebral fluid was slightly more effective with NaCl as the osmotic agent, rather than mannitol, even though the cerebral accumulation of Na
+ was significantly higher in rats treated with NaCl. The reduced osmotic fluid extraction (and thus osmolyte increase) observed with mannitol as the osmotic agent may instead be explained by an unknown but substantial influx of other osmolytes, e.g. mannitol itself, which has previously been detected in the rat brain following mannitol-induced elevation in the plasma osmolarity [
14]. With the similar Cl
− accumulation obtained with both NaCl and mannitol as the osmotic agent, one may, however, from the principle of electroneutrality, expect accumulation of another cationic electrolyte (or reduced retention of a different anion). Taken together, our findings indicate that the osmotherapy-induced rebound response may be regulated differently depending on the osmotic agent applied, although overlapping mechanisms, such as the observed gain of brain Na
+ and Cl
−, clearly exist.
According to theoretical considerations based on reflection coefficients of both osmotic agents, i.e. the relative impermeability across the BBB, NaCl treatment has been predicted to induce a larger osmotic response than mannitol [
27], as confirmed by our findings. While previous findings demonstrated that NaCl was superior with regard to initial reduction of the ICP, maintenance of a lowered ICP [
28,
29], and an increased cerebral water loss [
29] in experimental animal models of brain injuries, other researchers observed an equal efficiency of NaCl or mannitol as the osmotic agent [
30,
31], or a higher efficiency with mannitol in healthy animals [
32]. Two of the latter observations may, however, be influenced by the unequal end plasma osmolarity induced by either osmotic agent [
30,
32], which essentially prevents a comparative analysis. A line of clinical trials, mainly performed on patients with traumatic brain injury, reported that osmotherapy using NaCl solutions with additives (e.g. dextran, lactate, or hydroxyethyl starch solutions) [
33‐
35] or NaCl alone [
36] more effectively lowered the ICP compared with mannitol. While these reports support the findings from our animal experiments, two other clinical trials found an equal efficacy of the two osmotic agents on the ICP [
37,
38]. However, a direct comparison between the few head-to-head studies carried out is challenged by the varying treatment strategies; (i) continuous or bolus injections, (ii) different doses/volumes of the osmotic agent, and (iii) different time windows, which altogether resulted in variable plasma osmolarities. In addition, diverse patient populations and outcome measurements [
39] further hamper the comparison between clinical trials. It is, therefore, still questionable which osmotic agent is superior [
1,
40] and animal/clinical studies, which allow direct comparison, are warranted. Mannitol remains the recommended standard osmotic agent for treatment of patients with severe head injury (Level II evidence), whereas hyperosmolar NaCl is recommended for children (Level III evidence) [
41]. The choice of osmotic agent may, however, rather be based on side-effect profiles of the osmotic agents and how those will affect the clinical situation (comorbidities, age) [
1].
Neither the signaling cascades, nor the molecular transport mechanisms, that couple systemic plasma hyperosmolarity to brain electrolyte accumulation have been identified. In the present study, we therefore introduced a mixture of inhibitors targeting ion-transporting proteins expressed in the BBB capillary endothelium and/or the choroid plexus epithelium, and determined their effect on osmotherapy-induced brain ion accumulation. While amiloride and methazolamide may target abluminal ion-transporting mechanisms [
21,
42], we expect insignificant bumetanide interaction at the abluminal membrane of the capillaries forming the BBB because of its poor BBB permeability [
43,
44]. We failed to detect evidence in favor of NKCC1, NHE1, ENaC or carbonic anhydrase (indirectly targeting the bicarbonate transporters) located at the BBB endothelium or in choroid plexus participating in this brain volume regulation. Hence, we were unable to reproduce a previously reported reduction of hyperosmotic plasma-induced brain water extraction by methazolamide [
14]. The reasons for this discrepancy are unclear, although the previous study employed a very high dose of methazolamide, which was delivered i.p. instead of i.v. as in the present study. We cannot rule out that the inhibitor concentrations applied in this study were not sufficient for effective blockage of the target proteins, even though a procedure with triple doses was incorporated to enhance inhibitor efficiency. The free unbound inhibitor concentration may, however, be significantly reduced by potential binding of inhibitors to plasma proteins, as shown for bumetanide [
45]. We recently found that hyperosmotic conditions enhanced the activity of abluminal Na
+/K
+-ATPase in endothelial cells, which were co-cultured with astrocytes in an in vitro BBB model [
46], indicating that this transport mechanism may counteract osmotic extraction from the brain by cerebral accumulation of Na
+ in response to a hyperosmotic challenge. With the damaging effect of pump inhibition, it is, however, not simple to verify this finding by currently available techniques in animal models in vivo: a direct effect of Na
+/K
+-ATPase inhibition is difficult to deduce, due to disruption of electrochemical gradients controlling secondary active and passive transporting mechanisms. The Na
+/K
+-ATPase expressed at the CSF-facing membrane of the choroid plexus could also be a potential candidate in brain volume regulation upon osmotherapy, since the Na
+/K
+-ATPase may contribute to CSF production [
47], in addition to the recently reported significant contribution of NKCC1 in murine CSF production [
48]. To this end, it is important to note that the wet-dry technique, employed to determine brain water content, favors parenchymal water content over CSF, as the major part of CSF is lost in the brain isolation process. If the ion-transporting mechanisms were to regulate the CSF production per se, and the equilibrium rate between CSF and brain interstitial fluid is slow, such regulatory functions could well be missed by this experimental design.
While the ion-transporting mechanisms (NKCC1, NHE1, NBCs, and ENaC) at the BBB capillary endothelium and choroid plexus epithelium were shown not to be involved in the osmotherapy-mediated translocation of Na
+ and Cl
− from the blood into the rat brain under our experimental conditions, Na
+ and Cl
− could instead enter the brain via paracellular transport routes, which may become available with hyperosmolar plasma. However, we demonstrated that the two major brain barriers, i.e. the BBB and BCSFB, appeared to remain intact upon osmotherapy, as we detected no changes in cerebral Na
+-fluorescein accumulation whether or not the animals had been exposed to osmotherapy. Notably, we cannot exclude that Na
+ and Cl
−, which are of a smaller molecular weight (22.99 Da and 35.45 Da) than Na
+-fluorescein (376.27 Da), can cross the brain barriers via a paracellular route
provided that the given hyperosmotic challenge promoted an increase in the permeability of the brain barriers towards smaller permeants, while excluding the fluorescent dye. However, a previous study showed that a change in barrier function, corresponding to BBB opening towards mannitol and Na
+, occurred only with hyperosmotic challenges rendering the plasma osmolarity > 385 mOsm [
49]. An alternative manner of accumulating brain electrolytes during conditions of elevated plasma osmolarity could be via increased bulk flow of CSF into the brain interstitial fluid [
50] or via a potential regulation of fluid drainage at arachnoid granulations [
51], dural lymphatic vessels [
52,
53], and/or at glymphatic paravascular drainage routes [
54]. Parenchymal cell volume regulation may, in addition, indirectly affect electrolyte movement across the brain barriers.
The present experimental protocol was designed to quantitatively resolve the
direct consequences of increased plasma osmolarity (mimicked osmotherapy) on brain water and ion accumulation (hence the choice of nephrectomized animals, in which the inflicted change in plasma osmolarity could be tightly controlled). In various severities of stroke-induced brain edema in animal models, one may well expect altered BBB integrity (in the afflicted area) and potentially even altered expression/activity of membrane transporters in the BBB capillary endothelium. Such stroke-induced membrane transport responses could potentially affect ion and water accumulation during osmotherapy, and may serve to explain the observed beneficial effect of bumetanide treatment in an animal stroke model [
11]. Future studies should therefore address whether the osmotherapy-mediated influx of cerebral Na
+ and Cl
− likewise contribute to the rebound response in animal models of stroke-induced cerebral edema.
Authors’ contributions
EKO, KL, ABS, KT, MFR, WL, and NM contributed substantially to the design/concept of experiments, experimental performance, data analysis, or interpretation. EKO, KL, ABS, KT, CK MFR, WL, and NM drafted or critically revised the manuscript, and approved the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.