nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

31.10.2019 | Original Article

Chairside measurement of the marginal and internal fit of crowns: a new intraoral scan–based approach

verfasst von: Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz, Jonas Adrian Helmut Vogler, Alexander Schmidt, Peter Rehmann, Bernd Wöstmann

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the marginal and internal fit of crowns, a new intraoral scanner–based digital approach for chairside measurement (D-IOS) was systematically analysed and compared with the conventional silicone replica technique (CV-SR) and digital 3D analysis software (D-GOM).

Materials and methods

Two models, representing different clinical situations, were constructed, and the first molar was prepared for a full-coverage crown. On the basis of an intraoral scan (Trios 3), copings of three different materials (non-precious alloy, zirconium dioxide, and resin composite) with two different cement spaces (80 μm, 50 μm) were manufactured. The fit of the copings was investigated by all three methods (CV-SR, D-IOS, D-GOM). Therefore, the cement space was visualized with low-viscosity silicone and digitalized with a second intraoral scan. Evaluation of fit by the D-IOS-method was measured in the intraoral scanner software, whereas for analysis by D-GOM, both intraoral scan datasets were transferred to 3D analysis software (GOM Inspect). The CV-SR-method was used as a control group. For all copings, the measurements were repeated five times. The data were analysed with ANOVA.

Results

No significant differences between the three evaluation methods and the coping materials were shown. However, in the occlusal area, the internal gap was significantly higher compared to the internal gap in the marginal and axial areas regardless of the cement space setting (p < .05). The target parameter of the cement spaces did not match the actual measured internal gaps.

Conclusions

All three evaluation methods and coping materials can be used for the measurement of fit within different clinical situations.

Clinical relevance

The digital chairside measurement implemented in the intraoral scanner software enables an easy, applicable evaluation of fit of crowns without additional laboratory devices or special software applications.

Pimenta MA, Frasca LC, Lopes R, Rivaldo E (2015) Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of ceramic and metallic crown copings using x-ray microtomography (micro-CT) technology. J Prosthet Dent 114:223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.02.002 CrossRefPubMed

Neves FD, Prado CJ, Prudente MS, Carneiro TA, Zancope K, Davi LR, Mendonca G, Cooper LF, Soares CJ (2014) Micro-computed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique. J Prosthet Dent 112:1134–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.028 CrossRefPubMed

Boitelle P, Mawussi B, Tapie L, Fromentin O (2014) A systematic review of CAD/CAM fit restoration evaluations. J Oral Rehabil 41:853–874. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12205 CrossRefPubMed

Nakamura T, Dei N, Kojima T, Wakabayashi K (2003) Marginal and internal fit of Cerec 3 CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns. Int J Prosthodont 16:244–248PubMed

Rezende CE, Borges AF, Gonzaga CC, Duan Y, Rubo JH, Griggs JA (2017) Effect of cement space on stress distribution in Y-TZP based crowns. Dent Mater 33:144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2016.11.006 CrossRefPubMed

Lee DH (2016) Digital approach to assessing the 3-dimensional misfit of fixed dental prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 116:836–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.05.012 CrossRefPubMed

Boitelle P, Tapie L, Mawussi B, Fromentin O (2018) Evaluation of the marginal fit of CAD-CAM zirconia copings: comparison of 2D and 3D measurement methods. J Prosthet Dent 119:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.026 CrossRefPubMed

Tsitrou EA, Northeast SE, van Noort R (2007) Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM. J Dent 35:68–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2006.04.008 CrossRefPubMed

Wostmann B, Blosser T, Gouentenoudis M, Balkenhol M, Ferger P (2005) Influence of margin design on the fit of high-precious alloy restorations in patients. J Dent 33:611–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.002 CrossRefPubMed

10.

Ji MK, Park JH, Park SW, Yun KD, Oh GJ, Lim HP (2015) Evaluation of marginal fit of 2 CAD-CAM anatomic contour zirconia crown systems and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crown. J Adv Prosthodont 7:271–277. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.271 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Bosniac P, Rehmann P, Wostmann B (2018) Comparison of an indirect impression scanning system and two direct intraoral scanning systems in vivo. Clin Oral Investig 23:2421–2427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2679-4 CrossRefPubMed

12.

Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P, Wostmann B (2015) Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig 19:2027–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1430-7 CrossRefPubMed

13.

Kuhn K, Ostertag S, Ostertag M, Walter MH, Luthardt RG, Rudolph H (2015) Comparison of an analog and digital quantitative and qualitative analysis for the fit of dental copings. Comput Biol Med 57:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2014.11.017 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P (2005) Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 113:174–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x CrossRefPubMed

15.

Mostafa NZ, Ruse ND, Ford NL, Carvalho RM, Wyatt CCL (2018) Marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated using conventional and digital methodology: a three-dimensional analysis. J Prosthodont 27:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12656 CrossRefPubMed

16.

Kim KB, Kim JH, Kim WC, Kim JH (2014) Three-dimensional evaluation of gaps associated with fixed dental prostheses fabricated with new technologies. J Prosthet Dent 112:1432–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.07.002 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Luthardt RG, Bornemann G, Lemelson S, Walter MH, Huls A (2004) An innovative method for evaluation of the 3-D internal fit of CAD/CAM crowns fabricated after direct optical versus indirect laser scan digitizing. Int J Prosthodont 17:680–685PubMed

18.

Mai HN, Lee KE, Lee KB, Jeong SM, Lee SJ, Lee CH, An SY, Lee DH (2017) Verification of a computer-aided replica technique for evaluating prosthesis adaptation using statistical agreement analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 9:358–363. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.5.358 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D (2018) Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach. Quintessence Int 49:9–15. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.qi.a39402 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Praca L, Pekam FC, Rego RO, Radermacher K, Wolfart S, Marotti J (2018) Accuracy of single crowns fabricated from ultrasound digital impressions. Dent Mater 34:e280–e288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.08.301 CrossRefPubMed

21.

Podhorsky A, Rehmann P, Wostmann B (2015) Tooth preparation for full-coverage restorations-a literature review. Clin Oral Investig 19:959–968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1439-y CrossRefPubMed

22.

Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD (1989) Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 62:405–408CrossRef

23.

Boitelle P, Tapie L, Mawussi B, Fromentin O (2016) 3D fitting accuracy evaluation of CAD/CAM copings - comparison with spacer design settings. Int J Comput Dent 19:27–43PubMed

24.

Forbes A (1989) Least-squares best-fit geometric elements

25.

Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H (2000) Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 83:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70087-4 CrossRefPubMed

26.

Ueda K, Beuer F, Stimmelmayr M, Erdelt K, Keul C, Guth JF (2016) Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions. Clin Oral Investig 20:283–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1513-5 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Keul C, Stawarczyk B, Erdelt KJ, Beuer F, Edelhoff D, Guth JF (2014) Fit of 4-unit FDPs made of zirconia and CoCr-alloy after chairside and labside digitalization--a laboratory study. Dent Mater 30:400–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2014.01.006 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Hmaidouch R, Neumann P, Mueller WD (2011) Influence of preparation form, luting space setting and cement type on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM crown copings. Int J Comput Dent 14:219–226PubMed

29.

Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D (2019) Three-dimensional digital evaluation of the fit of endocrowns fabricated from different CAD/CAM materials. J Prosthodont 28:e504–e509. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12770 CrossRefPubMed

30.

May LG, Kelly JR, Bottino MA, Hill T (2012) Effects of cement thickness and bonding on the failure loads of CAD/CAM ceramic crowns: multi-physics FEA modeling and monotonic testing. Dent Mater 28:e99–e109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.04.033

Titel: Chairside measurement of the marginal and internal fit of crowns: a new intraoral scan–based approach
verfasst von: Maximiliane Amelie Schlenz
Jonas Adrian Helmut Vogler
Alexander Schmidt
Peter Rehmann
Bernd Wöstmann
Publikationsdatum: 31.10.2019
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-019-03108-3

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Chairside measurement of the marginal and internal fit of crowns: a new intraoral scan–based approach