Background
The number of patients diagnosed with lymphoid malignancies has increased to 18,000 per year in Europe [
1]. Hodgkin-lymphomas (HL) with characteristic histopathological subtypes comprise about 11% of all lymphomas [
1,
2]. Tumor cells [Hodgkin-/Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells] usually represent only a small fraction of diagnostic histology, while differences in microenvironment (reactive lymphocytes, extracellular matrix) allow subclassification of HL [
3,
4]. The prognosis of HL patients is relatively good, however, some patients may relapse in spite of first line chemotherapy and radiation protocols, and can be further treated, sometimes cured by intensified chemotherapy and/or peripheral stem cell transplantation [
5]. Unfortunately, these treatments still fail in 15-20% of HL patients [
6]. Considering that the majority of HL patients are young and the survivors have a high risk of acute or late toxicity associated with therapy [
7], more efficient and less toxic therapeutic strategies are needed. Targeting signaling pathways offers an attractive approach.
The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway is activated in a number of human neoplasms, accompanied by lower overall and disease free survival [
8]. This pathway plays a key role in the regulation of cellular functions such as survival, proliferation, cell death and metabolic activities [
9]. mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) – an important component of this network – is a serine-threonine kinase, which exists in two distinct multiprotein complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2 – containing characteristic elements: Raptor and Rictor, respectively) [
10]. The best known targets of mTORC1 are eukaryotic initiating factor-4E binding proteins (4EBP) and S6 kinase (S6K). mTORC2 can regulate Akt dependent antiapoptotic and survival mechanisms by phosphorylating Akt [
11].
The PI3K pathway can be activated by several upstream receptors (IGF-R, Flt3, c-Kit, Notch, TCR, BCR) or intracellular proteins (Ras, BCR/ABL) in various hematological diseases [
12]. Information about mTOR activity is very limited; however, transforming direct genetic modifications of PI3K, Akt, mTOR or PTEN are rare – such mutations occur in 5% of lymphoid malignancies [
13]. mTOR has indeed been proven an important element in tumorigenesis in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL): its role was confirmed in MCL cell proliferation, mainly by influencing cyclin D1 expression [
14]. This suggests that the mTOR pathway may play an important role in the development or progression of other lymphoma types as well, and can be considered as a useful therapeutic target.
Rapamycin (and its analogs: rapalogs) interacts with the FKBP12 protein, an element of the mTOR complex, and preferentially disrupts mTORC1 activity [
15]. The response of mTORC2 to rapalogs remains conflicting [
16]. Rapalogs have been used as immunosuppressive agents in organ transplantation since 1999, and they have been introduced into clinical oncology as a treatement option in renal cell carcinoma and recently in MCL as well [
14]. Several trials using mTOR inhibitors in tumors with high mTOR activity are currently underway [
17‐
19].
The aim of our study was to investigate mTOR activity in different lymphomas, with a focus on HL. We found that the majority of HL cases (93%) displays high mTOR activity. Therefore we suggest that mTOR inhibition (e.g. by rapalogs) may be considered as a therapeutic option in HL, especially in patients with poor prognosis/relapse.
Methods
Cell culture
KM-H2, L428, L1236, HDLM2, DEV (Hodgkin-lymphoma) cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 ng/ml streptomycin (Sigma) and heat-inactivated 10% FCS (Gibco). The UH-01 (HL) cell line was cultured in Iscove's MDM + RPMI-1640 (4:1) supplemented with 20% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine (Sigma) and penicillin and streptomycin as above.
Cells were treated with rapamycin (50 ng/ml, Sigma) for 72 h; culture medium was refreshed with new medium supplemented with rapamycin after 72 h to avoid rapamycin concentration decrease (due to metabolic degradation) in longer treatments (96–144 h). Combination treatments in HL cell lines were done for 72 hours. Doxorubicin (0.2 μM; Ebewe Pharma), vincristine (10 nM; Richter Gedeon) and etoposide (1 μM; Pharmachemie BV) were used in combination with rapamycin. Cell morphology was evaluated on methanol fixed and hematoxylin-eosin (HE) stained cytospin preparates.
Western-blotting
Whole cell extracts were prepared and quantitated with Quant-iT protein assay (Invitrogene). Protein extracts (112.5 μg) were transferred to PVDF membranes after SDS-PAGE. Membranes were incubated with anti-phospho-mTOR (Ser2448), anti-mTOR, anti-phospho-p70S6K (Thr389) and anti-phospho-S6 (Ser235/236) antibodies (Cell Signaling), followed by biotinylated secondary antibodies and avidin-HRP complex (Vectastain Elite ABC Kit, Vector), and detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (Pierce ECL Western Blotting Substrate). Membranes were stripped (Re-Blot Plus, Millipore) and reprobed with β-actin (A2228; Sigma) to confirm equal protein loading.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Cell lysates were obtained from isolated normal B- and T-cells, normal mononuclear cells from buffy coat and lymphoma/leukemia cell lines (5×106 cells/sample) in lysis buffer (Cell Signaling) containing 1 mM phenyl-methylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) for 30 minutes on ice. Sandwich ELISA Kit (p4EBP1 – Thr37/Thr46, Cell Signaling) was used for the detection of phospho-4EBP1 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm wavelength.
Flow cytometry
For apoptosis detection cells were fixed in 70% ethanol (−20°C) followed by alkalic extraction (200 mM Na
2HPO
4, pH 7.4 and 100 mg/ml RNase; Sigma) and propidium-iodide staining (1 mg/ml, Sigma) according to Mihalik et al. [
20]. A minimum of 10,000 events/sample were acquired on a FACScan flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Erembodegem, Belgium). Data were analyzed with WinList software (Verity Software House, Topsman, ME, USA).
Tissue microarray (TMA) and Hodgkin-lymphoma patients
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens from 105 lymphoma patients (6 Burkitt-lymphomas [BL], 23 HL, 11 MCL, 9 anaplastic large-cell lymphomas [ALCL], 9 diffuse large B-cell lymphomas [DLBCL], 12 marginal zone lymphomas [MZL], 13 chronic lymphoid leukemias/small lymphocytic lymphomas [CLL], 10 follicular lymphomas, 12 peripheral T-cell lymphomas) were included in the first TMA study. The total number of HL patients was 83 in the second TMA set, which represented all HL subtypes: nodular lymphocyte predominant (NLPHL) and classical HL (cHL) types (7 and 76 cases, respectively). cHL samples included nodular sclerosis (n=47), mixed cellularity (n=18), lymphocyte rich (n=8) and lymphocyte depleted (n=3) cases. In each case, two representative cores of 2 mm diameter were selected from different areas. Reactive lymphoid tissues (tonsils and lymph nodes) were also included as non-neoplastic controls.
Hodgkin-lymphoma patients (40 females, 43 males; age: 8–82 years [23 patients<18 years, 41 patients: 18–45 years, 15 patients: >45 years]; mean age: 29.8 years) were diagnosed at our Institute between 2000 and 2007. The minimum follow-up period was 5 years in all cases. Clinical data were available in detail in 72 cases from the analyzed 83 patients: 59 of these patients were in complete remission after 5 years of follow-up, 25 patients had relapse and 10 patients died, 13 patients had stem cell transplantation. 60% of these relapsed patients (15/25) are now in CR, including 8 patients who achieved CR following stem cell transplantation. The majority (64%) of the patients had stage I-II disease, whereas 36% presented with stage III-IV disease; 30% of the patients had B-symptoms.
For pediatric and adolescent patients (8–18 years), treatment group (TG) 1 (stages IA/B, IIA) received 2 cycles OPPA (females) or OEPA (males); TG2 (stages IIB, IIIA, IEA/B, IIEA) received 2 cycles OPPA or OEPA and 2 cycles COPP; TG3 (IIIB, IVA/B, IIEB, IIIEA/B) received 2 cycles OPPA or OEPA and 4 cycles COPP. Additional radiotherapy and/or autologous/allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was given in the case of incomplete remission. (OPPA: vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone, doxorubicin; OEPA: vincristine, etoposide, prednisone, doxorubicin; COPP: cyclophosphamid, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone).
Adult patients were treated with ABVD; DHAP protocol was used in the case of ABVD-resistance. DHAP was also given before HSCT. (ABVD: adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine; DHAP: dexamethasone, high dose cytarabine, cisplatin).
All protocols were approved by the Institutional Ethical Review Board (TUKEB no. 7/2006).
Immunocytochemistry/Immunohistochemistry (ICC/IHC)
Four μm TMA sections were deparaffinized. Endogenous peroxidase blocking was followed by antigen retrieval in sodium citrate (pH=6) buffer in a microwave oven.
Cytospin preparates were fixed in 80% methanol (10’,-20°C), and incubated with primary antibodies following endogenous peroxidase blocking.
Slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with phospho-S6 (Ser235/236), phospho-mTOR (Ser2448), phospho-4EBP1 (Thr37/46), phospho-p70S6K (Thr389), phospho-Histone-H3 (pHH3), cleaved/activated caspase3 (Cell Signaling), Rictor (Abcam), Raptor (Novus), CD15 (Leica), CD30, MUM-1, Bcl-xL, Bcl-2 (Dako), NF-kappaB-p50 and Survivin (LabVision) antibodies.
Primary antibodies were followed by Novolink Polymer Detection System (Novocastra, Wetzlar, Germany), visualized by DAB and counterstained with hematoxylin. Immunostainings were evaluated by 2 independent pathologists. 3DHistech Pannoramic Viewer program and Nikon E200 were used for tissue microarray analysis.
Phospho-mTOR, phospho-4EBP1, phospho-p70S6K, phospho-S6 TMA immunostaining reaction intensity (negative, 1+(weak)/2+(moderate)/3+(strong) positive) was agreed upon before blind evaluation of the scores (0/1+/2+/3+). Non malignant, reactive lymphocytes showed a maximum positivity of 1+, whereas plasma cells were score 3+.
The most reliable phospho-protein marker for mTOR activity was phospho-S6, which is supported by literature data. Therefore, the cases in our study were considered to have high mTOR activity only when scores were 2+/3+ for phospho-S6 and for at least one additional mTOR activity related phosphoprotein (pmTOR, pp70S6K), as described previously [
21].
NF-kappaB-p50 was considered positive when nuclear staining was observed; Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL positivity was cytoplasmic. Survivin showed both nuclear and cytoplasmic positivity.
The cutoff for positivity was set at 10% of the tumor cells staining for the antibodies, according to Sebestyén et al. [
21].
Hodgkin-lymphoma xenograft model
Xenograft tumors were established in SCID mice by injecting 2×107 KMH2 cells subcutaneously (s.c.) with matrigel into the back region of 8–10 week old (20–23 g) mice. Palpable tumors were removed, cut into pieces and transplanted into secondary recipient mice. When palpable s.c. tumors developed (after 8 weeks), animals were divided into control and rapamycin-treated groups (n=10 each). Rapamycin (Rapamune 1 mg/ml, Wyeth Europa Ltd.) was administered by gavage at 3 mg/kg body weight three times per week for 8 weeks. Control groups were treated with saline. Body weight and tumor diameter was measured weekly. Tumor volume was calculated as follows: п/6×(2×shorter diameter + longer diameter)/3)3. Tumor weight was measured in euthanized animals at the end of the experiments. Tumor tissues were formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and immunostained with human CD15, human CD30, cleaved/activated caspase3 and pHH3. pHH3 and cleaved/activated caspase3 stainings were analyzed with Mirax Viewer software (analysing 4 areas in each sample).
All experiments involving laboratory animals were done in accordance with the Guidelines for Animal Experiments of the Office of Agricultural Administration of Budapest and by the Animal Research Comittee of our university (permission number: 201/2010).
Statistics
Statistics was calculated with paired Student’s t-test, Chi square test and Fisher’exact test using SPSS (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and PAST softwares (PAST free software was downloaded from
http://folk.uio.no), and log-rank test using GraphPad software (GraphPad, San Diego, California, USA).
Discussion
The introduction of new drugs has to be based on convincing evidence in malignancies where clinical response rate (or even cure rate) is rather high. A typical example is Hodgkin-lymphoma (HL); in fact, no new drugs have been approved by the FDA for HL in the last 30 years [
22]. However, treatment failures in patients with advanced disease, insufficient response (recurrences and resistance) as well as late toxicity of the currently used chemotherapy – including second malignancies, cardiovascular toxicity and infertility – requires improvement in standard options for treating HL [
23]. Targeted therapy is an innovative research field in oncology, where the defects of major regulatory steps fine-tuning critical cell functions such as survival, proliferation and apoptosis serve as molecular targets.
There is substantial evidence highlighting the importance of changes in the activity of different PI3K pathway members, including mTOR complexes. Here we show that mTOR activity is a characteristic feature in the majority (>50%) of MCL, BL, DLBCL, ALCL and HL cases. High mTOR activity of HRS cells is further supported by our second TMA study focusing on HLs.
Previous publications reported only small numbers of cases without considering subclassification of HL [
24,
25]. Based on the evaluation of different downstream mTOR target proteins in 83 HL cases, increased mTOR activity was confirmed in more than 90% of HLs in our work, which was independent of HL subtype and clinical parameters. Low mTOR activity cases had no relapse, and these patients had more than 5 year disease free survival, with complete remission. However, high mTOR activity was observed in the case of both favorable and unfavorable clinical response, therefore it cannot be considered as a prognostic indicator. We are aware that the 83 HL patients included in our study comprise a heterogeneous patient group in respect of age, gender, stage, histological type and prognosis. Therefore, it is difficult to reach significant conclusions; nevertheless, our study offers a comprehensive overview of this heterogeneous group, which is obviously characterized by high mTOR activity in general.
At a molecular level, mTOR activity is known to play a role in cyclin D1 overexpression and cell cycle dysregulation in MCL [
14]. Through the regulation of translation or by directly influencing the activity of p70S6K, mTOR can induce the antiapoptotic functions of mitochondrial proteins, e.g. by BAD phosphorylation, supporting the survival and proliferation of tumor cells [
26]. The malfunction of apoptotic pathways and the overexpression of several cyclins (cyclin A, B1 and E) are also known in HL [
27]. The overexpression of antiapoptotic signals (Bcl-xL) showed correlation with high mTOR activity in our study.
Each time a protein known to be a member of regulatory signaling pathways, participating in the development and/or progression of malignancies is brought into focus, the question arises: can we turn our knowledge to therapeutic advantage? In the case of mTOR, inhibitors already exist (rapamycin and its analogs: rapalogs), which are well tolerated [
28], and rapamycin has also been shown to synergize with anticancer agents in several tumors [
12,
29‐
31]. Rapalogs/rapamycin inhibited proliferation and induced apoptosis, moreover, they increased the apoptotic effect of chemotherapeutic agents (doxorubicin, vincristine and etoposide) in HL cells in our xenograft and in vitro experiments. These results – along with others [
32‐
35] – suggest that mTOR inhibition is an option in tumors with increased mTOR activity. In this respect HL could be a good candidate, as high mTOR activity and mTORC1 expression could be detected in a high percentage of cases, and mTORC1 inhibition also had an antiproliferative and apoptotic effect in vitro and in vivo.
The efficiency of mTOR inhibitors may be dependent on the ratio of mTOR complexes [
36]. While mTORC1 is sensitive to currently used mTOR inhibitors, the rapalog sensitivity of mTORC2 is still conflicting, and may vary in different cell types [
37,
38]. New dual inhibitors – inhibiting both mTOR complexes, or mTORC1 and upstream elements of the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway – are being developed [
39]. The inclusion of upstream proteins is quite logical, because the inhibition of mTORC1 may be able to activate them. The immunohistochemical detection of the phosphorylated forms of Akt (specifically, Ser473, which is connected to mTORC2) is very difficult. We tested different antibodies but we could not detect realiably specific staining in our lymphoid tissues. Baker et al. investigated the stability of phosphorylated Akt and they established that postoperative surgical samples may be of limited value for measuring phospho-Akt levels because Akt can be dephosphorylated quickly during tumor removal and fixation [
40]. Considering this, we chose to investigate the expression of Rictor, one essential component of functioning mTORC2. We concluded that mTORC2 was not a characteristic feature when Rictor expression was not detected in the samples. Several solid and lymphoid malignancies such as non-GC DLBCLs overexpress Rictor (a characteristic protein in mTORC2), which potentially indicates increased mTORC2 activity [
21,
41,
42]. Rictor was not overexpressed in our HL cell lines and cases, which can explain the sensitivity to rapamycin/rapalogs.
Taken together, Hodgkin-lymphoma is characterized by high mTOR activity, and this high mTOR activity does not exclude good prognosis. Moreover, mTORC1 may be a potential therapeutic target in HL, especially when commonly used protocols prove ineffective, and may also allow dose reduction of chemotherapeutic drugs in order to decrease late toxicity without diminishing treatment efficacy. The combination of mTOR inhibitors with other agents targeting critical molecular sites will likely be crucial for achieving the best clinical response.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Tibor Krenács, Renáta Kis, Edit Parsch, Zsuzsa Kaminszky, András Sztodola and Anna Tamási (1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University) for technical assistance, and the assistance of hemato-oncologists who treated and followed the patients. This work was supported by OTKA projects (K81624, K68341, K84262, K76204) of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ contributions
AS was the principal investigator, designed the study, supervised materials, data collection and analysis, and takes primary responsibility for the paper. ÁM, NN and TBS designed and prepared TMA blocks and performed IHC stainings and statistical analysis for this study. MH, LB, LK, JCs took part in the morphological evaluation of sections and evaluated IHC results. ÁM, NN and VV performed in vitro and in vivo experiments, MCs and ZsV collected clinical data for the study and participated in analysis. AS, MH, ÁM and KL wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.