nach oben

Erschienen in:

13.11.2023 | Original Article

Characterization of the root and canal anatomy of maxillary premolar teeth in an Iraqi subpopulation: a cone beam computed tomography study

verfasst von: Abdullah Mohammed Aljawhar, Norliza Ibrahim, Azwatee Abdul Aziz, Hany Mohamed Aly Ahmed, Noor Hayati Azami

Erschienen in: Odontology | Ausgabe 2/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the number of roots and root canal morphology types of maxillary premolars in relation to a patient’s gender and age in an Iraqi population using two classification systems. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of 1116 maxillary premolars from 385 patients were evaluated for the number of roots and root canal morphology types according to Vertucci’s classification and Ahmed et al. classification systems. Differences in the number of roots and root canal morphology types with regard to tooth type, patients’ gender and age groups were evaluated and the degree of bilateral symmetry was determined. Chi-squared test was used for statistical analysis. About 51.1% of the 1st premolars were double rooted. The majority (87.9%) of the 2nd premolars were single rooted. The three-rooted form presented in only 1.2% and 0.7% of the 1st and 2nd premolars, respectively. Vertucci Type IV (Ahmed et al. code ²MaxP B¹P¹) and Vertucci Type I (Ahmed et al. code ¹MaxP¹) were the most common canal morphology types in the 1st and 2nd premolars, respectively. Females showed a lower number of roots and a higher prevalence of Vertucci Type I configuration (P < 0.05). Younger age groups showed a higher prevalence of Vertucci Type I configuration (P < 0.05). Bilateral symmetry was seen in more than half of the maxillary premolars. There is a considerable variation in the number of roots and root canal configurations of maxillary premolars in the studied Iraqi population, with a significant difference by gender and age groups. Ahmed et al. classification provided more accurate presentation of the root and canal anatomy in maxillary premolars compared to Vertucci’s classification.

Cantatore G, Berutti E, Castellucci A. Missed anatomy: frequency and clinical impact. Endod Top. 2006;15(1):3–31.CrossRef

Cleghorn BM, Goodacre CJ, Christie WH. Morphology of teeth and their root canal Systems. In: Ingle JIBL, Baumgartner JC, editors. Ingle‘s Endodontics 6. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2008. p. 155.

Zaatar EI, Al-Kandari AM, Alhomaidah S, Al-Yasin IM. Frequency of endodontic treatment in Kuwait: radiographic evaluation of 846 endodontically treated teeth. J Endod. 1997;23(7):453–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(97)80302-0.CrossRefPubMed

Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58(5):589–99.PubMedCrossRef

Kartal N, Özçelik B, Cimilli H. Root canal morphology of maxillary premolars. J Endod. 1998;24(6):417–9.PubMedCrossRef

Abella F, Teixidó LM, Patel S, Sosa F, Duran-Sindreu F, Roig M. Cone-beam computed tomography analysis of the root canal morphology of maxillary first and second premolars in a Spanish population. J Endod. 2015;41(8):1241–7.PubMedCrossRef

Ahmed HMA, Cheung GSP. Accessory roots and root canals in maxillary premolar teeth: a review of a critical endodontic challenge. ENDO Endod Practice Today. 2012;6(1):7–18.

Bürklein S, Heck R, Schäfer E. Evaluation of the root canal anatomy of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a selected German population using cone-beam computed tomographic data. J Endod. 2017;43(9):1448–52.PubMedCrossRef

Buchanan GD, Gamieldien MY, Tredoux S, Vally ZI. Root and canal configurations of maxillary premolars in a South African subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography and two classification systems. J Oral Sci. 2020;62(1):93–7.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Saber SEDM, Ahmed MH, Obeid M, Ahmed HMA. Root and canal morphology of maxillary premolar teeth in an Egyptian subpopulation using two classification systems: a cone beam computed tomography study. Int Endod J. 2019;52(3):267–78.PubMedCrossRef

11.

Gulabivala K, Ng Y. Tooth organogenesis, morphology and physiology. In: Endodontics. Elsevier; 2014. p. 2–32.CrossRef

12.

Martins JN, Ordinola-Zapata R, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Differences in root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth within different age groups. Int Endod J. 2018;51(8):931–41.PubMedCrossRef

13.

Martins JN, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Gender influence on the number of roots and root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth of a Portuguese subpopulation. Quintessence Int. 2018;49(2):103–11.PubMed

14.

Briseño-Marroquín B, Paqué F, Maier K, Willershausen B, Wolf TG. Root canal morphology and configuration of 179 maxillary first molars by means of micro-computed tomography: an ex vivo study. J Endod. 2015;41(12):2008–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2015.09.007.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Gupta SK, Saxena P. Proposal for a simple and effective diagrammatic representation of root canal configuration for better communication amongst oral radiologists and clinicians. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2016;6(1):59–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2015.09.005.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969;28(3):419–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(69)90237-0.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Weine FS. Endodontic therapy. 3 ed ed. St. Louis: CV. Mosby 1982.

18.

Vertucci F, Seelig A, Gillis R. Root canal morphology of the human maxillary second premolar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1974;38(3):456–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(74)90374-0.CrossRefPubMed

19.

Ahmed HMA, Keleş A, Martins JNR, Dummer PMH. Tooth root and canal anatomy. In: Ahmed HMA, Dummer PMH, editors. Endodontic advances and evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cham: Wiley; 2022. p. 1–50.CrossRef

20.

Karobari MI, Noorani TY, Halim MS, Ahmed HMA. Root and canal morphology of the anterior permanent dentition in Malaysian population using two classification systems: a CBCT clinical study. Aust Endod J. 2021;47(2):202–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12454.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Filpo-Perez C, Bramante CM, Villas-Boas MH, Duarte MAH, Versiani MA, Ordinola-Zapata R. Micro–computed tomographic analysis of the root canal morphology of the distal root of mandibular first molar. J Endod. 2015;41(2):231–6.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Kim Y, Chang SW, Lee JK, Chen IP, Kaufman B, Jiang J, et al. A micro-computed tomography study of canal configuration of multiple-canalled mesiobuccal root of maxillary first molar. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(6):1541–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-012-0852-8.CrossRefPubMed

23.

Ahmed HMA, Versiani MA, De-Deus G, Dummer PMH. A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology. Int Endod J. 2017;50(8):761–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12685.CrossRefPubMed

24.

Ahmed HMA, Dummer PMH. Advantages and applications of a new system for classifying roots and canal systems in research and clinical practice. Eur Endod J. 2018;3(1):9.PubMed

25.

Olczak K, Pawlicka H, Szymański W. Root form and canal anatomy of maxillary first premolars: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Odontology. 2022;110(2):365–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-021-00670-9.CrossRefPubMed

26.

Grover C, Shetty N. Methods to study root canal morphology: a review. ENDO (Lond Engl). 2012;6(3):171–82.

27.

Ahmed HMA. A critical analysis of laboratory and clinical research methods to study root and canal anatomy. Int Endod J. 2022;55:229–80.PubMedCrossRef

28.

Martins JN, Versiani MA. CBCT and micro-CT on the study of root canal anatomy. In: Versiani MA, Basrani B, Sousa-Neto MD, editors. The root canal anatomy in permanent dentition. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 89–180.CrossRef

29.

Zhang D, Chen J, Lan G, Li M, An J, Wen X, et al. The root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars: a comparative evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography and micro-computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(4):1007–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1852-x.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, Kumar V, Yelton CD. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study. J Endod. 2010;36(5):867–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.023.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Domark JD, Hatton JF, Benison RP, Hildebolt CF. An ex vivo comparison of digital radiography and cone-beam and micro computed tomography in the detection of the number of canals in the mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. J Endod. 2013;39(7):901–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

da Silva Ramos Fernandes LM, Rice D, Ordinola-Zapata R, Alvares Capelozza AL, Bramante CM, Jaramillo D, et al. Detection of various anatomic patterns of root canals in mandibular incisors using digital periapical radiography, 3 cone-beam computed tomographic scanners, and micro-computed tomographic imaging. J Endod. 2014;40(1):42–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.039.CrossRef

33.

Ulack C. Demography of race and ethnicity in Iraq. In: Sáenz R, Embrick DG, Rodríguez NP, editors. The international handbook of the demography of race and ethnicity. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2015. p. 367–84.CrossRef

34.

Dogan S, Gurkan C, Dogan M, Balkaya HE, Tunc R, Demirdov DK, et al. A glimpse at the intricate mosaic of ethnicities from mesopotamia: paternal lineages of the northern iraqi arabs, kurds, syriacs, turkmens and yazidis. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(11):e0187408. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187408.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Ali HAh. Distribution of HLA polymorphism in a sample of Iraqi Arabs in comparison with three Arab gulf populations. Iraqi J Sci. 2009;50(1):120–5.

36.

CSO Estimates of Iraq's Population by Governorates, Environment and Sex. Central statistical organization of Iraq https://cosit.gov.iq/ar/?option=com_content&view=article&layout=edit&id=174&jsn_setmobile=no. (2020). Accessed 9 Aug 2022.

37.

Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the Turkish population. J Endod. 2004;30(6):391–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200406000-00004.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Ahmed H, Ibrahim N, Mohamad N, Nambiar P, Muhammad R, Yusoff M, et al. Application of a new system for classifying root and canal anatomy in studies involving micro-computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography: explanation and elaboration. Int Endod J. 2021;54(7):1056–82.PubMedCrossRef

39.

Ahmed HMA, Dummer PMH. A new system for classifying tooth, root and canal anomalies. Int Endod J. 2018;51(4):389–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12867.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Purps J, Siegert S, Willuweit S, Nagy M, Alves C, Salazar R, et al. A global analysis of Y-chromosomal haplotype diversity for 23 STR loci. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;12:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.04.008.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Lazim H, Almohammed EK, Hadi S, Smith J. Population genetic diversity in an Iraqi population and gene flow across the Arabian Peninsula. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):15289. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72283-1.ADSCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Borges CC, Estrela C, Decurcio DA, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD, Rossi-Fedele G. Cone-beam and micro-computed tomography for the assessment of root canal morphology: a systematic review. Braz Oral Res. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0056.CrossRefPubMed

43.

Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1547–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.008.CrossRefPubMed

44.

Vizzotto MB, Silveira PF, Arús NA, Montagner F, Gomes BP, da Silveira HE. CBCT for the assessment of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molar teeth: effect of voxel size and presence of root filling. Int Endod J. 2013;46(9):870–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12075.CrossRefPubMed

45.

Martins JNR, Kishen A, Marques D, Nogueira Leal Silva EJ, Caramês J, Mata A, et al. Preferred reporting items for epidemiologic cross-sectional studies on root and root canal anatomy using cone-beam computed tomographic technology: a systematized assessment. J Endod. 2020;46(7):915–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2020.03.020.CrossRefPubMed

46.

Monardes H, Herrera K, Vargas J, Steinfort K, Zaror C. Root anatomy and canal configuration of maxillary premolars: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Int J Morphol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022021000200463.CrossRef

47.

Alqedairi A, Alfawaz H, Al-Dahman Y, Alnassar F, Al-Jebaly A, Alsubait S. Cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars in a Saudi population. BioMed Res Int. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8170620.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Awawdeh L, Abdullah H, Al-Qudah A. Root form and canal morphology of Jordanian maxillary first premolars. J Endod. 2008;34(8):956–61.PubMedCrossRef

49.

Bulut DG, Kose E, Ozcan G, Sekerci AE, Canger EM, Sisman Y. Evaluation of root morphology and root canal configuration of premolars in the Turkish individuals using cone beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(04):551–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

50.

Asheghi B, Momtahan N, Sahebi S, Booshehri MZ. Morphological evaluation of maxillary premolar canals in Iranian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Dent. 2020;21(3):215.

51.

Pan JYY, Parolia A, Chuah SR, Bhatia S, Mutalik S, Pau A. Root canal morphology of permanent teeth in a Malaysian subpopulation using cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0710-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

52.

Senan EM, Alhadainy HA, Genaid TM, Madfa AA. Root form and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars of a Yemeni population. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):1–10.CrossRef

53.

Li YH, Bao SJ, Yang XW, Tian XM, Wei B, Zheng YL. Symmetry of root anatomy and root canal morphology in maxillary premolars analyzed using cone-beam computed tomography. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;94:84–92.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Gupta S, Sinha DJ, Gowhar O, Tyagi SP, Singh NN, Gupta S. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolar teeth in north Indian population using clearing technique: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(3):232–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.157260.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

55.

Dinakar C, Shetty UA, Salian VV, Shetty P. Root canal morphology of maxillary first premolars using the clearing technique in a South Indian Population: an in vitro study. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2018;8(3):143–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_46_18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Peiris R. Root and canal morphology of human permanent teeth in a Sri Lankan and Japanese population. Anthropol Sci. 2008;116(2):123–33.CrossRef

57.

Mashyakhy M. Anatomical evaluation of maxillary premolars in a Saudi population: an in vivo cone-beam computed tomography study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(3):284–9.PubMedCrossRef

58.

de Lima CO, de Souza LC, Devito KL, do Prado M, Campos CN. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary premolars: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Aust Endod J. 2019;45(2):196–201.PubMedCrossRef

59.

Al-Ghananeem MM, Haddadin K, Al-Khreisat AS, Al-Weshah M, Al-Habahbeh N. The number of roots and canals in the maxillary second premolars in a group of jordanian population. Int J dent. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/797692.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

60.

Huang XF, Chai Y. Molecular regulatory mechanism of tooth root development. Int J Oral Sci. 2012;4(4):177–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/ijos.2012.61.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

61.

Gellis JJ, Foley RA. Patterns of variation in canal and root number in human post-canine teeth. J Anat. 2022;241(4):896–918. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13729.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Atieh MA. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Saudi population. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008;9(1):46–53.PubMedCrossRef

63.

Özcan E, Çolak H, Hamidi MM. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Turkish population. J Dent Sci. 2012;7(4):390–4.CrossRef

64.

Chaparro A, Segura J, Guerrero E, Jimenez-Rubio A, Murillo C, Feito J. Number of roots and canals in maxillary first premolars: study of an Andalusian population. Dent Traumatol. 1999;15(2):65–7.CrossRef

65.

Carns EJ, Skidmore A. Configurations and deviations of root canals of maxillary first premolars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973;36(6):880–6.PubMedCrossRef

66.

Lipski M, Wozniak K, Lagocka R, Tomasik M. Root and canal morphology of the first human maxillary premolar. Durham Anthropol J. 2005;12:2–3.

67.

Tinelli M, Ferreira G, Llahyah K, Gomez N. Ethnic Variations in the topography of the root canals. Electron J Endod Rosario. 2011;2:558–62.

68.

Ok E, Altunsoy M, Nur BG, Aglarci OS, Çolak M, Güngör E. A cone-beam computed tomography study of root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular premolars in a Turkish population. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72(8):701–6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357.2014.898091.CrossRefPubMed

69.

Martins JN, Marques D, Mata A, Caramês J. Root and root canal morphology of the permanent dentition in a Caucasian population: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Int Endod J. 2017;50(11):1013–26.PubMedCrossRef

70.

Ahmed HMA, Rossi-Fedele G. Preferred reporting items for root and canal anatomy in the human dentition (PROUD 2020)–a systematic review and a proposal for a standardized protocol. Eur Endod J. 2020;5(3):159.PubMedPubMedCentral

71.

Ahmed HMA, Nagendrababu V, Duncan HF, Peters OA, Dummer PMH. Developing a consensus-based glossary of controversial terms in endodontology. Int Endod J. 2023;56(7):788–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13918.CrossRefPubMed

72.

Ahmed HMA, Rossi-Fedele G, Dummer PMH. Critical analysis of a new system to classify root and canal morphology—a systematic review. Aust Endod J. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12780.CrossRefPubMed

73.

Yang L, Chen X, Tian C, Han T, Wang Y. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root canal morphology and locate root canal orifices of maxillary second premolars in a Chinese subpopulation. J Endod. 2014;40(5):630–4.PubMedCrossRef

74.

Von Arx T. Frequency and type of canal isthmuses in first molars detected by endoscopic inspection during periradicular surgery. Int Endod J. 2005;38(3):160–8.CrossRef

75.

Endal U, Shen Y, Knut A, Gao Y, Haapasalo M. A high-resolution computed tomographic study of changes in root canal isthmus area by instrumentation and root filling. J Endod. 2011;37(2):223–7.PubMedCrossRef

76.

Karobari M, Noorani T, Halim M, Dummer P, Ahmed H. Should inter-canal communications be included in the classification of root canal systems? Int Endod J. 2019;52(6):917–9.PubMedCrossRef

77.

Villegas JC, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Frequency of transverse anastomoses with and without apical communication in Japanese population teeth. Aust Endod J. 2004;30(2):50–2.PubMedCrossRef

78.

Green D. Double canals in single roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973;35(5):689–96.PubMedCrossRef

79.

Pineda F. Roentgenographic investigation of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973;36(2):253–60.PubMedCrossRef

80.

Erkan E, Olcay K, Eyüboğlu TF, Şener E, Gündoğar M. Assessment of the canal anatomy of the premolar teeth in a selected Turkish population: a cone-beam computed tomography study. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):403. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03107-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

81.

Tabakcilar D, Yilmaz DO, Seymen F, Gencay K. Hormonal factors affecting teeth development. Int J Med Investig. 2020;9(4):1–12.

82.

Johnstone M, Parashos P. Endodontics and the ageing patient. Aust Dent J. 2015;60:20–7.PubMedCrossRef

83.

Lee J-H, Kim K-D, Lee J-K, Park W, Jeong JS, Lee Y, et al. Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111(6):785–91.PubMedCrossRef

84.

Peiris HR, Pitakotuwage TN, Takahashi M, Sasaki K, Kanazawa E. Root canal morphology of mandibular permanent molars at different ages. Int Endod J. 2008;41(10):828–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01428.x.CrossRefPubMed

85.

Al-Saedi A, Al-Bakhakh B, Al-Taee RG. Using cone-beam computed tomography to determine the prevalence of the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molar teeth in a sample of an Iraqi population. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020. https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S281159.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

86.

Kim SY, Kim BS, Kim Y. Mandibular second molar root canal morphology and variants in a Korean subpopulation. Int Endod J. 2016;49(2):136–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12437.MathSciNetCrossRefPubMed

87.

Tian YY, Guo B, Zhang R, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, et al. Root and canal morphology of maxillary first premolars in a Chinese subpopulation evaluated using cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2012;45(11):996–1003. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02059.x.CrossRefPubMed

88.

Diab H, Al-Sheeb F, Diab A, Marouf N, Al Obaid M, Lari M. A cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) study of root anatomy, canal morphology and bilateral symmetry of permanent maxillary premolar teeth among the Qatari subpopulation. Open Dent J. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2174/18742106-v16-e2204260.CrossRef

89.

Felsypremila G, Vinothkumar TS, Kandaswamy D. Anatomic symmetry of root and root canal morphology of posterior teeth in Indian subpopulation using cone beam computed tomography: a retrospective study. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(4):500–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.172623.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

90.

Mashyakhy M, Abu-Melha AS. Analysis of bilateral symmetry of root canal anatomy in permanent dentition: an in vivo CBCT study in a Saudi Arabian population. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021;22(8):867–75.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Characterization of the root and canal anatomy of maxillary premolar teeth in an Iraqi subpopulation: a cone beam computed tomography study
verfasst von: Abdullah Mohammed Aljawhar
Norliza Ibrahim
Azwatee Abdul Aziz
Hany Mohamed Aly Ahmed
Noor Hayati Azami
Publikationsdatum: 13.11.2023
Verlag: Springer Nature Singapore
Erschienen in: Odontology / Ausgabe 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-023-00870-5

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Characterization of the root and canal anatomy of maxillary premolar teeth in an Iraqi subpopulation: a cone beam computed tomography study

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2024

Rational design of EDTA-incorporated nanoflowers as novel and effective endodontic disinfection against biofilms

Videofluoroscopic analysis of the laryngeal movement of older adults in swallowing

The radiographic evaluation of 11 different resin composites

Influence of laser intensity and BaTiO3 content on the surface properties of 3YSZ

Evaluation of changes in root canal length and accuracy of the electronic apex locator during different stages of endodontic treatment and retreatment

The effect of bovine trypsin on dental biofilm dispersion: an in vitro study

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter