Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology 2/2018

28.11.2017

Characterizing indeterminate liver lesions in patients with localized pancreatic cancer at the time of diagnosis

verfasst von: Manav Bhalla, Mohammed Aldakkak, Naveen M. Kulkarni, Stacy D. O’Connor, Michael O. Griffin Jr., Kathleen K. Christians, Douglas B. Evans, Susan Tsai, Parag P. Tolat

Erschienen in: Abdominal Radiology | Ausgabe 2/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

In patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer, the classification of indeterminate liver lesions is an unanswered clinical dilemma as misclassification of these lesions can impact the assignment of clinical stage and subsequent treatment planning. Our objective was to design a standardized classification system to more accurately define the risk of malignancy in indeterminate liver lesions.

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients with localized, non-metastatic pancreatic cancer were identified and pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) scans were evaluated for the presence or absence of liver lesions. Liver lesions were defined as definitely benign (1) or indeterminate (2). Indeterminate lesions were further sub-classified as either indeterminate probably benign (2B) or indeterminate possibly malignant (2M). The index liver lesion was evaluated on follow-up imaging for stability or unequivocal disease progression.

Results

From 2008 to 2015, 304 patients with localized, non-metastatic pancreatic cancer were identified and 125 (41%) patients had liver lesions. Of the 125 patients, the liver lesions in 35 (28%) were classified as definitely benign and in 90 (72%) patients they were classified as indeterminate. The 90 patients with indeterminate lesions included 80 (89%) classified as indeterminate probably benign (2B) and 10 (11%) classified as indeterminate possibly malignant (2M). After a median follow-up of 56 weeks, no patient with a definitely benign lesion had metastatic disease progression of the index lesion. Of the 90 patients with indeterminate liver lesions, the index lesion progressed to unequivocal liver metastasis in 8 (9%) patients; 5 (6%) of the 80 lesions classified as indeterminate probably benign (2B), and 3 (30%) of the ten lesions classified as indeterminate possibly malignant (2M). The sensitivity of the classification system was 38% and the specificity was 91%. The positive predictive value was 30% and the negative predictive value was 94%.

Conclusions

A significant proportion of patients with localized pancreatic cancer will have liver lesions identified at the time of diagnosis and most of these lesions will have indeterminate characteristics. A classification system which further stratifies indeterminate liver lesions by malignant potential can assist clinicians in determining optimal treatment plan and is associated with a high negative predictive value.
Literatur
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Horton KM, Fishman EK (2002) Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: CT imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 40(6):1263–1272CrossRefPubMed Horton KM, Fishman EK (2002) Adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: CT imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 40(6):1263–1272CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Liu RC, Traverso LW (2005) Diagnostic laparoscopy improves staging of pancreatic cancer deemed locally unresectable by computed tomography. Surg Endosc 19(5):638–642CrossRefPubMed Liu RC, Traverso LW (2005) Diagnostic laparoscopy improves staging of pancreatic cancer deemed locally unresectable by computed tomography. Surg Endosc 19(5):638–642CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Satoi S, Yanagimoto H, Toyokawa H, et al. (2011) Selective use of staging laparoscopy based on carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level and tumor size in patients with radiographically defined potentially or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 40(3):426–432CrossRefPubMed Satoi S, Yanagimoto H, Toyokawa H, et al. (2011) Selective use of staging laparoscopy based on carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level and tumor size in patients with radiographically defined potentially or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. Pancreas 40(3):426–432CrossRefPubMed
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Somers I, Bipat S (2017) Contrast-enhanced CT in determining resectability in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the positive predictive values of CT. Eur Radiol 27(8):3408–3435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Somers I, Bipat S (2017) Contrast-enhanced CT in determining resectability in patients with pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis of the positive predictive values of CT. Eur Radiol 27(8):3408–3435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Tsai S, Evans DB (2016) Therapeutic advances in localized pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg 151:862–868CrossRefPubMed Tsai S, Evans DB (2016) Therapeutic advances in localized pancreatic cancer. JAMA Surg 151:862–868CrossRefPubMed
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Colangelo SM, Ercolani MC, Panicek DM (1999) Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology 210(1):71–74CrossRefPubMed Schwartz LH, Gandras EJ, Colangelo SM, Ercolani MC, Panicek DM (1999) Prevalence and importance of small hepatic lesions found at CT in patients with cancer. Radiology 210(1):71–74CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Khalil HI, Patterson SA, Panicek DM (2005) Hepatic lesions deemed too small to characterize at CT: prevalence and importance in women with breast cancer. Radiology 235(3):872–878CrossRefPubMed Khalil HI, Patterson SA, Panicek DM (2005) Hepatic lesions deemed too small to characterize at CT: prevalence and importance in women with breast cancer. Radiology 235(3):872–878CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans DB, George B, Tsai S (2015) Non-metastatic pancreatic cancer: resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced-definitions of increasing importance for the optimal delivery of multimodality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 22(11):3409–3413CrossRefPubMed Evans DB, George B, Tsai S (2015) Non-metastatic pancreatic cancer: resectable, borderline resectable, and locally advanced-definitions of increasing importance for the optimal delivery of multimodality therapy. Ann Surg Oncol 22(11):3409–3413CrossRefPubMed
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH, et al. (2008) Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol 26(21):3496–3502CrossRefPubMed Evans DB, Varadhachary GR, Crane CH, et al. (2008) Preoperative gemcitabine-based chemoradiation for patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. J Clin Oncol 26(21):3496–3502CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Raman SP, Horton KM, Fishman EK (2012) Multimodality imaging of pancreatic cancer-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Cancer J 18(6):511–522CrossRefPubMed Raman SP, Horton KM, Fishman EK (2012) Multimodality imaging of pancreatic cancer-computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography. Cancer J 18(6):511–522CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Appel BL, Tolat P, Evans DB, Tsai S (2012) Current staging systems for pancreatic cancer. Cancer journal. 18(6):539–549CrossRef Appel BL, Tolat P, Evans DB, Tsai S (2012) Current staging systems for pancreatic cancer. Cancer journal. 18(6):539–549CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST, et al. (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Gastroenterology 146(1):291–304CrossRefPubMed Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR, Chari ST, et al. (2014) Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association. Gastroenterology 146(1):291–304CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones EC, Chezmar JL, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME (1992) The frequency and significance of small (less than or equal to 15 mm) hepatic lesions detected by CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158(3):535–539CrossRefPubMed Jones EC, Chezmar JL, Nelson RC, Bernardino ME (1992) The frequency and significance of small (less than or equal to 15 mm) hepatic lesions detected by CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158(3):535–539CrossRefPubMed
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal I, Kaur H, Hindman NM, et al. (2017) ACR appropriateness criteria(R) suspected liver metastases. J Am Coll Radiol 14(5S):S314–S325 Expert Panel on Gastrointestinal I, Kaur H, Hindman NM, et al. (2017) ACR appropriateness criteria(R) suspected liver metastases. J Am Coll Radiol 14(5S):S314–S325
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Krakora GA, Coakley FV, Williams G, et al. (2004) Small hypoattenuating hepatic lesions at contrast-enhanced CT: prognostic importance in patients with breast cancer. Radiology 233(3):667–673CrossRefPubMed Krakora GA, Coakley FV, Williams G, et al. (2004) Small hypoattenuating hepatic lesions at contrast-enhanced CT: prognostic importance in patients with breast cancer. Radiology 233(3):667–673CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Characterizing indeterminate liver lesions in patients with localized pancreatic cancer at the time of diagnosis
verfasst von
Manav Bhalla
Mohammed Aldakkak
Naveen M. Kulkarni
Stacy D. O’Connor
Michael O. Griffin Jr.
Kathleen K. Christians
Douglas B. Evans
Susan Tsai
Parag P. Tolat
Publikationsdatum
28.11.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Abdominal Radiology / Ausgabe 2/2018
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Elektronische ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1404-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2018

Abdominal Radiology 2/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Medizinstudium Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Akuter Schwindel: Wann lohnt sich eine MRT?

28.04.2024 Schwindel Nachrichten

Akuter Schwindel stellt oft eine diagnostische Herausforderung dar. Wie nützlich dabei eine MRT ist, hat eine Studie aus Finnland untersucht. Immerhin einer von sechs Patienten wurde mit akutem ischämischem Schlaganfall diagnostiziert.

Screening-Mammografie offenbart erhöhtes Herz-Kreislauf-Risiko

26.04.2024 Mammografie Nachrichten

Routinemäßige Mammografien helfen, Brustkrebs frühzeitig zu erkennen. Anhand der Röntgenuntersuchung lassen sich aber auch kardiovaskuläre Risikopatientinnen identifizieren. Als zuverlässiger Anhaltspunkt gilt die Verkalkung der Brustarterien.

Update Radiologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.