nach oben

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

Erschienen in:

01.02.2018 | Original Scientific Article

Clinical assessment of class II resin-based composites versus preformed metal crowns performed on primary molars in patients at high risk of caries

verfasst von: A. Alyahya, A. Khanum, M. Qudeimat

Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Aim

To compare class II resin composite with preformed metal crowns (PMC) in the treatment of proximal dentinal caries in high caries-risk patients.

Methods

The charts (270) of paediatric patients with proximal caries of their primary molars were reviewed. Success or failure of a procedure was assessed using the dental notes. Survival analysis was used to calculate the mean survival time (MST) for both procedures. The influence of variables on the mean survival time was investigated.

Results

A total of 593 class II resin composites and 243 PMCs were placed in patients ranging between 4–13 years of age. The failure percentage of class II resin composites was 22.6% with the majority having been due to recurrent caries, while the failure percentage of PMCs was 15.2% with the majority due to loss of the crown. There was no significant difference between the MST of class II resin composites and PMCs, 41.3 and 45.6 months respectively (p value = 0.06). In class II resin composites, mesial restorations were associated with lower MST compared to distal restorations (p-value < 0.001).

Conclusions

The MST of resin composites and PMCs were comparable when performed on high caries-risk patients.

Atieh M. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:325–32.CrossRefPubMed

Attari N, Roberts JF. Restoration of primary teeth with crowns: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7:58–62.CrossRefPubMed

Attin T, Opatowski A, Meyer C, et al. Three-year follow up assessment of Class II restorations in primary molars with a polyacid-modified composite resin and a hybrid composite. Am J Dent. 2001;14:148–52.PubMed

Barr-Agholme M, Oden A, Dahllof G, Modeer T. A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Dent Mater. 1991;7:230–3.CrossRefPubMed

Belduz Kara N, Yilmaz Y. Assessment of oral hygiene and periodontal health around posterior primary molars after their restoration with various crown types. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2014;24:303–13.CrossRefPubMed

Bernardo M, Luis H, Martin MD, et al. Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007;138:775–83.CrossRefPubMed

Chambers D. Learning curves: what do dental students learn from repeated practice of clinical procedures? J Dent Educ. 2012;76:291–302.PubMed

Curzon MEJ, Toumba KJ. Restoration of primary teeth: clinical criteria for assessment of the literature. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;1:48–52.CrossRef

Cutler SJ, Ederer F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis. 1958;8:699–712.CrossRefPubMed

Dawson AS, Smales RJ. The influence of examination frequency and changing dentist on dental treatment provision in an Australian defence force population. Br Dent J. 1992;173:237–41.CrossRefPubMed

Drake CW. A comparison of restoration longevity in maxillary and mandibular teeth. J Am Dent Assoc. 1988;116:651–4.CrossRefPubMed

Duggal MS, Nooh A, High A. Response of the primary pulp to inflammation: a review of the Leeds studies and challenges for the future. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3:111–4.PubMed

Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Survival analysis. In: Fundamentals of clinical trials. 4th ed. New York: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC; 2010. p. 269–91.

Fuks AB, Araujo FB, Osorio LB, Hadani PE, Pinto AS. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:479–85.PubMed

Hutcheson C, Seale NS, McWhorter A, Kerins C, Wright J. Multi-surface composite vs stainless steel crown restorations after mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Dent. 2012;34:460–7.PubMed

Kindelan SADP, Nichol R, Willmott N, Fayle SA. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry: stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18(Suppl 1):20–8.CrossRefPubMed

Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Restorative materials in the primary dentition of poli-caries patients. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2007;8:29–35.CrossRefPubMed

Kupietzky A, Waggoner WE, Galea J. Long-term photographic and radiographic assessment of bonded resin composite strip crowns for primary incisors: results after 3 years. Pediatr Dent. 2005;27:221–5.PubMed

Mjor IA, Dahl JE, Moorhead JE. Age of restorations at replacement in permanent teeth in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand. 2000;58:97–101.CrossRefPubMed

O’Sullivan EA, Curzon ME. The efficacy of comprehensive dental care for children under general anesthesia. Br Dent J. 1991;171:56–8.CrossRefPubMed

Papathanasiou AG, Curzon ME, Fairpo CG. The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent. 1994;16:282–8.PubMed

Ram D, Fuks AB, Eidelman E. Long-term clinical performance of esthetic primary molar crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25:582–4.PubMed

Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Innes N, Clarkson J. Complete or ultraconservative removal of decayed tissue in unfilled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;3:CD003808.

Ricketts D, Lamont T, Innes NP, Kidd E, Clarkson JE. Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;3:CD003808.

Roberts JF, Attari N, Sherriff M. The survival of resin modified glass ionomer and stainless steel crown restorations in primary molars, placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice. Br Dent J. 2005;198:427–31.CrossRefPubMed

Savide NL, Caputo AA, Luke LS. The effect of tooth preparation on the retention of stainless steel crowns. ASDC J Dent Child. 1979;46:385–9.PubMed

Seale NS, Randall R. The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Dent. 2015;37:145–60.PubMed

Shen C. Dental cements. In: Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls HR, editors. Phillips’ science of dental materials. 12th ed. Missouri: Saunders, Elsevier Inc; 2013. p. 307–39.

Tate AR, Ng MW, Needleman HL, Acs G. Failure rates of restorative procedures following dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24:69–71.PubMed

Varpio M. Proximoclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a six-year follow-up. ASDC J Dent Child. 1985;52:435–40.PubMed

Wong FS, Day SJ. An investigation of factors influencing the longevity of restorations in primary molars. J Int Assoc Dent Child. 1990;20:11–6.PubMed

Titel: Clinical assessment of class II resin-based composites versus preformed metal crowns performed on primary molars in patients at high risk of caries
verfasst von: A. Alyahya
A. Khanum
M. Qudeimat
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2018
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 1818-6300
Elektronische ISSN: 1996-9805
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-017-0322-8

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Die Highlights vom Kongress des American College of Cardiology 2024

Springer Medizin

Clinical assessment of class II resin-based composites versus preformed metal crowns performed on primary molars in patients at high risk of caries

Abstract