nach oben

Clinical Oral Investigations

Erschienen in:

19.05.2020 | Review

Clinical efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa round dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

verfasst von: Vittorio Moraschini, Heloisa Bailly Guimarães, Ingrid Chaves Cavalcante, Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia

Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Ausgabe 7/2020

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effects of xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) in augmenting keratinized mucosa width (KMW) around dental implants.

Materials and methods

Articles that were published before or during April 2020 were electronically searched in four databases without any date or language restrictions and manually searched in regular journals and grey literature. The eligibility criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective studies that analysed the clinical efficacy of XCM for augmenting KMW around dental implants. This systematic review (SR) was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42018115399.

Results

Eleven studies published between 2009 and 2019 were included in this SR. There was no significant difference in KMW increase (p = 0.14), probing depth (PD) decrease (p = 0.17) or participants’ aesthetic satisfaction (PAS) (p = 0.32) when XCM was compared to connective tissue graft (CTG). However, the increase in gingival thickness (GT) was significantly higher (p = 0.001) with the use of CTG.

Conclusions

The use of XCM improved KMW and PD with rates comparable to those for CTG. XCM showed lower results for GT when compared to CTG. XCM presented similar results in terms of PAS when compared to CTG.

Clinical relevance

The presence of a KMW around dental implants is associated with better peri-implant tissue health.

Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI (1981) A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10:387–416PubMedCrossRef

Moraschini V, Poubel LA, Ferreira VF, Barboza ES (2015) Evaluation of survival and success rates of dental implants reported in longitudinal studies with a follow-up period of at least 10 years: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:377–388PubMedCrossRef

Mazzotti C, Stefanini M, Felice P, Bentivogli V, Mounssif I, Zucchelli G (2018) Soft-tissue dehiscence coverage at peri-implant sites. Periodontol 2000 77:256–272PubMedCrossRef

Small PN, Tarnow DP (2000) Gingival recession around implants: a 1-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15:527–532PubMed

Oates TW, West J, Jones J, Kaiser D, Cochran DL (2002) Long-term changes in soft tissue height on the facial surface of dental implants. Implant Dent 11:272–279PubMedCrossRef

Moraschini V, Luz D, Velloso G, Barboza ESP (2017) Quality assessment of systematic reviews of the significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:774–781PubMedCrossRef

Lin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL (2013) The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: a systematic review. J Periodontol 84:1755–1767PubMedCrossRef

Gobbato L, Avila-Ortiz G, Sohrabi K, Wang CW, Karimbux N (2013) The effect of keratinized mucosa width on peri-implant health: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:1536–1545PubMedCrossRef

Brito C, Tenenbaum HC, Wong BK, Schmitt C, Nogueira-Filho G (2014) Is keratinized mucosa indispensable to maintain peri-implant health? A systematic review of the literature. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 102:643–650PubMedCrossRef

10.

Lang NP, Löe H (1972) The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol 43:623–627PubMedCrossRef

11.

Tatakis DN, Chambrone L, Allen EP, Langer B, McGuire MK, Richardson CR, Zabalegui I, Zadeh HH (2015) Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol 86(2 Suppl):S52–S55PubMedCrossRef

12.

Chambrone L, Tatakis DN (2015) Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol 86(2 Suppl):S8–S51

13.

Pini Prato GP, Franceschi D, Cortellini P, Chambrone L (2018) Long-term evaluation (20 years) of the outcomes of subepithelial connective tissue graft plus coronally advanced flap in the treatment of maxillary single recession-type defects. J Periodontol 89:1290–1299PubMedCrossRef

14.

Yu SH, Tseng SC, Wang HL (2018) Classification of soft tissue grafting materials based on biologic principles. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 38:849–854PubMedCrossRef

15.

Lorenz J, Blume M, Barbeck M, Teiler A, Kirkpatrick CJ, Sader RA, Ghanaati S (2017) Expansion of the peri-implant attached gingiva with a three-dimensional collagen matrix in head and neck cancer patients-results from a prospective clinical and histological study. Clin Oral Investig 21:1103–1111PubMedCrossRef

16.

Armstrong DG, Jude EB (2002) The role of matrix metalloproteinases in wound healing. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92:12–18PubMedCrossRef

17.

Fuchs S, Ghanaati S, Orth C, Barbeck M, Kolbe M, Hofmann A, Eblenkamp M, Gomes M, Reis RL, Kirkpatrick CJ (2009) Contribution of outgrowth endothelial cells from human peripheral blood on in vivo vascularization of bone tissue engineered constructs based on starch polycaprolactone scaffolds. Biomaterials 30:526–534PubMedCrossRef

18.

Sanz M, Lorenzo R, Aranda JJ, Martin C, Orsini M (2009) Clinical evaluation of a new collagen matrix (Mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue in patients with fixed prosthetic restorations: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 36:868–876PubMedCrossRef

19.

Lorenzo R, García V, Orsini M, Martin C, Sanz M (2012) Clinical efficacy of a xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa around implants: a randomized controlled prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:316–324PubMedCrossRef

20.

Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U (2014) Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol 41(Suppl 15):S44–S62PubMedCrossRef

21.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M et al (2015) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev 4:1PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

22.

Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed April 10, 2018

23.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269PubMedCrossRef

24.

Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P (2007) Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 15:7–16

25.

Grey Literature Report. The New York Academy of Medicine. Avaiable at: http://www.greylit.org. Accessed October 15, 2018

26.

Open Grey. Avaiable at: http://www.opengrey.eu. Accessed October 15, 2018

27.

Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 18:d5928CrossRef

28.

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Avaiable at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed November 05, 2018

29.

Egger M, Smith GD (2003) Principles of and procedures for systematic reviews. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG (eds) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. BMJ Books, London, pp 23–42

30.

Simion M, Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Dellavia C (2012) Evaluation of a resorbable collagen matrix infused with rhPDGF-BB in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation: a preliminary report with 3.5 years of observation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 32:273–282PubMed

31.

Froum SJ, Khouly I, Tarnow DP, Froum S, Rosenberg E, Corby P, Kye W, Elian N, Schoor R, Cho SC (2015) The use of a xenogeneic collagen matrix at the time of implant placement to increase the volume of buccal soft tissue. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 35:179–189PubMedCrossRef

32.

Lee KH, Kim BO, Jang HS (2010) Clinical evaluation of a collagen matrix to enhance the width of keratinized gingiva around dental implants. J Periodontal Implant Sci 40:96–101PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef

33.

Vignoletti F, Nuñez J, de Sanctis F, Lopez M, Caffesse R, Sanz M (2015) Healing of a xenogeneic collagen matrix for keratinized tissue augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:545–552PubMedCrossRef

34.

Nocini PF, Castellani R, Zanotti G, Gelpi F, Covani U, Marconcini S, de Santis D (2014) Extensive keratinized tissue augmentation during implant rehabilitation after Le Fort I osteotomy: using a new porcine collagen membrane (Mucoderm). J Craniofac Surg 25:799–803PubMedCrossRef

35.

Fu JH, Su CY, Wang HL (2012) Esthetic soft tissue management for teeth and implants. J Evid Based Dent Pract 12(3 Suppl):129–142PubMedCrossRef

36.

Puzio M, Hadzik J, Błaszczyszyn A, Gedrange T, Dominiak M (2020) Soft tissue augmentation around dental implants with connective tissue graft (CTG) and xenogenic collagen matrix (XCM). 1-year randomized control trail. Ann Anat 230:151484PubMedCrossRef

37.

Schallhorn RA, McClain PK, Charles A, Clem D, Newman MG (2015) Evaluation of a porcine collagen matrix used to augment keratinized tissue and increase soft tissue thickness around existing dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 35(1):99–103PubMedCrossRef

38.

Schmitt CM, Moest T, Lutz R, Wehrhan F, Neukam FW, Schlegel KA (2016) Long-term outcomes after vestibuloplasty with a porcine collagen matrix (Mucograft) versus the free gingival graft: a comparative prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 27(11):e125–e133PubMedCrossRef

39.

Cairo F, Barbato L, Tonelli P, Batalocco G, Pagavino G, Nieri M (2017) Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 44(7):769–776PubMedCrossRef

40.

Puzio M, Błaszczyszyn A, Hadzik J, Dominiak M (2018) Ultrasound assessment of soft tissue augmentation around implants in the aesthetic zone using a connective tissue graft and xenogeneic collagen matrix - 1-year randomised follow-up. Ann Anat 217:129–141PubMedCrossRef

41.

Zuiderveld EG, Meijer HJA, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM (2018) The influence of different soft-tissue grafting procedures at single implant placement on esthetics: a randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol 89(8):903–914PubMedCrossRef

42.

Papi P, Pompa G (2018) The use of a novel porcine derived acellular dermal matrix (Mucoderm) in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation: preliminary results of a prospective pilot cohort study. Biomed Res Int 9:6406051

43.

Huber S, Zeltner M, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE, Thoma DS (2018) Non-interventional 1-year follow-up study of peri-implant soft tissues following previous soft tissue augmentation and crown insertion in single-tooth gaps. J Clin Periodontol 45:504–512PubMedCrossRef

44.

Vellis J, Kutkut A, Al-Sabbagh M (2019) Comparison of xenogeneic collagen matrix vs. free gingival grafts to increase the zone of keratinized mucosa around functioning implants. Implant Dent 28:20–27PubMedCrossRef

45.

Verardi S, Orsini M, Lombardi T, Ausenda F, Testori T, Pulici A, Oreglia F, Valente NA, Stacchi C (2019) Comparison between two different techniques for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation: porcine dermal matrix graft versus tenting screw. J Periodontol. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.19-0447

46.

Cheng YF, Chen JW, Lin SJ, Lu HK (2007) Is coronally positioned flap procedure adjunct with enamel matrix derivative or root conditioning a relevant predictor for achieving root coverage? A systemic review. J Periodontal Res 42:474–485PubMedCrossRef

47.

Fleming PS, Lynch CD, Pandis N (2014) Randomized controlled trials in dentistry: common pitfalls and how to avoid them. J Dent 42:908–914PubMedCrossRef

48.

Guiha R, el Khodeiry S, Mota L, Caffesse R (2001) Histological evaluation of healing and revascularization of the subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 72:470–478PubMedCrossRef

49.

Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hilbe M, Hämmerle CH, Hüsler J, Jung RE (2016) Randomized controlled clinical study evaluating effectiveness and safety of a volume-stable collagen matrix compared to autogenous connective tissue grafts for soft tissue augmentation at implant sites. J Clin Periodontol 43:874–885PubMedCrossRef

50.

Thoma DS, Villar CC, Cochran DL, Hammerle CH, Jung RE (2012b) Tissue integration of collagen-based matrices: an experimental study in mice. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:1333–1339PubMedCrossRef

51.

Lin CY, Chen Z, Pan WL, Wang HL (2018) Impact of timing on soft tissue augmentation during implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 29:508–521PubMedCrossRef

52.

Chambrone L, Pini Prato GP (2018) Clinical insights about the evolution of root coverage procedures: the flap, the graft, and the surgery. J Periodontol 90:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.18-0281 CrossRefPubMed

53.

Tatakis DN, Chambrone L (2016) The effect of suturing protocols on coronally advanced flap rootcoverage outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Periodontol 87:148–155PubMedCrossRef

54.

Raes S, Rocci A, Raes F, Cooper L, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J (2015) A prospective cohort study on the impact of smoking on soft tissue alterations around single implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:1086–1090PubMedCrossRef

55.

Palmer RM, Wilson RF, Hasan AS, Scott DA (2005) Mechanisms of action of environmental factors: tobacco smoking. J Clin Periodontol 32:180–190PubMedCrossRef

56.

Park JB (2006) Increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around endosseous implant using acellular dermal matrix allograft. Implant Dent 15:275–281PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Clinical efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa round dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
verfasst von: Vittorio Moraschini
Heloisa Bailly Guimarães
Ingrid Chaves Cavalcante
Monica Diuana Calasans-Maia
Publikationsdatum: 19.05.2020
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Clinical Oral Investigations / Ausgabe 7/2020
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Elektronische ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03321-5

Bestellen Sie unseren kostenlosen Newsletter Update Zahnmedizin und bleiben Sie gut informiert – ganz bequem per eMail.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Clinical efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix in augmenting keratinized mucosa round dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusions

Clinical relevance

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2020

The forgotten merits of GIC restorations: a systematic review

First insights for targeted therapies in odontogenic myxoma

Changes of the patient management in dentistry during the pandemic caused by the SARS-Coronavirus 2—initial perspectives of a clinic of operative dentistry in Europe

Root caries lesions inhibition and repair using commercial high-fluoride toothpastes with or without tri-calcium phosphate and conventional toothpastes containing or not 1.5% arginine CaCO3: an in situ investigation

The effect of water spray on the release of composite nano-dust

Four-year clinical prospective follow-up of resin composite restoration after selective caries removal using Er:YAG laser

Neu im Fachgebiet Zahnmedizin

Darf man die Behandlung eines Neonazis ablehnen?

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

Parodontalbehandlung verbessert Prognose bei Katheterablation

Newsletter