Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2019

12.12.2018 | Review

Clinical findings and outcomes of MRI staging of breast cancer in a diverse population

Erschienen in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Ausgabe 2/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

The performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the effect of patient factors, and resulting surgical management in underserved and ethnically diverse breast cancer (BC) patient populations have been understudied.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 1116 consecutive patients who were newly diagnosed with in situ or invasive BC with preoperative staging MRI. Non-index lesions (NILs) were defined as abnormal MRI findings with BI-RADS score of 4 or 5 in breast or axillary nodes not previously detected by conventional imaging. Occult cancers (OCs) were NILs found to be malignant by biopsy or surgery. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between probabilities of NILs or OCs and patient characteristics.

Results

Staging MRI detected NILs and OCs in 24% and 7.5% of patients, respectively. Of 1116 patients, 271 (24%) had 327 NILs, and 84 (7.5%) had 87 OCs. Follow-up information was available for 306 NILs. Ipsilateral breast NILs (n = 124) were seen in 115 patients (10.3%), with OCs (n = 51) seen in 48 patients (4.4%). Contralateral breast NILs (n = 134) were seen in 118 (10.6%) patients, with OCs (n = 20) seen in 20 patients (1.8%). Laterality (p < 0.001) and disease stage (p = 0.018) were associated with probability of OC. Patients without BRCA mutations had a significantly higher probability of having NILs (p = 0.003) but not OCs.

Conclusions

Our study provides useful estimates of the rates of NILs and OCs anticipated in a younger, uninsured, ethnically diverse population. Prospective trials and larger pooled retrospective analyses are needed to define the long-term impacts of MRI staging after a BC diagnosis.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Warner E, Hill K, Causer P et al (2011) Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 29:1664–1669CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Warner E, Hill K, Causer P et al (2011) Prospective study of breast cancer incidence in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation under surveillance with and without magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol 29:1664–1669CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Arnaout A, Catley C, Booth CM et al (2015) Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer: a Canadian population-based study. JAMA Oncol 1:1238–1250CrossRefPubMed Arnaout A, Catley C, Booth CM et al (2015) Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer: a Canadian population-based study. JAMA Oncol 1:1238–1250CrossRefPubMed
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG et al (2003) Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 98:468–473CrossRefPubMed Bedrosian I, Mick R, Orel SG et al (2003) Changes in the surgical management of patients with breast carcinoma based on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer 98:468–473CrossRefPubMed
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wernli KJ, DeMartini WB, Ichikawa L et al (2014) Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice. JAMA Intern Med 174:125–132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wernli KJ, DeMartini WB, Ichikawa L et al (2014) Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice. JAMA Intern Med 174:125–132CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295–1303CrossRef Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295–1303CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Iacconi C, Galman L, Zheng J et al (2015) Multicentric cancer detected at breast MR imaging and not at mammography: important or not? Radiology 279(2):378-384PubMedCentral Iacconi C, Galman L, Zheng J et al (2015) Multicentric cancer detected at breast MR imaging and not at mammography: important or not? Radiology 279(2):378-384PubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Bitencourt AG, Pereira NP, França LK et al (2015) Role of MRI in the staging of breast cancer patients: does histological type and molecular subtype matter? Br J Radiol 88:20150458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bitencourt AG, Pereira NP, França LK et al (2015) Role of MRI in the staging of breast cancer patients: does histological type and molecular subtype matter? Br J Radiol 88:20150458CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007:1295–1303CrossRef Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007) MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007:1295–1303CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Turnbul L, Brown S, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial Turnbul L, Brown S, Harvey I et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of MRI in breast cancer (COMICE) trial: a randomised controlled trial
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters N, Van Esser S, van den Bosch M et al (2011) Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET–randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 47:879–886CrossRefPubMed Peters N, Van Esser S, van den Bosch M et al (2011) Preoperative MRI and surgical management in patients with nonpalpable breast cancer: the MONET–randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 47:879–886CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRefPubMed Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R et al (2009) Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42:377–381CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sickles E, D’Orsi C, Bassett L et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston Sickles E, D’Orsi C, Bassett L et al (2013) ACR BI-RADS® Atlas Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. American College of Radiology, Reston
13.
Zurück zum Zitat D’Orsi DBBWR (2003) VA: American College of Radiology; 2003. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Mammography, BI-RADS D’Orsi DBBWR (2003) VA: American College of Radiology; 2003. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Mammography, BI-RADS
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Cox DR (1989) Analysis of binary data, Chapman & Hall, London Cox DR (1989) Analysis of binary data, Chapman & Hall, London
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Hocking RR (1976) The Analysis and Selection of Variables in Linear Regression Hocking RR (1976) The Analysis and Selection of Variables in Linear Regression
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Silbergeld JJ et al (2011) High cancer yield and positive predictive value: outcomes at a center routinely using preoperative breast MRI for staging. Am J Roentgenol 196:W93–W99CrossRef Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Silbergeld JJ et al (2011) High cancer yield and positive predictive value: outcomes at a center routinely using preoperative breast MRI for staging. Am J Roentgenol 196:W93–W99CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Chlebowski RT, Chen Z, Anderson GL et al (2005) Ethnicity and breast cancer: factors influencing differences in incidence and outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:439–448CrossRefPubMed Chlebowski RT, Chen Z, Anderson GL et al (2005) Ethnicity and breast cancer: factors influencing differences in incidence and outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:439–448CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Orel S (2008) Who should have breast magnetic resonance imaging evaluation? J Clin Oncol 26:703–711CrossRefPubMed Orel S (2008) Who should have breast magnetic resonance imaging evaluation? J Clin Oncol 26:703–711CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Ciatto S, Macaskill P et al (2008) Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:3248–3258CrossRefPubMed
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Turner R, Morrow M (2013) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Ann Surg 257:249–255CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Turner R, Morrow M (2013) Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer: meta-analysis of surgical outcomes. Ann Surg 257:249–255CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Rijnsburger AJ, Obdeijn IM, Kaas R et al (2010) BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. J Clin Oncol 28:5265–5273CrossRefPubMed Rijnsburger AJ, Obdeijn IM, Kaas R et al (2010) BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. J Clin Oncol 28:5265–5273CrossRefPubMed
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2001) MRI screening for breast cancer in women with familial or genetic predisposition: design of the Dutch National Study (MRISC). Fam Cancer 1:163–168CrossRefPubMed Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C et al (2001) MRI screening for breast cancer in women with familial or genetic predisposition: design of the Dutch National Study (MRISC). Fam Cancer 1:163–168CrossRefPubMed
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Phi XA, Houssami N, Obdeijn IM et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 33:349–356CrossRefPubMed Phi XA, Houssami N, Obdeijn IM et al (2015) Magnetic resonance imaging improves breast screening sensitivity in BRCA mutation carriers age ≥ 50 years: evidence from an individual patient data meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 33:349–356CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Houssami N, Turner R, Macaskill P et al (2014) An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol 32:392–401CrossRefPubMed Houssami N, Turner R, Macaskill P et al (2014) An individual person data meta-analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and breast cancer recurrence. J Clin Oncol 32:392–401CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Clinical findings and outcomes of MRI staging of breast cancer in a diverse population
Publikationsdatum
12.12.2018
Erschienen in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Ausgabe 2/2019
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-018-05084-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2019

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 2/2019 Zur Ausgabe

Update Onkologie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.