nach oben

International Ophthalmology

Erschienen in:

01.12.2024 | Review

Clinical utility of handheld fundus and smartphone-based camera for monitoring diabetic retinal diseases: a review study

verfasst von: Huma Naz, Rahul Nijhawan, Neelu Jyothi Ahuja

Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology | Ausgabe 1/2024

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the leading global cause of vision loss, accounting for 4.8% of global blindness cases as estimated by the World Health Organization (WHO). Fundus photography is crucial in ophthalmology as a diagnostic tool for capturing retinal images. However, resource and infrastructure constraints limit access to traditional tabletop fundus cameras in developing countries. Additionally, these conventional cameras are expensive, bulky, and not easily transportable. In contrast, the newer generation of handheld and smartphone-based fundus cameras offers portability, user-friendliness, and affordability. Despite their potential, there is a lack of comprehensive review studies examining the clinical utilities of these handheld (e.g. Zeiss Visuscout 100, Volk Pictor Plus, Volk Pictor Prestige, Remidio NMFOP, FC161) and smartphone-based (e.g. D-EYE, iExaminer, Peek Retina, Volk iNview, Volk Vistaview, oDocs visoScope, oDocs Nun, oDocs Nun IR) fundus cameras. This review study aims to evaluate the feasibility and practicality of these available handheld and smartphone-based cameras in medical settings, emphasizing their advantages over traditional tabletop fundus cameras. By highlighting various clinical settings and use scenarios, this review aims to fill this gap by evaluating the efficiency, feasibility, cost-effectiveness, and remote capabilities of handheld and smartphone fundus cameras, ultimately enhancing the accessibility of ophthalmic services.

Sun H et al (2022) IDF diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 183:109119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109119CrossRefPubMed

Teo ZL et al (2021) Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and projection of burden through 2045: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 128(11):1580–1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.04.027CrossRefPubMed

Fenner BJ, Wong RLM, Lam WC, Tan GSW, Cheung GCM (2018) Advances in retinal imaging and applications in diabetic retinopathy screening: a review. Ophthalmol Ther 7(2):333–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-018-0153-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yau JWY et al (2012) Global prevalence and major risk factors of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care 35(3):556–564. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc11-1909CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Grauslund J (2022) Diabetic retinopathy screening in the emerging era of artificial intelligence. Diabetologia 65(9):1415–1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-022-05727-0CrossRefPubMed

Rajalakshmi R, Subashini R, Anjana RM, Mohan V (2018) Automated diabetic retinopathy detection in smartphone-based fundus photography using artificial intelligence. Eye 32(6):1138–1144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0064-9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Pieczynski J, Kuklo P, Grzybowski A (2021) The role of telemedicine, in-home testing and artificial intelligence to alleviate an increasingly burdened healthcare system: diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmol Ther 10(3):445–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-021-00353-2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

International council on ophthalmology, (n.d.), Data on Ophthalmologists Worldwide, Accessed 01 Mar 2023, https://icoph.org/advocacy/data-on-ophthalmologists-worldwide

NHS Information Centre (2018) General ophthalmic services: workforce statistics for England and wales pp. 1–42

10.

Hoffman M, Steinley D, Brusco MJ (2015) A note on using the adjusted Rand index for link prediction in networks. Soc Networks 42:72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.03.002CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Panwar N et al (2016) Fundus photography in the 21st century -a review of recent technological advances and their implications for worldwide healthcare. Telemed e-Health 22(3):198–208. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2015.0068MathSciNetCrossRef

12.

Li B (2018) This article has been accepted for publication in Archives of Disease in Childhood following peer review. The definitive copyedited, typeset will be available online at: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2018pp. 1–16

13.

Gulshan V et al (2016) Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc 316(22):2402–2410. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.17216CrossRef

14.

Milea D et al (2020) Artificial intelligence to detect papilledema from ocular fundus photographs. N Engl J Med 382(18):1687–1695. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1917130CrossRefPubMed

15.

Micheletti JM, Hendrick AM, Khan FN, Ziemer DC, Pasquel FJ (2016) Current and next generation portable screening devices for diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Sci Technol 10(2):295–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816629158CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Barikian A, Haddock LJ (2018) Smartphone assisted fundus fundoscopy/photography. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 6(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-018-0162-7CrossRef

17.

Grzybowski A et al (2020) Artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy screening: a review. Eye 34(3):451–460. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-019-0566-0CrossRefPubMed

18.

Palermo BJ, D’Amico SL, Kim BY, Brady CJ (2022) Sensitivity and specificity of handheld fundus cameras for eye disease: a systematic review and pooled analysis. Surv Ophthalmol 67(5):1531–1539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2021.11.006CrossRefPubMed

19.

Tran K, Mendel TA, Holbrook KL, Yates PA (2012) Construction of an inexpensive, hand-held fundus camera through modification of a consumer ‘point-and-shoot’ camera. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(12):7600–7607. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.12-10449CrossRef

20.

Piyasena MMPN, Yip JLY, MacLeod D, Kim M, Gudlavalleti VSM (2019) Diagnostic test accuracy of diabetic retinopathy screening by physician graders using a hand-held non-mydriatic retinal camera at a tertiary level medical clinic. BMC Ophthalmol 19(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1092-3CrossRef

21.

Kubin AM, Wirkkala J, Keskitalo A, Ohtonen P, Hautala N (2021) Handheld fundus camera performance, image quality and outcomes of diabetic retinopathy grading in a pilot screening study. Acta Ophthalmol 99(8):e1415–e1420. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14850CrossRefPubMed

22.

Midena E, Zennaro L, Lapo C, Torresin T, Midena G, Pilotto E, Frizziero L (2022) Handheld fundus camera for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison study with table-top fundus camera in real-life setting. J Clin Med 11(9):2352. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11092352CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Yogesan K, Constable IJ, Barry CJ, Eikelboom RH, McAllister IL, Tay-Kearney ML (2000) Telemedicine screening of diabetic retinopathy using a hand-held fundus camera. Telemed J 6(2):219–223. https://doi.org/10.1089/107830200415153CrossRefPubMed

24.

Nunez do Rio, J. M., Nderitu, P., Bergeles, C., Sivaprasad, S., Tan, G. S., & Raman, R. (2022) Evaluating a deep learning diabetic retinopathy grading system developed on mydriatic retinal images when applied to non-mydriatic community screening. J Clin Med 11(3):614. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11030614CrossRefPubMed

25.

Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM (2002) The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: a comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic color photography. Am J Ophthalmol 134(2):204–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01522-2CrossRefPubMed

26.

Spitzer BYMS (2014) Case study : ZEISS VISUSCOUT 100—Handheld fundus camera the ZEISS VISUSCOUT 100 handheld fundus camera—a valuable tool for outreach programs in rural and underserved regions. p. 2014

27.

Xiao B et al (2020) Validation of handheld fundus camera with mydriasis for retinal imaging of diabetic retinopathy screening in China: a prospective comparison study. BMJ Open 10(10):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040196CrossRef

28.

Stino H et al (2022) Comparison of two ultra-widefield color-fundus imaging devices for visualization of retinal periphery and microvascular lesions in patients with early diabetic retinopathy. Sci Rep 12(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-21319-9ADSCrossRef

29.

Cuadros J, Bresnick G (2017) Can commercially available handheld retinal cameras effectively screen diabetic retinopathy? J Diabetes Sci Technol 11(1):135–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816682033CrossRefPubMed

30.

Medical Technology for healthcare professionals, (n.d.) Zeiss Visuscout 100 Handheld Fundus Camera, Accessed 20 Apr 2023 https://www.zeiss.com/meditec/en/products/retinal-cameras/visuscout-100-handheld-fundus-camera.html

31.

Sachdeva V et al (2018) Optic nerve head edema among patients presenting to the emergency department. Neurology 90(5):e373–e379. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004895CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

32.

Soliz P et al (2016) Comparison of the effectiveness of three retinal camera technologies for malarial retinopathy detection in Malawi. Ophthalmic Technol XXVI 9693:96930B. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2213282CrossRef

33.

Das S et al (2023) Feasibility and clinical utility of handheld fundus cameras for retinal imaging. Eye 37(2):274–279. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01926-yCrossRefPubMed

34.

Volk, (n.d.) Quality you can see, Volk Cat., 2022, Accessed 28 Apr 2023 https://pdf.medicalexpo.com/pdf/volk/volk-catalog/80610-115955.html

35.

Volk. Pictor PlusTM Fundus Camera, (n.d.) Volk optical, Accessed 26 Apr 2023 https://www.volk.com/products/pictor-plus-fundus-camera

36.

Zhang W, Nicholas P, Schuman S, Allingham M, Faridi A, Tushar S, Prakalapakorn SG (2015) Screening for diabetic retinopathy using the hand-held PICTOR camera. Investigat Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56(7):1426–1426

37.

Lanzelotte V, Vieira AA, Fonseca ABM, da Silva JE, Gonet B, Bueno AC (2022) ROP screening with the Pictor plus camera: a telemedicine solution for developing countries. J Am Assoc Pediat Ophthalmol Strabismus 26(5):244-e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2022.05.019CrossRef

38.

Schafer B, Ramsey F, Henderer J (2020) A comparison of 3 hand-held non-mydriatic cameras for taking glaucoma screening photographs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 61(7):5249–5249

39.

Rogers TW et al (2021) Evaluation of an AI system for the detection of diabetic retinopathy from images captured with a handheld portable fundus camera: the MAILOR AI study. Eye 35(2):632–638. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0927-8CrossRefPubMed

40.

Analysis A, Manual U (2012) User manual user manual. Data Base 3304(January):1–148

41.

Salongcay RP et al (2022) Comparison of handheld retinal imaging with ETDRS 7-standard field photography for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular Edema. Ophthalmol Retin 6(7):548–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2022.03.002CrossRef

42.

Hand Held Fundus Camera, (n.d.), FOP NM-10 Easy-to-use fundus imaging that revolutionizes retinal screening, Accessed 23 Feb 2023, https://www.remidio.com/products/fop

43.

Balasopoulou A et al (2017) Symposium recent advances and challenges in the management of retinoblastoma globe—saving treatments. BMC Ophthalmol 17(1):1. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJOCrossRef

44.

Prathiba V, Rajalakshmi R, Arulmalar S, Usha M, Subhashini R, Gilbert CE, Mohan V (2020) Accuracy of the smartphone-based nonmydriatic retinal camera in the detection of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol 68(Suppl 1):S42. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1937_19CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

45.

Jain A, Krishnan R, Rogye A, Natarajan S (2021) Use of offline artificial intelligence in a smartphone-based fundus camera for community screening of diabetic retinopathy. Indian J Ophthalmol 69(11):3150. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_3808_20CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

46.

Sosale AR (2019) Screening for diabetic retinopathy—is the use of artificial intelligence and cost-effective fundus imaging the answer? Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 39(1):1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-019-00729-yCrossRef

47.

Soliz P, Zamora G, Benson J, Nemeth S, Maynard J, Barriga S, Wigdahl J (2019) Impact of retinal image quality: software aid for a low-cost device and effects on disease detection. In: Ophthalmic Technologies XXIX (Vol 10858, pp 137–148). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2510125

48.

FC161 Hand-held Fundus Camera, (n.d.) Accessed 27 Apr 2023 https://www.mediworks.biz/en/product/handheld-fundus-camera-fc161

49.

Rajalakshmi R, Prathiba V, Arulmalar S, Usha M (2021) Review of retinal cameras for global coverage of diabetic retinopathy screening. Eye 35(1):162–172. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-01262-7CrossRefPubMed

50.

Shanmugam M, Mishra D, Madhukumar R, Ramanjulu R, Reddy S, Rodrigues G (2014) Fundus imaging with a mobile phone: a review of techniques. Indian J Ophthalmol 62(9):960–962. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.143949CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Iqbal U (2021) Smartphone fundus photography: a narrative review. Int J Retin Vitr 7(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-021-00313-9CrossRef

52.

Tan CH, Quah WH, Tan CS, Smith H, Car LT (2019) Use of smartphones for detecting diabetic retinopathy: a protocol for a scoping review of diagnostic test accuracy studies. BMJ Open. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028811CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Bang SYX, Le KNT, Le DT, Choo H (2023) Feature pool exploitation for disease detection in fundus images. In: 2023 17th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication (IMCOM) (pp 1–4). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCOM56909.2023.10035647.

54.

Sharma A (2017) Emerging simplified retinal imaging. Dev Ophthalmol 60:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1159/000459690CrossRefPubMed

55.

Shah D, Dewan L, Singh A, Jain D, Damani T, Pandit R, Patel A (2021) Utility of a smartphone assisted direct ophthalmoscope camera for a general practitioner in screening of diabetic retinopathy at a primary health care center. Indian J Ophthalmol 69(11):3144CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Kurup AR, Wigdahl J, Benson J, Martínez-Ramón M, Solíz P, Joshi V (2023) Automated malarial retinopathy detection using transfer learning and multi-camera retinal images. Biocybern Biomed Eng 43(1):109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbe.2022.12.003CrossRefPubMed

57.

visoScope 2.0 (n.d.) visoScope 2.0. Accessed 22 Mar 2023, https://odocseyecare.shop/products/visoscope-2-0?variant=32723089260629

58.

Russo A, Morescalchi F, Costagliola C, Delcassi L, Semeraro F (2015) A novel device to exploit the smartphone camera for fundus photography. J Ophthalmol 2015:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/823139CrossRef

59.

Sengupta S, Sindal MD, Baskaran P, Pan U, Venkatesh R (2019) Sensitivity and specificity of smartphone-based retinal imaging for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative study. Ophthalmol Retin 3(2):146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2018.09.016CrossRef

60.

Toy BC et al (2016) Smartphone-based dilated fundus photography and near visual acuity testing as inexpensive screening tools to detect referral warranted diabetic eye disease. Retin 36(5):1000–1008. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000955CrossRef

61.

Ryan ME et al (2015) Comparison among methods of retinopathy assessment (CAMRA) study. Ophthalmology 122(10):2038–2043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.06.011.ComparisonCrossRefPubMed

62.

Rajalakshmi R et al (2015) Validation of smartphone based retinal photography for diabetic retinopathy screening. PLoS ONE 10(9):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138285MathSciNetCrossRef

63.

Odigie OM, Akinlabi GA (2022) Smartphone imaging devices for screening of diabetic retinopathy: a review. Ibom Med J 15(1):1–7CrossRef

64.

Laurent C, Hong SC, Cheyne KR, Ogbuehi KC (2020) The detection of spontaneous venous pulsation with smartphone video ophthalmoscopy. Clin Ophthalmol 14:331–337. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S238897CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

65.

Description P (2020) Technical document—ODocs nun ophthalmoscope pp 1–6

66.

Singh A, Cheyne K, Wilson G, Sime MJ, Hong SC (2020) On the use of a new monocular-indirect ophthalmoscope for retinal photography in a primary care setting. N Z Med J 133(1512):31–38PubMed

67.

O’Keeffe B, Hong SC, Chalakkal R (2021) Retinal self examination ‘selfies’ during a pandemic. Open Ophthalmol J 15(1):206–208. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874364102115010206CrossRef

68.

Hu R, Chalakkal RJ, Linde G, Dhupia JS (2022) Multi-image stitching for smartphone-based retinal fundus stitching. In: 2022 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM) (pp 179–184). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM52237.2022.9863260.

69.

Dunn HP, Kang CJ, Marks S, Dunn SM, Healey PR, White AJ (2023) Optimising fundoscopy practices across the medical spectrum: a focus group study. PLoS ONE 18(1):e0280937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280937CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

70.

Bastawrous A (2012) Smartphone fundoscopy. Ophthalmology 119(2):432-433.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.11.014CrossRefPubMed

71.

DK Ho and PJE Morgan (2018) Fundoscopy among novice users : comparing between direct ophthalmoscope and PEEK Retina 134(2):10228

72.

Bastawrous A (2016) Increasing access to eye care. There’s an app for that. Peek: smartphone technology for eye health. Int J Epidemiol 45(4):1040–1043. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw086CrossRefPubMed

73.

Peek Vision (n.d.) Peek Retina. Accessed 12 Feb 2023 https://peekvision.org/en_GB/about-peek/peek-retina/

74.

Yusuf AM, Lusobya RC, Mukisa J, Batte C, Nakanjako D, Juliet-Sengeri O (2022) Validity of smartphone-based retinal photography (PEEK-retina) compared to the standard ophthalmic fundus camera in diagnosing diabetic retinopathy in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 17(9):e0273633. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273633CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

75.

Maamari RN, Keenan JD, Fletcher DA, Margolis TP (2014) A mobile phone-based retinal camera for portable wide field imaging. Br J Ophthalmol 98(4):438–441. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-303797CrossRefPubMed

76.

Karakaya M, Hacisoftaoglu RE (2020) Comparison of smartphone-based retinal imaging systems for diabetic retinopathy detection using deep learning. BMC Bioinf 21(Suppl 4):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-03587-2CrossRef

77.

D.EYE Our Vision (n.d.) D.EYE Our Vision. Accessed 24 Apr 2023 http://www.d-eyecare.com. Accessed 26 May 2020

78.

Shikino K, Suzuki S, Hirota Y, Kikukawa M, Ikusaka M (2019) Effect of the iexaminer teaching method on fundus examination skills: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw open 2(9):e1911891. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.11891CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

79.

Hartnett ME (2005) Perceived barriers to diabetic eye care. Arch Ophthalmol 123(3):387. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.123.3.387MathSciNetCrossRefPubMed

80.

Hu H et al (2020) Characterization of the retinal vasculature in fundus photos using the PanOptic iExaminer system. Eye Vis 7(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40662-020-00211-5CrossRef

81.

Petrushkin H, Barsam A, Mavrakakis M, Parfitt A, Jaye P (2012) Optic disc assessment in the emergency department: a comparative study between the PanOptic and direct ophthalmoscopes. Emerg Med J 29(12):1007–1008. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2011-200038CrossRefPubMed

82.

McComiskie JE, Greer RM, Gole GA (2004) Panoptic versus conventional ophthalmoscope. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 32(3):238–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2004.00810.xCrossRefPubMed

83.

Eszes DJ, Szabó DJ, Russell G, Lengyel C, Várkonyi T, Paulik E, Petrovski BÉ (2021) Diabetic retinopathy screening in patients with diabetes using a handheld fundus camera: the experience from the South-Eastern region in Hungary. J Diabet Res. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6646645CrossRef

84.

Barriga ES, Dewi ER, Baldivieso O, Borda J, Diaz C, Rahimy E, Soliz P (2020) Using a handheld retinal camera and artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy screening in Bolivia. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 61(7):1645–1645

85.

Prakalapakorn SG et al (2018) Evaluating a portable, noncontact fundus camera for retinopathy of prematurity screening by nonophthalmologist health care workers. Ophthalmol Retin 2(8):864–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2017.12.003CrossRef

86.

Chen M, Swinney C, Chen M, Bal M, Nakatsuka A (2015) Comparing the utility of the non-mydriatic fundus camera to the direct ophthalmoscope for medical education. Hawaii J Med Public Health 74(3):93–95PubMedPubMedCentral

87.

Chalam KV, Chamchikh J, Gasparian S (2022) Optics and utility of low-cost smartphone-based portable digital fundus camera system for screening of retinal diseases. Diagnostics 12(6):1499. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12061499CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

88.

Queiroz MS et al (2020) Diabetic retinopathy screening in urban primary care setting with a handheld smartphone-based retinal camera. Acta Diabetol 57(12):1493–1499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00592-020-01585-7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

89.

Zafar S, Cardenas YM, Leishangthem L, Yaddanapudi S (2018) Opinion and special articles: amateur fundus photography with various new devices Our experience as neurology residents. Neurology 90(19):897–901. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005480CrossRefPubMed

90.

HRC as an EFI—D-E review, Handheld retinal camera as an eye for innovation—D-EYE review

91.

Kaur R et al (2020) MII RetCam assisted smartphone-based fundus imaging (MSFI)—a boon for paediatric retinal imaging. Eye 34(8):1307–1309. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-0822-3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

92.

Bursztyn L et al (2018) Accuracy and reliability of a handheld, nonmydriatic fundus camera for the remote detection of optic disc Edema. Telemed e-Health 24(5):344–350. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2017.0120CrossRef

93.

Prakalapakorn SG, Freedman SF, Hutchinson AK, Saehout P, Cetinkaya-Rundel M, Wallace DK, Kulvichit K (2018) Real-world simulation of an alternative retinopathy of prematurity screening system in Thailand: a pilot study. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 55(4):245–253. https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20180327-04CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

94.

Prakalapakorn SG, Wallace DK, Freedman SF (2014) Retinal imaging in premature infants using the Pictor noncontact digital camera. J AAPOS 18(4):321–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2014.02.013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

95.

Quellec G, Bazin L, Cazuguel G, Delafoy I, Cochener B, Lamard M (2016) Suitability of a low-cost, handheld, nonmydriatic retinograph for diabetic retinopathy diagnosis. Trans Vis Sci Technol 5(2):16–16. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.5.2.16CrossRef

96.

Sengupta S et al (2018) Screening for vision-threatening diabetic retinopathy in South India: comparing portable non-mydriatic and standard fundus cameras and clinical exam. Eye 32(2):375–383. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.199CrossRefPubMed

97.

Yogesan K, Constable IJ, Barry CJ, Eikelboom RH, Morgan W, Tay-Kearney ML, Jitskaia L (1999) Evaluation of a portable fundus camera for use in the teleophthalmologic diagnosis of glaucoma. J Glaucoma 8(5):297–301CrossRefPubMed

98.

Zhang W et al (2017) Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a portable, noncontact, nonmydriatic handheld retinal camera. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11(1):128–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296816658902MathSciNetCrossRefPubMed

99.

Khanamiri HN, Nakatsuka A, El-Annan J (2017) Smartphone fundus photography. JoVE J Visual Exp 125:e55958. https://doi.org/10.3791/55958CrossRef

100.

Kumari S, Venkatesh P, Tandon N, Chawla R, Takkar B, Kumar A (2022) Selfie fundus imaging for diabetic retinopathy screening. Eye 36(10):1988–1993. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-021-01804-7CrossRefPubMed

101.

Sheikh A, Bhatti A, Adeyemi O, Raja M, Sheikh I (2021) The utility of smartphone-based artificial intelligence approaches for diabetic retinopathy: a literature review and meta-analysis. J Curr Ophthalmol 33(3):219–226. https://doi.org/10.4103/2452-2325.329064CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

102.

Haddock LJ, Kim DY, Mukai S (2013) Simple, inexpensive technique for high-quality smartphone fundus photography in human and animal eyes. J Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/518479CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

103.

EXAMINER™ Eye Imaging on Your iPhone (n.d.) About PanOptic + iExaminer, Accessed 20 Mar 2023, https://www.welchallyn.com/en/microsites/iexaminer.html

Titel: Clinical utility of handheld fundus and smartphone-based camera for monitoring diabetic retinal diseases: a review study
verfasst von: Huma Naz
Rahul Nijhawan
Neelu Jyothi Ahuja
Publikationsdatum: 01.12.2024
Verlag: Springer Netherlands
Erschienen in: International Ophthalmology / Ausgabe 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0165-5701
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2630
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-02975-4

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Metastasen Leitthema

Orbitale und periokuläre metastatische Tumoren galten früher als sehr selten. Aber mit der ständigen Aktualisierung von Medikamenten und Nachweismethoden für die Krebsbehandlung werden neue Chemotherapien und Strahlenbehandlungen eingesetzt. Die …

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Metastasen bösartiger Erkrankungen sind die häufigsten Tumoren, die im Auge diagnostiziert werden. Sie treten bei ungefähr 5–10 % der Patienten mit soliden Tumoren im Verlauf der Erkrankung auf. Besonders häufig sind diese beim Mammakarzinom und …

Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

Trabekulektomie CME-Artikel

Die überschießende Wundheilung in der filtrierenden Glaukomchirurgie ist ein zentraler Faktor für ein operatives Versagen. Nach der Einführung der Trabekulektomie in den 1960er-Jahren wurden viele Faktoren erkannt, die mit einer vermehrten …

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Metastasen Leitthema

Peri- sowie intraokuläre Metastasen sind insgesamt gesehen selten und meist Zeichen einer fortgeschrittenen primären Tumorerkrankung. Die Therapie ist daher zumeist palliativ und selten kurativ. Zudem ist die Therapiefindung sehr individuell. Die …

Update Augenheilkunde

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Clinical utility of handheld fundus and smartphone-based camera for monitoring diabetic retinal diseases: a review study

Abstract

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Update Augenheilkunde

Klimawandel und Gesundheit: Was Sie in der Hausarztpraxis wissen müssen und tun können

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2024

The effects of an electronic head-mounted display in vision rehabilitation for patients with tunnel vision

Prediction of substantial closed-globe injuries in orbital wall fractures

Interrater reliability of photographic assessment of thyroid eye disease using the VISA classification

Anti-inflammatory potential of simvastatin and amfenac in ARPE-19 cells; insights in preventing re-detachment and proliferative vitreoretinopathy after rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery

Development and evaluation of Order of Magnitude (OM): a virtual reality-based visual field analyzer for glaucoma detection

Complications after CyPass® Micro-Stent explantation: a case series

Neu im Fachgebiet Augenheilkunde

Metastase in der periokulären Region

Staging und Systemtherapie bei okulären und periokulären Metastasen

Wundheilung nach Trabekulektomie

„standard operating procedures“ (SOP) – Vorschlag zum therapeutischen Management bei periokulären sowie intraokulären Metastasen

Update Augenheilkunde