Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2012

01.12.2012 | Original Article

Colonoscopy Preparation: Polyethylene Glycol with Gatorade Is as Safe and Efficacious as Four Liters of Polyethylene Glycol with Balanced Electrolytes

verfasst von: Thomas McKenna, Alice Macgill, Gail Porat, Frank K. Friedenberg

Erschienen in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Ausgabe 12/2012

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Four liters of polyethylene glycol 3350 (PEG) with balanced electrolytes for colonoscopy preparation has had poor acceptance. Another approach is the use of electrolyte-free PEG combined with 1.9 L of Gatorade. Despite its widespread use, there are no data on metabolic safety and minimal data on efficacy. Our aim was to assess the efficacy and electrolyte safety of these two PEG-based preparations.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, single-blind, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomized to 238 g PEG + 1.9 L Gatorade or 4 L of PEG-ELS containing 236 g PEG. Split dosing was not performed. On procedure day blood was drawn for basic chemistries. The primary outcome was preparation quality from procedure photos using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.

Results

We randomized 136 patients (66 PEG + Gatorade, 70 PEG-ELS). There were no differences in preparation scores between the two agents in the ITT analysis (7.2 ± 1.9 for PEG-ELS and 7.0 ± 2.1 for PEG + Gatorade; p = 0.45). BBPS scores were identical for those who completed the preparation and dietary instructions as directed (7.4 ± 1.7 for PEG-ELS, and 7.4 ± 1.8 for PEG + Gatorade; p = 0.98). There were no statistical differences in serum electrolytes between the two preparations. Patients who received PEG + Gatorade gave higher overall satisfaction scores for the preparation experience (p = 0.001), and had fewer adverse effects.

Conclusions

Use of 238 g PEG + 1.9 L Gatorade appears to be safe, better tolerated, and non-inferior to 4 L PEG-ELS. This preparation may be especially useful for patients who previously tolerated PEG-ELS poorly.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384.PubMedCrossRef Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ, et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:378–384.PubMedCrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79.PubMedCrossRef Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:76–79.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Adamcewicz M, Bearelly D, Porat G, et al. Mechanism of action and toxicities of purgatives used for colonoscopy preparation. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011;7:89–101.PubMedCrossRef Adamcewicz M, Bearelly D, Porat G, et al. Mechanism of action and toxicities of purgatives used for colonoscopy preparation. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011;7:89–101.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:894–909.PubMedCrossRef Wexner SD, Beck DE, Baron TH, et al. A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:894–909.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Pashankar DS, Uc A, Bishop WP. Polyethylene glycol 3350 without electrolytes: a new safe, effective, and palatable bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr. 2004;144:35862. Pashankar DS, Uc A, Bishop WP. Polyethylene glycol 3350 without electrolytes: a new safe, effective, and palatable bowel preparation for colonoscopy in children. J Pediatr. 2004;144:35862.
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Stratton S, Shelton P, Carleton V, et al. Feasibility of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 (Miralax) for colon preparation prior to lower endoscopic examination in healthy adults; experience in a community clinic setting. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2163–2164.PubMedCrossRef Stratton S, Shelton P, Carleton V, et al. Feasibility of polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3350 (Miralax) for colon preparation prior to lower endoscopic examination in healthy adults; experience in a community clinic setting. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2163–2164.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Enestvedt BK, Fennerty MB, Eisen GM. Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely—a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33:33–40.PubMedCrossRef Enestvedt BK, Fennerty MB, Eisen GM. Randomised clinical trial: MiraLAX vs. Golytely—a controlled study of efficacy and patient tolerability in bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;33:33–40.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Hjelkrem M, Stengel J, Liu M, et al. MiraLAX is not as effective as GoLytely in bowel cleansing before screening colonoscopies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:326–332.e1. Hjelkrem M, Stengel J, Liu M, et al. MiraLAX is not as effective as GoLytely in bowel cleansing before screening colonoscopies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:326–332.e1.
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1480–1491.PubMedCrossRef Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD, et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1480–1491.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620–625.PubMedCrossRef Lai EJ, Calderwood AH, Doros G, et al. The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:620–625.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:686–692.PubMedCrossRef Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:686–692.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Mittal S. The Boston bowel preparation scale: reliable not only for colonoscopy-oriented research but clinical practice also. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:221.PubMedCrossRef Mittal S. The Boston bowel preparation scale: reliable not only for colonoscopy-oriented research but clinical practice also. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:221.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Julious SA. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Stat Med. 2004;23:1921–1986.PubMedCrossRef Julious SA. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Stat Med. 2004;23:1921–1986.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541.PubMedCrossRef Barclay RL, Vicari JJ, Doughty AS, et al. Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2533–2541.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Millan MS, Gross P, Manilich E, et al. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1217–1220.PubMedCrossRef Millan MS, Gross P, Manilich E, et al. Adenoma detection rate: the real indicator of quality in colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1217–1220.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Nyberg C, Hendel J, Nielson OH. The safety of osmotically acting cathartics in colon cleansing. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7:557–564.PubMedCrossRef Nyberg C, Hendel J, Nielson OH. The safety of osmotically acting cathartics in colon cleansing. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;7:557–564.PubMedCrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Ho JM, Juurlink DN, Cavalcanti RB. Hypokalemia following polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy in older hospitalized patients with significant comorbidities. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44:466–470.PubMedCrossRef Ho JM, Juurlink DN, Cavalcanti RB. Hypokalemia following polyethylene glycol-based bowel preparation for colonoscopy in older hospitalized patients with significant comorbidities. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44:466–470.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Nagler J, Poppers D, Turetz M. Severe hyponatremia and seizure following a polyethylene glycol-based preparation for colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:558–559.PubMedCrossRef Nagler J, Poppers D, Turetz M. Severe hyponatremia and seizure following a polyethylene glycol-based preparation for colonoscopy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;40:558–559.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen CD, Keuneke C, Schiemann U, et al. Hyponatraemia as a complication of colonoscopy. Lancet. 2001;357:282–283.PubMedCrossRef Cohen CD, Keuneke C, Schiemann U, et al. Hyponatraemia as a complication of colonoscopy. Lancet. 2001;357:282–283.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Poon CM, Lee DWH, Mak SK, et al. Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2002;34:560–563.PubMedCrossRef Poon CM, Lee DWH, Mak SK, et al. Two liters of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage solution versus sodium phosphate as bowel cleansing regimen for colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2002;34:560–563.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat El Sayed AMA, Kanafani ZA, Mourad FH, et al. A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:36–40.PubMedCrossRef El Sayed AMA, Kanafani ZA, Mourad FH, et al. A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:36–40.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM, et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1240–1245.PubMedCrossRef Kilgore TW, Abdinoor AA, Szary NM, et al. Bowel preparation with split-dose polyethylene glycol before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1240–1245.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Sanaka MR, Deepinder F, Thota PN, et al. Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1659–1664; quiz 1665. Sanaka MR, Deepinder F, Thota PN, et al. Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1659–1664; quiz 1665.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Seinela L, Sairanen U, Laine T, et al. Comparison of polyethylene glycol with and without electrolytes in the treatment of constipation in elderly institutionalized patients: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Drugs Aging. 2009;26:703–713.PubMedCrossRef Seinela L, Sairanen U, Laine T, et al. Comparison of polyethylene glycol with and without electrolytes in the treatment of constipation in elderly institutionalized patients: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Drugs Aging. 2009;26:703–713.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Barkun A, Chiba N, Enns R, et al. Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety—a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006;20:699–710.PubMed Barkun A, Chiba N, Enns R, et al. Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety—a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006;20:699–710.PubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Ainley EJ, Winwood PJ, Begley JP. Measurement of serum electrolytes and phosphate after sodium phosphate colonoscopy bowel preparation: an evaluation. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:1319–1323.PubMedCrossRef Ainley EJ, Winwood PJ, Begley JP. Measurement of serum electrolytes and phosphate after sodium phosphate colonoscopy bowel preparation: an evaluation. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50:1319–1323.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan HL, Liew QY, Loo S, et al. Severe hyperphosphataemia and associated electrolyte and metabolic derangement following the administration of sodium phosphate for bowel preparation. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:478–483.PubMedCrossRef Tan HL, Liew QY, Loo S, et al. Severe hyperphosphataemia and associated electrolyte and metabolic derangement following the administration of sodium phosphate for bowel preparation. Anaesthesia. 2002;57:478–483.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3389–3396.PubMedCrossRef Markowitz GS, Stokes MB, Radhakrishnan J, et al. Acute phosphate nephropathy following oral sodium phosphate bowel purgative: an underrecognized cause of chronic renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16:3389–3396.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Baudet JS, Castro V, Redondo I. Recurrent ischemic colitis induced by colonoscopy bowel lavage. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:700–701.PubMedCrossRef Baudet JS, Castro V, Redondo I. Recurrent ischemic colitis induced by colonoscopy bowel lavage. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:700–701.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat DiPalma JA, McGowan J, Cleveland MV. Clinical trial: an efficacy evaluation of reduced bisacodyl given as part of a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution preparation prior to colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1113–1119.PubMedCrossRef DiPalma JA, McGowan J, Cleveland MV. Clinical trial: an efficacy evaluation of reduced bisacodyl given as part of a polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution preparation prior to colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:1113–1119.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Cohen LB, Sanyal SM, von Althann C, et al. Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation—a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:637–644. Cohen LB, Sanyal SM, von Althann C, et al. Clinical trial: 2-L polyethylene glycol-based lavage solutions for colonoscopy preparation—a randomized, single-blind study of two formulations. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:637–644.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat Corporaal S, Kleibeuker JH, Koornstra JJ. Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1380–1386. Corporaal S, Kleibeuker JH, Koornstra JJ. Low-volume PEG plus ascorbic acid versus high-volume PEG as bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:1380–1386.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J, et al. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2275–2284.PubMedCrossRef Di Palma JA, Rodriguez R, McGowan J, et al. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2275–2284.PubMedCrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Colonoscopy Preparation: Polyethylene Glycol with Gatorade Is as Safe and Efficacious as Four Liters of Polyethylene Glycol with Balanced Electrolytes
verfasst von
Thomas McKenna
Alice Macgill
Gail Porat
Frank K. Friedenberg
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Ausgabe 12/2012
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Elektronische ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2266-5

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 12/2012

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 12/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Echinokokkose medikamentös behandeln oder operieren?

06.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Die Therapie von Echinokokkosen sollte immer in spezialisierten Zentren erfolgen. Eine symptomlose Echinokokkose kann – egal ob von Hunde- oder Fuchsbandwurm ausgelöst – konservativ erfolgen. Wenn eine Op. nötig ist, kann es sinnvoll sein, vorher Zysten zu leeren und zu desinfizieren. 

Umsetzung der POMGAT-Leitlinie läuft

03.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Seit November 2023 gibt es evidenzbasierte Empfehlungen zum perioperativen Management bei gastrointestinalen Tumoren (POMGAT) auf S3-Niveau. Vieles wird schon entsprechend der Empfehlungen durchgeführt. Wo es im Alltag noch hapert, zeigt eine Umfrage in einem Klinikverbund.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Die „Zehn Gebote“ des Endokarditis-Managements

30.04.2024 Endokarditis Leitlinie kompakt

Worauf kommt es beim Management von Personen mit infektiöser Endokarditis an? Eine Kardiologin und ein Kardiologe fassen die zehn wichtigsten Punkte der neuen ESC-Leitlinie zusammen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.