nach oben

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Erschienen in:

26.08.2021 | Knee Revision Surgery

Comparative analysis of pathogen structure in patients with PJI after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty

verfasst von: Petr Preobrazhensky, Svetlana Bozhkova, Andrey Kochish, Rashid Tikhilov, Alexander Kazemirsky

Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Ausgabe 11/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Background

Microbiological profile of pathogens causing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total hip (THA) and knee (TKA) arthroplasty varies in different regions, clinics and even departments. The objective of this study was to analyze the pathogen structure in patients with PJI after primary THA and TKA and its influence on the effectiveness of the infection eradication after two-stage reimplantation.

Materials and methods

We collected the retrospective data of 364 patients—161 with PJI after primary TKA (113 treated in two stages 48 with failure after spacer implantation) and 203 patients with infected THA (127 after successful two-stage reimplantation and 76 with PJI recurrence after the first stage) within the time period from January 2012 to December 2017, treated with two-stage protocol in the single center. A comparative analysis of pathogen structure was performed between cohorts of patients with hip and knee PJI. A subanalysis was made between the subsets comprised from patients with successful two-stage treatment and the subsets with failure to treat the infection.

Results

Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most commonly identified pathogen in the full hip and knee cohorts: 30.1% and 32.5%, respectively. However, the percentage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) among all S. epidermidis isolates was higher in the hip cohort—50% compared with 35% in the knee cohort (p = 0.073). Other coagulase-negative Staphylococci were more common to patients with PJI after primary TKA—10.3% compared with 5% (p < 0.02). Streptococcus sp. caused hip PJI in a larger percentage of cases than in knee PJI (p < 0.01)—7% and 2%, respectively (p < 0.01).

Polymicrobial associations were significantly more common in hip PJI compared to knee PJI: 45.3% and 14% of cases, respectively (p < 0.001). The presence of polymicrobial infection significantly raised the risk of PJI recurrence [OR 2 (95% CI from 1.24 to 3.24)] in knee PJI patients and reduced the effectiveness of infection eradication from 73.9% to 47.8%.

Conclusion

Comparative analysis showed significant differences in the structure of PJI pathogens in the hip and knee. These findings are useful when choosing treatment strategies and empirical antibiotics regimens, in the management of patients with PJIs after primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

Aggarwal VK, Bakhshi H, Ecker NU, Parvizi J, Gehrke T, Kendoff D (2014) Organism profile in periprosthetic joint infection: pathogens differ at two arthroplasty infection referral centers in Europe and in the United States. J Knee Surg 27(5):399–406. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1364102CrossRefPubMed

Akgün D, Müller M, Perka C, Winkler T (2019) High cure rate of periprosthetic hip joint infection with multidisciplinary team approach using standardized two-stage exchange. J Orthop Surg Res 14:78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1122-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Akgün D, Trampuz A, Perka C, Renz N (2017) High failure rates in treatment of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection: results from a seven-year retrospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 99-B(5):653–659. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0851.R1CrossRefPubMed

Antony SJ, Westbrook RS, Jackson JS, Heydemann JS, Nelson JL (2015) Efficacy of single-stage revision with aggressive debridement using intra-articular antibiotics in the treatment of infected joint prosthesis. Infect Dis (Auckl) 8:17–23. https://doi.org/10.4137/IDRT.S26824CrossRef

Ascione T, Pagliano P, Balato G, Mariconda M, Rotondo R, Esposito S (2017) Oral therapy, microbiological findings, and comorbidity influence the outcome of prosthetic joint infections undergoing 2-stage exchange. J Arthroplasty 32(7):2239–2243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.057CrossRefPubMed

Bjerke-Kroll BT, Christ AB, McLawhorn AS, Sculco PK, Jules-Elysée KM, Sculco TP (2014) Periprosthetic joint infections treated with two-stage revision over 14 years: an evolving microbiology profile. J Arthroplasty 29(5):877–882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.053CrossRefPubMed

Boelch SP, Jakuscheit A, Doerries S, Fraissler L, Hoberg M, Arnholdt J, Rudert M (2018) Periprosthetic infection is the major indication for TKA revision—experiences from a university referral arthroplasty center. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1):395. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2314-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bozhkova SA, Kasimova AR, Tikhilov RM, Polyakova EM, Rukina AN, Shabanova VV, Liventsov VN (2018) Adverse trends in the etiology of orthopedic infection: results of 6 year monitoring of the structure and resistance of leading pathogens. Traumatol Orthop of Russia 24(4):20–31. https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-4-20-31 (In Russ)CrossRef

Bozhkova S, Tikhilov R, Labutin D, Denisov A, Shubnyakov I, Razorenov V, Artyukh V, Rukina A (2016) Failure of the first step of two-stage revision due to polymicrobial prosthetic joint infection of the hip. J Orthop Traumatol 17(4):369–376. https://doi.org/10.21823/2311-2905-2018-24-4-20-31CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Bozic KJ, Kamath AF, Ong K, Lau E, Kurtz S, Chan V, Vail TP, Rubash H, Berry DJ (2015) Comparative epidemiology of revision arthroplasty: failed THA poses greater clinical and economic burdens than failed TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 473(6):2131–2138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4078-8CrossRefPubMed

11.

Castellani L, Daneman N, Mubareka S, Jenkinson R (2017) Factors associated with choice and success of one- versus two-stage revision arthroplasty for infected hip and knee prostheses. HSS J 13(3):224–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-017-9550-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Chen SY, Wang JT, Chen TH, Lai MS, Chie WC, Chien KL, Hsueh PR, Wang JL, Changv SC (2010) Impact of traditional hospital strain of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and community strain of MRSA on mortality in patients with community-onset S aureus bacteremia. Medicine (Baltimore) 89(5):285–294. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e3181f1851eCrossRef

13.

Dubée V, Zeller V, Lhotellier L, Kitzis MD, Ziza JM, Mamoudy P, Desplaces N (2013) Continuous high-dose vancomycin combination therapy for methicillin-resistant staphylococcal prosthetic hip infection: a prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 19(2):E98-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12071CrossRefPubMed

14.

Gundtoft PH, Pedersen AB, Varnum C, Overgaard S (2017) Increased mortality after prosthetic joint infection in primary THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475(11):2623–2631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-017-5289-6CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Hischebeth GT, Randau TM, Ploeger MM, Friedrich MJ, Kaup E, Jacobs C, Molitor E, Hoerauf A, Gravius S, Wimmer MD (2019) Staphylococcus aureus versus Staphylococcus epidermidis in periprosthetic joint infection—outcome analysis of methicillin-resistant versus methicillin-susceptible strains. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 93(2):125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2018.08.012CrossRefPubMed

16.

Ip D, Yam SK, Chen CK (2005) Implications of the changing pattern of bacterial infections following total joint replacements. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 13(2):125–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900501300204CrossRef

17.

Jhan SW, Lu YD, Lee MS, Lee CH, Wang JW, Kuo FC (2017) The risk factors of failed reimplantation arthroplasty for periprosthetic hip infection. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1622-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Kandel CE, Jenkinson R, Daneman N, Backstein D, Hansen BE, Muller MP, Katz KC, Widdifield J, Bogoch E, Ward S, Sajja A, Jeldes FG, McGeer A (2019) Predictors of treatment failure for hip and knee prosthetic joint infections in the setting of 1- and 2-stage exchange arthroplasty: a multicenter retrospective cohort. Open Forum Infect Dis 6(11):ofz452. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz452CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

19.

Kavolus JJ, Cunningham DJ, Rao SR, Wellman SS, Seyler TM (2019) Polymicrobial infections in hip arthroplasty: lower treatment success rate, increased surgery, and longer hospitalization. J Arthroplasty 34(4):710-716.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.090CrossRefPubMed

20.

Lentino JR (2003) Prosthetic joint infections: bane of orthopedists, challenge for infectious disease specialists. Clin Infect Dis 36(9):1157–1161. https://doi.org/10.1086/374554CrossRefPubMed

21.

Parvizi J, Gehrke T (2014) International consensus group on periprosthetic joint infection. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 29(7):1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009CrossRefPubMed

22.

Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Cofield RH, Sperling JW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Osmon DR, McDowell A, Patrick S, Steckelberg JM, Mandrekar JN, Fernandez Sampedro M, Patel R (2009) Microbiologic diagnosis of prosthetic shoulder infection by use of implant sonication. J Clin Microbiol 47(6):1878–1884. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01686-08CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

23.

Postler A, Lützner C, Beyer F, Tille E, Lützner J (2018) Analysis of total knee arthroplasty revision causes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-1977-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

24.

Rosteius T, Jansen O, Fehmer T, Baecker H, Citak M, Schildhauer TA, Geßmann J (2018) Evaluating the microbial pattern of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Med Microbiol 67(11):1608–1613. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000835CrossRefPubMed

25.

Tsai JC, Sheng WH, Lo WY, Jiang CC, Chang SC (2015) Clinical characteristics, microbiology, and outcomes of prosthetic joint infection in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 48(2):198–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2013.08.007CrossRefPubMed

26.

Tsai Y, Chang CH, Lin YC, Lee SH, Hsieh PH, Chang Y (2019) Different microbiological profiles between hip and knee prosthetic joint infections. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 27(2):2309499019847768. https://doi.org/10.1177/2309499019847768CrossRef

27.

Wimmer MD, Friedrich MJ, Randau TM, Ploeger MM, Schmolders J, Strauss AA, Hischebeth GT, Pennekamp PH, Vavken P, Gravius S (2016) Polymicrobial infections reduce the cure rate in prosthetic joint infections: outcome analysis with two-stage exchange and follow-up ≥ two years. Int Orthop 40(7):1367–1373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2871-yCrossRefPubMed

28.

Zajonz D, Wuthe L, Rodloff AC, Prietzel T, von Salis-Soglio GF, Roth A, Heyde CE, Josten C, Ghanem M (2016) Infections of hip and knee endoprostheses. Spectrum of pathogens and the role of multiresistant bacteria. Chirurg 87(4):332–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-015-0126-5CrossRefPubMed

29.

Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE (2004) Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 351(16):1645–1654. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra040181 (Review. PMID: 15483283)CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Comparative analysis of pathogen structure in patients with PJI after primary total hip and knee arthroplasty
verfasst von: Petr Preobrazhensky
Svetlana Bozhkova
Andrey Kochish
Rashid Tikhilov
Alexander Kazemirsky
Publikationsdatum: 26.08.2021
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Ausgabe 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Elektronische ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04139-w

Arthropedia

Grundlagenwissen der Arthroskopie und Gelenkchirurgie. Erweitert durch Fallbeispiele, Videos und Abbildungen.
» Jetzt entdecken

Neu im Fachgebiet Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Ein Drittel der jungen Ärztinnen und Ärzte erwägt abzuwandern

07.05.2024 Klinik aktuell Nachrichten

Extreme Arbeitsverdichtung und kaum Supervision: Dr. Andrea Martini, Sprecherin des Bündnisses Junge Ärztinnen und Ärzte (BJÄ) über den Frust des ärztlichen Nachwuchses und die Vorteile des Rucksack-Modells.

Aquatherapie bei Fibromyalgie wirksamer als Trockenübungen

03.05.2024 Fibromyalgiesyndrom Nachrichten

Bewegungs-, Dehnungs- und Entspannungsübungen im Wasser lindern die Beschwerden von Patientinnen mit Fibromyalgie besser als das Üben auf trockenem Land. Das geht aus einer spanisch-brasilianischen Vergleichsstudie hervor.

Endlich: Zi zeigt, mit welchen PVS Praxen zufrieden sind

IT für Ärzte Nachrichten

Darauf haben viele Praxen gewartet: Das Zi hat eine Liste von Praxisverwaltungssystemen veröffentlicht, die von Nutzern positiv bewertet werden. Eine gute Grundlage für wechselwillige Ärztinnen und Psychotherapeuten.

Proximale Humerusfraktur: Auch 100-Jährige operieren?

01.05.2024 DCK 2024 Kongressbericht

Mit dem demographischen Wandel versorgt auch die Chirurgie immer mehr betagte Menschen. Von Entwicklungen wie Fast-Track können auch ältere Menschen profitieren und bei proximaler Humerusfraktur können selbst manche 100-Jährige noch sicher operiert werden.

Update Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.

Newsletter bestellen

Springer Medizin

Abstract

Background

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu diesem Inhalt zu erhalten

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2021

Femoral nerve versus adductor canal block for early postoperative pain control and knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autografts: a prospective single-blind randomised controlled trial

Wound closure position in total knee arthroplasty: flexion versus extension—a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Future burden of primary and revision hip arthroplasty in Germany: a socio-economic challenge

Treatment for tuberculosis of the subaxial cervical spine: a systematic review

Suture anchor fixation of comminuted inferior pole patella fracture-novel technique: suture bridge anchor fixation technique