Skip to main content
Erschienen in: The European Journal of Health Economics 2/2007

01.06.2007 | Original Paper

Comparative cost-minimisation of oral and intravenous chemotherapy for first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the UK NHS system

verfasst von: K. Le Lay, E. Myon, S. Hill, L. Riou-Franca, D. Scott, M. Sidhu, D. Dunlop, R. Launois

Erschienen in: The European Journal of Health Economics | Ausgabe 2/2007

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence recommends vinorelbine (VNB), paclitaxel, docetaxel, and gemcitabine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. An economic model was prepared to determine the comparative cost of these agents, including the new oral formulation of VNB from a United Kingdom National Health System perspective. Clinical effectiveness was determined from published trials. Costs of drug acquisition, administration, toxicity management, and patient transportation costs were calculated from reference publications. A Markov model was used to estimate the cost per patient over 52 weeks. Intravenous VNB, gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and docetaxel incur annual follow-up costs of £3,746, £5,332, £5,977, and £6,766, respectively, while oral VNB with outpatient administration on d1, and self-administration at home on d8 every 21 days has a cost per patient per year of £2,888. Oral VNB allows further hospital resources savings.
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Guidance on the use of docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Technol. Appraisal Guid. 26 (2001) National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Guidance on the use of docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Technol. Appraisal Guid. 26 (2001)
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Clegg, A., Scott, D.A., Sidhu, M., et al.: A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer. Health Technol. Assess. 5(32), 1–195, 55 (2001) Clegg, A., Scott, D.A., Sidhu, M., et al.: A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of docetaxel, paclitaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small cell lung cancer. Health Technol. Assess. 5(32), 1–195, 55 (2001)
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Lay, K., Riou-Franca, L., Launois, R.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral chemotherapy in ambulatory care: the example of vinorelbine. J. Econ. Méd. 20(7–8), 379–400 (2002) Le Lay, K., Riou-Franca, L., Launois, R.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral chemotherapy in ambulatory care: the example of vinorelbine. J. Econ. Méd. 20(7–8), 379–400 (2002)
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Le Chevalier, T., Brisgand, D., Soria, J.C., et al.: Long term analysis of survival in the European randomized trial comparing vinorelbine/cisplatin to vindesine/cisplatin and vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 6(Suppl. 1), 8–11 (2001)CrossRef Le Chevalier, T., Brisgand, D., Soria, J.C., et al.: Long term analysis of survival in the European randomized trial comparing vinorelbine/cisplatin to vindesine/cisplatin and vinorelbine alone in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Oncologist 6(Suppl. 1), 8–11 (2001)CrossRef
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Ten Bokkel Huinink, W., Bergman, B., Chemaissani, A., et al.: Single agent gemcitabine: an active and better tolerated alternative to standard cisplatin based chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer 26(2), 85–94 (1999)CrossRef Ten Bokkel Huinink, W., Bergman, B., Chemaissani, A., et al.: Single agent gemcitabine: an active and better tolerated alternative to standard cisplatin based chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic non small cell lung cancer.Lung Cancer 26(2), 85–94 (1999)CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Roszkowski, K., Pluzanska, A., Krzakowski, M., et al.: A multicentre, randomized study of docetaxel plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemotherapy naive patients with metastatic or non resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 27, 145–157 (2000)CrossRef Roszkowski, K., Pluzanska, A., Krzakowski, M., et al.: A multicentre, randomized study of docetaxel plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemotherapy naive patients with metastatic or non resectable localized non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 27, 145–157 (2000)CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ranson, M., Davidson, N., Nicolson, M., et al.: Randomized trial of paclitaxel plus supportive care versus supportive care for patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(13), 1074–1080 (2000)CrossRef Ranson, M., Davidson, N., Nicolson, M., et al.: Randomized trial of paclitaxel plus supportive care versus supportive care for patients with advanced non small cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(13), 1074–1080 (2000)CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Crawford, J.: Randomized trial of vinorelbine compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with stage IV non small cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 14(10), 2774–2784 (1996) Crawford, J.: Randomized trial of vinorelbine compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with stage IV non small cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 14(10), 2774–2784 (1996)
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Depierre, A.: Vinorelbine vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin in advanced non small cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 5, 37–42 (1994) Depierre, A.: Vinorelbine vs vinorelbine plus cisplatin in advanced non small cell lung cancer. Ann. Oncol. 5, 37–42 (1994)
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Jassem, J., Ramlau, R., Karnicka-Mlodkowska, H., et al.: A multicentre randomized phase II study vs. intravenous vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 12, 1375–1381 (2001)CrossRef Jassem, J., Ramlau, R., Karnicka-Mlodkowska, H., et al.: A multicentre randomized phase II study vs. intravenous vinorelbine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 12, 1375–1381 (2001)CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Perng, R.P.: Gemcitabine vs the combination of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with inoperable non small cell lung cancer in phase II randomized study. J. Clin. Oncol. 15(5), 2097–2102 (1997) Perng, R.P.: Gemcitabine vs the combination of cisplatin and etoposide in patients with inoperable non small cell lung cancer in phase II randomized study. J. Clin. Oncol. 15(5), 2097–2102 (1997)
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Anderson, H., Hopwood, P., Stephens, R.J., et al.: Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer—a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Br. J. Cancer 83(4), 447–453 (2000) Anderson, H., Hopwood, P., Stephens, R.J., et al.: Gemcitabine plus best supportive care (BSC) vs BSC in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer—a randomized trial with quality of life as the primary outcome. UK NSCLC Gemcitabine Group. Br. J. Cancer 83(4), 447–453 (2000)
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Weinstein, M.C., Siegel, J.E., Gold, M.R., Kamlet, M.S., Russel, L.B.: Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 276(15), 1553–1558 (1996)CrossRef Weinstein, M.C., Siegel, J.E., Gold, M.R., Kamlet, M.S., Russel, L.B.: Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA 276(15), 1553–1558 (1996)CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller, D.K., Homan, S.M.: Determining transition probabilities: confusion and suggestions. Med. Decis. Making 14, 52–58 (1994)CrossRef Miller, D.K., Homan, S.M.: Determining transition probabilities: confusion and suggestions. Med. Decis. Making 14, 52–58 (1994)CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Varney, S.J., Guest, J.F.: The annual cost of blood transfusions in UK. Transfus. Med. 13, 205–218 (2003)CrossRef Varney, S.J., Guest, J.F.: The annual cost of blood transfusions in UK. Transfus. Med. 13, 205–218 (2003)CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Cooper, N., Abrams, K.R., Sutton, A.J., Turner, D., Lambert, P.C.: A Bayesian approach to Markov modelling in cost-effectiveness analyses: application to taxane use in advanced breast cancer. J. R. Stat. Soc. 166, 389–405 (2003)CrossRef Cooper, N., Abrams, K.R., Sutton, A.J., Turner, D., Lambert, P.C.: A Bayesian approach to Markov modelling in cost-effectiveness analyses: application to taxane use in advanced breast cancer. J. R. Stat. Soc. 166, 389–405 (2003)CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Berkowitz, N.C., Silberman, G., Gupta, S., Leyland-Jones, B.: Comparing the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Manag. Care Cancer 1(5), 18–25 (1999) Berkowitz, N.C., Silberman, G., Gupta, S., Leyland-Jones, B.: Comparing the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Manag. Care Cancer 1(5), 18–25 (1999)
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Gregor, A., Thomson, C.S., Brewster, D.H., et al.: Management and survival of patients with lung cancer in Scotland diagnosed in 1995: results of a national population based study. Thorax 56, 212–217 (2001)CrossRef Gregor, A., Thomson, C.S., Brewster, D.H., et al.: Management and survival of patients with lung cancer in Scotland diagnosed in 1995: results of a national population based study. Thorax 56, 212–217 (2001)CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary (BNF) 47: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (2004) Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary (BNF) 47: British Medical Association and Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain (2004)
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Netten, A., Curtis, L.: Unit costs of health and social care: Public Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). University of Kent, Canterbury (2002) Netten, A., Curtis, L.: Unit costs of health and social care: Public Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). University of Kent, Canterbury (2002)
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Netten, A., Curtis, L.: Unit costs of health and social care: Public Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). University of Kent, Canterbury (2003) Netten, A., Curtis, L.: Unit costs of health and social care: Public Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU). University of Kent, Canterbury (2003)
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Gridelli, C.: Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non small non cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91(1), 66–72 (1999)CrossRef Gridelli, C.: Effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with advanced non small non cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91(1), 66–72 (1999)CrossRef
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Berthelot, J.M., Will, B.P., Evans, W.K., et al.: Decision framework for chemotherapic interventions for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(16), 1321–1329 (2000)CrossRef Berthelot, J.M., Will, B.P., Evans, W.K., et al.: Decision framework for chemotherapic interventions for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92(16), 1321–1329 (2000)CrossRef
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Earle, C.C., Evans, W.K.: A comparison of costs of paclitaxel and best supportive care in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Prev. Control 1, 282–288 (1997) Earle, C.C., Evans, W.K.: A comparison of costs of paclitaxel and best supportive care in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Prev. Control 1, 282–288 (1997)
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Smith, T.J., Hillner, B.E., Neighbors, D.M., et al.: Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing vinorelbine, vinorelbine plus cisplatine, vindesine plus cisplatine for non-small cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 13, 2166–2173 (1995) Smith, T.J., Hillner, B.E., Neighbors, D.M., et al.: Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial comparing vinorelbine, vinorelbine plus cisplatine, vindesine plus cisplatine for non-small cell lung cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 13, 2166–2173 (1995)
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hillner, B.E., Smith, T.J.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of three regimens using vinorelbine for non-small cell lung cancer. Semin. Oncol. 23, 25–30 (1995) Hillner, B.E., Smith, T.J.: Cost-effectiveness analysis of three regimens using vinorelbine for non-small cell lung cancer. Semin. Oncol. 23, 25–30 (1995)
Metadaten
Titel
Comparative cost-minimisation of oral and intravenous chemotherapy for first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer in the UK NHS system
verfasst von
K. Le Lay
E. Myon
S. Hill
L. Riou-Franca
D. Scott
M. Sidhu
D. Dunlop
R. Launois
Publikationsdatum
01.06.2007
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
The European Journal of Health Economics / Ausgabe 2/2007
Print ISSN: 1618-7598
Elektronische ISSN: 1618-7601
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-006-0034-1

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2007

The European Journal of Health Economics 2/2007 Zur Ausgabe