Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy 7/2018

15.06.2018 | Original Research

Comparative Efficacy of Treatments for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis

verfasst von: Junlong Li, Medha Sasane, Jing Zhao, Viviana Garcia Horton, Pingkuan Zhang, Marie Louise Ricculli, Zheng-Yi Zhou, James Signorovitch

Erschienen in: Advances in Therapy | Ausgabe 7/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Introduction

Due to the rarity of BRAF V600E mutation, no randomized study has compared the combination targeted therapy dabrafenib + trametinib with other second-line treatments for advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to assess the comparative efficacy of treatments among patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Methods

Randomized trials of dabrafenib + trametinib, docetaxel, erlotinib, nintedanib + docetaxel, nivolumab, pemetrexed, pembrolizumab, and best supportive care as second-line or above treatments for advanced or metastatic NSCLC identified in a systematic literature review were included in the NMA. Overall response rates (ORRs) and disease control rates (DCRs) were compared using logit models; progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using fractional polynomial hazards models. Dabrafenib + trametinib was linked into the evidence network through a matching-adjusted indirect comparison versus nivolumab.

Results

Ten trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the NMA. Dabrafenib + trametinib, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab were associated with the highest odds of achieving overall response (12.2, 1.2, and 0.7 times higher, respectively, compared with docetaxel). Estimated DCR was higher for dabrafenib + trametinib, nintedanib + docetaxel, and pemetrexed compared with other treatments. Patients treated with dabrafenib + trametinib, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab had the lowest hazards of disease progression or death during follow-up (72, 61, and 29% lower hazard of progression at 6 months; 61, 48, and 46% lower hazard of death at 1 year, respectively, compared with docetaxel).

Conclusion

Dabrafenib + trametinib, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab were associated with higher ORR and prolonged PFS and OS compared with chemotherapy in previously treated advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

Funding

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Peters S, Adjei AA, Gridelli C, et al. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23 Suppl 7:56–64. Peters S, Adjei AA, Gridelli C, et al. Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2012;23 Suppl 7:56–64.
3.
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Tatematsu T, Sasaki H, Shimizu S, et al. Intra-tumor heterogeneity of BRAF V600E mutation in lung adenocarcinomas. Exp Ther Med. 2015;9(5):1719–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tatematsu T, Sasaki H, Shimizu S, et al. Intra-tumor heterogeneity of BRAF V600E mutation in lung adenocarcinomas. Exp Ther Med. 2015;9(5):1719–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Villaruz LC, Socinski MA, Abberbock S, et al. Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring BRAF mutations in the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium. Cancer. 2015;121(3):448–56.CrossRefPubMed Villaruz LC, Socinski MA, Abberbock S, et al. Clinicopathologic features and outcomes of patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring BRAF mutations in the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium. Cancer. 2015;121(3):448–56.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Paik PK, Arcila ME, Fara M, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring BRAF mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):2046–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Paik PK, Arcila ME, Fara M, et al. Clinical characteristics of patients with lung adenocarcinomas harboring BRAF mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):2046–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Imai H, Takahashi T, Mori K, et al. Individual-level data on the relationships of progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and tumor response with overall survival in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Neoplasma. 2014;61(2):233–40.CrossRefPubMed Imai H, Takahashi T, Mori K, et al. Individual-level data on the relationships of progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and tumor response with overall survival in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer. Neoplasma. 2014;61(2):233–40.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Kinno T, Tsuta K, Shiraishi K, et al. Clinicopathological features of nonsmall cell lung carcinomas with BRAF mutations. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(1):138–42.CrossRefPubMed Kinno T, Tsuta K, Shiraishi K, et al. Clinicopathological features of nonsmall cell lung carcinomas with BRAF mutations. Ann Oncol. 2014;25(1):138–42.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Planchard D, Besse B, Groen HJ, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with previously treated BRAF(V600E)-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):984–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Planchard D, Besse B, Groen HJ, et al. Dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with previously treated BRAF(V600E)-mutant metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):984–93.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. Value Health. 2011;14(4):417–28.CrossRefPubMed Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, et al. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. Value Health. 2011;14(4):417–28.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, et al. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value Health. 2011;14(4):429–37.CrossRefPubMed Hoaglin DC, Hawkins N, Jansen JP, et al. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 2. Value Health. 2011;14(4):429–37.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Signorovitch JE, Betts KA, Yan YS, et al. Comparative efficacy of biological treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a network meta-analysis adjusting for cross-trial differences in reference arm response. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(2):504–12.CrossRefPubMed Signorovitch JE, Betts KA, Yan YS, et al. Comparative efficacy of biological treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis: a network meta-analysis adjusting for cross-trial differences in reference arm response. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(2):504–12.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. NICE DSU technical support document 1: introduction to evidence synthesis for decision making. NICE decision support unit technical support documents. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2012. Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. NICE DSU technical support document 1: introduction to evidence synthesis for decision making. NICE decision support unit technical support documents. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2012.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. NICE DSU technical support document 2: a generalised linear modelling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2011. Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. NICE DSU technical support document 2: a generalised linear modelling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2011.
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Tan DS, Araujo A, Zhang J, et al. Comparative efficacy of ceritinib and crizotinib as initial ALK-targeted therapies in previously treated advanced NSCLC: an adjusted comparison with external controls. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(9):1550–7.CrossRefPubMed Tan DS, Araujo A, Zhang J, et al. Comparative efficacy of ceritinib and crizotinib as initial ALK-targeted therapies in previously treated advanced NSCLC: an adjusted comparison with external controls. J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11(9):1550–7.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1627–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L, et al. Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(17):1627–39.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Planchard D, Besse B, Groen HJM, et al. An open-label phase II trial of dabrafenib (D) in combination with trametinib (T) in patients (pts) with previously treated BRAF V600E–mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; BRF113928). J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(15 Suppl):107.CrossRef Planchard D, Besse B, Groen HJM, et al. An open-label phase II trial of dabrafenib (D) in combination with trametinib (T) in patients (pts) with previously treated BRAF V600E–mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC; BRF113928). J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(15 Suppl):107.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Signorovitch JE, Wu EQ, Yu AP, et al. Comparative effectiveness without head-to-head trials: a method for matching-adjusted indirect comparisons applied to psoriasis treatment with adalimumab or etanercept. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):935–45.CrossRefPubMed Signorovitch JE, Wu EQ, Yu AP, et al. Comparative effectiveness without head-to-head trials: a method for matching-adjusted indirect comparisons applied to psoriasis treatment with adalimumab or etanercept. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):935–45.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Signorovitch JE, Sikirica V, Erder MH, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research. Value Health. 2012;15(6):940–7.CrossRefPubMed Signorovitch JE, Sikirica V, Erder MH, et al. Matching-adjusted indirect comparisons: a new tool for timely comparative effectiveness research. Value Health. 2012;15(6):940–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Guyot P, Ades A, Ouwens MJ, et al. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan–Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Guyot P, Ades A, Ouwens MJ, et al. Enhanced secondary analysis of survival data: reconstructing the data from published Kaplan–Meier survival curves. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12(1):9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. A generalised linear modelling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. nice decision support unit technical support documents. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2014. Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. A generalised linear modelling framework for pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. nice decision support unit technical support documents. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2014.
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R, et al. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(10):2095–103.CrossRefPubMed Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R, et al. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(10):2095–103.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, et al. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(2):123–32.CrossRefPubMed Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, et al. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(2):123–32.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Garassino MC, Martelli O, Broggini M, et al. Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(10):981–8.CrossRefPubMed Garassino MC, Martelli O, Broggini M, et al. Erlotinib versus docetaxel as second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and wild-type EGFR tumours (TAILOR): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(10):981–8.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(9):1589–97.CrossRefPubMed Hanna N, Shepherd FA, Fossella FV, et al. Randomized phase III trial of pemetrexed versus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(9):1589–97.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Vergnenegre A, Corre R, Berard H, et al. Cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: an economic, randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial comparing docetaxel and pemetrexed: the GFPC 05-06 study. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(1):161–8.CrossRefPubMed Vergnenegre A, Corre R, Berard H, et al. Cost-effectiveness of second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: an economic, randomized, prospective, multicenter phase III trial comparing docetaxel and pemetrexed: the GFPC 05-06 study. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(1):161–8.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kim ES, Neubauer M, Cohn A, et al. Docetaxel or pemetrexed with or without cetuximab in recurrent or progressive non-small-cell lung cancer after platinum-based therapy: a phase 3, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(13):1326–36.CrossRefPubMed Kim ES, Neubauer M, Cohn A, et al. Docetaxel or pemetrexed with or without cetuximab in recurrent or progressive non-small-cell lung cancer after platinum-based therapy: a phase 3, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(13):1326–36.CrossRefPubMed
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1540–50.CrossRefPubMed Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim DW, et al. Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1540–50.CrossRefPubMed
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Reck M, Kaiser R, Mellemgaard A, et al. Docetaxel plus nintedanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 1): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):143–55.CrossRefPubMed Reck M, Kaiser R, Mellemgaard A, et al. Docetaxel plus nintedanib versus docetaxel plus placebo in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (LUME-Lung 1): a phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(2):143–55.CrossRefPubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat GILOTRIF(R) [package insert]. Ridgefield: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2016. GILOTRIF(R) [package insert]. Ridgefield: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; 2016.
32.
Zurück zum Zitat IRESSA(R) [package insert]. Wilmington: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2015. IRESSA(R) [package insert]. Wilmington: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2015.
33.
Zurück zum Zitat TAGRISSO(R) [package insert]. Wilmington: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2015. TAGRISSO(R) [package insert]. Wilmington: AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP; 2015.
34.
Zurück zum Zitat TARCEVA(R) [package insert]. Melville: OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2010. TARCEVA(R) [package insert]. Melville: OSI Pharmaceuticals Inc.; 2010.
35.
Zurück zum Zitat XALKORI(R) [package insert]. Dublin: Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals; 2012. XALKORI(R) [package insert]. Dublin: Pfizer Ireland Pharmaceuticals; 2012.
36.
Zurück zum Zitat ZYKADIA(R) [package insert]. East Hanover: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2017. ZYKADIA(R) [package insert]. East Hanover: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2017.
37.
Zurück zum Zitat ALECENSA(R) [package insert]. South San Francisco: Genentech, Inc.; 2015. ALECENSA(R) [package insert]. South San Francisco: Genentech, Inc.; 2015.
38.
Zurück zum Zitat TAFINLAR(R) [package insert]. East Hanover: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2017. TAFINLAR(R) [package insert]. East Hanover: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2017.
39.
Zurück zum Zitat MEKINIST(R) [package insert]. East Hanover: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2017. MEKINIST(R) [package insert]. East Hanover: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2017.
40.
Zurück zum Zitat Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, et al. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(26):1–134, iii–iv. Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, et al. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Health Technol Assess. 2005;9(26):1–134, iii–iv.
41.
Zurück zum Zitat Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23(20):3105–24.CrossRefPubMed Lu G, Ades AE. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2004;23(20):3105–24.CrossRefPubMed
42.
Zurück zum Zitat Lumley T. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2002;21(16):2313–24.CrossRefPubMed Lumley T. Network meta-analysis for indirect treatment comparisons. Stat Med. 2002;21(16):2313–24.CrossRefPubMed
43.
Zurück zum Zitat Laws A, Kendall R, Hawkins N. A comparison of national guidelines for network meta-analysis. Value Health. 2014;17(5):642–54.CrossRefPubMed Laws A, Kendall R, Hawkins N. A comparison of national guidelines for network meta-analysis. Value Health. 2014;17(5):642–54.CrossRefPubMed
44.
Zurück zum Zitat Cardarella S, Ogino A, Nishino M, et al. Clinical, pathologic, and biologic features associated with BRAF mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(16):4532–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cardarella S, Ogino A, Nishino M, et al. Clinical, pathologic, and biologic features associated with BRAF mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(16):4532–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Zurück zum Zitat Marchetti A, Felicioni L, Malatesta S, et al. Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring BRAF mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(26):3574–9.CrossRefPubMed Marchetti A, Felicioni L, Malatesta S, et al. Clinical features and outcome of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring BRAF mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(26):3574–9.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Zurück zum Zitat Barlesi F, Mazieres J, Merlio JP, et al. Routine molecular profiling of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a 1-year nationwide programme of the French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT). Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1415–26.CrossRefPubMed Barlesi F, Mazieres J, Merlio JP, et al. Routine molecular profiling of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a 1-year nationwide programme of the French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup (IFCT). Lancet. 2016;387(10026):1415–26.CrossRefPubMed
Metadaten
Titel
Comparative Efficacy of Treatments for Previously Treated Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis
verfasst von
Junlong Li
Medha Sasane
Jing Zhao
Viviana Garcia Horton
Pingkuan Zhang
Marie Louise Ricculli
Zheng-Yi Zhou
James Signorovitch
Publikationsdatum
15.06.2018
Verlag
Springer Healthcare
Erschienen in
Advances in Therapy / Ausgabe 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0741-238X
Elektronische ISSN: 1865-8652
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-018-0734-9

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 7/2018

Advances in Therapy 7/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Leitlinien kompakt für die Innere Medizin

Mit medbee Pocketcards sicher entscheiden.

Seit 2022 gehört die medbee GmbH zum Springer Medizin Verlag

Notfall-TEP der Hüfte ist auch bei 90-Jährigen machbar

26.04.2024 Hüft-TEP Nachrichten

Ob bei einer Notfalloperation nach Schenkelhalsfraktur eine Hemiarthroplastik oder eine totale Endoprothese (TEP) eingebaut wird, sollte nicht allein vom Alter der Patientinnen und Patienten abhängen. Auch über 90-Jährige können von der TEP profitieren.

Niedriger diastolischer Blutdruck erhöht Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Komplikationen

25.04.2024 Hypotonie Nachrichten

Wenn unter einer medikamentösen Hochdrucktherapie der diastolische Blutdruck in den Keller geht, steigt das Risiko für schwere kardiovaskuläre Ereignisse: Darauf deutet eine Sekundäranalyse der SPRINT-Studie hin.

Bei schweren Reaktionen auf Insektenstiche empfiehlt sich eine spezifische Immuntherapie

Insektenstiche sind bei Erwachsenen die häufigsten Auslöser einer Anaphylaxie. Einen wirksamen Schutz vor schweren anaphylaktischen Reaktionen bietet die allergenspezifische Immuntherapie. Jedoch kommt sie noch viel zu selten zum Einsatz.

Therapiestart mit Blutdrucksenkern erhöht Frakturrisiko

25.04.2024 Hypertonie Nachrichten

Beginnen ältere Männer im Pflegeheim eine Antihypertensiva-Therapie, dann ist die Frakturrate in den folgenden 30 Tagen mehr als verdoppelt. Besonders häufig stürzen Demenzkranke und Männer, die erstmals Blutdrucksenker nehmen. Dafür spricht eine Analyse unter US-Veteranen.

Update Innere Medizin

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.