Skip to main content
Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2019

27.07.2019 | Original Article

Comparison of PSMA-ligand PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in the pelvis

verfasst von: Ali Afshar-Oromieh, Bernd Vollnberg, Ian Alberts, Alexandrine Bähler, Christos Sachpekidis, Lotte Dijkstra, Fabian Haupt, Silvan Boxler, Tobias Gross, Tim Holland-Letz, George Thalmann, Johannes Heverhagen, Axel Rominger, Kirsi Härmä, Martin H. Maurer

Erschienen in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging | Ausgabe 11/2019

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

So far, there have been very few studies which provide a direct comparison between MRI and PSMA-ligand PET/CT for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer (rPC). This present study therefore aims to provide further clinical data in order to resolve this urgent clinical question, and thereby strengthen clinical recommendations.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed for patients who were scanned at our institution with whole-body PSMA-PET/CT (tracer: 68Ga-PSMA-11) between January 2017 and September 2018 in order to detect rPC. Amongst them, 43 underwent an additional pelvic MRI within 2 months. Both modalities were compared as follows: a consensus read of the PET data was performed by two nuclear physicians. All lesions were recorded with respect to their type and localization. The same process was conducted by two radiologists for pelvic MRI. Thereafter, both modalities were directly compared for every patient and lesion.

Results

Overall, 30/43 patients (69.8%) presented with a pathologic MRI and 38/43 (88.4%) with a pathologic PSMA-PET/CT of the pelvis. MRI detected 53 pelvic rPC lesions (13 of them classified as “uncertain”) and PSMA-PET/CT detected 75 pelvic lesions (three classified as “uncertain”). The superiority of PSMA-PET/CT was statistically significant only if uncertain lesions were classified as false-positive.

Conclusions

PSMA-PET/CT detected more pelvic lesions characteristic for rPC when compared to MRI. In order to detect rPC, a potential future scenario could be conducting first a PSMA-PET/CT. Combining the advantages of both modalities in hybrid PET/MRI scanners would be an ideal future scenario.
Literatur
3.
Zurück zum Zitat Kessler B, Albertsen P. The natural history of prostate cancer. Urol Clin N Am. 2003;30:219–26.CrossRef Kessler B, Albertsen P. The natural history of prostate cancer. Urol Clin N Am. 2003;30:219–26.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Afshar-Oromieh A, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, Hadaschik BA, et al. PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:486–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-012-2298-2.CrossRefPubMed Afshar-Oromieh A, Malcher A, Eder M, Eisenhut M, Linhart HG, Hadaschik BA, et al. PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:486–95. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-012-2298-2.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Rauscher I, Duwel C, Haller B, Rischpler C, Heck MM, Gschwend JE, et al. Efficacy, predictive factors, and prediction nomograms for (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in early biochemical recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2018;73:656–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.01.006.CrossRefPubMed Rauscher I, Duwel C, Haller B, Rischpler C, Heck MM, Gschwend JE, et al. Efficacy, predictive factors, and prediction nomograms for (68)Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-ligand positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in early biochemical recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2018;73:656–61. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2018.​01.​006.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Pfister D, Porres D, Heidenreich A, Heidegger I, Knuechel R, Steib F, et al. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer lesions before salvage lymphadenectomy is more accurate with (68)Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC than with (18)F-Fluoroethylcholine PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1410–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-016-3366-9.CrossRefPubMed Pfister D, Porres D, Heidenreich A, Heidegger I, Knuechel R, Steib F, et al. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer lesions before salvage lymphadenectomy is more accurate with (68)Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC than with (18)F-Fluoroethylcholine PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1410–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-016-3366-9.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Bashir U, Tree A, Mayer E, Levine D, Parker C, Dearnaley D, et al. Impact of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT on management in prostate cancer patients with very early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(4):901–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4249-z. Bashir U, Tree A, Mayer E, Levine D, Parker C, Dearnaley D, et al. Impact of Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT on management in prostate cancer patients with very early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(4):901–7. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-018-4249-z.
22.
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Sawicki LM, Kirchner J, Buddensieck C, Antke C, Ullrich T, Schimmoller L, et al. Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(7):1542–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04308-5. Sawicki LM, Kirchner J, Buddensieck C, Antke C, Ullrich T, Schimmoller L, et al. Prospective comparison of whole-body MRI and (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2019;46(7):1542–50. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-019-04308-5.
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Zacho HD, Nielsen JB, Afshar-Oromieh A, Haberkorn U, deSouza N, De Paepe K, et al. Prospective comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT, (18)F-sodium fluoride PET/CT and diffusion weighted-MRI at for the detection of bone metastases in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1884–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4058-4.CrossRefPubMed Zacho HD, Nielsen JB, Afshar-Oromieh A, Haberkorn U, deSouza N, De Paepe K, et al. Prospective comparison of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT, (18)F-sodium fluoride PET/CT and diffusion weighted-MRI at for the detection of bone metastases in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:1884–97. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s00259-018-4058-4.CrossRefPubMed
26.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Emmett L, Metser U, Bauman G, Hicks RJ, Weickhardt A, Davis ID, et al. A prospective, multi-site, international comparison of F-18 fluoro-methyl-choline, multi-parametric magnetic resonance and Ga-68 HBED-CC (PSMA-11) in men with high-risk features and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy: clinical performance and patient outcomes. J Nucl Med. 2018;60(6):794–800. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.118.220103. Emmett L, Metser U, Bauman G, Hicks RJ, Weickhardt A, Davis ID, et al. A prospective, multi-site, international comparison of F-18 fluoro-methyl-choline, multi-parametric magnetic resonance and Ga-68 HBED-CC (PSMA-11) in men with high-risk features and biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy: clinical performance and patient outcomes. J Nucl Med. 2018;60(6):794–800. https://​doi.​org/​10.​2967/​jnumed.​118.​220103.
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of PSMA-ligand PET/CT and multiparametric MRI for the detection of recurrent prostate cancer in the pelvis
verfasst von
Ali Afshar-Oromieh
Bernd Vollnberg
Ian Alberts
Alexandrine Bähler
Christos Sachpekidis
Lotte Dijkstra
Fabian Haupt
Silvan Boxler
Tobias Gross
Tim Holland-Letz
George Thalmann
Johannes Heverhagen
Axel Rominger
Kirsi Härmä
Martin H. Maurer
Publikationsdatum
27.07.2019
Verlag
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging / Ausgabe 11/2019
Print ISSN: 1619-7070
Elektronische ISSN: 1619-7089
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04438-w

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2019

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 11/2019 Zur Ausgabe