Skip to main content
Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 11/2021

17.08.2021 | Reports of Original Investigations

Comparison of the strength of various disposable videolaryngoscope blades

verfasst von: Jongbong Choi, BEng, Yeongtak Song, PhD, Heekyung Lee, MD, Yongil Cho, MD, PhD, Tae Hee Han, MD, PhD, Tae Ho Lim, MD, PhD

Erschienen in: Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie | Ausgabe 11/2021

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Abstract

Purpose

Breaking of disposable blades during emergency endotracheal intubation has been reported. Breakage can cause serious injury and foreign body ingestion. We aimed to measure and analyze the strength characteristics of different disposable videolaryngoscope blades with the application of an upward-lifting force.

Methods

We measured the strength of four disposable videolaryngoscope blades (C-Mac® S Video laryngoscope MAC #3, Glidescope GVL® 3 stat, Pentax AWS® PBlade TL type, and King Vision® aBlade #3) using the fracture test. The strength of 12 samples of each type of disposable videolaryngoscope blade was measured using an Instron 5,966 tensile tester by applying an upward-lifting force.

Results

After the fracture test using C-Mac, Glidescope GVL, Pentax AWS, and King Vision, the number of deformed blades were 0, 12, 3, and 7, respectively, and the number of broken blades were 12, 0, 9, and 5, respectively. The mean (standard deviation) maximum force strengths of Pentax AWS, C-Mac, King Vision, and Glidescope GVL blades were 408.4 (27.4) N, 325.8 (26.5) N, 291.8 (39.3) N, and 262.7 (3.8) N, respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Clinicians should be aware of the varied strength characteristics of the four types of disposable videolaryngoscope blades when they are used in endotracheal intubation.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
1.
Zurück zum Zitat Chemsian R, Bhananker S, Ramaiah R. Videolaryngoscopy. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2014; 4: 35-41.CrossRef Chemsian R, Bhananker S, Ramaiah R. Videolaryngoscopy. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2014; 4: 35-41.CrossRef
2.
Zurück zum Zitat Jones PM, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, et al. A comparison of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 144-8.CrossRef Jones PM, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, et al. A comparison of GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2008; 107: 144-8.CrossRef
4.
Zurück zum Zitat Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh Blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 32-7.CrossRef Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh Blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 32-7.CrossRef
5.
Zurück zum Zitat Shimada M, Hirabayashi Y, Seo N. Nasotracheal intubation using GlideScope videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope by novice laryngoscopists (Japanese). Masui 2010; 59: 1318-20.PubMed Shimada M, Hirabayashi Y, Seo N. Nasotracheal intubation using GlideScope videolaryngoscope or Macintosh laryngoscope by novice laryngoscopists (Japanese). Masui 2010; 59: 1318-20.PubMed
6.
Zurück zum Zitat Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management–part 1–difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 1089-18.CrossRef Law JA, Broemling N, Cooper RM, et al. The difficult airway with recommendations for management–part 1–difficult tracheal intubation encountered in an unconscious/induced patient. Can J Anesth 2013; 60: 1089-18.CrossRef
7.
Zurück zum Zitat Ballin MS, McCluskey A, Maxwell S, Spilsbury S. Contamination of laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 1115-6.CrossRef Ballin MS, McCluskey A, Maxwell S, Spilsbury S. Contamination of laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 1115-6.CrossRef
8.
Zurück zum Zitat Ayliffe GA. Sterilization, disinfection and cleaning of medical equipment: guidance on decontamination from the Microbiology Advisory Committee to Department of Health Medical Devices Directorate. Part I principles. J Hosp Infect 1995; 29: 322-4.CrossRef Ayliffe GA. Sterilization, disinfection and cleaning of medical equipment: guidance on decontamination from the Microbiology Advisory Committee to Department of Health Medical Devices Directorate. Part I principles. J Hosp Infect 1995; 29: 322-4.CrossRef
9.
Zurück zum Zitat Miller DM, Youkhana I, Karunaratne WU, Pearce A. Presence of protein deposits on ‘cleaned’ re-usable anaesthetic equipment: apparatus. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 1069-72.CrossRef Miller DM, Youkhana I, Karunaratne WU, Pearce A. Presence of protein deposits on ‘cleaned’ re-usable anaesthetic equipment: apparatus. Anaesthesia 2001; 56: 1069-72.CrossRef
10.
Zurück zum Zitat Rutala WA, Weber DJ; Healthcare Infection Control Practice Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities; 2008; latest update May 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from URL: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/47378 (accessed June 2021). Rutala WA, Weber DJ; Healthcare Infection Control Practice Advisory Committee (HICPAC). Guideline for disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities; 2008; latest update May 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from URL: https://​stacks.​cdc.​gov/​view/​cdc/​47378 (accessed June 2021).
11.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherman JD, Hopf HW. Balancing infection control and environmental protection as a matter of patient safety: the case of laryngoscope handles. Anesth Analg 2018; 127: 576-9.CrossRef Sherman JD, Hopf HW. Balancing infection control and environmental protection as a matter of patient safety: the case of laryngoscope handles. Anesth Analg 2018; 127: 576-9.CrossRef
12.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherman JD, Raibley LA 4th, Eckelman MJ. Life cycle assessment and costing methods for device procurement: comparing reusable and single-use disposable laryngoscopes. Anesth Analg 2018; 127: 434-43.CrossRef Sherman JD, Raibley LA 4th, Eckelman MJ. Life cycle assessment and costing methods for device procurement: comparing reusable and single-use disposable laryngoscopes. Anesth Analg 2018; 127: 434-43.CrossRef
13.
Zurück zum Zitat Sherman J. Reusable vs. disposable laryngoscopes. Anesthesaia Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter 2019; 33: 91. Sherman J. Reusable vs. disposable laryngoscopes. Anesthesaia Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter 2019; 33: 91.
14.
Zurück zum Zitat Howell V, Thoppil A, Young H, Sharma S, Blunt M, Young P. Chlorhexidine to maintain cleanliness of laryngoscope handles: an audit and laboratory study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30: 216‐21.CrossRef Howell V, Thoppil A, Young H, Sharma S, Blunt M, Young P. Chlorhexidine to maintain cleanliness of laryngoscope handles: an audit and laboratory study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2013; 30: 216‐21.CrossRef
15.
Zurück zum Zitat Amour J, Le Manach Y, Borel M, et al. Comparison of single-use and reusable metal laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: a multicenter cluster randomized study. Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 325-32.CrossRef Amour J, Le Manach Y, Borel M, et al. Comparison of single-use and reusable metal laryngoscope blades for orotracheal intubation during rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: a multicenter cluster randomized study. Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 325-32.CrossRef
16.
Zurück zum Zitat Evans A, Vaughan RS, Hall JE, Mecklenburgh J, Wilkes AR. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy using disposable and non-disposable laryngoscope blades. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 869-73.CrossRef Evans A, Vaughan RS, Hall JE, Mecklenburgh J, Wilkes AR. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy using disposable and non-disposable laryngoscope blades. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 869-73.CrossRef
17.
Zurück zum Zitat Gaszynski TM. Forces applied by the laryngoscope blade onto the tongue during intubation attempts: a comparison between Mackintosh, AirTraq and Pentax AWS in a mannequin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 463-4.CrossRef Gaszynski TM. Forces applied by the laryngoscope blade onto the tongue during intubation attempts: a comparison between Mackintosh, AirTraq and Pentax AWS in a mannequin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011; 28: 463-4.CrossRef
18.
Zurück zum Zitat Rassam S, Wilkes AR, Hall JE, Mecklenburgh JS. A comparison of 20 laryngoscope blades using an intubating manikin: visual analogue scores and forces exerted during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 384-94.CrossRef Rassam S, Wilkes AR, Hall JE, Mecklenburgh JS. A comparison of 20 laryngoscope blades using an intubating manikin: visual analogue scores and forces exerted during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 384-94.CrossRef
19.
Zurück zum Zitat Lee C, Russell T, Firat M, Cooper RM. Forces generated by Macintosh and GlideScope® laryngoscopes in four airway-training manikins. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 492-6.CrossRef Lee C, Russell T, Firat M, Cooper RM. Forces generated by Macintosh and GlideScope® laryngoscopes in four airway-training manikins. Anaesthesia 2013; 68: 492-6.CrossRef
20.
Zurück zum Zitat Russell T, Khan S, Elman J, Katznelson R, Cooper RM. Measurement of forces applied during Macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 626-31.CrossRef Russell T, Khan S, Elman J, Katznelson R, Cooper RM. Measurement of forces applied during Macintosh direct laryngoscopy compared with GlideScope® videolaryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 626-31.CrossRef
21.
Zurück zum Zitat Twigg SJ, McCormick B, Cook TM. Randomized evaluation of the performance of single-use laryngoscopes in simulated easy and difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 8-13.CrossRef Twigg SJ, McCormick B, Cook TM. Randomized evaluation of the performance of single-use laryngoscopes in simulated easy and difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth 2003; 90: 8-13.CrossRef
22.
Zurück zum Zitat Goodwin N, Wilkes A, Hall JE. Strength of disposable laryngoscope blades. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 630-1.CrossRef Goodwin N, Wilkes A, Hall JE. Strength of disposable laryngoscope blades. Anaesthesia 2005; 60: 630-1.CrossRef
23.
Zurück zum Zitat Panacek EA, Laurin EG, Bair AE. Fracture of a GlideScope® cobalt GVL® Stat disposable blade during an emergency intubation. J Emerg Med 2012; 42: e125-8.CrossRef Panacek EA, Laurin EG, Bair AE. Fracture of a GlideScope® cobalt GVL® Stat disposable blade during an emergency intubation. J Emerg Med 2012; 42: e125-8.CrossRef
24.
Zurück zum Zitat Jefferson P, Perkins V, Edwards VA, Ball DR. Problems with disposable laryngoscope blades. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 385-6.CrossRef Jefferson P, Perkins V, Edwards VA, Ball DR. Problems with disposable laryngoscope blades. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 385-6.CrossRef
25.
Zurück zum Zitat Yanovski B, Soroka G, Khalaila J, Charco Mora P, Gaitini L, Vaida S. Fracture of a GlideScope cobalt blade. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 190-1.CrossRef Yanovski B, Soroka G, Khalaila J, Charco Mora P, Gaitini L, Vaida S. Fracture of a GlideScope cobalt blade. Anaesthesia 2012; 67: 190-1.CrossRef
26.
Zurück zum Zitat Hensley M. An incident of GlideScope® stat cover failure. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter 2020; 35: 14. Hensley M. An incident of GlideScope® stat cover failure. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Newsletter 2020; 35: 14.
27.
Zurück zum Zitat Czichos H, Saito T, Smith L. Springer Handbook of Materials Measurement Methods. Vol 978. Springer; 2006. Czichos H, Saito T, Smith L. Springer Handbook of Materials Measurement Methods. Vol 978. Springer; 2006.
28.
Zurück zum Zitat Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 1952; 47: 583-621.CrossRef Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 1952; 47: 583-621.CrossRef
29.
Zurück zum Zitat Bishop MJ, Harrington RM, Tencer AF. Force applied during tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 411-4.CrossRef Bishop MJ, Harrington RM, Tencer AF. Force applied during tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 1992; 74: 411-4.CrossRef
30.
Zurück zum Zitat Hastings RH, Hon ED, Nghiem C, Wahrenbrock EA. Force and torque vary between laryngoscopists and laryngoscope blades. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 462-8. PubMed Hastings RH, Hon ED, Nghiem C, Wahrenbrock EA. Force and torque vary between laryngoscopists and laryngoscope blades. Anesth Analg 1996; 82: 462-8. PubMed
31.
Zurück zum Zitat Caesar CG, Scott DH. Strength of disposable laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 1144-5.CrossRef Caesar CG, Scott DH. Strength of disposable laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia 2004; 59: 1144-5.CrossRef
33.
Zurück zum Zitat Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Hara K. Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 563-7.CrossRef Maruyama K, Yamada T, Kawakami R, Hara K. Randomized cross-over comparison of cervical-spine motion with the AirWay Scope or Macintosh laryngoscope with in-line stabilization: a video-fluoroscopic study. Br J Anaesth 2008; 101: 563-7.CrossRef
34.
Zurück zum Zitat Bucx MJ, Scheck PA, Van Geel RT, Den Ouden AH, Niesing R. Measurement of forces during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 348-1CrossRef Bucx MJ, Scheck PA, Van Geel RT, Den Ouden AH, Niesing R. Measurement of forces during laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia 1992; 47: 348-1CrossRef
Metadaten
Titel
Comparison of the strength of various disposable videolaryngoscope blades
verfasst von
Jongbong Choi, BEng
Yeongtak Song, PhD
Heekyung Lee, MD
Yongil Cho, MD, PhD
Tae Hee Han, MD, PhD
Tae Ho Lim, MD, PhD
Publikationsdatum
17.08.2021
Verlag
Springer International Publishing
Erschienen in
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie / Ausgabe 11/2021
Print ISSN: 0832-610X
Elektronische ISSN: 1496-8975
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02069-0

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 11/2021

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie 11/2021 Zur Ausgabe

Update AINS

Bestellen Sie unseren Fach-Newsletter und bleiben Sie gut informiert.